{"id":384143,"date":"2018-11-08T00:38:29","date_gmt":"2018-11-07T23:38:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=384143"},"modified":"2018-11-08T00:38:29","modified_gmt":"2018-11-07T23:38:29","slug":"russia-china-invest-in-infrastructure-u-s-instead-spends-on-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/russia-china-invest-in-infrastructure-u-s-instead-spends-on-military\/","title":{"rendered":"Russia & China Invest in Infrastructure; U.S. Instead Spends on Military."},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

China\u2019s \u201cBelt and Road Initiative\u201d is famous as an extension of their domestic infrastructure investments, but Russia is also investing heavily in infrastructure. Both countries need to do it in order to improve the future for their respective populations, and both Governments have avoided the Western development model of going heavily into debt in order to pay for creating and maintaining infrastructure. Both are, in fact, exceptionally low-debt Governments. <\/span><\/p>\n

According to the \u201cGlobal Debt Clock\u201d<\/span><\/a> at Economist<\/i>, China has a public debt\/GDP of 17.7%, and Russia\u2019s is 8.0%. For comparison, America\u2019s is 93.6%. (Others are: Germany 85.8%, Spain 91.2%, Italy 122.6%, Greece 147.1%, India 54.2%, Pakistan 47.0%, and Brazil 55.0%.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The United States isn\u2019t going into public debt in order to finance building or maintenance of infrastructure, but instead to finance expansions of its military, which is already (and by far) the world\u2019s largest (in terms of its costs, but not of its numbers of troops).<\/span><\/p>\n

While the U.S. Government now spends around half of the world\u2019s military expenditures<\/span><\/a> and plans to conquer Russia, China, and all countries (such as Iran and Syria) that cooperate with those \u2018enemies\u2019<\/span><\/a> (and please click onto a link wherever you question the truthfulness of an allegation made here), Russia and China plan to improve their infrastructures, in order to boost their national economies and to minimize the impacts that (the mainly U.S.-caused<\/span><\/a>) global warming will have. These infrastructure projects are optimistic and long-term expenditures, which are being planned and built only because the countries that the U.S. aristocracy are targeting to conquer, expect the U.S. aristocracy to fail to achieve its clear #1 goal, of controlling the entire world and conquering them \u2014 of America\u2019s rulers finally achieving the global fascist empire that, in World War II, Hitler and the other Axis powers had been hoping<\/i> to become.<\/span><\/p>\n

By contrast, U.S. infrastructure is rotting<\/span><\/a>; and, while every recent U.S. President has promised to reverse that decline, none has done anything significant to repair this nation\u2019s rotting infrastructure \u2014 it has always been just talk and empty promises. A nation that spends over a trillion dollars a year on \u2018national defense\u2019<\/span><\/a> can\u2019t have much left over to spend on things that \u2018can wait\u2019 \u2014 such as repairing its bridges, roads, etc. \u2014 and so those repairs do wait, while even more money, than before, becomes devoted to purchases of new weaponry, such as the F-35 program.<\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Russia and China prepare for their future, and hope it won\u2019t be war.<\/span><\/p>\n

On November 1st, Russian Television bannered \u201cRussia, India & Iran want to create alternative trade route to Suez Canal \u2013 report\u201d<\/span><\/a> and described \u201cThe 7,200-kilometers long corridor [that] will combine sea and rail routes\u201d:<\/span><\/p>\n

The route will make it possible to deliver cargoes from India to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas. Then, the goods will be transported by land to Bandar Anzali, Iran\u2019s port on the Caspian Sea. After that, goods will be shipped to the Russian southern port of Astrakhan, from where they will move to Europe by rail. The new transport artery will potentially reduce the time and costs of shipping by up to 40 percent.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

A linked news-report there headlined \u201cTop of the world: Russia to build world’s northernmost railway in Arctic\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and another headlined \u201cJapan turns to Trans-Siberian Railway to test potential connection with Russia, China & S. Korea\u201d<\/span><\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n

If the U.S. Government\u2019s plans to destroy Russia<\/span><\/a> succeed, then any of these new or extended infrastructures will either be destroyed or else be taken over by the U.S. and its allies. (If taken over, then presumably Japan\u2019s aristocracy will be part of the new regime there that does so.) Consequently, building and extending these new infrastructures is Russia\u2019s bet \u2014 and a concrete testimonial to the bet \u2014 that outright war by the destroyers can be avoided. The nations that America and its allies want to conquer are looking to the future, not to conquest or any type of war (though they must also be prepared for war, if the U.S. does invade<\/span><\/a>). Right now, the U.S. and its NATO allies are holding the largest war-games in history<\/span><\/a>, and these preparations to invade Russia are occurring all along and near Russia\u2019s borders<\/span><\/a>, in the countries that formerly were the Soviet Union\u2019s Warsaw Pact military alliance. Though the U.S. and its allies say that Russia and China are threatening to them, these massings of soldiers and of tanks and planes on Russia\u2019s borders are aggressions, not defensive at all as claimed. How would we Americans feel if Russia were doing this along America\u2019s borders? Would we feel that Russia is defending itself, then? Russians have sound reason to be terrified by the U.S. and its allies. Americans were terrified by the Soviets when the issue was Soviet missiles located in Cuba only a hundred miles from the U.S. This country then threatened: if you do that, then we\u2019ll launch war against you. Russia isn\u2019t responding similarly, even though America\u2019s threat to them is much bigger than that threat to the U.S. was in 1962 during the Cuban Missile Crisis.<\/span><\/p>\n

All that today\u2019s U.S. Government wants is to conquer the world<\/span><\/a>, which now especially means Russia, China, and countries that do business with those \u2018enemies\u2019. Iran is also a major target of the U.S., because the U.S. aristocracy\u2019s main allies are the Sauds and Israel, both of which hate and crave to destroy Iran. Though those three targeted countries want to avoid being conquered by the U.S. Government, most of their expenditures are for their own domestic economies, instead of for defending against the U.S. and its allies. (However, the U.S. and its allies are clearly and consistently the aggressor since 1991<\/span><\/a>, and expanded their NATO alliance up to Russia\u2019s borders; Russia didn\u2019t expand its Warsaw Pact alliance up to America\u2019s borders, but ended the Warsaw Pact in 1991. None of Russia\u2019s expenditures are for conquering foreign countries, such as the U.S. alliance now is trying to do in countries such as Syria and Yemen, and perhaps soon in Iran, too; so, the U.S. Government has no excuse whatsoever in this matter, but pure guilt in it, pure aggression.)<\/span><\/p>\n

There really is a difference between \u201cThe West\u201d and \u201cThe East\u201d in our era, but it\u2019s more like the difference between The Axis powers in WW II versus The Allies, than it is between democracy versus dictatorship; and, in fact, the U.S. Government is the world\u2019s only Government that has been scientifically analyzed to determine whether it is a democracy or instead a dictatorship, and it has consistently been found, in these rigorous studies, to be a dictatorship, against the public, by its billionaires, the aristocrats, and not a democracy, at all<\/span><\/a>. Furthermore, the preponderance of the major outcome-indicators of the extent to which a given nation is a dictatorship or even a police-state, or is instead a democracy that\u2019s ruled by its public, are showing that the U.S. is a dictatorship<\/span><\/a> or even a police-state<\/span><\/a>, and that the nations it calls its \u2018enemies\u2019 are more toward the democratic side \u2014 serving their respective public, instead of any such narrow and exclusive elite as the owners of \u201cthe military-industrial complex.\u201d (U.S.-allied propaganda to the contrary alleging that the U.S. and its allies are the ones which are ‘democracies’, like this piece from the U.S. stooge-nations that constitute the EU<\/span><\/a>, are always based on ranking \u2014 without clearly explaining how \u2014 the mere formalities<\/i> of \u2018democracy\u2019, no authentic measures of democracy itself, but only the associated formalities, which often are mere fronts, behind which the given nation\u2019s aristocracy control that given country.) <\/span><\/p>\n

The U.S. has emerged into the very model of the modern dictatorship, relying maximally upon a coordination between deceit and military power<\/span><\/a>. This is the reason why it now spends half of the world\u2019s military costs<\/span><\/a> \u2014 to serve its aristocracy, who have perfected Joseph Goebbels\u2019s system of calling good bad, and bad good, and of otherwise imposing what the novelist George Orwell subsequently called \u201cNewspeak\u201d in its \u2018news\u2019-reporting and commentaries, to serve the controlling aristocracy, \u201cBig Brother.\u201d It\u2019s here, and now. On November 1st, Jonathan Cook at Global Research headlined \u201cBolsonaro: A Monster Engineered by Our Media\u201d<\/span><\/a> and he explained how even the \u201cliberal\u201d aristocrats in the U.S. and its allied countries have brought back racist fascism, the ideology known as nazism, as a globally spreading plague now.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here is how America\u2019s master of Newspeak<\/span><\/a>, Barack Obama, represented, to West Point Military Academy\u2019s graduating cadets on 28 May 2014<\/span><\/a>, the new, American<\/i>, version, of Adolf Hitler\u2019s beloved \u201cDeutschland, Deutschland \u00fcber alles, \u00fcber alles in der Welt\u201d<\/span><\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n

The United States is and remains <\/i>the one indispensable nation<\/i><\/b>.<\/i> [Every other nation is therefore \u2018dispensable\u2019; we therefore now have \u201cAmerika, Amerika \u00fcber alles, \u00fcber alles in der Welt\u201d.]\u00a0That has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the century to come. \u2026 America must always lead on the world\u00a0stage. If we don\u2019t, no one else\u00a0will. \u2026 Russia\u2019s aggression toward former Soviet\u00a0states unnerves capitals in Europe, while China\u2019s economic rise and military\u00a0reach worries its neighbors. From\u00a0Brazil to India, rising middle classes compete with us. <\/i>[He was here telling these future U.S. military leaders that they are to fight for the U.S. aristocracy, to help them defeat any nation that resists.] \u2026 In Ukraine, Russia\u2019s recent actions recall\u00a0the days when Soviet tanks rolled into Eastern Europe. But this isn\u2019t the Cold\u00a0War. Our ability to shape world opinion helped isolate Russia right away. Because\u00a0of\u00a0American leadership, the world immediately condemned Russian actions; Europe\u00a0and the G7 joined us to impose sanctions; NATO reinforced our commitment to\u00a0Eastern European allies; the IMF is helping to\u00a0stabilize Ukraine\u2019s economy;\u00a0OSCE monitors brought the eyes of the world to unstable parts of Ukraine.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Actually, his \u2014 Obama\u2019s \u2014 regime, had conquered Ukraine in February 2014 by a very bloody coup<\/span><\/a>, and installed a racist-fascist anti-Russian Government there<\/span><\/a> next door to Russia, a stooge-regime to this day, which instituted a racial-cleansing campaign to eliminate enough pro-Russia voters<\/span><\/a> so as to be able to hold onto power there. It has destroyed Ukraine and so alienated the regions of Ukraine<\/span><\/a> that had voted more than 75% for the democratically elected Ukrainian President whom Obama overthrew, so that those pro-Russia regions quit Ukraine. What remains of Ukraine after the U.S. conquest is a nazi mess<\/span><\/a> and a destroyed nation in hock to Western taxpayers and banks<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, Obama insisted upon (to use Bush\u2019s term about Saddam Hussein) \u201cregime-change\u201d in Syria. Twice in one day<\/span><\/a> the Secretary General of the U.N. asserted that only the Syrian people have any right to do that, no outside nation has any right to impose it. Obama ignored him and kept on trying. Obama actually protected Al Qaeda\u2019s Syrian affiliate against bombing by Syria\u2019s Government and by Syria\u2019s ally Russia, while the U.S. bombed Syria\u2019s army<\/span><\/a>, which was trying to prevent those jihadists from overthrowing the Government. Obama bombed Libya in order to \u201cregime-change\u201d Muammar Gaddafi, and he bombed Syria in order to \u201cregime-change\u201d Bashar al-Assad; and, so, while the \u201cU.S. Drops Bombs; EU Gets Refugees & Blame. This Is Insane.\u201d<\/span><\/a> And Obama\u2019s successor Trump continues Obama\u2019s policies, regarding not only Ukraine, but regarding also Yemen and Syria, and much else, except that Trump goes even more nazi than Obama did. The change from Obama to Trump was from soft nazi to hard nazi. That\u2019s all. Trump is the U.S. regime\u2019s going wild.<\/span><\/p>\n

Every day, the U.S. regime murders lots of people in foreign lands. Today, as this is being written, on November 3rd, Syria News, which I\u2019ve found to be far more reliably truthful about the situation in Syria than is for example the New York Times<\/i>, headlined “US-Led Coalition Murders 15 Civilians in a New Bombing in Hajin\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and reported that, \u201cUnder the guise of fighting ISIS, the US and its cronies, are trying to establish a de facto barrier on the Syrian-Iraqi border which is run by ISIS and SDF, who both receive support from the US and both have occasional clashes [against each other] in between.\u201d Aggression (and lying about it) is normal for the U.S. Government.<\/span><\/p>\n

On January 19th<\/a><\/span>, U.S. \u2018Defense\u2019 Secretary James Mattis said that <\/b>\u201cgreat power competition, not terrorism, is now the primary focus of U.S. national security,\u201d<\/b><\/span><\/a> and this means war by the U.S. against both Russia and China, and perhaps also Iran; but if the people of Europe don\u2019t rise up against that plan, then not only will they have even more refugees from America\u2019s \u201cregime-change\u201d bombs, but they will soon have Russia\u2019s bombs retaliating against Europe itself for being a part of America\u2019s aggression, via the NATO military alliance, an alliance that should have ended when the Warsaw Pact military alliance did, back in 1991. Either End NATO Now, or else join the carnage that America\u2019s aristocracy are clearly determined to impose upon the world in order to conquer it. The choice is that simple.<\/span><\/p>\n

The only ways that the global public can effectively fight back against the U.S.-and-allied aristocracies\u2019 plan to enslave the entire world to their coercive and sanctions-laden \u2018free market\u2019 are: <\/span><\/p>\n

(1) to boycott America\u2019s brands and, as much as possible, <\/b>conduct all international transactions in any other type of currency than the U.S. dollar<\/b><\/span><\/a>; and, <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

(2) to vote against any politician who has endorsed America\u2019s invasions, such as of Iraq 2003, Libya 2011, Syria 2012-, Yemen 2015-, and U.S. coups, including its <\/b>coup that conquered Ukraine in 2014<\/b><\/span><\/a> and installed <\/b>a nazi Government there<\/b><\/span><\/a>. And, <\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

(3) to organize marches, if possible, against any U.S. military base occupying their nation. The occupying power needs to be expelled in order for the given nation\u2019s public to control their own country.<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

Otherwise, the U.S. aristocracy can simply continue with its pillage of our planet. The global public needs to do its part, not to leave it to the targeted countries alone to try to put down this global resurgence of fascism, by America\u2019s oligarchs. This also means abandoning the two aristocracies that work the most closely with America\u2019s:<\/i> Israel\u2019s and Saudi Arabia\u2019s (both of which target Iran and its allies, even more than they target Russia and its allies). The listed three steps are the only path toward a survivable planet: isolating and publicly shaming the nazis.<\/span><\/p>\n

Also the Newspeak needs to end, right now, because without honesty, no type of progress is even possible.<\/span><\/p>\n

All of these measures are not only morally right; they are necessary, because the present path leads to not only profound injustices, but a hellish global future.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the U.N. cannot do any of these essential things. But only the global public can \u2014 and will, if there is to be continued life of this planet, and lives here that are worth living.<\/span><\/p>\n

PS: For anyone who might consider odd that an American (the present writer) views Russia as a core ally of the American people, and views recent American Presidents (<\/b>starting with George Herbert Walker Bush on 24 February 1990<\/b><\/span><\/a>) as traitors to America \u2014 as being enemies of the American people and of the entire world \u2014 please consider the following historical facts:<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

According to Jan Ludv\u00edk\u2019s\u00a0 <\/span>“The Poverty of Statistics: Military Power, Defence Expenditure and Strategic Balance\u201d<\/span><\/a>, in the January 2014 Central European Journal of International and Security Studies<\/i> (p. 157), the relative expenditures in order to win World War I were Russia 24%, UK 22%, U.S. 21%, France 20%, and Italy 13%. Russia spent the most of all the allies. In WW II, the relative expenditures in order to win were Russia 58%, UK 20%, U.S. 12%, France 10%. Yet again \u2014 and this time overwhelmingly \u2014 Russia spent the most of all the allies, 58% of the total allied cost. The only country that spent more on that war was Germany, which of course was on the losing (\u201cAxis\u201d) side, and which spent 37% more to lose that war than Russia spent to win it. During WW II, Germany spent 75% of its side\u2019s entire costs; Japan spent 17%, and Italy spent 8%. So: WW I was mainly between Russia and Germany, and so was WW II. And that\u2019s clear also from another calculation:<\/span><\/p>\n

The same source (p. 159) indicates that Russia\u2019s troops were 46% of those fighting on the winning side of WW I (and #2 on that was France with 20%), and were 55% of the troops fighting on the winning side of WW II. (France was #2 again in WW II, also 20%.)<\/span><\/p>\n

Furthermore, in WW I, Russia\u2019s troops were 38% more (in numbers) than both Germany\u2019s and Austria\u2019s put together; and, in WW II, Russia\u2019s troops were 4% less than Germany\u2019s, Japan\u2019s and Italy\u2019s combined, but were twice as many as Germany\u2019s number.<\/span><\/p>\n

So: by far the biggest contributions to the winning not only of WW II, but also of WW I, were made by one and the same country, both times: Russia. America\u2019s contribution was much smaller, on both occasions. And, now, America\u2019s leaders and their foreign allies have become nazis, heirs of Hitler\u2019s tradition, who call Russia an \u201cenemy,\u201d for refusing to do what these nazis demand.<\/span><\/p>\n

Of course, there were also other nations on each side of each of those wars (for example, Wikipedia lists over a dozen \u201cAllies of World War I\u201d<\/span><\/a>), but Ludvik calculated the numbers only for these, the main ones, on both sides.<\/span><\/p>\n

So: everyone who can should now become active on this!<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a>,<\/i> and of<\/span> \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org China\u2019s \u201cBelt and Road Initiative\u201d is famous as an extension of their domestic infrastructure investments, but Russia is also investing heavily in infrastructure. Both countries need to do it in order to improve the future for their respective populations, and both Governments have avoided the Western development model of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":384144,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[30,960,18045,59,524,754,523,49],"class_list":{"0":"post-384143","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-big-brother","10":"tag-china","11":"tag-infrastructure","12":"tag-military","13":"tag-russia","14":"tag-syria","15":"tag-ukraine","16":"tag-usa-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=384143"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384143\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":384146,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/384143\/revisions\/384146"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/384144"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=384143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=384143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=384143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}