{"id":375811,"date":"2018-09-02T11:30:43","date_gmt":"2018-09-02T10:30:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/trump-says-no-political-necessity-to-keep-canada-in-new-nafta-deal-rt-us-news\/"},"modified":"2018-09-02T11:30:43","modified_gmt":"2018-09-02T10:30:43","slug":"trump-says-no-political-necessity-to-keep-canada-in-new-nafta-deal-rt-us-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/trump-says-no-political-necessity-to-keep-canada-in-new-nafta-deal-rt-us-news\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump says \u2018no political necessity\u2019 to keep Canada in new NAFTA deal \u2014 RT US News"},"content":{"rendered":"

Donald Trump said there is \u201cno political necessity\u201d to keep Canada in the NAFTA agreement if a \u201cfair deal\u201d cannot be reached. The US president warned Congress against interfering, threatening to kill the deal single-handedly.<\/p>\n

\n

\u201cThere is no political necessity to keep Canada in the new NAFTA deal. If we don’t make a fair deal for the US after decades of abuse, Canada will be out,\u201d<\/em> Trump tweeted on Saturday, a day after the trade negotiations with Canada were upended by leaked off-the-record remarks he made to Bloomberg.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

There is no political necessity to keep Canada in the new NAFTA deal. If we don\u2019t make a fair deal for the U.S. after decades of abuse, Canada will be out. Congress should not interfere w\/ these negotiations or I will simply terminate NAFTA entirely & we will be far better off…<\/p>\n

\u2014 Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 1, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

He went on to warn US lawmakers against involving themselves into the negotiations, tweeting that should they do this he \u201cwill simply terminate NAFTA entirely and we will be far better off.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Trump, who has repeatedly branded the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) the \u201cworst trade deal ever made,\u201d reiterated that he will not back down from his pledge to quit the deal, if his concerns are not met. \u201cWe make new deal or go back to pre-NAFTA!\u201d<\/em> he tweeted.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

….Remember, NAFTA was one of the WORST Trade Deals ever made. The U.S. lost thousands of businesses and millions of jobs. We were far better off before NAFTA – should never have been signed. Even the Vat Tax was not accounted for. We make new deal or go back to pre-NAFTA!<\/p>\n

\u2014 Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 1, 2018<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

In the remarks that were published by the Toronto Sun on Friday, Trump said <\/a>that he did not intend to make any concessions to Canada during the NAFTA negotiations. He asked Bloomberg not to make the remark public, since it is \u201cgoing to be so insulting that they’re not going to be able to make a deal.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\n

Read more<\/p>\n


\n \"Workers
\n <\/a>\n<\/div>\n

Trump previously set a deadline for Friday to reach the trilateral deal. When the US-Canada trade talks eventually missed the deadline, US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said that Trump had asked Congress to approve the bilateral agreement with Mexico, notifying lawmakers of his intention within the three-month period prescribed by the law.<\/p>\n

\u201cToday the president notified the Congress of his intent to sign a trade agreement with Mexico \u2013 and Canada, if it is willing \u2013 90 days from now,\u201d<\/em> Lighthizer stated<\/a> on Friday, hailing the deal with Mexico as \u201cthe most advanced and high-standard trade agreement in the world.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Moving ahead towards securing the trade deal with Mexico does not mean Washington is ceasing attempts to agree a deal with Canada, Lighthizer noted. \u201cOur officials are continuing to work toward agreement,\u201d<\/em> he said, adding that the talks will be resumed on Wednesday.<\/p>\n

The NAFTA was signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States in 1993 and came into force in 1994, during the presidency of Bill Clinton. The longstanding trilateral deal was roundly criticized by the protectionist right, as well as the anti-globalization left, particularly for the damage that eliminating tariffs did to the American auto industry.
Without the impediment of tariffs, auto manufacturers moved their operations south of the border, wreaking havoc on former manufacturing hubs like Detroit, Michigan, and Cleveland, Ohio. According to a study on the deal effects back in 2013, NAFTA was directly responsible for raising the US trade deficit with Mexico from $17 billion to $177 billion, and cost the US over 850,000 jobs.<\/p>\n

In June this year, Washington introduced a 25-percent tariff on steel imports and a 10-percent tariff on aluminum imports from Mexico, Canada and the EU. Mexico swiftly retaliated with import tariffs on some American goods, including steel, apples and pork. Ottawa introduced retaliatory taxes on US imports of steel, aluminum and such goods as whiskey, orange juice and other food products .<\/p>\n

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n