{"id":373140,"date":"2018-08-13T00:13:08","date_gmt":"2018-08-12T23:13:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/more-whitey-on-the-moon\/"},"modified":"2018-08-13T00:13:08","modified_gmt":"2018-08-12T23:13:08","slug":"more-whitey-on-the-moon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/more-whitey-on-the-moon\/","title":{"rendered":"More “Whitey on the Moon”"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n

Trump and Pence\u00a0<\/a>want to spend $8 billion to establish a new branch of the U.S. armed forces, the Space Force.<\/p>\n

I have enormous respect of the U.S. military. My father was a 20-year man. Two of my uncles served in WWII. We think an ancestor on the McIlwee side, spelling it Mucklewee, served in the Revolutionary War.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But, the U.S. military was intended by the Founding Fathers to be an institution for self-defense. Most of them thought a standing army would kill democracy. Since the end of WWII just such a standing military has been set up and is now gobbling up over $700 billion a year. Actually, the true amount of military-related expenses is over $1 trillion a year. War-fighters are an ever shrinking part of this military.<\/p>\n

And here\u2019s the secret of the way the scam works. A good half of the Pentagon budget is given back out to military contractors. It is, in essence, corporate welfare on a huge scale. Officers who retire often form provision companies on getting out. They know what their former colleagues need and want, and their former colleagues will take the call when they make the offer. The retirees with their new companies take the profits.<\/p>\n

Many of the former officers you see interviewed on CNN<\/em> and other cable news shows are actually making money off wars even as the opine on them, and despite print press exposes, CNN<\/em> et al. have never apologized for the practice, never identified biased guests, and never acknowledged it is happening.<\/p>\n

The U.S. military doesn\u2019t need to be nearly so large if it is a defense force and if it were run like a public sector corporation (think Reneault) instead of as a way to enrich cronies. Nor does \u201cdefense\u201d spending create many jobs, and the ones it creates are way more expensive to the public than most others.<\/p>\n

The U.S. military isn\u2019t very good at counter-terrorism (see: Afghanistan), and where it is, it doesn\u2019t need those sort of resources. ISIL was defeated by the Iraqi military, Shiite militias, the Iranian Revolutionary Guards with the support of 6,000 U.S. special operations forces and lots of sorties by the U.S. Air Force. That didn\u2019t cost $700 billion. It cost the U.S. $14.3 billion, and it was arguably the biggest active security threat to the U.S. at the time.<\/p>\n

The biggest challenge the United States faces is climate change, and addressing that would actually save us money. Inventing more ways of scaring the public and throwing money to military contractors won\u2019t save any money at all, and since there are no military threats in space, it can\u2019t be a defense unit.<\/p>\n

One who understood that the (mostly white Protestant U.S. elite) will gladly spend trillions on war but won\u2019t step up to put a social safety net under American workers was Gil Scott-Heron:<\/p>\n

\n