{"id":371372,"date":"2018-07-29T23:55:29","date_gmt":"2018-07-29T22:55:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=371372"},"modified":"2018-07-29T23:55:29","modified_gmt":"2018-07-29T22:55:29","slug":"neocons-hate-russia-more-than-they-hate-any-other-nation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/neocons-hate-russia-more-than-they-hate-any-other-nation\/","title":{"rendered":"Neocons hate Russia more than they hate any other nation."},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Neoconservatism started in 1953 with Henry \u201cScoop\u201d Jackson, the Democratic Party U.S. Senator from the state of Washington (1953-1983), who became known as a \u2018defense\u2019 hawk, and as \u201cthe Senator from Boeing,\u201d<\/span><\/a> because Boeing practically owned him. The UK\u2019s Henry Jackson Society<\/span><\/a> was founded in 2005 in order to carry forward Senator Jackson\u2019s unwavering and passionate endorsement of growing the American empire so that the U.S.-UK alliance<\/span><\/a> will control the entire world (and U.S. weapons-makers will dominate in every market).<\/span><\/p>\n

Later, during the 1990s, neoconservatism became taken over by the Mossad and the lobbyists for Israel and came to be publicly identified as a \u2018Jewish\u2019 ideology, despite its having \u2014 and having long had \u2014 many champions who were \u2018anti-communist\u2019 or \u2018pro-democracy\u2019 or simply even anti-Russian, but who were neither Jewish nor even focused at all on the Middle East. Republicans Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and John McCain; and the Democrat, CIA Director James Woolsey \u2014 the latter of whom was one of the patrons of Britain\u2019s Henry Jackson Society<\/span><\/a> \u2014 were especially prominent neoconservatives, who came to prominence even before neocons became called \u201cneoconservatives.\u201d What all neocons have always shared in common has been a visceral hatred of Russians. That comes above anything else \u2014 and even above NATO (the main neocon organization).<\/span><\/p>\n

During recent decades, neocons have been hating Iranians and more generally Shiites \u2014 such as in Syria and in Lebanon, and now also in Yemen \u2014 and not only<\/i> hating Russians.<\/span><\/p>\n

When the Israel lobby during the 1990s and after, pumped massive resources into getting the U.S. Government to invade first Iraq and then Iran, neoconservatism got its name, but the ideology itself did not change. However, there are a few neoconservatives today who are too ignorant to know, in any coherent way, what their own underlying beliefs are, or why, and so who are anti-Russians (that\u2019s basic for any neocon) who either don\u2019t know or else don\u2019t particularly care that Iran and Shia Muslims generally, are allied with Russia. Neoconservatives such as this, are simply confused neocons, people whose underlying ideology is self-contradictory, because they\u2019ve not carefully thought things through. <\/span><\/p>\n

An example is Vox\u2019s Alex Ward, who built his career as an anti-Russia propagandist<\/span><\/a>, and whose recent ten-point tirade against Russia I then exposed as being false on each one of its ten points<\/span><\/a>, each of those points having been based upon mere allegations by U.S. neocons against Russia without any solid evidence whatsoever. Indictments, and other forms of accusations, are not evidence for anything. But a stupid \u2018journalist\u2019 accepts them as if they were evidence, if those accusations come from \u2018the right side\u2019 \u2014 but not if they come from \u2018the wrong side\u2019. They don\u2019t understand even such a simple distinction as that between an indictment, and a conviction. A conviction is at least a verdict (though maybe based on false \u2018evidence\u2019 and thus false itself), but all that an accusation is is an accusation \u2014 and all accusations (in the American legal system) are supposed to be disbelieved, unless and until there is at least a verdict that gives the accusation legal force. (This is called \u201cinnocent unless proven guilty.\u201d)<\/span><\/p>\n

Earlier, Mr. Ward had headlined as if he were an anti<\/i>-neocon, when he posted his \u201cAmerica is fueling the war in Yemen. Congress is finally pushing back.\u201d<\/span><\/a> What can account for that seemingly incongruous article?<\/span><\/p>\n

Mr. Ward is a Democrat \u2014 an heir to Senator Jackson\u2019s allegedly anti-communist though actually anti-Russian ideology \u2014 but, since Ward isn\u2019t as intelligent as the ideology\u2019s founder was, Ward becomes anti-neocon when a Republican-led Administration is doing things (such as Ward there criticizes) that are even more-neocon than today\u2019s Democratic Party itself is. In other words: \u2018journalists\u2019 (actually, propagandists) such as he, are more partisan in favor of support of Democratic Party billionaires against Republican Party billionaires, than in support of conquering Russia as opposed to cooperating with Russia (and with all other countries). They\u2019re unaware that all American billionaires support expansion of the U.S. empire \u2014 including over Yemen (to bring Yemen in, too \u2014 which invasion Ward incongruously opposes). But politicians (unlike their financial backers) need to pretend not to be so bloodthirsty or so beholden to the military-industrial complex. Thus, an American doesn\u2019t need to be intelligent in order to build his or her career in \u2018journalism\u2019, on the basis of having previously served as a propagandist writing for non-profits that are mere fronts for NATO and for Israel, and which are fronts actually for America\u2019s weapons-manufacturing firms, who need those wars in order to grow their profits. Such PR for front-organizations for U.S. firms such as Lockheed Martin, is excellent preparation for a successful career in American \u2018journalism\u2019. If a person is stupid, then it\u2019s still necessary to be stupid in the right way, in order to succeed; and Ward is, and does.<\/span><\/p>\n

This, for example, is how it makes sense that Ward had previously been employed at the War on the Rocks website that organized the Republican neoconservative campaign against Donald Trump during the 2016 Republican primaries<\/span><\/a>: the mega-donors to both U.S. Parties are united in favor of America conquering Russia. And that\u2019s<\/i> why War on the Rocks had organized Republican neocons to oppose Trump: it was done in order to increase the chances for Trump\u2019s rabidly anti-Russia and pro-Israel competitors such as Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio to win that nomination instead, which would then have produced the billionaires\u2019 dream contest, between Hillary Clinton versus an equally neoconservative Republican nominee. A bipartisan neoconservatism controls both of the American political Parties. A \u2018journalist\u2019 who displays that sort of bipartisanship can\u2019t fail in America, no matter how incompetent at real journalism he or she might be. (However, they do have to be literate<\/i>. Stupid, maybe; but literate, definitely.)<\/span><\/p>\n

The core of America\u2019s form of capitalism has come to be the U.S. aristocracy\u2019s bipartisan, liberal and conservative, Democratic and Republican, form of capitalism, which isn\u2019t merely fascist (which includes privatizing everything that can be privatized) but which is also imperialist (which means favoring the country\u2019s perpetration of invasions and coups in order to expand that nation\u2019s empire). The United States is now a globe-spanning empire, controlling not merely the aristocracies in a few banana republics such as Guatemala and Honduras, but also the aristocracies in richer countries such as France, Germany and UK, so as to extract from virtually the entire world \u2014 by means mainly of deception but also sometimes public threats and clearly coercive \u2014 unfair advantages for corporations that are within its borders, and against corporations that are headquartered in foreign countries. America\u2019s billionaires \u2014 both the Democratic ones and the Republican ones \u2014 are 100% in favor of America\u2019s conquering the world: this ideology is entirely bipartisan, in the United States.<\/span><\/a> Though the billionaires succeeded, during the first Cold War \u2014 the one that was nominally against communism \u2014 at fooling the public to think they were aiming ultimately to conquer communism, George Herbert Walker Bush made clear, on the night of 24 February 1990, privately to the leaders of the U.S. aristocracy\u2019s foreign allies, that the actual goal was world-conquest, and so the Cold War would now secretly continue on the U.S. side<\/span><\/a>, even after ending on the U.S.S.R. side. When GHW Bush did that, the heritage of U.S. Senator Jackson became no longer the formerly claimed one, of \u2018anti-communism\u2019, but was, clearly now and henceforth, anti-Russian. And that\u2019s what it is today \u2014 not only in the Democratic Party, and not only in the Republican Party, and not only in the United States, but throughout the entire U.S. alliance<\/i>. <\/span><\/p>\n

And this is what we are seeing today, in all of the U.S.-and-allied propaganda-media. America is always \u2018the injured party\u2019 against \u2018the aggressors\u2019; and, so, one after another, such as in Iraq, and in Libya, and in Syria, and in Iran, and in Yemen, and in China, all allies (or even merely friends) of Russia are \u2018the aggressors\u2019 and are \u2018dictatorships\u2019 and are \u2018threats to America\u2019, and only the U.S. side represents \u2018democracy\u2019<\/i>. It\u2019s actually an aristocracy<\/span><\/a>, which has deeply deceived its public, to think it\u2019s a democracy. Just as every aristocracy is based on lies and on coercion, this one is, too \u2014 it is no exception; it\u2019s only that this particular empire is on a historically unprecedentedly large scale, dominating all continents. Support that, and you\u2019re welcomed into the major (i.e., billionaire-backed) \u2018news\u2019 media in America, and in its allied countries. This is America\u2019s\u00a0 <\/span>\u2018democracy\u2019<\/span><\/a>. (Of course, an article such as this one is not \u2018journalism\u2019 in America and its allied countries; it\u2019s merely \u201cblogging.\u201d So, it won\u2019t be found there though it\u2019s being submitted everywhere. It will be accepted and published at only the honest news-sites. A reader may Web-search the headline here in order to find out which ones those are. Not many \u2018news\u2019media report the institutionalized corruptness of the \u2018news\u2019media; they just criticize one-another, in the way that the politicians do, which is bipartisan \u2014 the bipartisan dictatorship. But the rot that\u2019s actually throughout the \u2018news\u2019media, is prohibited to be reported about and published, in and by any of them. It is totally suppressed reality. Only the few honest news-sites will publish this information and its documentation, the links here.)<\/span><\/p>\n

However, actually, the first time that the term either \u201cneoconservatism\u201d or \u201cneo-conservatism\u201d is known to have been used, was in the British magazine, The Contemporary Review<\/i>, January 1883, by Henry Dunkley, in his \u201cThe Conservative Dilemma\u201d<\/span><\/a> where \u201cneo-conservative\u201d appeared 8 times, and was contrasted to traditional \u201cconservatism\u201d because, whereas the traditional type \u201cToryism\u201d was pro-aristocratic, anti-democratic, and overtly elitist; the new type was pro-democratic, anti-aristocratic, and overtly populist (which no form of conservatism honestly<\/i> is \u2014 they\u2019re all elitist): \u201cWhat is this new creed of yours? \u2026 That there must be no class influence in politics? That any half-dozen hinds on my estate are as good as so many dukes? That the will of the people is the supreme political tribunal? That if a majority at the polls bid us abolish the Church and toss the Crown into the gutter we are forthwith to be their most obedient servants?\u201d \u201cNo: from whatever point of view we consider the question, it is plain that the attempt to reconstruct the Tory party on a democratic basis cannot succeed.\u201d \u201cThe Tories have always been adepts at conservation, but the things they have been most willing to conserve were not our liberties but the restrictions put upon our liberties.\u201d \u201cThe practical policy of Conservatism would not alter, and could not be altered much, but its pretensions would have to be pitched in a lower key.\u201d \u201cHere we seem to get within the smell of soup, the bustle of evening receptions, and the smiles of dowagers. The cares which weigh upon this couple of patriot souls cannot be described as august. It is hardly among such petty anxieties that the upholders of the Empire and the pilots of the State are bred.\u201d \u201cThe solemn abjuration which is now proposed in the name of Neo-conservatism resembles a charge of dynamite.\u201d He viewed neo-conservatives as being let\u2019s-pretend populists, whose pretense at being democrats will jeopardize the Empire, not strengthen it. Empire, and its rightness, were so deeply rooted in the rulers\u2019 psyche, it went unchallenged. In fact, at that very time, in the 1880s, Sir Cecil Rhodes was busy creating the foundation for the UK-U.S. empire that now controls most of the world<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The modern pro-Israel neoconservatism<\/span><\/a> arose in the 1960s when formerly Marxist Jewish intellectuals in New York City and Washington DC, who were even more anti-communist than anti-Nazi (if they weren\u2019t in some ways even pro-Nazi), became impassioned with the U.S. empire being extended to the entire world by spreading \u2018democracy\u2019 (and protection of Israel) as if this Israel-protecting empire were a holy crusade not only against the Soviet Union, which was demonized by neocons, but against Islam, which also was demonized by them (since they were ethnocentric Jews and the people whose land the \u2018Israelis\u2019 had stolen were overwhelmingly Muslims \u2014 who now were very second-class citizens in their own long-ancestral and also birth-land, \u2018Israel\u2019). This was how neoconservatives distinguished themselves from \u201cpaleoconservatism\u201d<\/span><\/a>, which wasn\u2019t nearly so Messianic, but which was more overtly ethnocentric, though ethnic Christian (and mainly Roman Catholic), instead of ethnic Jewish. The \u201cpaleoconservatives\u201d were isolationists, not imperialists. They originated from the opponents of America\u2019s entry into WW II against the imperialists of that time, who were the fascists. Those American \u201cisolationists\u201d (now called \u201cpaleoconservatives\u201d) would have given us a world controlled by Hitler and his Axis allies \u2014 and maybe even they would have supported Hitler against Stalin, since they were rabid against communists. All conservatism is absurd, but there are many forms of it, none of which makes intelligent sense, and no type has compassion for anyone who is unlike themselves.<\/span><\/p>\n

Some of Senator Henry Jackson\u2019s staff members, such as Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle, subsequently became prominent Republican neoconservatives; others, such as their fellow-Democrat Jeanne Kirkpatrick, were close friends and political supporters of Jackson, and likewise switched to become Reagan Republicans, and then Bush Republicans \u2014 especially prominent under George W. Bush.<\/span><\/p>\n

The roots of neoconservatism are 100% imperialistic, colonialist, supremacist, and blatantly evil. They hate Russia because they still crave to conquer it<\/span><\/a>, and don\u2019t know how to do this, short of nuclear annihilation, which would be extremely dangerous, even for themselves. So, they endanger everyone; they\u2019re enemies of the whole world, even if they\u2019re too unintelligent to know it. On top of that, they are unsurpassable in their blatant arrogance. And they become hired to very responsible positions, by America\u2019s billionaires who fund both Parties. Neoconservatism is bipartisan. It has become America\u2019s bipartisan foreign policy.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a>,<\/i> and of<\/span> \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org Neoconservatism started in 1953 with Henry \u201cScoop\u201d Jackson, the Democratic Party U.S. Senator from the state of Washington (1953-1983), who became known as a \u2018defense\u2019 hawk, and as \u201cthe Senator from Boeing,\u201d because Boeing practically owned him. The UK\u2019s Henry Jackson Society was founded in 2005 in order to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":371373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[115,30,32,96,3604,535,59628,59,14489,19413,524,754,523],"class_list":{"0":"post-371372","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-barack-obama","10":"tag-big-brother","11":"tag-cia","12":"tag-cover-up","13":"tag-donald-trump","14":"tag-global-news","15":"tag-imperialists","16":"tag-military","17":"tag-neocons","18":"tag-neoconservatives","19":"tag-russia","20":"tag-syria","21":"tag-ukraine"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=371372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":371374,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371372\/revisions\/371374"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/371373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=371372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=371372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=371372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}