{"id":37060,"date":"2013-05-29T12:26:11","date_gmt":"2013-05-29T11:26:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/why-the-next-war-with-china-could-go-very-badly-for-the-united-states\/37060\/"},"modified":"2013-05-29T12:26:11","modified_gmt":"2013-05-29T11:26:11","slug":"why-the-next-war-with-china-could-go-very-badly-for-the-united-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/why-the-next-war-with-china-could-go-very-badly-for-the-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Why The Next War With China Could Go Very Badly For The United States"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- START CONTENT --><\/p>\n<p><strong>Michael Snyder<\/strong><br \/><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/endoftheamericandream.com\/archives\/why-the-next-war-with-china-could-go-very-badly-for-the-united-states\">American Dream<\/a><br \/>May 29, 2013<\/p>\n<p>Most Americans assume that the U.S. military is so vastly superior to everyone else that no other nation would ever dream of fighting a full-scale war against us. Unfortunately, that assumption is dead wrong. In recent years, the once mammoth technological gap between the U.S. military and the Chinese military has been closing at a frightening pace. China has been accomplishing this by brazenly stealing our technology and hacking into our computer systems. The Pentagon and the Obama administration know all about this, but they don\u2019t do anything about it. Perhaps the fact that China owns about a trillion dollars of our national debt has something to do with that. In any event, today China has the largest military in the world and the second largest military budget in the world. They have stolen plans for our most advanced jets, helicopters, ships and missile systems. It is estimated that stealing our technology has saved China about\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"25 years\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/national-security\/confidential-report-lists-us-weapons-system-designs-compromised-by-chinese-cyberspies\/2013\/05\/27\/a42c3e1c-c2dd-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story_2.html\">25 years<\/a> of research and development. In addition, China is rapidly developing a new generation of strategic weapons that could potentially enable it to actually win a future war against the United States. At one time such a notion would have been unthinkable, but as you will see below, the next war with China could go very badly for the United States.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Washington Post\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/national-security\/confidential-report-lists-us-weapons-system-designs-compromised-by-chinese-cyberspies\/2013\/05\/27\/a42c3e1c-c2dd-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story_2.html\">Washington Post<\/a> is reporting on a confidential report that was prepared for the Pentagon, and what this report says about the extent of Chinese cyber espionage is absolutely startling. Will China know ALL of our secrets at some point? The following is a brief excerpt from\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"the Washington Post article\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/world\/national-security\/confidential-report-lists-us-weapons-system-designs-compromised-by-chinese-cyberspies\/2013\/05\/27\/a42c3e1c-c2dd-11e2-8c3b-0b5e9247e8ca_story.html\">the Washington Post article<\/a>about the theft of our military technology by China. It turns out that Chinese hackers have gotten their hands on plans for almost all of the new cutting edge weapons systems that we have been developing\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Some of the weapons form the backbone of the Pentagon\u2019s regional missile defense for Asia, Europe and the Persian Gulf. The designs included those for the advanced Patriot missile system, known as PAC-3; an Army system for shooting down ballistic missiles, known as the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD; and the Navy\u2019s Aegis ballistic-missile defense system.<\/p>\n<p>Also identified in the report are vital combat aircraft and ships, including the F\/A-18 fighter jet, the V-22 Osprey, the Black Hawk helicopter and the Navy\u2019s new Littoral Combat Ship, which is designed to patrol waters close to shore.<\/p>\n<p>Also on the list is the most expensive weapons system ever built \u2013 the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which is on track to cost about $1.4 trillion.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>One military expert that the Washington Post showed the report to was absolutely stunned\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s staggering,\u201d said Mark Stokes, executive director of the Project 2049 Institute, a think tank that focuses on Asia security issues. \u201cThese are all very critical weapons systems, critical to our national security. When I hear this in totality, it\u2019s breathtaking.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The experts said the cybertheft creates three major problems. First, access to advanced U.S. designs gives China an immediate operational edge that could be exploited in a conflict. Second, it accelerates China\u2019s acquisition of advanced military technology and saves billions in development costs. And third, the U.S. designs can be used to benefit China\u2019s own defense industry. There are long-standing suspicions that China\u2019s theft of designs for the F-35 fighter allowed Beijing to develop its version much faster.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>But it isn\u2019t just hackers that the U.S. military needs to be concerned about.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is that the Chinese are stealing secrets from us any way that they can.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the Chinese use attractive young women to seduce our defense contractors. In fact, as\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"the Washington Times\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2013\/mar\/19\/us-defense-contractor-arrested-passing-secrets-chi\/\">the Washington Times<\/a> recently reported, one 59-year-old American man was recently charged with passing very sensitive secrets to a 27-year-old Chinese \u201choneypot\u201d that he was seeing\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A U.S. defense contractor who works in intelligence at the military\u2019s\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Pacific Command\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/topics\/pacific-command\/\">Pacific Command<\/a> in Hawaii has been charged with passing classified national security information to a 27-year-old Chinese woman he was dating.<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Benjamin Pierce Bishop\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/topics\/benjamin-pierce-bishop\/\">Benjamin Pierce Bishop<\/a>, 59, is accused of sending the woman an email in May with information on Pacom\u2019s war plans, nuclear weapons and U.S. relations with international partners, according to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Honolulu and unsealed Monday.<\/p>\n<p>The complaint goes on to allege that\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Mr. Bishop\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/topics\/benjamin-pierce-bishop\/\">Mr. Bishop<\/a> told the woman over the telephone in September about the deployment of U.S. nuclear weapons and about the ability of the U.S. to detect other nations\u2019 short- and medium-range ballistic missiles.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Another way that China is gaining a strategic advantage over the U.S. is by getting the U.S. military to become increasingly dependent upon them. According to\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Forbes\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/eamonnfingleton\/2013\/05\/05\/a-modest-proposal-lets-outsource-the-entire-u-s-defense-effort-to-china\/?partner=yahootix\">Forbes<\/a>, now the U.S. military is even leasing a Chinese satellite for communications purposes\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>American dependence on China grows by the day. The latest<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"news\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2013-04-29\/pentagon-using-china-satellite-for-u-s-africa-command.html\">news<\/a> is that the United States has been reduced to leasing a Chinese satellite to handle communications with U.S. military bases in Africa. Surprising, isn\u2019t it? The nation that launched the world\u2019s first communications satellite (I remember it well \u2014 it was called Telstar) has so lost its manufacturing mojo that it has to rely on its most formidable military adversary to provide the hardware for some of its most sensitive communications. This at a time when underlying unemployment rates among U.S. manufacturing workers remain at near-depression levels.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Isn\u2019t that crazy?<\/p>\n<p>And a recent Senate report discovered that many of our most advanced weapons systems\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"are absolutely riddled\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/counterfeit-parts-from-china-raise-grave-concerns-for-both-us-companies-and-national-security-2012-6\">are absolutely riddled<\/a> with counterfeit Chinese parts\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A recent Senate report,\u00a0titled\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Inquiry Into Counterfeit Electronic Parts In The Department Of Defense Supply Chain\" href=\"http:\/\/armed-services.senate.gov\/Publications\/Counterfeit%20Electronic%20Parts.pdf\"><em>Inquiry Into Counterfeit Electronic Parts In The Department Of Defense Supply Chain<\/em><\/a>, \u201cuncovered overwhelming evidence of large numbers of counterfeit parts making their way into critical defense systems.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The investigation found\u00a0<strong>1,800 cases of counterfeit electron<\/strong><strong>ic parts involving over one million suspect parts in 2009-10 alone<\/strong>, thereby exposing \u201ca defense supply chain that relies on hundreds of unveiled independent distributors to supply electronic parts for some of our most sensitive systems.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The report\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"concluded\" href=\"http:\/\/www.levin.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press\/release\/senate-armed-services-committee-releases-report_on-counterfeit-electronic-parts\">concluded<\/a>, among other things, that\u00a0<strong>China is the \u201cdominant source\u201d of counterfeit products that enter the Do<\/strong><strong>D supply chain<\/strong>, that the Chinese government does little to stop it and that the DoD doesn\u2019t know the \u201cscope and impact\u201d of these parts on critical defense systems.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Who in the world would be stupid enough to allow one of their greatest strategic enemies to supply large numbers of parts for key weapons systems?<\/p>\n<p>Apparently we are that stupid.<\/p>\n<p>Things are particularly bad when it comes\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"to semiconductors\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/eamonnfingleton\/2013\/05\/05\/a-modest-proposal-lets-outsource-the-entire-u-s-defense-effort-to-china\/?partner=yahootix\">to semiconductors<\/a>\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Senator John McCain commented: \u201cWe can\u2019t tolerate the risk of a ballistic missile interceptor failing to hit its target, a helicopter pilot unable to fire his missiles, or any other mission failure because of a counterfeit part.\u201d Calling the issue \u201ca ticking time bomb,\u201d Brian Toohey, president of the Semiconductor Industry Association, commented: \u201cThe catastrophic failure risk inherently found in counterfeit semiconductors places our citizens and military personnel in unreasonable peril.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>It would be bad enough if we just had to worry about counterfeit parts failing. But what if China has a way to shut some of those parts down in the event of a conflict? What if some of those parts contain \u201cTrojan Horse\u201d computer chips or malware?<\/p>\n<p>That may sound crazy, but unfortunately Trojan Horse chips can be extremely difficult to detect. The following is from a recent\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"Forbes article\" href=\"http:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/eamonnfingleton\/2013\/05\/05\/a-modest-proposal-lets-outsource-the-entire-u-s-defense-effort-to-china\/?partner=yahootix\">Forbes article<\/a>\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>As the Defense Science Board pointed out, Trojan Horse circuitry is almost impossible to detect even with the most rigorous analysis. This is particularly so if a saboteur can accomplish matching subversions in both software and relevant hardware.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And as I mentioned above, China is rapidly developing a vast array of new strategic weapons which may enable it to actually win the next war with the United States.<\/p>\n<p>For example, China has been developing\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"a new generation\" href=\"http:\/\/articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com\/2012-08-25\/news\/33385310_1_dongfeng-41-dummy-warheads-missiles\">a new generation<\/a> of inter-continental and submarine-launched nuclear missiles.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"submarine-launched missiles\" href=\"http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/the-comprehensive-guide-to-chinas-military-tech-2012-6#the-ju-lang-2-delivers-an-immense-payload-up-to-8700-miles-away-19\">submarine-launched missiles<\/a> are of particular concern\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The Ju Lang-2 intercontinental missile is the second generation of Chinese\u00a0submarine-launched ballistic missiles.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a closely held secret, and details are sketchy. If it lives up to what public military intelligence says it is, it\u2019s a huge get for China, especially with their new sub fleet.<\/p>\n<p>The missile is believed to have a range of 8,000 km, and can carry conventional or nuclear warheads.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Do you remember a few years ago when a Chinese sub fired a missile\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"from just off the west coast of the United States\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2010\/11\/230425\/\">from just off the west coast of the United States<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>We didn\u2019t know that the sub was there. If that missile had been fired at Los Angeles it would have been destroyed long before we could have ever responded.<\/p>\n<p>And don\u2019t think that a first strike by either China or Russia is inconceivable. As I have written about previously, the U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has already been reduced\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"by about 95 percent\" href=\"http:\/\/endoftheamericandream.com\/archives\/barack-obama-it-is-a-moral-obligation-to-neuter-america\">by about 95 percent<\/a>, and Obama seems absolutely determined to whittle it down even more. In fact, there has been talk that the Obama administration ultimately wants to reduce our arsenal down\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"to just 300 warheads\" href=\"http:\/\/endoftheamericandream.com\/archives\/barack-obama-it-is-a-moral-obligation-to-neuter-america\">to just 300 warheads<\/a>. If Russia or China knows exactly where those warheads are, it would be very easy to take them out in less than 10 minutes with a submarine-based first strike.<\/p>\n<p>And China has also reportedly been developing very sophisticated EMP weapons. The following is from a\u00a0<a target=\"_blank\" title=\"WND\" href=\"http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2013\/03\/u-s-ships-threatened-by-secret-china-emps\/\">WND<\/a> report\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>In 2011, it was first revealed that China was developing EMP weapons to be used against U.S. aircraft carriers in any future conflict, especially over Taiwan, according to a 2005 National Ground Intelligence Center study.<\/p>\n<p>That center study said the Chinese were developing a family, or \u201cassassin\u2019s mace\u201d of EMP and high-powered microwave, or HPM, weapons to be used by a technologically inferior force such as China\u2019s, against U.S. military forces.<\/p>\n<p>The once secret but now declassified study pointed out that the Chinese could detonate an EMP weapon some 30 to 40 kilometers over Taiwan or \u2014 by inference \u2014 a U.S. carrier strike group \u2014 and destroy the electronics capability on which U.S. network-centric strategy depends.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>But an EMP weapon does not have to be a high-altitude weapon that affects a large area. Smaller scale EMP weapons could take out a wave of fighter jets or a carrier fleet.<\/p>\n<p>In a future conflict with China, we could see U.S. planes falling out of the sky or great naval vessels sitting dead in the water after being hit with EMP blasts.<!--  --><\/p>\n<ul class=\"ppani\">\n<li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t<\/li>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><!--  --><\/p>\n<p>But isn\u2019t China our friend?<\/p>\n<p>That is what most Americans and most American politicians seem to believe. They seem to think that China is our \u201cbuddy\u201d and \u201ctrading partner\u201d and that we will never have a military conflict with China.<\/p>\n<p>But that is NOT how the Chinese see things.<\/p>\n<p>The Chinese regard the United States as their greatest strategic threat and as an enemy that needs to be vanquished.<\/p>\n<p>That is why they are constantly spying on us, hacking into our computers and stealing our technology.<\/p>\n<p>That is why they are feverishly building up their military and preparing for a future war with America.<\/p>\n<p>So what do you think?<\/p>\n<p>Do you believe that war with China is in our future?<\/p>\n<p>If so, do you think that we will win?<\/p>\n<p>Please feel free to post a comment with your thoughts below\u2026<\/p>\n<p>      &lt;!&#8211; <\/p>\n<div class=\"nextpage\">\n              <\/div>\n<p> &#8211;&gt;<\/p>\n<p>This article was posted: Wednesday, May 29, 2013  at  6:14 am<\/p>\n<p>Tags: <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.com\/tag\/foreign-affairs\/\" rel=\"tag\">foreign affairs<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.com\/tag\/government-corruption\/\" rel=\"tag\">government corruption<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.com\/tag\/war\/\" rel=\"tag\">war<\/a><\/p>\n<hr class=\"dotted_line\" \/>\n<hr class=\"dotted_line\" \/><!-- share and follow --><br \/>\n      <!-- end of share and follow --><\/p>\n<hr class=\"dotted_line\" \/>\n<hr class=\"dotted_line\" \/>&lt;!&#8211; this is where we need to show the related articles  <\/p>\n<div class=\"related_articles_container\">\n<h3 class=\"sub_titles\">Related Articles<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>&#8211;&gt; <\/p>\n<p>This article originally appeared on: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.com\/why-the-next-war-with-china-could-go-very-badly-for-the-united-states\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Why The Next War With China Could Go Very Badly For The United States\">Infowars<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael SnyderAmerican DreamMay 29, 2013 Most Americans assume that the U.S. military is so vastly superior to everyone else that no other nation would ever dream of fighting a full-scale war against us. Unfortunately, that assumption is dead wrong. In recent years, the once mammoth technological gap between the U.S. military and the Chinese military [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-37060","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37060","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37060"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37060\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37060"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37060"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37060"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}