Obviously, RT did everything it could to try and keep its nefarious campaign of interference under wraps, but the day of judgement is finally upon us.<\/p>\n
In fairness to him, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California), who is one of the leading Russiagate conspiracy theorists in Congress and the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, did his very best to make a mountain out of a molehill here<\/a>, so let\u2019s give credit where it is due.<\/p>\n Nonetheless, we have just a few little problems with his approach.<\/p>\n Schiff released a document<\/a> detailing the supposed evidence thus far that RT was part of a \u201csurreptitious\u201d<\/em> social media campaign to interfere with the American election. Yet, the document includes no evidence that this was actually the case, and instead it focuses heavily on information published more than one year ago in an infamous intelligence community report, which was widely panned \u2014 even by some of the usual Russiagate fanatics \u2014 as being very thin on detail.<\/p>\n Read more<\/p>\n Schiff\u2019s big reveal of a list of advertised tweets paid for by RT.com also falls flat \u2014 because RT itself released<\/a> a list of its top paid-for tweets last November. So, sorry Schiff, you haven\u2019t blown the lid off a big conspiracy here; we were already way ahead of you.<\/p>\n It was also around the same time that RT revealed that Twitter had asked RT<\/a> to spend millions of dollars on marketing during the US election \u2014 an offer which RT turned down.<\/p>\n To add some weight to his big announcement, Schiff and the Intelligence Committee released a whopping 110 pages of RT.com paid-for tweets, which, to be fair, was a really impressive effort.<\/p>\n But it seems that maybe Schiff and his merry gang of Russiagaters were confident that no one would bother to actually trawl through the whole list \u2014 because most of them had nothing to do with the US election.<\/p>\n Of the 1665 tweets<\/a> promoted by the @RT_com Twitter account, Donald Trump was mentioned 153 times, while Hillary Clinton got 78 mentions \u2014 that\u2019s just 13 percent of promoted tweets. Of the 127 tweets <\/a>paid for by the @RT_America Twitter account, only 38 of them mentioned Trump and 25 mentioned Clinton.<\/p>\n According to our count, there are 390 tweets out of the total 1792 listed that could be said to be related to the US election in some way \u2014 that\u2019s under 22 percent. The rest of the time, RT was also tweeting about non-US related matters, because, shocking as it may sound, news happens in other places too.<\/p>\n Read more<\/p>\n If they looked closely, Schiff and his team might also have noticed that RT published and promoted tweets about all parties and candidates running for US president in 2016 \u2014 including Green Party candidate Jill Stein and Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.<\/p>\n We understand that Schiff might not be familiar with these names or see such a wide array of news and viewpoints in the mainstream media, but it\u2019s called journalism.<\/p>\n In a last-ditch attempt at relevancy, Schiff included a list of tweets that were aimed <\/a>at voter suppression, urging voters to stay at home or to \u201cvote online\u201d<\/em> instead of going to the polls.<\/p>\n Schiff acknowledges that there is \u201cno indication\u201d<\/em> that any of these tweets had anything whatsoever to do with Russia. What\u2019s more, BuzzFeed has already identified some of those voter suppression scams with having originated on the 4chan message boards. So why are they included in the supposed revelations about RT\u2019s alleged election influence campaign? Your guess is as good as ours.<\/p>\n READ MORE:$17 million and counting: Mueller investigation cost to US taxpayers revealed<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n It looks like Schiff and his Democratic colleagues on the House Intelligence Committee are trying to look busy, but they are coming up short again.<\/p>\n Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Via RT<\/a>. This piece was reprinted by RINF Alternative News<\/a> with permission or license.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Democratic lawmakers have finally managed to expose RT\u2019s extensive efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election \u2014 by releasing a list of advertised tweets, most of which actually had nothing to do with the election. Obviously, RT did everything it could to try and keep its nefarious campaign of interference under wraps, but the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":366030,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-366029","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366029\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/366030"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}1. Democrats are re-hashing old fake news<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n ![\"\u00a9](\"https:\/\/cdni.rt.com\/files\/2017.11\/thumbnail\/59fa2237fc7e93ee678b4567.jpg\")
\n <\/a>\n<\/div>\n2. RT already made its paid-for tweets public<\/strong><\/h2>\n
3. Only a fraction of RT tweets were election-related<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n ![\"\u00a9](\"https:\/\/cdni.rt.com\/files\/2018.05\/thumbnail\/5afd9de7dda4c847238b459d.jpg\")
\n <\/a>\n<\/div>\n4. RT promoted tweets about all candidates and parties<\/strong><\/h2>\n
5. Voter suppression?<\/strong><\/h2>\n