{"id":358401,"date":"2018-04-25T23:54:41","date_gmt":"2018-04-25T22:54:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=358401"},"modified":"2018-04-26T00:20:18","modified_gmt":"2018-04-25T23:20:18","slug":"success-rate-april-14th-missiles-syria","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/success-rate-april-14th-missiles-syria\/","title":{"rendered":"What was the success-rate of the April 14th missiles against Syria?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse<\/span><\/p>\n

The U.S. and Russia provide diametrically opposite accounts of the percentages of U.S.-and-allied missiles that hit their targets in Syria on the night of April 13th-14th.<\/span><\/p>\n

On the 14th, Russia\u2019s military said that 71 of the 103 U.S.-and-allied missiles were shot down by Syria<\/span><\/a>. But on this very same day, the U.S. announced that 105 missiles had been launched and \u201cnone intercepted.\u201d<\/span><\/a> So: Was the U.S. side\u2019s success-rate 100%, as America claimed; or, instead, 31%, as Russia claimed? This difference is, obviously, huge.<\/span><\/p>\n

During the subsequent days, U.S.-and-allied media celebrated their side\u2019s alleged victory; for example, on April 22nd, USA Today<\/i> bannered “105 to 0: Why Syria’s air defenses failed to intercept a single incoming missile\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and reported that:<\/span><\/p>\n

U.S., French and British forces launched 105 missiles from aircraft and ships at three chemical weapons facilities in Syria last weekend in response to a suspected chemical weapons attack launched by the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Russia claimed that Syrian defenses knocked down many incoming missiles, but the Pentagon said every weapon hit its intended target, dismissing the Russian comments as a disinformation campaign.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

As of yet, the Russian side has not accused the U.S. side of a \u201cdisinformation campaign\u201d about this. However, it has stuck to its guns and not backed down about its own, directly opposite, assertions; for example, Russia on April 16th gave a detailed breakdown of the results of the U.S.-and-allied bombing, and reported at https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=vrLvhJnvZJQ<\/span><\/a> (at 1:32:30), \u201ca total of 103 cruise missiles were targeting the Syrian targets, and 71 [missiles] were taken out.\u201d That claim would be a 69% Syrian-and-allied (defensive) success-rate, and a 31% U.S.-and-allied (aggressive) success-rate, on this event, which was the biggest direct military confrontation between Russian and American (and French and UK) forces, ever. This was also, therefore, arguably, the actual start of World War III. <\/span><\/p>\n

The issue in the wake of the U.S. side\u2019s invasion here \u2014 the crucial issue \u2014 is the relative functionality of the two sides\u2019 conventional weaponries, and perhaps even more broadly of their militaries: the functionality of, and preparedness for, the conventional stage, preceding the strategic nuclear stage, in WW III. Presumably, after the conventional phase will have its ultimate winner and loser, the loser will suddenly unleash its nuclear forces against the other, so as to avoid defeat. The first side to attack will have the advantage to achieve a nuclear victory. The nuclear phase of the war will be over within around 30 minutes. In military matters, to \u2018win\u2019 means simply suffering less damage than does the opponent; and the first to attack will destroy some of the opponent\u2019s retaliatory strategic weapons. Only conventional weaponry is involved at the present stage, the conventional-war phase; but, if things do reach the nuclear stage between these two sides, then even the side that \u2018wins\u2019 the war will be far more totally destroyed than even the loser has been in any prior war in history.<\/span><\/p>\n

On April 25th, a Russian news-site headlined (as autotranslated) “The Russian military showed the remains of downed Coalition missiles in Syria\u201d<\/span><\/a> and reported that:<\/span><\/p>\n

The Russian Defense Ministry showed the wreckage of the American Tomahawk missiles and European TOOL, the Storm Shadow. At the disposal of the military were large fragments of the engines and control systems, parts of the fuselage. And many of them show visible marks from shrapnel. This proves the fact that the missiles were intercepted by air defense systems.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

Although the truth about this matter might not be of much interest to voters in any country, it will matter a great deal to the ruling aristocracies in any countries, such as Turkey, which are now making decisions between buying weapons made by the U.S. side, or else buying weapons made by the Russian side. And those decisions, in turn, will factor heavily into the choosing-up-of-sides in WW III, if neither the U.S nor Russia backs down so that a full-fledged hot war between U.S. and Russia results.<\/span><\/p>\n

Consequently, the question as to which of these two sides is lying, is geostrategically very important. If Russia is telling the truth, then the sway will be favorable to Russia; if America is telling the truth, America will benefit.<\/span><\/p>\n

Also: ever since the U.S. misrepresented the evidence regarding \u201cSaddam\u2019s WMD\u201d in the lead-up to America\u2019s 2003 invasion-and-occupation of Iraq, the question as to whether or not the assertions by the U.S. Government are lies is at least as severe as is the question as to whether the Russian Government lies. Presumably, both sides do (though one side might be lying far more than does the other); but, the question here concerns, in particular, military matters, and even the fate of the world. Lying in order to \u2018justify\u2019 an invasion is as serious a matter as exists, anywhere, anytime; and, if the Organization for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons will determine that the U.S.-and-allied invasion of Syria on April 14th was likewise based upon lies, then the consequences of what happened in that invasion will be even larger than merely the military competencies of the two respective sides.<\/span><\/p>\n

On April 25th, Russia\u2019s Sputnik News bannered “OPCW Finds No Chemical Weapons at Syrian Facilities Bombed by US – Russian MoD\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and so it\u2019s not only the U.S. side\u2019s military competency that is yet to be determined, but \u2014 again, as had happened in 2003 Iraq \u2014 whether or not the U.S. now routinely lies in order to \u2018justify’ its invasions. That might turn out to be an issue of interest not only to the ruling aristocracies, but to their respective subjects.<\/span><\/p>\n

Perhaps neither of the two sides will back down as between there having been an American missiles-success-rate of 100%, or of 31%, but the OPCW represents a higher authority than does any nation; it represents, in fact, 192 nations. If the finding by the OPCW turns out to confirm the U.S. Government\u2019s accusation (that Syria\u2019s government had used chemicals on April 7th against its own people) which was used to justify the April 14th invasion, then the invasion will retroactively thereby receive at least some degree of moral, if not legal, confirmation. But if the finding turns out to disconfirm that accusation, then the April 14th invasion will be seen instead as a smaller version of George W. Bush\u2019s and Tony Blair\u2019s clearly illegal and unjustified 20 March 2003 invasion of Iraq. Repeating that type of invasion, now, even though far smaller than happpened in 2003, would indicate to the entire world that the United States is an enduring and systematic threat to world peace. The stakes are high for both sides, regardless of what the finding by the OPCW turns out to be.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a>,<\/i> and of<\/span> \u00a0<\/i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Zuesse The U.S. and Russia provide diametrically opposite accounts of the percentages of U.S.-and-allied missiles that hit their targets in Syria on the night of April 13th-14th. On the 14th, Russia\u2019s military said that 71 of the 103 U.S.-and-allied missiles were shot down by Syria. But on this very same day, the U.S. announced […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":358361,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,519],"tags":[30,1036,96,535,524,754,55,755,76,1024],"class_list":{"0":"post-358401","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-newswire","9":"tag-big-brother","10":"tag-breaking-news","11":"tag-cover-up","12":"tag-global-news","13":"tag-russia","14":"tag-syria","15":"tag-uk-news","16":"tag-usa","17":"tag-warfare","18":"tag-ww3"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358401","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358401"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358401\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/358361"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358401"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358401"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358401"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}