{"id":340858,"date":"2017-12-24T00:41:39","date_gmt":"2017-12-23T23:41:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=340858"},"modified":"2017-12-24T00:41:39","modified_gmt":"2017-12-23T23:41:39","slug":"americans-now-beginning-learn-live-dictatorship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/americans-now-beginning-learn-live-dictatorship\/","title":{"rendered":"Americans Are Only Now Beginning to Learn that We Live in a Dictatorship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Eric Zuesse, originally posted at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.strategic-culture.org\/news\/2017\/12\/22\/americans-only-now-beginning-learn-that-we-live-dictatorship.html\"><span class=\"s2\">strategic-culture.org<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The first time when it became clear to me that I live in a dictatorship was in 2014 when reading, prior to its publication, the landmark (and still the <i>only<\/i>) scientific empirical study to address the question as to whether or not the United States federal Government is, authentically, a democracy \u2014 or, whether, alternatively, it&#8217;s instead more of a dictatorship, than a democracy. This study documented conclusively that America&#8217;s Government is the latter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\">So, on 14 April 2014, I headlined <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views\/2014\/04\/14\/us-oligarchy-not-democracy-says-scientific-study\"><span class=\"s4\">\u201cU.S. Is an Oligarchy, Not a Democracy, Says Scientific Study\u201d<\/span><\/a>. Subsequently, my editor <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B\/S1537592714001595a.pdf\"><span class=\"s4\">linked it to the published article at the Journal where the study was published, <i>Perspectives on Politics<\/i>, from the American Political Science Association<\/span><\/a>, and the full study can be read there.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">On 30 April 2014, was posted at youtube the video that remains, to this day, the best and clearest ordinary-language summary of what that badly-written academic study proved. See its explanation here:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">That summary\u2019s title is also better than the title of my article was; this excellent video headlines <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig\"><span class=\"s4\">\u201cCorruption is Legal in America\u201d<\/span><\/a>, which is another accurate conclusion from that study. Every American citizen should know what this 6-minute video says and shows from the academic study, because it explains how the super-rich, as a class, steal from everyone else (everyone who isn\u2019t super-rich): They do it through corruption. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Then, that same person who created the video did another presentation of it, but this time with text accompanying the video, and this article was titled <a href=\"https:\/\/represent.us\/action\/theproblem-3\/\"><span class=\"s4\">&#8220;One graph shows how the rich control American politics\u201d<\/span><\/a>, and it indeed showed how. The super-rich carry out their control via corruption, which is legal in America and which can be done vastly more by rich people than by poor people \u2014 poor people simply can\u2019t buy the Government, and any who would even attempt to do so would be using only the illegal means, which the U.S. Supreme Court says constitutes the <i>only<\/i> illegal means, and that&#8217;s blatant bribery, which is lower-class corruption, not the far more lucrative type of corruption that super-wealthy individuals have access to. Only the forms of corruption which are available only to the super-rich are <i>legal<\/i> in America. That\u2019s the reason why the super-rich keep getting still-richer, while the rest of the population are lucky if they don\u2019t become poorer. The super-rich control the legal system (and the rest of the U.S. Government). They control appointments to the Supreme Court and even to lower courts. They control Congress. And they control the Presidency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">On 28 July 2015, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter was frank about this situation; as a caller at a progressive radio show, he said this about America\u2019s soaring top-level corruption:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>It violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system. Now it&#8217;s just an oligarchy with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or being elected president. And the same thing applies to governors, and U.S. Senators and congress members. So, now we&#8217;ve just seen a subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors, who want and expect, and sometimes get, favors for themselves after the election is over. &#8230; At the present time the incumbents, Democrats and Republicans, look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves. Somebody that is already in Congress has a great deal more to sell.&#8221;<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Three days later, Huffington Post published my article about that statement, which was headlined \u201cJimmy Carter Is Correct That the U.S. Is No Longer a Democracy,\u201d and it had over 60,000 likes on Facebook (<a href=\"http:\/\/archive.is\/aQIzs\"><span class=\"s4\">here<\/span><\/a> the article is shown a bit earlier, when it had 56,000) but HuffPo reduced that number down to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/eric-zuesse\/jimmy-carter-is-correct-t_b_7922788.html\"><span class=\"s4\">its currently shown number, 18,000<\/span><\/a>; and this article turned out to have been the last submission of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/author\/eric-zuesse\"><span class=\"s2\">the 100+ that they accepted from me<\/span><\/a>. They&#8217;ve rejected all of my submissions after it. No explanation was ever given, and I never heard anything from them again.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The scientific article about America\u2019s Government had reviewed 1,779 pieces of proposed legislation during the period from 1981 to 2002, and it found that only what the super-rich wanted to become law <i>did<\/i> become law: \u201cThe preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy,\u201d they said. That\u2019s certainly <i>not<\/i> a democracy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">There has been speculation as to how far back historically America\u2019s government-by-the-aristocracy (or, simply, America\u2019s <i>being<\/i> an aristocracy \u2014 a rule over the public <i>by<\/i> the few super-rich, an \u201coligarchy\u201d) has been in effect. Prior to Ronald Reagan\u2019s Presidency, going back to the time when FDR died in office in 1945 as the President, the distribution of income and of wealth was much more equal in America than it started to become as soon as Reagan entered the White House and began the subsequent dominance of supply-side economics, which is based upon the supply-push belief that wealth trickles down from the few rich, instead of (as FDR believed) in a demand-pull way, that it percolates up from the many poor. FDR believed that what drives an economy is needs, not the products and services to fill needs. Reagan believed in the opposite, Say\u2019s law, which says that whatever is produced will fill needs (or at least desires) \u2014 that production is what drives an economy, and that needs (and desires) just take care of themselves. So, FDR focused on \u201cthe common man\u201d and especially the poor, but Reagan focused on \u201centrepreneurs\u201d or the owners of businesses. (The middle class isn\u2019t an issue here, but is simply the richer portion of the poor. Historically that has been the case. For example, America\u2019s middle class has declined while the poor have mushroomed, but only the top 5% are getting all of the gains; and most of that is going to the top 1% or even less. So: \u201cpoor\u201d here <i>includes<\/i> the middle-class; and so, to refer to \u201cmiddle-class America\u201d is now like referring to a dying breed \u2014 a breed of poor, not of rich.)<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">However, the extreme corruption at the top in this country is showing up more sharply than ever in recently declassified U.S. Government documents about the JFK assassination \u2014 showing up as having begun much earlier than had generally been suspected, begun at least by the time when President Kennedy came into office on 20 January 1961. Kennedy found himself surrounded by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ourdocuments.gov\/doc.php?flash=false&amp;doc=90\"><span class=\"s2\">military-industrial complex<\/span><\/a> that his predecessor, Eisenhower, had cultivated while he was in the White House and that \u201cIke\u201d hypocritically warned the American public against, on his way out of office, only on 17 January 1961 \u2014 three days before Kennedy\u2019s inauguration. Some of these corrupt people were ones whom Kennedy himself had brought in. Not all of them were Ike\u2019s holdovers. But Kennedy was apparently shocked, nonetheless.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The beginnings of this profound corruption might be traced still farther back to moles in the Government (such as the Dulles brothers, Averell Harriman and Prescott Bush) who had built their careers after World War I by means of plying and mastering the revolving door between the Government\u2019s foreign-policy Establishment and Wall Street. Starting at the very end of WW II, in 1945, agents of these moles ended FDR\u2019s Office of Strategic Services and started Truman\u2019s CIA. Right from the get-go, the CIA was deeply corrupt, as the following 2.5-hour BBC documentary from 1992 makes clear:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p5\"><span class=\"s5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=GGHXjO8wHsA\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=GGHXjO8wHsA<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Operation Gladio &#8211; Full 1992 documentary BBC<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">It documents from testimony of former CIA operatives in Europe, that the CIA had been hiring European aristocrats and committed fascists and even \u2018former\u2019 Nazis, to set up terrorist incidents in Europe rigged so as to be blamed by the public against communists and against any entities that were favorable in any way toward the Soviet Union. Numberless Europeans were injured and killed in terrorist incidents that were set up by the CIA to be, basically, anti-communist propaganda. This CIA operation was called \u201cGladio,\u201d and it continues to this day, even though communism itself is gone.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Subsequently, a video was done that\u2019s far briefer, 50 minutes, and which starts with interviews of some of the survivors of these CIA-NATO operations, so that it\u2019s far more from the victims\u2019 perspective than was the BBC\u2019s lengthier documentary, which focused on the aristocrats and other perpetrators. Here is that 2009 documentary:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s5\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=k83L3I6Z35w\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=k83L3I6Z35w<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>NATO\u2019s Secret Armies (2009)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">When Kennedy became President, he found himself surrounded by advisors who were urging him such as, on 22 March 1962, John Kennedy\u2019s own brother and U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy urged, when RFK held a meeting to discuss <a href=\"https:\/\/www.archives.gov\/files\/research\/jfk\/releases\/docid-32977055.pdf\"><span class=\"s4\">\u201cthe possibility of U.S. manufacture or acquisition of Soviet aircraft\u201d<\/span><\/a>, because:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cThere is a possibility that such aircraft could be used in a deception operation designed to confuse enemy planes in the air, to launch a surprise attack against enemy installations or in a provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack U.S. or friendly installations in order to provide an excuse for U.S. intervention. If the planes were to be used in such covert operations, it would seem preferable to manufacture them in the United States.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s3\">And, also like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.archives.gov\/files\/research\/jfk\/releases\/docid-32112987.pdf\"><span class=\"s4\">this (on 12 April 1962, from a Major General and CIA officer \u2014 see it on page 16)<\/span><\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u201cWe could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of a Cuban agent and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Even JFK\u2019s own brother RFK, and Secretary of \u2018Defense\u2019 Robert McNamara, and Secretary of State Dean Rusk \u2014 plus lots of holdovers from the Eisenhower Administration \u2014 thought that this sort of thing would be worth the President of the United States considering. Fortunately, JFK didn\u2019t. If he had been like them, World War III would surely have occurred.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Michael Ellison had gotten to see a bit of the 12 April 1962 document decades earlier, and he reported it on 2 May 2001 in Britain\u2019s <i>Guardian<\/i> under the headline <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2001\/may\/03\/michaelellison\"><span class=\"s4\">\u201cMemos disclose US cold-war plot to frame Castro\u201d<\/span><\/a>. Ellison wrote that \u201cThe idea was an element in a wider scheme that \u2018may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the US government\u2019, asserts James Bamford.\u201d Since Bamford is perhaps the world\u2019s leading journalist and historian who has written about the NSA (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Books-James-Bamford\/s?ie=UTF8&amp;page=1&amp;rh=n:283155,p_27:James%20Bamford\"><span class=\"s2\">books<\/span><\/a> such as his 1983 <i>The Puzzle Palace<\/i>), for even <i>him<\/i> to have expressed surprise in 2001 that the U.S. Government, at its top level, was predominantly staffed by people who were racking their brains to figure out ways to fake Soviet terrorism and attacks so as for the U.S. and NATO to have a pretext to invade the Soviet Union, indicates how much more cynical we all have become after <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonsblog.com\/2015\/09\/americas-news-is-heavily-censored.html\"><span class=\"s2\">George W. Bush\u2019s lies about \u2018Saddam\u2019s WMD\u2019<\/span><\/a> as pretexts for the U.S. and its collaborators to invade and destroy Iraq in 2003. Not only was John Kennedy surprised to discover it in 1962, but James Bamford was surprised to discover it even as late as 2001. Bamford in 2001 might not have said what he said there if he had seen that 1992 BBC documentary, which showed that the top level of the CIA had been like this from the time when the CIA started in 1947. But with so much history behind us now and which had still been classified information, and thus non-public, until 2001 when Bamford said that the 12 April 1962 document described \u201cmay be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. Government,\u201d <i>we today<\/i> are hardly surprised at all to discover it. The corruption at the top of the U.S. Government has long since overflowed its banks, out into the public\u2019s consciousness. And probably not all the king\u2019s horses and all the king\u2019s men can put the myth of U.S. Government decency together again. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s7\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s8\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of<\/span><span class=\"s9\"> <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s8\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s7\">.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org The first time when it became clear to me that I live in a dictatorship was in 2014 when reading, prior to its publication, the landmark (and still the only) scientific empirical study to address the question as to whether or not the United States federal Government is, authentically, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":276213,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[115,30,32,96,3604,698,59,755,76,40,1024],"class_list":{"0":"post-340858","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-newswire","8":"tag-barack-obama","9":"tag-big-brother","10":"tag-cia","11":"tag-cover-up","12":"tag-donald-trump","13":"tag-hillary-clinton","14":"tag-military","15":"tag-usa","16":"tag-warfare","17":"tag-white-house","18":"tag-ww3"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340858\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/276213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}