{"id":310866,"date":"2017-06-02T02:10:45","date_gmt":"2017-06-02T01:10:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=310866"},"modified":"2017-06-02T03:03:23","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T02:03:23","slug":"boycott-u-s-firms-till-trump-signs-195-nation-paris-climate-agreement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/boycott-u-s-firms-till-trump-signs-195-nation-paris-climate-agreement\/","title":{"rendered":"Boycott U.S. Firms Till Trump Signs to 195-Nation Paris Climate Agreement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\">Eric Zuesse<\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">U.S. President Donald Trump announced, on Thursday, June 1st, that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2017\/06\/01\/politics\/trump-paris-climate-decision\/\"><span class=\"s2\">\u201cWe\u2019re getting out\u201d<\/span><\/a> of the global agreement on limiting the amount of greenhouse gases pouring into the Earth\u2019s atmosphere. Trump\u2019s predecessor, Barack Obama, had described the agreement (which he had signed), by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.popsci.com\/features\/interview-with-president-barack-obama\/\"><span class=\"s2\">saying of it<\/span><\/a>: \u201cI believe the Paris agreement can be a turning point for our planet. It\u2019s the biggest single step the world has ever taken toward combating global climate change.\u201d Trump doesn\u2019t place a high priority on the issue, and he says that to adhere to the agreement would hurt America\u2019s economy, which he obviously cares about much more than he does about the planet\u2019s climate. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">According to the vast majority of climate-scientists, there will be no way to avoid this planet\u2019s climate-burnout unless the promises of the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Paris_Agreement\"><span class=\"s3\">Paris Climate Agreement<\/span><\/a> are kept. It therefore needs the support of the world\u2019s second-biggest national emitter of greenhouse gases; it needs U.S. President Trump&#8217;s support. The world\u2019s biggest emitter, China, is unwavering in its commitment to the agreement. So too is virtually the entire planet \u2014 except the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In 1992, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was approved by the U.S. Senate, and as a consequence of that, no new legislation is required in order for the U.S. to participate in this Agreement, which has since become a part of that Framework Agreement. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The only other gigantic national contributor to global warming gases (20.09% of the total), China, signed the Agreement on 22 April 2016, and is not threatening at all to back out. The United States, the second-biggest emitter, accounts for 17.89% of the total, and likewise signed on that date. But President Trump is withdrawing the U.S. That, however, could lead ultimately to the collapse of the participation of the other 194 countries, maybe even of China\u2019s participation \u2014 unravel and destroy the entire global effort to save this planet (from its humans, who thus are obligated to do what we can to reverse our destruction of the planet). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Any intelligent person knows that abandoning this agreement wouldn\u2019t merely be an insult to those other 194 nations; it would also be an insult to our planet. Our grandchildren should hate us if we do that. Unless this nation quickly reverses the course that Trump has chosen, they will hate us for it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">Therefore, I propose a global boycott against the U.S. aristocracy, the U.S. billionaires who control U.S.-based international corporations (<a href=\"http:\/\/archive.is\/aQIzs\"><span class=\"s3\">the people who control the U.S. government<\/span><\/a>). The way to do this would be for an international conference to be held, under U.N. auspices, in order to determine which U.S.-based international corporations are to be boycotted in the first phase, which will be be added in the second phase if need be, etc.; until the U.S. government complies with its global obligation and rejoins the Paris Agreement and is monitored strictly for its compliance with that commitment. If the U.S. then vetoes such a resolution at the U.N. Security Council \u2014 since this matter has already been officially <i>recognized<\/i> by the U.S. government as being crucial to international security \u2014 then yet an additional phase of the boycott should kick in, until the U.S. aristocracy buckles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The alternative to such a boycott will be planetary burnout. Which of the two alternatives is preferable? Is the answer to this question not clear?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">In any event, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/the-press-office\/2017\/06\/01\/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord\"><span class=\"s2\">alleged<\/span><\/a> reason why Trump decided to end U.S. cooperation with the rest of the world on this, was:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>\u201cCompliance with the terms of the Paris Accord and the onerous energy restrictions it has placed on the United States could cost America as much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025 according to the National Economic Research Associates. \u00a0This includes 440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">The appropriate way for the planet to respond to that concern would be to continue the boycott of the products of U.S. headquartered international firms until at least that number, 440,000, of U.S. manufacturing jobs, would be hit by it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">However, that \u2018440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs\u2019 was the estimate of NERA, which gets its money from the coal, and liquified natural gas, and nuclear, and other established energy-creation industries \u2014 all of the dying ones, none of the ones that are becoming increasingly cost-effective, which are the types that would be soaring if the Paris agreement doesn\u2019t break apart. NERA is no scientific information-source; it\u2019s a propaganda-source. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.desmogblog.com\/2012\/11\/19\/revealed-reuters-ids-nera-economic-consulting-third-party-contractor-doe-lng-export-study\"><span class=\"s2\">Desmog blog reported<\/span><\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>\u201cNERA\u201d is shorthand for <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=National_Economic_Research_Associates\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>National Economic Research Associates<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>, an economic consulting firm SourceWatch identifies as the entity that published a <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americaspower.org\/new-analysis-finds-epas-power-plant-regulations-would-increase-electricity-costs-lose-jobs-0\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>June 2011 report<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> on behalf of coal industry front group <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=American_Coalition_for_Clean_Coal_Electricity\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> (ACCCE). ACCCE&#8217;s report <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.americaspower.org\/new-analysis-finds-epas-power-plant-regulations-would-increase-electricity-costs-lose-jobs-0\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>concluded<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>, \u201cclean-air rules proposed by the Obama administration would cost utilities $17.8 billion annually and raise electricity rates 11.5 percent on average in 2016.\u201d<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>That report went so far to say that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations of the coal-generated electricity sector would amount to some 1.5 million lost jobs over the next four years.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>NERA was founded by <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.hudson.org\/learn\/index.cfm?fuseaction=staff_bio&amp;eid=StelIrwi\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>Irwin Stelzer<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>, senior fellow and director of the right-wing <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=Hudson_Institute\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>Hudson Institute<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>\u2019s Center for Economic Policy. In Oct. 2004, The Guardian <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/politics\/2004\/oct\/17\/media.mediabusiness\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>described Stelzer<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> as the \u201cright-hand man of Rupert Murdoch,\u201d the <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=K._Rupert_Murdoch\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>CEO of News Corp.<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>, which owns Fox News. <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>According to NERA&#8217;s website, the late Alfred E. Kahn, the \u201c<\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.news.cornell.edu\/stories\/Dec10\/KahnObit.html\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>father of deregulation<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,\u201d <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nera.com\/7250.htm\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>advised NERA&#8217;s 1961 foundation<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>. <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>In 2010, NERA <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dec.ny.gov\/docs\/permits_ej_operations_pdf\/ipnerareport.pdf\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>published a letter<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> to the New York Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to protest the prospective closure of the <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sourcewatch.org\/index.php?title=Indian_Point_%28Nuclear_Power_Station%29\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>Indian Point Nuclear Power Plants<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>.<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\"><i>A NERA <\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nera.com\/nera-files\/PUB_MATS_Rule_0312.pdf\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>report from earlier this year<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> provided the basis for the popular King Coal refrain that the EPA&#8217;s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) Rule would cost the U.S. tens of billions of dollars and \u201ckill\u201d 180,000-215,000 jobs.<\/p>\n<p><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.epw.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.PressReleases&amp;ContentRecord_id=b9cacaf1-802a-23ad-4459-39890f9d90ff\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>These figures were picked up and cited<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> by <\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.desmogblog.com\/james-inhofe-shilling-god-or-oil-correct-answer-both\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>climate change denier U.S. Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK)<\/i><\/span><\/a><i> in June when he spoke out against President Barack Obama&#8217;s mythological \u201cwar on coal,\u201d as well as by the Republican Policy Committee in a May policy paper titled, \u201c<\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rpc.senate.gov\/policy-papers\/obamas-war-on-coal\"><span class=\"s3\"><i>Obama\u2019s War on Coal<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>.\u201d <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">So, that provides a good indication, as to which types of U.S. international companies would especially need to be included in the first phase of the international boycott. Basically, it\u2019s the type that pay Republican politicians more than Democratic politicians.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">What other approach than an international boycott, can be effective in order to force such an extremely corrupt nation to do what it must do, for the entire world \u2014 to join the rest of the world, in salvaging the entire planet?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p1\"><span class=\"s1\">\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014\u2014<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p3\"><span class=\"s4\">Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Theyre-Not-Even-Close-Democratic\/dp\/1880026090\/ref=sr_1_9?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1339027537&amp;sr=8-9\"><span class=\"s5\"><i>They\u2019re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010<\/i><\/span><\/a><i>,<\/i> and of<\/span><span class=\"s6\"> <i>\u00a0<\/i><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/dp\/B007Q1H4EG\"><span class=\"s5\"><i>CHRIST\u2019S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity<\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span><span class=\"s4\">.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Zuesse U.S. President Donald Trump announced, on Thursday, June 1st, that \u201cWe\u2019re getting out\u201d of the global agreement on limiting the amount of greenhouse gases pouring into the Earth\u2019s atmosphere. Trump\u2019s predecessor, Barack Obama, had described the agreement (which he had signed), by saying of it: \u201cI believe the Paris agreement can be a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1254,"featured_media":310868,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461],"tags":[30,1036,74,3604,927,535,654,804,6257],"class_list":{"0":"post-310866","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"tag-big-brother","9":"tag-breaking-news","10":"tag-climate-change","11":"tag-donald-trump","12":"tag-environment","13":"tag-global-news","14":"tag-global-warming","15":"tag-politics-2","16":"tag-trump"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310866","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1254"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310866\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/310868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}