{"id":308684,"date":"2017-05-18T04:03:37","date_gmt":"2017-05-18T03:03:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/the-hidden-bombshell-in-the-comey-trump-story\/"},"modified":"2017-05-18T04:03:37","modified_gmt":"2017-05-18T03:03:37","slug":"the-hidden-bombshell-in-the-comey-trump-story","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/the-hidden-bombshell-in-the-comey-trump-story\/","title":{"rendered":"The Hidden Bombshell in the Comey-Trump Story"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"pf-content\">\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">How can you tell an authoritarian when you see one? We know the 20th century hallmarks \u2014 brown shirts, street rallies, and the like. But there\u2019s an autocratic attitude, some historians suggest, that can easily be traced across the centuries.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">To put it simply, New York University professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.democracynow.org\/2017\/5\/11\/historian_of_fascism_why_trump_firing\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">told <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Democracy Now<\/span><\/i><\/a> <span style=\"font-weight: 400\">recently,<\/span> <span style=\"font-weight: 400\">&#8220;authoritarians believe that institutions should serve them, and not the other way around.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just ask Jim Comey \u2014 who, as recently as October, might\u2019ve been Donald Trump\u2019s favorite person. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Less than two weeks before the November vote, the now-former FBI director announced that he was reopening an investigation into one of Trump\u2019s favorite subjects: Hillary Clinton\u2019s emails. For that, Trump praised Comey\u2019s &#8220;guts,&#8221; while Clinton now blames Comey\u2019s announcement for costing her the election.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump seemed happy to accept that help. But in a twist, Comey also found the guts to investigate whether Trump accepted help from the Russians, too. For that, he was fired this month. &#8220;This Russia thing&#8221; was &#8220;a made-up story,&#8221; Trump complained by way of explanation.<\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_33474\" style=\"width: 598px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-33474\" src=\"http:\/\/otherwords.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Cement-Shoes-600x440.jpg\" alt=\"comey-trump-fbi\" width=\"588\" height=\"431\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Khalil Bendib\/ OtherWords.org<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">All that\u2019s explosive enough. Even more so was <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/05\/16\/us\/politics\/james-comey-trump-flynn-russia-investigation.html?_r=0\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a subsequent revelation<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">: That Trump had called on Comey to &#8220;let go&#8221; of an investigation into Michael Flynn, Trump\u2019s national security adviser who\u2019d been ousted for lying about his own contacts with the Russians. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">That little bombshell is now headline news all over. But buried in the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">New York Times <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">story about that memo was another, less noticed bomblet: &#8220;Alone in the Oval Office,&#8221; the paper reported, Trump said &#8220;Comey should consider putting reporters in prison for publishing classified information.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">That\u2019s right: In addition to asking Comey to stop investigating his friend Flynn, the president called on the FBI director to arrest journalists who published things Trump found unflattering. Perhaps including stories like this one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Was this an impulsive request? Not likely. In fact, the administration appears to have been laying the groundwork for this for some time. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Take WikiLeaks. Trump once said he &#8220;loved&#8221; the group for publishing leaked Clinton campaign emails. But then it earned the White House\u2019s enmity by also publishing details about <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/03\/07\/world\/europe\/wikileaks-cia-hacking.html\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">CIA hacking<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump\u2019s CIA director has since described WikiLeaks as &#8220;<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2017\/04\/14\/trumps-cia-director-pompeo-targeting-wikileaks-explicitly-threatens-speech-and-press-freedoms\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">a hostile foreign intelligence service<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">&#8221; and warned that &#8220;America\u2019s First Amendment freedoms&#8221; will not &#8220;shield them from justice.&#8221; Attorney General Jeff Sessions is now trying to bring a case against the group\u2019s founder, Julian Assange.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">While leaking classified information may be a crime, publishing it most certainly isn\u2019t \u2014 that\u2019s been protected by the Supreme Court <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/New_York_Times_Co._v._United_States\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">since the early 1970s<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. In this respect, any charges brought against WikiLeaks could equally be brought against virtually every newspaper and TV station in the country. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which, by all appearances, is the idea. When CNN asked if the WikiLeaks case could lead to charges against other outlets, Sessions <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2017\/04\/21\/media\/jeff-sessions-wikileaks\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">didn\u2019t bother to deny it<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Of course, this is all under the auspices of a candidate who called journalists &#8220;lying, disgusting people&#8221; and even <\/span><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2015\/12\/21\/politics\/trump-putin-killing-reporters\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">wondered aloud<\/span> <\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">about whether he\u2019d kill them as president. (He ultimately said no, but seemed reluctant.) And it\u2019s the same White House that wants to sue journalists whose reporting it disputes. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But consider that Michael S. Schmidt, the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Times <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">reporter who broke the Comey memo story, happens to be <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SteveKopack\/status\/864609522534494208\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">the very same person<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> who reported on Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of a private email server. Has anyone benefited more from that reporting than Trump?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It all depends on the headlines that come next, apparently. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">They\u2019ve surely been spotty about it, but in a democracy public institutions \u2014 from law enforcement to the free press \u2014 are supposed to serve the public, not the president. If Trump can\u2019t accept that, maybe he\u2019s the one who should be fired.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>This piece was reprinted from <a href=\"http:\/\/otherwords.org\/the-hidden-bombshell-in-the-comey-trump-story\/\">Other Words<\/a> by <a href=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\">RINF Alternative News<\/a> with permission.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How can you tell an authoritarian when you see one? We know the 20th century hallmarks \u2014 brown shirts, street rallies, and the like. But there\u2019s an autocratic attitude, some historians suggest, that can easily be traced across the centuries. To put it simply, New York University professor Ruth Ben-Ghiat told Democracy Now recently, &#8220;authoritarians [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2523,"featured_media":308646,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-308684","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308684","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2523"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308684"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308684\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/308646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308684"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308684"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308684"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}