{"id":288958,"date":"2017-01-07T00:26:54","date_gmt":"2017-01-06T23:26:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/signs-look-grim-for-media-picking-the-side-of-liberty-and-dissent\/"},"modified":"2017-01-07T00:26:54","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T23:26:54","slug":"signs-look-grim-for-media-picking-the-side-of-liberty-and-dissent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/signs-look-grim-for-media-picking-the-side-of-liberty-and-dissent\/","title":{"rendered":"Signs Look Grim for Media Picking the Side of Liberty and Dissent"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is a kind of &#8220;which side are you on?&#8221; moment for journalists. Will they defend the rights and liberties of the many communities under threat\u2014Muslims, women, those reliant on government assistance? Will they keep alive a space for dissent and critical questioning in the face of a White House that declares itself indifferent to rules about conflicts of interest, among many other things, and that threatens revenge on those it calls &#8220;enemies&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s just say: Signs bode poorly.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_5584767\" style=\"width: 360px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/MTPBaker.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-5584767\" src=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/MTPBaker.png\" alt=\"The Wall Street Journal's Gerard Baker on Meet the Press\" width=\"350\" height=\"197\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>The <strong>Wall Street Journal<\/strong>&#8216;s Gerard Baker on <strong>Meet the Press <\/strong>(1\/1\/17): &#8220;I think if you start ascribing a moral intent&#8230;you look like you\u2019re not being objective.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>One sign: The editor-in-chief of the <strong>Wall Street Journal<\/strong>, Gerard Baker, told <strong>Meet the Press<\/strong> (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/meet-the-press\/meet-press-1-1-17-n702006\">1\/1\/17<\/a>) that it wouldn&#8217;t be &#8220;objective&#8221; to use the word &#8220;lie&#8221; to refer to patently false statements from Donald Trump. That would imply &#8220;a deliberate intent to mislead,&#8221; Baker explained, and that&#8217;s lacking, in his view, in things like Trump&#8217;s claim that &#8220;thousands and thousands&#8221; of Muslim Americans &#8220;celebrated&#8221; the attacks of September 11, 2001. It&#8217;s &#8220;up to the reader,&#8221; he contended, to weigh that statement against the fact that nobody has ever found any evidence of it whatsoever.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>Journal<\/strong> has run articles containing criticism of Trump; that&#8217;s presumably why he called it &#8220;a piece of garbage&#8221; at a campaign rally. Baker called that &#8220;strange tough love,&#8221; suggesting he has a creative relationship to language generally.<\/p>\n<p>Note that this isn&#8217;t a new thing. In 2005, FAIR <a href=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/extra\/quotyou-cant-just-say-the-president-is-lyingquot\/\">reported<\/a> a talk in which the <strong>New York Times<\/strong>&#8216; Elizabeth Bumiller and Susan Page of <strong>USA Today<\/strong> detailed how they construct absurd word salads to avoid breaking what they present as a firm rule: In Bumiller&#8217;s words, &#8220;You can&#8217;t say the president is lying.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bumiller elaborated: &#8220;You can say Mr. Bush&#8217;s statement was not factually accurate. You can&#8217;t say the president is lying\u2014that&#8217;s a judgement call.&#8221; Over the increasingly outraged murmurs of the audience of journalism students, Page underscored the idea, adding, &#8220;I think it&#8217;s much more powerful to say, &#8216;However, the president&#8217;s statement did not reflect the record.&#8217;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Keep in mind, both outlets are comfortable saying other people are lying\u2014it&#8217;s only when it comes to some of the most powerful people on the planet that the rules change.<\/p>\n<p>Another sign: The <strong>Washington Post<\/strong>&#8216;s Paul Farhi (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/lifestyle\/style\/mainstream-media-puts-out-the-call-for-pro-trump-columnists\/2016\/12\/09\/2153fdd2-bca7-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html\">12\/9\/16<\/a>) reports that the nation&#8217;s newspapers are stumped by even conservative columnists&#8217; unwillingness to endorse Donald Trump or his ideas, and rather than explore and explain that, they think the answer is to dig up folks who will. &#8220;We struggled to find voices&#8221; that would advocate for Trump, the <strong>New York Times<\/strong>&#8216; editorial page editor says; &#8220;I&#8217;m still waiting&#8221; for pro-Trump op-eds to come in, says his counterpart at the <strong>Des Moines Register<\/strong>. Our editor &#8220;ought to be aggressively seeking smart, articulate people who have positive things to say,&#8221; says the <strong>LA Times<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>USA Today<\/strong> solved the problem, we&#8217;re told, by getting Trump and Pence themselves to write for them. Maybe the <strong>New York Times<\/strong> will adopt that strategy, given its editor&#8217;s statement that his paper &#8220;could have done better.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_5584768\" style=\"width: 361px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/MegynKelly.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-5584768\" src=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/MegynKelly.png\" alt=\"Megyn Kelly\" width=\"351\" height=\"198\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>Megyn Kelly, <strong>Fox News<\/strong> debate moderator, now on her way to <strong>NBC<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>And of a piece with that: <strong>NBC<\/strong> has decided that a good place to seek talent for its news division is <strong>Fox News<\/strong>. Megyn Kelly will soon host a daytime news show, anchor an &#8220;in-depth&#8221; Sunday night news show, and take part in <strong>NBC<\/strong>&#8216;s special political programming and event coverage. \u00a0Kelly was subjected to the creepy predations of <strong>Fox<\/strong> head Roger Ailes, and of course was the target of Donald Trump for daring to broach his overt sexism in a debate question.<\/p>\n<p>But one wonders what was so attractive about her journalistic record (which Jamelle Bouie detailed in <strong>Slate<\/strong>\u2014<a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/news_and_politics\/politics\/2017\/01\/megyn_kelly_is_a_racial_demagogue.html\">1\/4\/17<\/a>). Was it the doggedness reflected in the <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/research\/2010\/07\/16\/report-fox-news-has-hyped-phony-new-black-panth\/167811\">45 segments<\/a> she dedicated to conspiracy-mongering that the New Black Panther Party was carrying out a campaign of voter intimidation and anti-white racism on behalf of the Obama Justice Department? Her repeated dismissal of racism as a factor in police violence, a topic she often discussed with favored guest the LAPD&#8217;s Mark Fuhrman, or her <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/video\/2015\/09\/04\/foxs-megyn-kelly-bemoans-the-anti-cop-thug-ment\/205400\">reference<\/a> to the &#8220;anti-cop, thug mentality&#8221; she detected in black communities? Or maybe it was the journalistic mettle evidenced by her <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/fox-news-presenter-tells-viewers-it-is-a-fact-that-both-jesus-and-santa-claus-are-white-9001041.html\">insistence<\/a> that Santa Claus is white. She was firm on that one, adding: &#8220;Jesus was a white man too. He&#8217;s a historical figure and that&#8217;s a verifiable fact, as is Santa.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Yes, Santa is white and Trump can be a newspaper&#8217;s source on Trump and there&#8217;s no such thing as a president lying. \u00a0Buckle up.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><em>Janine Jackson is the program director of FAIR and the producer and host of <strong>CounterSpin<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This piece was reprinted by <a href=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\">RINF Alternative News<\/a> with permission from <a href=\"http:\/\/fair.org\/home\/signs-look-grim-for-media-picking-the-side-of-liberty-and-dissent\/\">FAIR<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is a kind of &#8220;which side are you on?&#8221; moment for journalists. Will they defend the rights and liberties of the many communities under threat\u2014Muslims, women, those reliant on government assistance? Will they keep alive a space for dissent and critical questioning in the face of a White House that declares itself indifferent to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2521,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-288958","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288958","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2521"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288958"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288958\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288958"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288958"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288958"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}