{"id":287564,"date":"2016-12-28T15:39:56","date_gmt":"2016-12-28T14:39:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/federal-appeals-court-revives-lawsuit-over-clinton-email-scandal\/"},"modified":"2016-12-28T15:39:56","modified_gmt":"2016-12-28T14:39:56","slug":"federal-appeals-court-revives-lawsuit-over-clinton-email-scandal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/federal-appeals-court-revives-lawsuit-over-clinton-email-scandal\/","title":{"rendered":"Federal appeals court revives lawsuit over Clinton email scandal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p><strong>A US federal appeals court has revived one of the legal challenges seeking to force the US government to sue Hillary Clinton over a private email server she used as secretary of state.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling that the Department of State\u2019s review of the emails was sufficient\u00a0and that any appeal for the attorney general\u2019s involvement was \u201cmoot.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The court ruled that the law in fact requires such intervention, providing a new opening for President-elect Donald Trump and his attorney general nominee, Senator Jeff Sessions, to get involved in supervising the release of more Clinton emails.<\/p>\n<p>Tuesday\u2019s decision pertains to emails Clinton and her aides sent and received using private email addresses and a server in her New York residence to conduct State Department business.<\/p>\n<p>While the State Department and National Archives made efforts to recover the emails,&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.presstv.ir\/Detail\/2016\/12\/28\/503841\/Appeals-court-revives-Clinton-email-lawsuit\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A US federal appeals court has revived one of the legal challenges seeking to force the US government to sue Hillary Clinton over a private email server she used as secretary of state. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling that the Department [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-287564","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=287564"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/287564\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=287564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=287564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=287564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}