{"id":286225,"date":"2016-12-20T04:45:53","date_gmt":"2016-12-20T03:45:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/media-legitimizing-gops-universal-health-plan-that-doesnt-exist\/"},"modified":"2016-12-20T04:45:54","modified_gmt":"2016-12-20T03:45:54","slug":"media-legitimizing-gops-universal-health-plan-that-doesnt-exist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/media-legitimizing-gops-universal-health-plan-that-doesnt-exist\/","title":{"rendered":"Media Legitimizing GOP\u2019s \u2018Universal\u2019 Health Plan That Doesn\u2019t Exist"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"New<\/a><\/p>\n

The first problem with this New York Times<\/strong> headline (12\/15\/16<\/a>) is pretending the Republicans have a healthcare plan.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Members of the GOP leadership were likely jubilant when they read the New York Times<\/b> (12\/15\/16<\/a>) and saw the following headline: \u201cGOP Plans to Repeal Health Law with \u2018Universal Access.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

The Times<\/b>\u2019 decision to include the words \u201cuniversal,\u201d \u201chealth\u201d and \u201cplan\u201d in the headline was extremely misleading and irresponsible. It gave readers the distinct\u2014and deceptive\u2014impression that Republicans have something resembling a \u201cuniversal\u201d health plan, and will use it to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).<\/p>\n

It appears that the same corporate media who misled us into the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Extra!<\/b>, 4\/10<\/a>) are now misleading us out of it\u2014and the Times\u2019<\/b> reporting\u00a0 on the GOP\u2019s health care agenda is a particularly egregious example of this.<\/p>\n

Republicans haven\u2019t determined what, if any, plan will be enacted to \u201creplace\u201d the ACA after it is repealed. Donald Trump\u2019s brief 7-point campaign proposal (3\/16<\/a>) does not even contain the word \u201cuniversal.\u201d There are several other conservative proposals from prominent organizations and politicians, including House Speaker Paul Ryan (6\/22\/16<\/a>), the Cato Institute (7\/4\/12<\/a>), the Heritage Foundation (10\/13<\/a>, 11\/22\/16<\/a>) and various legislative efforts vetoed by President Obama (Health Affairs<\/b>, 1\/9\/16<\/a>). There is nothing in any of these plans approaching universality\u2014not as a goal, a result or a guiding principal.<\/p>\n

The phrase \u201cuniversal access\u201d sounds nice, but is a meaningless slogan clearly aimed to confuse the status quo, in which healthcare is a commodity, with everyone actually being able to get the medical treatment they need. \u201cOur goal here is to make sure that everybody can buy coverage or find coverage if they choose to,\u201d one anonymous GOP aide told the Times<\/b> (12\/15\/16<\/a>). Of course, the right to \u201cbuy coverage\u201d has never been in question\u2014the more than 30 million Americans who currently lack insurance<\/a> can \u201cchoose\u201d to buy coverage today. And when that number swells by another 20 million or so, which the Congressional Budget Office (12\/3\/15<\/a>) predicts will happen if the ACA is repealed, they will all be allowed to buy coverage then too. Using this flawed logic, the Times<\/b> could just as well amplify nonexistent GOP plans to provide \u201cuniversal access\u201d to housing, childcare and transportation, too.<\/p>\n

But not a single critic was quoted in the Times<\/b> article. The only quotes were from the anonymous Republican aide, Paul Ryan and a federal judge who ruled against some ACA subsidies. Not even a token response from the Democratic leadership was included, let alone an independent policy expert or advocate for true universal care. This omission occurs despite the article being 853 words and 20 paragraphs long\u201425 column inches, to use old print vernacular, and not a solitary clause devoted to a critical response.<\/p>\n

But misleading coverage from the dominant newspaper is hardly surprising on this topic<\/a>. In addition to spreading nonsensical and unchallenged arguments made by Republicans, major media outlets also routinely rely on current or former industry executives as sources or op-ed contributors.<\/p>\n

Politico<\/b>, for instance, has relied on Heritage Foundation health analyst and former Pfizer executive Ed Haismaier<\/a> as their go-to expert. Haismaier, who co-authored the Heritage repeal plan, has been cited or mentioned in 22 Politico<\/b> articles<\/a> since the passage of the ACA, including six times in November 2016. This included more than 20 minutes in a Politico<\/b> podcast (11\/28\/16<\/a>). This, it would turn out, was just 10 days before he was announced (Politico<\/b>, 12\/7\/16<\/a>) to be part of Trump\u2019s Department of Health and Human Services (DHS). Yet more evidence of how, according to the Wall Street Journal<\/b> (11\/25\/16<\/a>), \u201cHeritage has become a hybrid of an administration-in-waiting for Mr. Trump\u201d and \u201ca policy factory for the new Republican-led Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Washington Post<\/b> (12\/7\/16<\/a>) recently published an op-ed from Marilyn Tavenner that advanced the agenda of private insurers whom she represents<\/a> as CEO of America\u2019s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP). \u201cThere is no single \u2018silver bullet\u2019 to ensure that people get and stay covered,\u201d Tavenner wrote, advancing the notion that universal health care is virtually impossible. Of course, despite using the word \u201csingle,\u201d she ignores a policy that is used in almost every industrialized nation<\/a> to \u201censure that people get and stay\u201d covered: a single-payer system (or a similarly structured public plan).<\/p>\n

This is hardly a surprise. The corporate media have long allowed partisan power brokers in Washington, funded heavily<\/a> by the health industry, to frame the debate<\/a> in the narrowest of terms, treating the commodification of healthcare as a default setting that can never be changed (Extra! Update<\/b>, 6\/94<\/a>; FAIR.org<\/b>, 5\/11\/11<\/a>, 1\/20\/11<\/a>).<\/p>\n

While the industry and Heritage\/Trump staffers all get to have their say about what should replace Obamacare, finding an advocate for single-payer in these outlets is far more difficult. For instance, the only mention of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) in Politico<\/b> is a reference to a failed health reform effort in Vermont (12\/20\/14<\/a>). In fact, PNHP compiles a list of major articles<\/a> that advocate for single-payer, and with the exception of two articles from the Hill <\/b>(11\/16\/16<\/a>, 11\/30\/16<\/a>), and one letter to the editor in the Times <\/b>(11\/16\/16<\/a>), since Trump\u2019s stunning victory, the only articles advocating a national health system are from small local papers or independent news sites.<\/p>\n

This problem existed during the Obama presidency as well, when the media portrayed the ACA, which was a \u201cmarket solution\u201d once promoted by Heritage<\/b> (7\/20\/90<\/a>; Forbes<\/b>, 10\/20\/11), as the furthest acceptable \u201cleft\u201d solution to the healthcare crisis. Single-payer, and even the far less transformative public option, were largely dismissed (FAIR.org<\/b>, 5\/11\/11<\/a>, 1\/20\/11<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Further, the media published a great deal of hyperbole from partisan liberals about the ACA, falsely portraying the law as a groundbreaking path to universal coverage as a human right (Washington Post<\/b>, 11\/23\/13<\/a>; Politico<\/b>, 1\/1\/16<\/a>). This portrayal further enforced the doctrinal notion that only market solutions were worthy of consideration, thereby undermining legitimate critiques of the ACA and its shortcomings (Truthout<\/b>, 6\/9\/16<\/a>).<\/p>\n

The Times<\/b> story uncritically advancing GOP talking points, just as the party prepares to take a hacksaw to what little safety net already exists in the United States, is a worrisome sign that the media\u2019s flawed coverage of health policy will not be improving anytime soon. \u00a0In terms of the coming repeal of the ACA, it seems the public will have \u201cuniversal access\u201d to the narrow viewpoints of a small group of power brokers in Washington, and little in the way of critical dialogue.<\/p>\n

\n

Michael Corcoran\u00a0is a journalist based in Boston. He has written for the Boston Globe<\/strong>, The Nation<\/strong>, the Christian Science Monitor<\/strong>, Extra!<\/strong><\/a>, NACLA Report on the Americas<\/strong> and other publications. Follow him on Twitter<\/strong>: @mcorcoran3<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This piece was reprinted by RINF Alternative News<\/a> with permission from FAIR<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The first problem with this New York Times headline (12\/15\/16) is pretending the Republicans have a healthcare plan. Members of the GOP leadership were likely jubilant when they read the New York Times (12\/15\/16) and saw the following headline: \u201cGOP Plans to Repeal Health Law with \u2018Universal Access.\u2019\u201d The Times\u2019 decision to include the words […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2521,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-286225","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2521"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}