{"id":283647,"date":"2016-12-09T23:30:54","date_gmt":"2016-12-09T22:30:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?p=283647"},"modified":"2016-12-12T20:59:15","modified_gmt":"2016-12-12T19:59:15","slug":"hidden-impact-fake-news-mainstream-wont-tell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/hidden-impact-fake-news-mainstream-wont-tell\/","title":{"rendered":"The hidden impact of &#8216;fake news&#8217; the mainstream won&#8217;t tell you"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mick Meaney<\/p>\n<p>I built <a href=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\">RINF Alternative News<\/a> around 12 years ago&#8230; it&#8217;s always been an independent news website, and I have always maintained it.<\/p>\n<p>Recently the site found its way onto <em>that<\/em> list of supposed &#8216;fake news&#8217;. The same list\u00a0that&#8217;s currently dominating the news.<\/p>\n<p>Corporate media organisations attempted to smear every\u00a0website that&#8217;s listed, and now there are even calls for the law to be changed\u00a0that would stop\u00a0us from presenting a counter-view to the mainstream offering.<\/p>\n<p>The purpose of this post is not to delve into the politics of that list, but to talk about the immediate impact it has had, at least on my website.<\/p>\n<p>You might think that such &#8216;naming and shaming&#8217; across the global media\u00a0would be bad for business.<\/p>\n<p>Not so. In fact, this has possibly been the biggest endorsement we could have ever hoped to receive.<\/p>\n<p>The independent media, by its very nature is the enemy of the mainstream. We only exist because they have frequently repeatedly failed to uphold journalistic integrity.<\/p>\n<p>When that mainstream media considers us a threat, it signals that we are on the right path, we are doing a good job. That we are having an impact.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s no secret\u00a0that polarizing audiences can do wonders for your brand &#8211; when it&#8217;s authentic.<\/p>\n<p>It plays directly into the bandwagon effect,\u00a0a common psychological\u00a0phenomenon where people make choices based on the apparent choices of others.<\/p>\n<p>The mainstream media were undoubtedly hoping to tap into herd mentality.<\/p>\n<p>The harder you condemn a group of people, an idea or a cause, the more those who oppose that idea will align themselves to you. Politicians use\u00a0the technique perfectly.<\/p>\n<p>But\u00a0for the most part, the attempt backfired.<\/p>\n<p>When you&#8217;re being attacked by such a large entity as the mainstream media in this way, a strange thing happens&#8230; you instantly become the underdog.<\/p>\n<p>Because the mainstream media&#8217;s reasons for\u00a0publicising the list were entirely for their own gain, it was not in the best interests of their readers, their customers.<\/p>\n<p>It was a selfish act, for their own preservation and as a result most people see through it.<\/p>\n<p>My inbox is full of people thanking me for &#8216;standing up&#8217; against them.<\/p>\n<p>It puts us in a &#8216;David versus Goliath&#8217; situation.\u00a0People love an underdog, someone to root for. And it&#8217;s required absolutely zero additional effort on my part.<\/p>\n<p>Another unexpected side-effect is the level of credibility it gives.<\/p>\n<p>Suddenly, a sceptical\u00a0public now have a list of &#8216;genuine&#8217; independent news sources. The real deal. An &#8216;alternative&#8217; media\u00a0legitimised by the acknowledgement of how dangerous we are, how we must be stopped and how people should fear us.<\/p>\n<p>Are we the new rock n&#8217; roll? The latest designer drug?<\/p>\n<p>No, it&#8217;s much less exciting than that. In fact the mainstream\u00a0reaction has long been expected by us. We&#8217;ve been waiting for this. And there&#8217;s more to follow.<\/p>\n<p>The mainstream media\u00a0market share is steadily decreasing year on year, while ours increases.<\/p>\n<p>Combine that with the fact that their business model is dying; newspaper sales are in freefall.<\/p>\n<p>This means less advertising revenue. National newspapers reported an 11% fall last year alone, with some titles reporting a 13% fall.<\/p>\n<p>This amounts to a 29% fall in profits for some newspapers.<\/p>\n<p>They aren&#8217;t going to go quietly.<\/p>\n<p>So a word of caution\u00a0to all you entrepreneurs, it&#8217;s only a matter of time before print media in it&#8217;s current format becomes extinct. Avoid\u00a0it or do it better than what&#8217;s out there at the moment.<\/p>\n<p>But don&#8217;t think there is money to be found in the independent media.<\/p>\n<p>Pretty much everybody in this started out because we felt exposing political corruption\u00a0was the right thing to do.<\/p>\n<p>But money doesn&#8217;t care about ethics and it doesn&#8217;t care how right you are.<\/p>\n<p>So as a result most independent media sites don&#8217;t make a great deal of money, but a small number do and they have built a devoted following over many years. It&#8217;s taken a long time to get there, to work a 40 hour week would be a dream&#8230; a 16 hour day isn&#8217;t out of ordinary,\u00a0vacations and\u00a0days-off are rare.<\/p>\n<p>Revenue is mostly generated through advertising. A\u00a0payout is typically made for every 1000 people who visit.<\/p>\n<p>For us a payout can often be as low as $0.10 per every 1000 people who visit, with the Cost Per Mille (CPM) advertising model.<\/p>\n<p>This is because advertisers generally stay away from controversial websites, and you&#8217;d be hard-pushed to find a more controversial niche.<\/p>\n<p>So you can imagine just how little most sites actually make.<\/p>\n<p>This fact does somewhat prove an accusation by the mainstream media. We are dangerous, but not for the reasons they want you to believe. We&#8217;re dangerous because we can&#8217;t be bought.<\/p>\n<p>If our motivation was financial gain, then there are much easier ways to make money.<\/p>\n<p>Most of us never expected to make <em>any<\/em> money at all, and the prospect of losing it isn&#8217;t deterrent enough for us to quit. We do it because we <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">need<\/span> to do it, it&#8217;s a passion.<\/p>\n<p>And for that reason taking away our exposure in search engines and social media won&#8217;t mean much to us, because those organisations <em>already<\/em>\u00a0fail to promote most of what we produce.<\/p>\n<p>Taking away what little advertising revenue we earn won&#8217;t make that much difference, most of us started this as a side passion and never thought it could become more than that &#8211; and in the early days even back when we knew hardly anybody was reading, the independent media still showed up everyday and exposed corruption, inequality and inhumanity.<\/p>\n<p>The number of hits, Youtube views, etc, etc, are not important.<\/p>\n<p>The number of readers and reach across social media is not\u00a0something most\u00a0talk about, it doesn&#8217;t matter because it doesn&#8217;t matter if just a handful of people read\u00a0the info we share, or tens of millions.<\/p>\n<p>The information is being published either way.<\/p>\n<p>The motivation of the independent media is not the same as the corporate media, they\u00a0are dealing with something they do not understand.<\/p>\n<p>They work for statistics, for targets, for profit.<\/p>\n<p>We work for truth, so we can look our children in the eye and tell them that <em>somebody<\/em> tried to stand up against mass surveillance, illegal wars and crimes against humanity, against corrupt politicians and the corporations who control them.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship between mainstream journalists and politicians has become symbiotic.<\/p>\n<p>Journalists want scoops, it increases their value. To get scoops they need to buddy-up to politicians. They do that by\u00a0writing stories that cast politicians or their policies in a favorable light.<\/p>\n<p>Corporations buy influence with politicians through donations and lobbying.<\/p>\n<p>The same corporations that advertise in the mainstream media.<\/p>\n<p>The same mainstream media that wants to silence us.<\/p>\n<p>Do you see\u00a0how it works?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mick Meaney I built RINF Alternative News around 12 years ago&#8230; it&#8217;s always been an independent news website, and I have always maintained it. Recently the site found its way onto that list of supposed &#8216;fake news&#8217;. The same list\u00a0that&#8217;s currently dominating the news. Corporate media organisations attempted to smear every\u00a0website that&#8217;s listed, and now [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1239,"featured_media":229957,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461,18],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-283647","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"category-latest-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1239"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283647\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/229957"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}