by Michael K. Smith \/ November 6th, 2016<\/p>\n
\n. . . the potential first female president represent[s] a purely cosmetic form of diversity that works against the structural changes that need to be made at every level of culture and politics to expose and depose a political class that has acted with impunity to promote policies that benefit wealthy donors and powerful multinational corporations.
<\/wbr>\u2014 Professor Catherine Liu<\/p>\n Hillary Clinton is not responsible for the terrible policies of the Bush Administration, but she is responsible for following in lock-step with those policies during her tenure as Secretary of State under the Obama Administration.
\u2014 Robin D., Tits and Sass<\/i><\/p>\nThat\u2019s a wicked woman.
\u2014 Minister Louis Farrakhan<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\nIt is a staple observation of modern feminism that a woman has to be twice as capable as a man to go half as far in her career, which should mean that in the negative profession of U.S. politics a woman has to be four times as evil as a man in order to capture the presidency. With this in mind we can certainly agree that Hillary Clinton is \u201cfar more qualified\u201d than Donald Trump to be president. The only question is how many more years the human race can be expected to survive such \u201cqualified\u201d leaders.<\/p>\n
Apparently suffering from a permanent case of what used to be called \u201cthe vapors,\u201d liberals aghast at Donald Trump\u2019s \u201cracism\u201d continually overlook the fact that Hillary backed Bill Clinton\u2019s 1994 crime bill, which railroaded an…<\/p>\n<\/div>\n