by T.P. Wilkinson \/ September 1st, 2016<\/p>\n
In the period from 1945 until approximately 1989, the white empire in North America learned to rely upon its cadres of military officers throughout the world to directly control its non-white (in the US a term which extends to most of the world\u2019s population) dominions. This was defended by the pretext \u2014 inherited from the propaganda of WWII \u2014 that the Red Army which had quite surprisingly defeated Western attempts to destroy it culminating in Operation Barbarossa (a campaign that would have been impossible without the tacit consent of France, Britain and the US), would be able to drive the forces of Western empire out of its vast colonial territories or worse deprive the US of the markets it hoped to inherit from its exhausted allies.<\/p>\n
The US anti-Soviet propaganda was enormously successful \u2014 not because of anything inherent in the threat \u2014 but because then, as now, the best way to attack the declared enemy was to accuse it of all the things the US or its friends were doing. The point here is that propaganda must be based in fact, even if it is composed by deceit. This was the real lesson taught by Edward Bernays, Walter Lippmann and Edward Lansdale \u2014 not to lie outright but to control the context of interpretation. The reason the US regime could always convincingly present a \u201ccommunist threat\u201d was because it was perpetrating all those acts which terrorised people. Hence the terror was real. More importantly,…<\/p>\n<\/div>\n