![](\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/files\/styles\/story_image\/public\/story_images\/screen_shot_2013-01-25_at_1.22.26_pm.png\"\/)
<\/p>\n
January 25, 2013<\/span><\/em> \u00a0| \u00a0<\/p>\n Like this article?<\/p>\n Join our email list:<\/p>\n Christian conservative radio hosts Kevin Swanson and Dave Buehner are not exactly big fans of feminism in any of its forms. So far this month, they have opined that a woman fired for being too attractive \u00a0shouldn\u2019t have been working for a man who wasn\u2019t her husband<\/a>\u00a0in the first place; that \u201csocialist\u201d single women are taking over America<\/a>; and that Sandra Fluke isn\u2019t \u201cladylike\u201d enough<\/a>\u00a0to be considered for Woman of the Year.<\/p>\n On\u00a0Tuesday\u2019s edition<\/a>\u00a0of Generations Radio, Swanson and Buehner sat down in Swanson\u2019s basement studio to discuss a report they came across that claims \u201crising college costs are driving a new trend called \u2018Sugar Daddies.\u2019\u201d This led to a wide-ranging discussion of the scourge of women\u2019s independence and a new unified theory of feminism.<\/p>\n There are \u201ctwo forms of feminism,\u201d Buehner argued. There are \u201ccute\u201d feminists like Sarah Palin who will find jobs in the \u201cmarketplace\u201d and \u201cget themselves a husband\u201d but will \u201cnever submit to the husband, in fact they will use their power probably to make their husband submit to them.\u201d Then, there are the \u201cugly\u201d feminists whose \u201clack of attractiveness has not given them access to power that they wanted in the marketplace.\u201d These \u201cattractively challenged\u201d feminists will only find careers in academia and in government agencies, for instance, \u201cyou can run the EPA.\u201d<\/p>\n What all these feminists have in common, Swanson argues, is that \u201call of them want to be free from the family\u201d and together with \u201cthe homosexuals\u201d are \u201cdestroying society.\u201d Buehner speculates that in the future, feminism will be remembered as \u201ca time in which women lost the love of their children\u201d and \u201cdecided to become selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying whores.\u201d<\/p>\n Swanson:<\/strong>\u00a0Now remember, the goal is that these women have to be independent. The goal is lots and lots of birth control. The goal is lots and lots and lots of fornication. The goal is abortion. The day-after pill will help. And it will help a lot. Remember, the goal is to get that girl a job because she needs no stinkin\u2019 husband, she\u2019s got the fascist corporation and government-mandated insurance programs and socialist welfare that will take care of her womb to tomb. Who needs a cotton-pickin\u2019 husband? Who needs a family? That\u2019s pretty much the worldview that\u2019s dominating, my friends. That\u2019s what the college is all about.<\/p>\n Buehner:<\/strong>\u00a0Because her feminist professors have told her her husband will abuse her, she will be like a slave to him. Instead she will just go to the slave market and sell herself, at least sell her body, to the highest bidder. See, that\u2019s much, much better!<\/p>\n Swanson:<\/strong>\u00a0And Dave, you talk about the two kinds of feminists now, this is your new division, you say there\u2019s two kinds of feminists.<\/p>\n Buehner:<\/strong>\u00a0There are.<\/p>\n Swanson:<\/strong>\u00a0All of them want to be free from the family. They want to be free from the husband. Who needs a stinkin\u2019 husband? Who wants to be submitting to a husband and find security in the family when she can find security in the state or a sugar daddy for the four years that she needs to get through college?<\/p>\n Buehner:<\/strong>\u00a0Right. Actually, you\u2019re talking about perhaps even a third stream of feminism. There\u2019s the Sarah Palin kind of feminism that wants to have a husband, just not one to submit to. And she still wants to..<\/p>\n Swanson:<\/strong>\u00a0But talk about the two forms of feminism you see that are rising today.<\/p>\n Buehner:<\/strong>\u00a0Right, there are two forms of feminism, and it actually has to do with a division of how attractive a woman is. So, you have the group that is very attractive, they\u2019re in the sororities, they\u2019re gonna be in the beauty contests. They\u2019re actually going to get the good jobs. They\u2019re going to leverage their attractiveness in the marketplace because it has a market value. Marketing. It helps market who you are. They\u2019re going to proceed, now they will probably some of them become the Sarah Palin-style feminists, they\u2019ll get themselves a husband, but they\u2019ll never be dependent on the husband, they\u2019ll never submit to the husband, in fact they will use their power probably to make their husband submit to them.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n The conservative Christian take on feminism.<\/p>\n January 25, 2013<\/span><\/em> | <\/p>\n Like this article?<\/p>\n Join our email list:<\/p>\n Christian conservative radio hosts Kevin Swanson and Dave Buehner are not exactly big fans of feminism in any of its forms. So far this month, they have opined that a woman fired for being too attractive shouldn’t have been working for a man who wasn’t her husband<\/a> in the first place; that “socialist” single women are taking over America<\/a>; and that Sandra Fluke isn’t “ladylike” enough<\/a> to be considered for Woman of the Year.<\/p>\nStay up to date with the latest headlines via email.<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
![](\"http:\/\/pixel.quantserve.com\/pixel\/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif\")
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\nStay up to date with the latest headlines via email.<\/h3>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n