{"id":160518,"date":"2015-06-21T14:59:46","date_gmt":"2015-06-21T14:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/americas-exceptional-negotiations\/"},"modified":"2015-06-21T14:59:46","modified_gmt":"2015-06-21T14:59:46","slug":"americas-exceptional-negotiations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/newswire\/americas-exceptional-negotiations\/","title":{"rendered":"America\u2019s \u2018Exceptional\u2019 Negotiations"},"content":{"rendered":"<div readability=\"187.01667499375\">\n<p>America has a strange idea about international negotiations: It makes demands and the other side must capitulate or face crushing penalties if not violent \u201cregime change.\u201d This strange attitude is threatening the Iran-nuclear talks and\u00a0endangering real U.S. national interests, writes ex-CIA analyst Paul R. Pillar.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-15300\"\/>By Paul R. Pillar<\/p>\n<p>One of the unfortunate corollaries of American exceptionalism is a warped and highly asymmetric conception of negotiation. This conception can become a major impediment to the effective exercise of U.S. diplomacy.<\/p>\n<p>Although the attitudes that are part of this view of negotiation are not altogether unique to the United States, they are especially associated with American exceptionalist thinking about the supposed intrinsic superiority of U.S. positions and about how the sole superpower ought always to get its way.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_10600\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\" readability=\"37\"><a href=\"http:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/kerry-geneva.jpg?55ac53\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-10600\" src=\"https:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/lazy-load\/images\/1x1.trans.gif?55ac53\" data-lazy-src=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/kerry-geneva-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry takes a walk in a park between meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 8, 2013, that focused on limits on Iran's nuclear capabilities. (State Department photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\"\/><noscript><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-10600\" src=\"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/kerry-geneva-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry takes a walk in a park between meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 8, 2013, that focused on limits on Iran's nuclear capabilities. (State Department photo)\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\"\/><\/noscript><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry takes a walk in a park between meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 8, 2013, that focused on limits on Iran\u2019s nuclear capabilities. (State Department photo)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>The corollary about negotiation is, stated in its simplest and bluntest terms, that negotiation is an encounter between diplomats in which the United States makes its demands \u2013 sometimes expressed as \u201cred lines\u201d \u2013 and the other side accepts those demands, with the task of the diplomats being to work out the details of implementation. Or, if the other side is not going along with that script and acceding to U.S. demands, then the United States has to exert more pressure on the other side until it does accede.<\/p>\n<p>This is markedly different from the rest of the world\u2019s conception of negotiation, in which each side begins with positions that neither side will get or expects to get entirely, followed by a process of give-and-take and mutual concession to arrive at a compromise that meets the needs of each side enough that it is better for each than no agreement at all.<\/p>\n<p>Americans\u2019 domestic experience with negotiation has been only a partial corrective to their warped view of international negotiation, and that experience has become even less of a corrective in recent times. The United States has a long history of&#8230;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/consortiumnews.com\/2015\/06\/21\/americas-exceptional-negotiations\/\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>America has a strange idea about international negotiations: It makes demands and the other side must capitulate or face crushing penalties if not violent \u201cregime change.\u201d This strange attitude is threatening the Iran-nuclear talks and\u00a0endangering real U.S. national interests, writes ex-CIA analyst Paul R. Pillar. By Paul R. Pillar One of the unfortunate corollaries of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[519],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-160518","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-newswire"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/160518\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=160518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=160518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}