{"id":1520,"date":"2007-10-21T04:16:20","date_gmt":"2007-10-21T04:16:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/man-tasered-shot-with-bean-bag-rounds-for-filming-warrantless-police-search\/1520\/"},"modified":"2007-10-21T04:16:20","modified_gmt":"2007-10-21T04:16:20","slug":"man-tasered-shot-with-bean-bag-rounds-for-filming-warrantless-police-search","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/latest-news\/man-tasered-shot-with-bean-bag-rounds-for-filming-warrantless-police-search\/","title":{"rendered":"Man Tasered, Shot With Bean Bag Rounds For Filming Warrantless Police Search"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"mediumtext1\"><strong>Acquitted Portland man sues after cops stated camera &#8220;could be used as a weapon&#8221;<\/strong> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mediumtext1\">Steve Watson<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/infowars.net\/index.html\">Infowars.net<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"mediumtext1\"><\/span>A\u00a0man from Portland Oregon is suing police for unlawful seizure with excessive force after officers fired a Taser and bean bag rounds at him when he refused to stop filming a warrantless search of his neighbour&#8217;s property last year.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">According to a <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.oregonlive.com\/multimedia\/2007\/10\/four_sue_police_alleging_dirty.html\">report<\/a><\/strong> in The Oregonian, Frank Waterhouse claims that on May 27, 2006 he was brutally assaulted by police when officers followed a sniffer dog onto the property in pursuit of a fleeing suspect.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Waterhouse says that the dog keyed on a car, prompting officers to break out a window which upset residents who maintain that no one ran onto the property. It was at that point that an angry resident grabbed a video camera and started to film the police search.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The Oregonian report states:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">When one woman was told to stop recording, she gave the videocamera to Waterhouse. He walked to the edge of the property, climbed up a dirt embankment and continued to record. At one point, he yelled to his friend, &#8220;Yes, I got it all on film. They had no right to come on this property.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He says in the suit that police immediately came after him, and yelled at him &#8220;put it down.&#8221; Officers moved towards him, and he said, &#8220;Don&#8217;t come after me.&#8221; Waterhouse said seconds later he was shot with a bean bag gun and a Taser and fell to the ground.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">Here is the video that Waterhouse shot. It ends with a female officer approaching him and firing taser darts into his body:<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><embed swLiveConnect=\"true\" seamlesstabbing=\"false\" allowScriptAccess=\"always\" allowFullScreen=\"true\" base=\"http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com\" flashVars=\"allowFullScreen=true&amp;initVideoId=1243494890&amp;servicesURL=http:\/\/www.brightcove.tv&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https:\/\/www.brightcove.tv&amp;cdnURL=http:\/\/admin.brightcove.com&amp;autoStart=false\" bgcolor=\"#FFFFFF\" height=\"412\" width=\"486\" src=\"http:\/\/www.brightcove.tv\/playerswf\" pluginspage=\"http:\/\/www.macromedia.com\/shockwave\/download\/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash\" name=\"bcPlayer\"><\/embed><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"unnamed2\"><!--end--><font size=\"2\" face=\"Verdana\"><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Despite the video evidence that ends with Waterhouse&#8217;s painful screams, the police reports stated that Waterhouse had run away and that officers had to give chase, bean-bagging and tasering him in the process. One officer wrote, &#8220;He had refused to drop the camera which could be used as a weapon.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">So police knew Waterhouse was not a suspect and that he was merely holding a camera. Is a camera an adequate match for tasers and guns?<\/p>\n<p>Police arrested Waterhouse on charges of criminal trespass and disorderly conduct, which were later dismissed in court. Now Mr Waterhouse is suing the Portland Police Department.<\/p>\n<p><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">Filming in public is a right every American citizen has under the first and fourth amendments, there is no legal basis to seize cameras and footage.<\/p>\n<p>In the past we have reported on cases in which police have seized cameras and film from innocent people under bogus charges of &#8220;wiretapping&#8221;. Earlier this year <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prisonplanet.com\/articles\/june2007\/110607_b_Video.htm\">a man was charged<\/a><\/strong> in Carlisle, Pennsylvania with filming police officers during a routine traffic stop and faces up to seven years in prison. Last year a North Middleton Twp. man was charged in a street racing case that involved a wiretapping charge. Police claimed the man ordered associates to tape police breaking up an illegal race after officers told him to turn off their cameras. Furthermore, last June a 48-year-old man from Dover, New Hampshire <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.fosters.com\/apps\/pbcs.dll\/article?AID=\/20070507\/FOSTERS01\/105070187\">was arrested<\/a><\/strong> for &#8220;wiretapping&#8221; for allegedly recording police while they were investigating him for driving while intoxicated.<\/p>\n<p>Such charges are invalid because they flout privacy laws. Under the fourth amendment the <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.notbored.org\/privacy.html\">expectation of privacy<\/a><\/strong> is not reasonable at such public places as automobile thoroughfares.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the expectation of privacy is not reasonable if there exists a vantage point from which anyone, not just a police officer, can see or hear what is going on.<\/p>\n<p>See <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.infowars.net\/articles\/june2007\/290607Filming.htm\">this previous report<\/a><\/strong> for more on the all out assault by police and city authorities on the right to film in public.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The Oregonian also reports that Waterhouse&#8217;s case is one of four similar incidents of &#8220;dirty tactics&#8221; on behalf of the police which are being heard this week.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The Portland Police Bureau have refused to comment on any of the cases. <!--end--><\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Acquitted Portland man sues after cops stated camera &#8220;could be used as a weapon&#8221; Steve Watson Infowars.net A\u00a0man from Portland Oregon is suing police for unlawful seizure with excessive force after officers fired a Taser and bean bag rounds at him when he refused to stop filming a warrantless search of his neighbour&#8217;s property last [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-1520","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-latest-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}