The National Security Agency (NSA) claims that its computers are so powerful that to try to protect data from erasure would have \u201can immediate, specific, and harmful impact on the national security of the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n
This is the argument put forth by the surveillance agency to excuse itself from preserving data relevant to numerous legal challenges it faces to the constitutionality of its dragnet collection of telephone and Internet activity.<\/p>\n
District Court Judge Jeffrey S. White reversed an earlier order he had issued enjoining the federal government from destroying data that one of the plaintiffs \u2013 the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) \u2013 had requested be saved from the virtual shredder. Specifically, EFF wants to include information collected under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments.<\/p>\n
The NSA balked, insisting that protecting the information would be overly burdensome.<\/p>\n
“A requirement to preserve all data acquired under section 702 presents significant operational problems, only one of which is that the NSA may have to shut down all systems and databases that contain Section 702 information,”\u00a0NSA Deputy Director Richard Ledgett claimed in a document submitted to the court.<\/p>\n
He averred that due to the high complexity of the surveillance equipment, the attempt at preservation might not work and it if did, the safety of the United States could be imperiled.<\/p>\n