Anand Gopal, TomDispatch<\/b><\/p>\n
It was a typical Kabul morning. Malik Ashgar Square was already bumper-to-bumper with Corolla taxis, green police jeeps, honking minivans, and angry motorcyclists. There were boys selling phone cards and men waving wads of cash for exchange, all weaving their way around the vehicles amid exhaust fumes. At the gate of the Lyc\u00c3\u00a9e Esteqial, one of the country\u2019s most prestigious schools, students were kicking around a soccer ball. At the Ministry of Education, a weathered old Soviet-style building opposite the school, a line of employees spilled out onto the street. I was crossing the square, heading for the ministry, when I saw the suicide attacker.<\/p>\n
He had Scandinavian features. Dressed in blue jeans and a white t-shirt, and carrying a large backpack, he began firing indiscriminately at the ministry. From my vantage point, about 50 meters away, I couldn\u2019t quite see his expression, but he did not seem hurried or panicked. I took cover behind a parked taxi. It wasn\u2019t long before the traffic police had fled and the square had emptied of vehicles.<\/p>\n
Twenty-eight people, mostly civilians, died in attacks at the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Justice, and elsewhere across the city that day in 2009. Afterward, U.S. authorities implicated the Haqqani Network, a shadowy outfit operating from Pakistan that had pioneered the use of multiple suicide bombers in headline-grabbing urban assaults. Unlike other Taliban groups, the Haqqanis\u2019 approach to mayhem was worldly and sophisticated: they recruited Arabs, Pakistanis, even Europeans, and they were influenced by the latest in radical Islamist thought. Their leader, the septuagenarian warlord Jalaluddin Haqqani, was something like Osama bin Laden and Al Capone rolled into one, as fiercely ideological as he was ruthlessly pragmatic.<\/p>\n
And so many years later, his followers are still fighting. Even with the U.S. withdrawing the bulk of its troops this year, up to 10,000 Special Operations forces, CIA paramilitaries, and their proxies will likely stay behind to battle the Haqqanis, the Taliban, and similar outfits in a war that seemingly has no end. With such entrenched enemies, the conflict today has an air of inevitability\u2013but it could all have gone so differently.<\/p>\n
Though it\u2019s now difficult to imagine, by mid-2002 there was no insurgency in Afghanistan: al-Qaeda had fled the country and the Taliban had ceased to exist as a military movement. Jalaluddin Haqqani and other top Taliban figures were reaching out to the other side in an attempt to cut a deal and lay down their arms. Tens of thousands of U.S. forces, however, had arrived on Afghan soil, post-9\/11, with one objective: to wage a war on terror.<\/p>\n
As I report in my new book,\u00a0No Good Men Among the Living: America, the Taliban, and the War Through Afghan Eyes<\/em><\/a>, the U.S. would prosecute that war even though there was no enemy to fight. To understand how America\u2019s battle in Afghanistan went so wrong for so long, a (hidden) history lesson is in order. In those early years after 2001, driven by the\u00a0id\u00c3\u00a9e fixe<\/em>\u00a0that the world was rigidly divided into terrorist and non-terrorist camps, Washington allied with Afghan warlords and strongmen. Their enemies became ours, and through faulty intelligence, their feuds became repackaged as \u201ccounterterrorism.\u201d The story of Jalaluddin Haqqani, who turned from America\u2019s potential ally into its greatest foe, is the paradigmatic case of how the war on terror created the very enemies it sought to eradicate.<\/p>\n The Campaign to Take Out Haqqani: 2001<\/strong><\/p>\n Jalaluddin Haqqani stands at about average height, with bushy eyebrows, an aquiline nose, a wide smile, and an expansive beard, which in its full glory swallows half his face. In his native land, the three southeastern Afghan provinces known collectively as Loya Paktia, he is something of a war hero, an anti-Soviet mujahedeen of storied bravery and near mythical endurance. (Once, after being shot, he\u00a0refused<\/a>\u00a0painkillers because he was fasting.) During the waning years of the Cold War, he was beloved by the Americans\u2013Texas Congressman Charlie Wilson called him \u201cgoodness personified\u201d\u2013and by Osama bin Laden, too. In the 1980s, the U.S. supplied him with funds and weapons in the battle against a Soviet-backed regime in Kabul and the Red Army, while radical Arab groups provided a steady stream of recruits to bolster his formidable Afghan force.<\/p>\n American officials had this history in mind when the second Afghan War began in October 2001. Hoping to convince Haqqani (who had backed the Taliban and al-Qaeda in the post-Soviet years) to defect, they spared his territory in Loya Paktia the intense bombing campaign that they had loosed on much of the rest of the country. The Taliban, for their part, placed him in charge of their entire military force, both sides sensing that his could be the swing vote in the war. Haqqani met with top Taliban figures and Osama bin Laden, only to decamp for Pakistan, where he took part in a flurry of meetings with Pakistanis and U.S.-backed Afghans.<\/p>\n His representatives also began meeting American officials in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, and the United Arab Emirates, and the Americans eventually offered him a deal: surrender to detention, cooperate with the new Afghan military authorities, and after a suitable period, he would be free to go. For Haqqani, one of Loya Paktia\u2019s most respected and popular figures, the prospect of sitting behind bars was unfathomable. Arsala Rahmani, an associate of his, who would go on to serve as a senator in the Afghan government, told me, \u201cHe wanted to have an important position in Loya Paktia, but they offered to arrest him. He couldn\u2019t believe it. Can you imagine such an insult?\u201d<\/p>\n Haqqani declined the American offer, but left the door open to future talks. The prevailing ethos in the U.S., though, was that you were either with us or against us. \u201cI personally always believed that Haqqani was someone we could have worked with,\u201d a former U.S. intelligence official told journalist Joby Warrick. \u201cBut at the time, no one was looking over the horizon, to where we might be in five years. For the policy folks, it was just \u2018screw these little brown people.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n In early November, the U.S. began bombing Loya Paktia. Two nights later, warplanes attacked Haqqani\u2019s home in the town of Gardez, near the Pakistani border. He was not present, but his brother-in-law and a family servant died in the blast. The next evening, U.S. planes struck a religious school in the village of Mata China, one of many Haqqani had built in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which provided room, board, and education to poor children. Malem Jan, a Haqqani family friend, showed up the next morning. \u201cI had never seen anything like it,\u201d he said. \u201cThere were so many bodies. The roof was flattened to the ground. I saw one child who was alive under there, but no one could get him out in time.\u201d Thirty-four people, almost all children, lost their lives.<\/p>\n