{"id":109662,"date":"2014-03-18T07:48:00","date_gmt":"2014-03-18T07:48:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/?guid=59222b5603a229d8b01851a485e355d3"},"modified":"2014-03-18T07:48:00","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T07:48:00","slug":"post-crimean-referendum-propaganda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/editorials\/post-crimean-referendum-propaganda\/","title":{"rendered":"Post-Crimean Referendum Propaganda"},"content":{"rendered":"
Post-Crimean Referendum Propaganda<\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
by Stephen Lendman<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Previous articles discussed intense anti-Russian propaganda. It raged up to Sunday’s referendum vote. On Monday, it continued.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The New York Times headlined “Global Crises Put Obama’s Strategy of Caution to the Test,” saying:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“(W)ith Russia poised to annex Crimea after Sunday’s referendum, with a mounting threat to the rest of Ukraine and with the carnage in Syria accelerating, Mr. Obama’s strategy is now under greater stress than at any time in his presidency.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Mr. Obama’s strategy” is his own making. He’s waging multiple direct and proxy wars. proxy war on Syria. He replaced numerous independent governments with subservient Western ones.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Ukraine is his latest imperial trophy. A previous article said if he can keep it. The battle for Ukraine’s soul didn’t end. It continues. It just began. Perhaps years will pass to resolve it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Obama’s Iranian intentions are uncertain. Nuclear talks continue without resolution. Rapprochement remains a convenient illusion unless or until proved otherwise. No evidence suggests longterm US hostility eased. Plenty indicates otherwise.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Obama elevated neo-Nazi putschists to power in Kiev. He backs lawless governance. He spurns democratic legitimacy. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He bears full responsibility for crisis conditions. At issue is what he intends going forward. He risks potential global war. Don’t expect Times editors and\/or contributors to explain. They support what demands condemnation.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They repeat the Big Lie. “Putin invaded Crimea,” they said. A former unnamed Obama senior national security aid was quoted saying: “We’re seeing the ‘light footprint” run out of gas.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Former Bush Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was quoted saying:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“There was a view that if the United States pulled back and stopped ‘imposing’ and ‘insisting’ in the world, the vacuum would be filled by good things.” <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“But what has filled that space has been brutal dictators; extremist forces, especially in Iraq and Syria; and nationalism.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Pulled back?” From what? “Stopped imposing” its will? How so? Stopped “insisting” in the world?” Fundamental US policies under Democrats and Republicans enforce hardline Washington rules.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Multiple direct and proxy wars rage. Obama only stopped short of starting WW III. Perhaps he intends doing so. Don’t expect Times and contributors to explain.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Jochen Bittner is Die Zeit’s political editor. He’s militantly pro-war. Last year, he complained about Germany’s unwillingness to wage it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He wrote about “rethinking German pacifism.” He wants a greater military commitment. Die Zeit’s editor, Joseph Joffe, urges “massive” Middle East war.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Both men aggressively promote escalated German militarism. Bittner got feature Times op-ed space. He took full advantage.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He headlined “Is Crimea the Next Yugoslavia?” He wrote from Simferopol, Crimea. He spoke to a man named Bratislav.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He said he came from Kosovo “to protect the Russian brothers from the fascists.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“I can tell you,” he said, “Ukraine is becoming the next Yugoslavia. Only bigger.” Other Crimeans told Bittner the same thing.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He called referendum results “a catalyst for disintegration. He claimed former “(d)ifferent cultural and ethnic identities that used to coexist peacefully” no longer exist.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He scorned referendum results saying so. Numerous Crimean Ukrainians and Tatars voted in lockstep. They support joining Russia.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Trouble doesn’t exist in Crimea. It’s based in Kiev. It’s headquartered in Washington. It’s in Brussels and other Western European capitals. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Bittner didn’t explain. Indeed, the threat of Ukrainian civil war exists. The US\/EU-created monster risks it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Crimeans want peace and stability. They want union with Russia. They want Moscow guaranteeing their protection. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It’s their best chance to avoid conflict. It’s their best hope to survive it it erupts.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Bittner bashed Crimea’s referendum. He mischaracterized it. He called it “nothing less than the emergence of two nations within one state.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“\u2026Russian control may usher in outright oppression,” he said. His logic is upside down.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Crimea joining Russia is its best chance to avoid it. He asked whether militants might be attracted to Crimea.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He stopped short of explaining only if Kiev, Washington and rogue EU partners enlist them to launch Euromaidan 2.0.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He blamed Putin for what may be planned. “Chetniks. Cossacks. Fascists. Zombies, Jihadis. Was this part of Mr. Putin’s plan to enlarge his empire,” he asked?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He called him the “Kremlin’s would-be strongman.” He “resembles Goethe’s foolhardy sorcerer’s apprentice,” he said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He pointed fingers the wrong way. He wrongfully blamed him for ongoing events in Crimea. He substituted misinformation for credible analysis.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Before Sunday’s referendum, The Times headlined “Russia Moves Swiftly to Stifle Dissent Ahead of Secession Vote.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied claiming “Russian soldiers took up positions” at Simferopol’s “television transmission center.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
None invaded Crimea. None comprise an occupying force. The Times wrongfully claimed they’re involved in “a broad effort to muffle dissent over the Kremlin-backed project to guide Crimea through a swift secession from Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It spun a scenario of well-armed Russian troops, local self-defense forces called “pro-secession militia,” carrying “whips” to intimidate anti-self-determination Crimeans.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It claimed tactics resembled what “accompanied rigged ballots across the old Soviet world.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It alleged fraud. It ignored a legitimate process. It turned a blind eye to what turned out to be a model democratic election. It puts sham US ones to shame.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It claimed “dissent (was) suppressed by the implicit threat of force.” No evidence whatever suggested it. None exists.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“In a matter of days, the Kremlin has succeeded in recreating the constrained conditions of Russia’s own civic sphere in Crimea,” it claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It cited nonexistent “targeted intimidation (and) an expansive military occupation by ‘unmistakably’ elite Russian units\u2026”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
You can’t make this stuff up. The so-called “newspaper of record” reinvents history. It fabricates scenarios it calls news.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It cited Kiev fascist putschists as reliable sources. It repeated one Big Lie after another.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It suggested Russian forces “could be preparing to occupy parts of eastern and southern Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It called Crimean democrats “strong-arm” bullies. It compared them to myths about Putin targeting opponents at home.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied claiming “Crimean journalists (were) ordered not to describe the soldiers on their soil as Russian or to use the word ‘occupation.’ “<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied again saying “foreign and local journalists (were) beaten and had their materials confiscated\u2026”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“\u2026Russian troops (and supportive elements) “blockaded\u2026Ukrainian government centers,” it claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
This type reporting doesn’t rise to the level of bad fiction. It doesn’t pass the smell test. The Times has a long disturbing history. It’s an establishment publication.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It supports wealth, power and privilege. It turns truth on its head. It suppresses vital information. It features rubbish.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It systematically ignores police state Kiev ruthlessness. It lied claiming Crimea’s model democracy suppresses freedom. It shames itself in the process. The pattern repeats daily.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Neocon Washington Post editors headlined “US, EU must stay the course on Russian sanctions over Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They lied claiming Russia “seize(d) Crimea.” Washington and EU partners “must fashion a new policy\u2026to counter (Putin’s) aggression,” they bellowed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They called a model democratic exercise an “orchestrated” one. Maybe he plans “inva(ding) eastern Ukraine,” they claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want Putin “punish(ed)” and “weaken(ed).” They want tougher measures than ones imposed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want Russia “massiv(ely)” damaged “economically and politically.” Maybe they want WW III. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Neocons think this way. They promote war and violence. They deplore peace and stability. They endorse imperial lawlessness.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
WaPo editors are some of the worst. Wall Street Journal ones match them. They headlined “Welcome  to the 19th Century.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The repeated the Big Lie. They claimed Russia invaded Crimea. They quoted John Kerry saying “on a completely trumped up pretext.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Russia respects its neighbors. It doesn’t wage lawless aggression. Doing so is a US tradition. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It dates from the 19th century. It continues recklessly out-of-control today. Don’t expect Journal editors to explain.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They lied claiming Putin “consolidated his hold on Crimea Sunday by forcing a referendum with only two choices.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
One was enough given an overwhelming near 97% majority and celebratory victory joy.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Journal editors lied claiming choices offered were to join Russia now or later. False! Crimeans voted on whether to join the Russian Federation or remain part of Ukraine.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Next up for conquest may be eastern Ukraine,” claimed Journal editors. Russian forces mobilized on its border ready to invade, they hallucinated.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Russian agitators (may) create another ‘trumped up pretext,’ ” they claimed. Moscow “revanchists moved (to create) new world disorder,” they added.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Putin aims to “carv(e) up foreign countries when he feels he can,” they said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Journal editors want “renewed military deterrent.” They want NATO involved. They want Western forces deployed near Russia’s borders.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want advanced weapons targeting its heartland. Maybe they want WW III.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Post-Crimean Referendum Propaganda<\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
by Stephen Lendman<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Previous articles discussed intense anti-Russian propaganda. It raged up to Sunday’s referendum vote. On Monday, it continued.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The New York Times headlined “Global Crises Put Obama’s Strategy of Caution to the Test,” saying:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“(W)ith Russia poised to annex Crimea after Sunday’s referendum, with a mounting threat to the rest of Ukraine and with the carnage in Syria accelerating, Mr. Obama’s strategy is now under greater stress than at any time in his presidency.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Mr. Obama’s strategy” is his own making. He’s waging multiple direct and proxy wars. proxy war on Syria. He replaced numerous independent governments with subservient Western ones.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Ukraine is his latest imperial trophy. A previous article said if he can keep it. The battle for Ukraine’s soul didn’t end. It continues. It just began. Perhaps years will pass to resolve it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Obama’s Iranian intentions are uncertain. Nuclear talks continue without resolution. Rapprochement remains a convenient illusion unless or until proved otherwise. No evidence suggests longterm US hostility eased. Plenty indicates otherwise.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Obama elevated neo-Nazi putschists to power in Kiev. He backs lawless governance. He spurns democratic legitimacy. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He bears full responsibility for crisis conditions. At issue is what he intends going forward. He risks potential global war. Don’t expect Times editors and\/or contributors to explain. They support what demands condemnation.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They repeat the Big Lie. “Putin invaded Crimea,” they said. A former unnamed Obama senior national security aid was quoted saying: “We’re seeing the ‘light footprint” run out of gas.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Former Bush Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was quoted saying:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“There was a view that if the United States pulled back and stopped ‘imposing’ and ‘insisting’ in the world, the vacuum would be filled by good things.” <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“But what has filled that space has been brutal dictators; extremist forces, especially in Iraq and Syria; and nationalism.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Pulled back?” From what? “Stopped imposing” its will? How so? Stopped “insisting” in the world?” Fundamental US policies under Democrats and Republicans enforce hardline Washington rules.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Multiple direct and proxy wars rage. Obama only stopped short of starting WW III. Perhaps he intends doing so. Don’t expect Times and contributors to explain.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Jochen Bittner is Die Zeit’s political editor. He’s militantly pro-war. Last year, he complained about Germany’s unwillingness to wage it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He wrote about “rethinking German pacifism.” He wants a greater military commitment. Die Zeit’s editor, Joseph Joffe, urges “massive” Middle East war.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Both men aggressively promote escalated German militarism. Bittner got feature Times op-ed space. He took full advantage.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He headlined “Is Crimea the Next Yugoslavia?” He wrote from Simferopol, Crimea. He spoke to a man named Bratislav.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He said he came from Kosovo “to protect the Russian brothers from the fascists.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“I can tell you,” he said, “Ukraine is becoming the next Yugoslavia. Only bigger.” Other Crimeans told Bittner the same thing.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He called referendum results “a catalyst for disintegration. He claimed former “(d)ifferent cultural and ethnic identities that used to coexist peacefully” no longer exist.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He scorned referendum results saying so. Numerous Crimean Ukrainians and Tatars voted in lockstep. They support joining Russia.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Trouble doesn’t exist in Crimea. It’s based in Kiev. It’s headquartered in Washington. It’s in Brussels and other Western European capitals. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Bittner didn’t explain. Indeed, the threat of Ukrainian civil war exists. The US\/EU-created monster risks it.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Crimeans want peace and stability. They want union with Russia. They want Moscow guaranteeing their protection. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It’s their best chance to avoid conflict. It’s their best hope to survive it it erupts.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Bittner bashed Crimea’s referendum. He mischaracterized it. He called it “nothing less than the emergence of two nations within one state.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“…Russian control may usher in outright oppression,” he said. His logic is upside down.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Crimea joining Russia is its best chance to avoid it. He asked whether militants might be attracted to Crimea.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He stopped short of explaining only if Kiev, Washington and rogue EU partners enlist them to launch Euromaidan 2.0.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He blamed Putin for what may be planned. “Chetniks. Cossacks. Fascists. Zombies, Jihadis. Was this part of Mr. Putin’s plan to enlarge his empire,” he asked?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He called him the “Kremlin’s would-be strongman.” He “resembles Goethe’s foolhardy sorcerer’s apprentice,” he said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
He pointed fingers the wrong way. He wrongfully blamed him for ongoing events in Crimea. He substituted misinformation for credible analysis.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Before Sunday’s referendum, The Times headlined “Russia Moves Swiftly to Stifle Dissent Ahead of Secession Vote.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied claiming “Russian soldiers took up positions” at Simferopol’s “television transmission center.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
None invaded Crimea. None comprise an occupying force. The Times wrongfully claimed they’re involved in “a broad effort to muffle dissent over the Kremlin-backed project to guide Crimea through a swift secession from Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It spun a scenario of well-armed Russian troops, local self-defense forces called “pro-secession militia,” carrying “whips” to intimidate anti-self-determination Crimeans.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It claimed tactics resembled what “accompanied rigged ballots across the old Soviet world.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It alleged fraud. It ignored a legitimate process. It turned a blind eye to what turned out to be a model democratic election. It puts sham US ones to shame.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It claimed “dissent (was) suppressed by the implicit threat of force.” No evidence whatever suggested it. None exists.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“In a matter of days, the Kremlin has succeeded in recreating the constrained conditions of Russia’s own civic sphere in Crimea,” it claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It cited nonexistent “targeted intimidation (and) an expansive military occupation by ‘unmistakably’ elite Russian units…”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
You can’t make this stuff up. The so-called “newspaper of record” reinvents history. It fabricates scenarios it calls news.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It cited Kiev fascist putschists as reliable sources. It repeated one Big Lie after another.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It suggested Russian forces “could be preparing to occupy parts of eastern and southern Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It called Crimean democrats “strong-arm” bullies. It compared them to myths about Putin targeting opponents at home.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied claiming “Crimean journalists (were) ordered not to describe the soldiers on their soil as Russian or to use the word ‘occupation.’ “<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It lied again saying “foreign and local journalists (were) beaten and had their materials confiscated…”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“…Russian troops (and supportive elements) “blockaded…Ukrainian government centers,” it claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
This type reporting doesn’t rise to the level of bad fiction. It doesn’t pass the smell test. The Times has a long disturbing history. It’s an establishment publication.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It supports wealth, power and privilege. It turns truth on its head. It suppresses vital information. It features rubbish.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It systematically ignores police state Kiev ruthlessness. It lied claiming Crimea’s model democracy suppresses freedom. It shames itself in the process. The pattern repeats daily.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Neocon Washington Post editors headlined “US, EU must stay the course on Russian sanctions over Ukraine.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They lied claiming Russia “seize(d) Crimea.” Washington and EU partners “must fashion a new policy…to counter (Putin’s) aggression,” they bellowed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They called a model democratic exercise an “orchestrated” one. Maybe he plans “inva(ding) eastern Ukraine,” they claimed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want Putin “punish(ed)” and “weaken(ed).” They want tougher measures than ones imposed.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want Russia “massiv(ely)” damaged “economically and politically.” Maybe they want WW III. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Neocons think this way. They promote war and violence. They deplore peace and stability. They endorse imperial lawlessness.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
WaPo editors are some of the worst. Wall Street Journal ones match them. They headlined “Welcome  to the 19th Century.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The repeated the Big Lie. They claimed Russia invaded Crimea. They quoted John Kerry saying “on a completely trumped up pretext.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Russia respects its neighbors. It doesn’t wage lawless aggression. Doing so is a US tradition. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It dates from the 19th century. It continues recklessly out-of-control today. Don’t expect Journal editors to explain.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They lied claiming Putin “consolidated his hold on Crimea Sunday by forcing a referendum with only two choices.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
One was enough given an overwhelming near 97% majority and celebratory victory joy.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Journal editors lied claiming choices offered were to join Russia now or later. False! Crimeans voted on whether to join the Russian Federation or remain part of Ukraine.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Next up for conquest may be eastern Ukraine,” claimed Journal editors. Russian forces mobilized on its border ready to invade, they hallucinated.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“Russian agitators (may) create another ‘trumped up pretext,’ ” they claimed. Moscow “revanchists moved (to create) new world disorder,” they added.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Putin aims to “carv(e) up foreign countries when he feels he can,” they said.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Journal editors want “renewed military deterrent.” They want NATO involved. They want Western forces deployed near Russia’s borders.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They want advanced weapons targeting its heartland. Maybe they want WW III.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
http:\/\/www.claritypress.com\/LendmanII.html<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. <\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.progressiveradionetwork.com\/the-progressive-news-hour<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1217,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[461],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-109662","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-editorials"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1217"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109662\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}