{"id":105553,"date":"2014-01-13T21:24:19","date_gmt":"2014-01-13T21:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/as-senate-hawks-push-war-on-iran-silent-dems-complicit\/"},"modified":"2014-01-13T21:24:19","modified_gmt":"2014-01-13T21:24:19","slug":"as-senate-hawks-push-war-on-iran-silent-dems-complicit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/as-senate-hawks-push-war-on-iran-silent-dems-complicit\/","title":{"rendered":"As Senate Hawks Push War on Iran, Silent Dems Complicit?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A majority of Senate Democrats are refusing to say where they stand on a bipartisan Iran sanctions bill that experts warn risks a catastrophic war with Iran.<span><span>(Photo: peppergrasss\/cc\/flickr)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>According to the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/beta.congress.gov\/bill\/113th-congress\/senate-bill\/1881\/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22:%5B%22iran%22%5D%7D\">latest count<\/a>, sixteen Democrat senators have come out in support of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/beta.congress.gov\/bill\/113th\/senate-bill\/1881\/text\">Iran Nuclear Weapon Free Act of 2013 (S. 1881)<\/a>, which would advance further sanctions on Iran and impose near-impossible conditions on a final agreement.<\/p>\n<p>The bill violates an interim agreement reached in late November in Geneva that the U.S. will &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2013-12-19\/senators-introduce-measure-to-add-standby-iran-sanctions.html\">refrain from imposing new nuclear-related sanctions<\/a>&#8221; during the six-month period the agreement is in effect, and critics charge it amounts to a call for war.<\/p>\n<p>Most Senate Democrats have remained <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/plum-line\/wp\/2014\/01\/13\/an-odd-silence-among-senate-dems-on-iran\/\">silent <\/a>on the legislation that was introduced by Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.). The bill is strongly backed by the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee and is opposed by the Obama administration.<\/p>\n<p>Many media outlets are emphasizing that Senate support for the bill is creeping towards a <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/support-for-iran-sanctions-bill-nears-filibuster-proof-majority\/2014\/01\/10\/33efdaee-7a2c-11e3-af7f-13bf0e9965f6_story.html\">veto-proof majority, <\/a>due to support from the GOP and the sixteen Democrats.<\/p>\n<p>Yet some U.S.\/Iran policy experts suggest that this media frame advances the pro-sanctions narrative by misrepresenting a veto-proof majority as a sure path to the bill&#8217;s passage.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The idea of a veto-proof majority is an AIPAC frame,&#8221; said Robert Naiman, policy director for Just Foreign Policy, in an interview with <em>Common Dreams<\/em>, explaining that AIPAC is seeking to shift the debate by making it look like they are close to victory. &#8220;Actually, there is no technical reason that a veto-proof majority means anything. The battle is whether this bill will be introduced at all. The urgency is all about where Democrats will fall.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The focus on a veto-proof majority is an attempt to scare people into signing on,&#8221; agreed Jamal Abdi, policy director for the National Iranian American Council, in an interview with <em>Common Dreams<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>According to established Senate precedent, the party in power\u2013currently the Democrats\u2013will not bring the bill to a vote unless it has majority support. Democratic Senate majority leader Harry Reid is currently <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/blogs\/harry-reid-blocks-iran-sanctions-vote_774165.html\">blocking the vote<\/a> on S.1881.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, a rift in the Democratic party appears to be deepening. Last week, Bernadette Meehan, National Security Council spokeswoman, urged Democratic backers of the bill to admit their support is tantamount to a call for for war. &#8220;If certain members of Congress want the United States to take military action, they should be up front with the American public and say so,&#8221; she stated. &#8220;Otherwise, it&#8217;s not clear why any member of Congress would support a bill that possibly closes the door on diplomacy and makes it more likely that the United States will have to choose between military options or allowing Iran&#8217;s nuclear program to proceed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Also last week, Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI)\u2013who Jim Lobe of <em>Inter Press Service<\/em> refers to as &#8220;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lobelog.com\/neocons-who-brought-you-the-iraq-war-endorse-aipacs-iran-bill\/\">the neocons who brought you the Iraq war<\/a>&#8220;\u2013issued an <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.foreignpolicyi.org\/content\/open-letter-congressional-leaders-iran\">open letter<\/a> urging congressional leaders to line up behind the bill.<\/p>\n<p>Opponents to war with Iran say now is a critical time to contact Senators\u2013especially Democrats\u2013and urge them to take a stand against the bill.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If the bill passes and goes into law, I think this will be read not just by Iran but also the U.S.&#8217;s partners, as violation of the interim agreement,&#8221; said Abdi. &#8220;It&#8217;s going to convey to the world that the U.S. actually dropped the ball on diplomacy. That will render the diplomatic process terminated.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He added, &#8220;Any way you slice it, this bill undermines peaceful resolution and makes any peaceful resolution of nuclear standoff impossible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\">_____________________<\/p>\n<p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.<\/p>\n<p>Source: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/headline\/2014\/01\/13-8\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"As Senate Hawks Push War on Iran, Silent Dems Complicit?\">Common Dreams<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A majority of Senate Democrats are refusing to say where they stand on a bipartisan Iran sanctions bill that experts warn risks a catastrophic war with Iran.(Photo: peppergrasss\/cc\/flickr) According to the latest count, sixteen Democrat senators have come out in support of the Iran Nuclear Weapon Free Act of 2013 (S. 1881), which would advance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1213,"featured_media":105555,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-105553","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105553","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105553"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105553\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/105555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105553"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105553"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105553"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}