{"id":100901,"date":"2013-12-24T04:53:17","date_gmt":"2013-12-24T04:53:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/us-government-steps-up-attack-on-exposure-of-nsa-spying\/"},"modified":"2013-12-24T04:53:17","modified_gmt":"2013-12-24T04:53:17","slug":"us-government-steps-up-attack-on-exposure-of-nsa-spying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/breaking-news\/us-government-steps-up-attack-on-exposure-of-nsa-spying\/","title":{"rendered":"US government steps up attack on exposure of NSA spying"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/h3>\n

\n By
\n Patrick Martin
\n
24 December 2013
\n <\/h5>\n

The report issued last Wednesday by a White House panel on US surveillance programs has set the stage for an intensified effort to suppress any further revelations of illegal government spying.<\/p>\n

The report largely endorsed the National Security Agency’s operations, hailing the \u201cpatriotism\u201d of the operatives who are collecting and stockpiling private information on every American citizen and virtually the entire population of the world. This whitewash came two days after a federal judge ruled that the NSA’s mass collection of telephone records violated the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution’s prohibition of \u201cunreasonable searches and seizures.\u201d<\/p>\n

Within hours of the report’s issuance, the Obama administration was in court in a further attempt to shut down any legal challenge to the massive violation of privacy rights.<\/p>\n

The Justice Department filed papers in two lawsuits brought in the Northern District of California, one on behalf of Verizon customers, the other on behalf of AT&T customers, charging that the NSA surveillance was illegal and unconstitutional. Both court cases stemmed from spying initiated under the Bush administration\u2013and criticized by candidate Obama during the 2008 election campaign\u2013but then embraced and expanded by President Obama after he took office.<\/p>\n

In both cases, the US government has long argued that a \u201cstate secrets\u201d privilege forbids any court from hearing a challenge to the NSA’s actions. In particular, US attorneys have claimed the plaintiffs have no standing to sue because they cannot prove they were the targets of spying, since the spying is secret. This position, a perfect Catch-22, essentially forecloses any judicial remedy to illegal government action.<\/p>\n

The cases were revived in the wake of the Snowden disclosures, which showed that effectively all Americans, including the plaintiffs, had their communication metadata swept up and collected by the NSA.<\/p>\n

In affidavits filed with Judge Jeffrey S. White, the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, argued that the court should take no notice of the Snowden revelations because the facts Snowden disclosed were classified as secret.<\/p>\n

\u201cDisclosure of this still-classified information regarding the scope and operational details of NSA intelligence activities implicated by plaintiffs’ allegations could be expected to cause extremely grave damage to the national security of the United States,\u201d he claimed.<\/p>\n

\u201cDisclosing or confirming further details about these activities could seriously undermine an important tool\u2013metadata collection and analysis\u2013for tracking possible terrorist plots,\u201d Clapper continued, and by providing details of the methods used, help \u201cforeign adversaries evade detection.\u201d<\/p>\n

The affidavits reveal that warrantless surveillance of all US telecommunications was first authorized by President George W. Bush on October 4, 2001, citing as the pretext the 9\/11 terrorist attacks, in which the role of US government agencies remains unexamined and highly suspect.<\/p>\n

The cases were filed by Carolyn Jewel on behalf of herself and other AT&T customers, and Virginia Shubert, on behalf of herself and other Verizon customers. They have received legal and financial support from the Electronic Freedom Foundation (EFF), a group opposed to the police state methods of the US military\/intelligence apparatus.<\/p>\n

Cindy Cohn, legal director of the EFF, denounced the Clapper affidavits as an affront to common sense. \u201cThe American people know they’re being surveilled,\u201d she said. \u201cThe government is trying to reset the clock in order to avoid an open judicial determination about whether that surveillance is legal.\u201d<\/p>\n

The legal maneuvers are combined with a political counteroffensive. In appearances Sunday on television talk shows, both Democratic and Republican congressmen and members of the White House panel on the NSA denounced Snowden and called for his arrest and prosecution, in some cases for treason.<\/p>\n

Republican Congressman Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, hailed the report of the White House panel as a vindication of the NSA. \u201cBasically what they said was, this information is a vital part of our counterterrorism effort to keep Americans safe,\u201d he said, rejecting suggestions that the panel’s mild criticism of some spy activities was \u201cdevastating to the NSA.\u201d<\/p>\n

Speaking on the ABC program \u201cThis Week,\u201d Rogers claimed that Snowden had committed treason by offering to assist the Brazilian government in uncovering NSA spying against its leadership. \u201cHe has contacted a foreign country and said, I will sell you classified information for something of value,\u201d Rogers declared. \u201cThat’s what we call a traitor in this country.\u201d<\/p>\n

Just as rabid were the comments of Peter King, chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, who told the NBC program \u201cMeet the Press\u201d that the Obama panel had found \u201cthere were no abuses by the NSA.\u201d King added, \u201cI think Edward Snowden is a defector and a traitor.\u201d<\/p>\n

The comments of leading Democrats were more restrained in their language but even more politically significant, demonstrating a broad bipartisan consensus on covering up for the unconstitutional spying by the NSA.<\/p>\n

Senator Mark Udall of Colorado, a supposed \u201ccritic\u201d of the NSA, praised the White House panel for its alleged \u201cimportant reforms.\u201d In a revealing remark, he explained why such \u201creforms\u201d were necessary: \u201cBecause we have got to rebuild the American people’s trust in our intelligence community\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n

Asked directly about whether he thought Snowden should be prosecuted, he replied, \u201cI do. I do. He broke his oath. He broke the law. Come home, make the case that somehow there was a higher purpose here, but Edward Snowden ought to come back to the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n

Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Judiciary Committee and a self-proclaimed defender of civil liberties, criticized the NSA from the right during an appearance on \u201cMeet the Press.\u201d Referring to Snowden’s exposures, he said, \u201cThey did such a poor job at NSA that a subcontractor was able to steal all those secrets, and today, after spending millions of dollars, they still don’t know what was stolen.\u201d<\/p>\n

The two leading members of the White House panel also appeared on network television to reinforce the anti-Snowden campaign in Washington. Richard Clarke, a former White House counterterrorism adviser in both the Clinton and Bush administrations, said, \u201cWhat Mr. Snowden did is treason, was high crimes, and there is nothing in what we say that justifies what he did.\u201d<\/p>\n

Michael Morell, former deputy director of the CIA, hailed NSA operatives as \u201cpatriots\u201d and emphasized that the NSA was not a rogue agency. \u201cIt was doing exactly what its government asked it to do,\u201d he said, following the directives of the executive branch, ratified by the judicial branch, and \u201coverseen extensively by the intelligence committees of Congress.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a barefaced lie that was not disputed by his interviewer, Bob Schieffer, host of the CBS program \u201cFace the Nation,\u201d Morell declared, \u201cNSA is not spying on Americans. I think that is a perception that some have out there. It is not\u2013it is not\u2013it is not focused on any single American.\u201d<\/p>\n

Snowden himself has condemned the presidential panel. In an e-mail exchange with the Brazilian Globo TV channel, he wrote Sunday that the panel of five members was handpicked by Obama to obtain a prearranged result.<\/p>\n

\u201cTheir job wasn’t to protect privacy or deter abuses, it was to \u2018restore public confidence’ in these spying activities,\u201d he wrote. \u201cMany of the recommendations they made are cosmetic changes.\u201d Snowden’s comments were made public in a Sunday night broadcast on the television channel’s \u201cFantastico\u201d program.<\/p>\n

The Globo report cited further comments from Snowden denying that his revelations had caused any harm to the American people, who are among the victims of the NSA surveillance that Snowden has exposed. He told the network that US law currently makes no distinction between a whistleblower exposing illegal programs \u201cand a spy secretly selling documents to terrorists.\u201d<\/p>\n

His real offense was to \u201cembarrass\u201d the US government, prompting a political response that makes a fair trial in the United States impossible, Snowden said.<\/p>\n

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.<\/a>
\n <!– blog comments powered by Disqus<\/span><\/a> –><\/p>\n


\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n

‘
\n \t\t \t];
\n \t\t \tvar html = htmlArray.join(”);
\n \t\t \t$(‘#content.width72’).prepend(html);
\n\t\t\t$(‘#front-appeal’).animate({opacity:1.0},1000).slideDown(1000);
\n \t\t}
\n \t}<\/p>\n

\tfunction appendInlineAppeal() {
\n\t\tvar excludes = [ ‘wsws’, ‘twih’, ‘vide’, ‘sale’, ‘dart’, ‘task’, ‘powe’, ‘gmhv’, ‘raul’ ];
\n\t\tvar url = document.location.href;
\n\t\tvar filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“\/”) + 1, url.length);
\n \t\tif (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) && excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,4)) == -1) {
\n \t\t\tvar htmlArray = [
\n \t\t\t\t‘<\/p>\n

‘
\n \t\t \t];
\n \t\t \tvar html = htmlArray.join(”);
\n \t\t \tvar pCount = $(‘#content’).children(‘p’).length;
\n \t\t \tvar position = Math.floor(pCount*0.1);
\n \t$(‘#content’).children(‘p’).eq(position).before(html);
\n \t$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
\n \t\t\t\t$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
\n \t\t\t\t$(this).parent().hide();
\n \t\t\t\treturn false;
\n \t\t\t});
\n \t\t}
\n \t}<\/p>\n

\tfunction appendBottomAppeal() {
\n \t\tvar excludes = [ ‘lect-a20’ ];
\n \t\tvar url = document.location.href;
\n\t\tvar filename = url.substring(url.lastIndexOf(“\/”) + 1, url.length);
\n \t\tif (!$(‘#content’).is(‘.width72,.category’) && excludes.indexOf(filename.substr(0,8)) == -1) {
\n \t\t\tvar htmlArray = [
\n \t\t\t\t‘<\/p>\n

‘
\n \t\t \t];
\n \t\t \tvar html = htmlArray.join(”);
\n \t\t \tif ($(‘#article-tools’).length > 0) {
\n \t\t \t\t$(‘#article-tools’).before(html);
\n \t\t \t} else {
\n\t \t\t \t$(‘#content’).append(html);
\n \t\t \t}
\n \t$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘form’).children(‘.more-options’).children(‘a’).click(function() {
\n \t\t\t\t$(‘#inline-appeal’).children(‘.initially-hidden’).show();
\n \t\t\t\t$(this).parent().hide();
\n \t\t\t\treturn false;
\n \t\t\t});
\n \t\t}
\n \t}
\n$(document).ready(function(){
\n\t\/\/appendFrontAppeal();
\n\t\/\/appendInlineAppeal();
\n\t\/\/appendBottomAppeal();
\n});<\/p>\n

Source: WSWS<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Patrick Martin 24 December 2013 The report issued last Wednesday by a White House panel on US surveillance programs has set the stage for an intensified effort to suppress any further revelations of illegal government spying. The report largely endorsed the National Security Agency’s operations, hailing the \u201cpatriotism\u201d of the operatives who are collecting […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1213,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[487],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-100901","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-breaking-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100901","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=100901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/100901\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=100901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=100901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/rinf.com\/alt-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=100901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}