White House denied knowledge of military analyst program白宮出面否認知識的一位軍事分析家的計劃
By通過 Eric Brewer李家祥啤酒 | In the two weeks since |在兩個星期以來， I asked Dana Perino我問德納Perino ） whether the White House knew about or approved of the Pentagon’s use of TV military analysts as propaganda tools, I’ve been back to the briefing room three times (May 6, 12, and 13) to try to ask a follow-up question.白宮是否知道或批准五角大樓的使用電視軍事分析家作為宣傳工具，我已經回到簡報室的3倍（五月六日， 12 ，和第13條） ，試圖提出一項後續行動質詢。 As is her wont, Dana has refused to call on me.I had been intending to essentially repeat my question, since I’ve been under the impression that she hadn’t answered it the first time.由於是她wont ，德納拒絕，呼籲me.i已有意基本上是重複我的問題，因為我已經下的印象，她沒有回答這是第一次。 But on Tuesday,但在週二， Glenn Greenwald pointed out格倫格林瓦德指出， that Perino did answer the question back on April 30. Perino ）表示，沒有回答這個問題回到4月30日。 Although I didn’t realize this when I filed my last story, as seen in this雖然我沒有實現這個，當我提起我在去年的故事，看到在這 video clip of the exchange視頻剪輯的交流 , the White House press secretary did indeed provide a specific response. ，白宮新聞秘書確實提供了具體的回應。
I had repeated my question as she walked away from the podium, “Did the White House know about the program?” And on her way out of the room, Perino answered, “I just said: no.”我曾多次我的問題，因為她走開了，從講台上， “白宮知道該程序？ ”和她走出房間， Perino ）回答說： “ 我剛才說的：沒有” 。
(I just rechecked my own tape recording of the briefing, and that is what she said. I apologize profusely for leaving this crucial detail out of my earlier article.) （我只是複查我自己的錄音的簡報，而這正是她說，我道歉， profusely離開這個關鍵，詳細列於我較早時條） 。
Of course, in her earlier answer, she really hadn’t just said no—she’d said only, “I didn’t know.” But her denial of White House knowledge during that parting shot is very interesting, for reasons that Greenwald當然，在她剛才的答案，她真的沒有剛才所說的不she'd說，只有， “我不知道” ，但她拒絕白宮的知識在這臨別開槍很有趣，理由格林瓦德 points out指出， in the same post I linked to above: Glenn publishes emails from Pentagon officials dealing with the military analyst program that refer to weekly meetings with “karl,” to having the analysts briefed by Bush’s National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, and even to getting the analysts “in with potus” himself (that’s POTUS, or the President of the United States).在同一職位i掛鉤以上：格倫出版的電子郵件從五角大樓的官員在處理與軍事分析家的程序，是指每週一次的會議與“卡爾” ，有分析家聽取布什的國家安全事務助理哈德利，甚至越來越分析家們“在與potus ”自己（即的potus ，或美國總統） 。 As Glenn sums up, rather understatedly I believe:作為格倫總結，而不是understatedly我相信：
So in the process of discussing how to keep “their” TV military analysts “on message” regarding claims about the Iraq war, they talked about efforts to have both Stephen Hadley and Bush himself speak with the analysts — proposals that had been discussed with “karl” (which, clearly, in this case, means Rove). 因此，在討論的過程中如何保持“他們的”電視軍事分析家“的訊息”的有關索賠的有關伊拉克戰爭，他們談論的努力都斯蒂芬哈德利和布什本人發言，與分析師-的建議，已討論了與“卡爾“ （即，顯然，在這種情況下，指羅夫） 。 That means Perino’s denial was false and that the White House had at least some knowledge of and involvement in this propaganda program. 這意味著， Perino ）的否認，是虛假的，並說，白宮已至少有一些知識和參與，在這方面的宣傳計劃。
Uh oh.嗯哦。 Dana has denied something that is clearly true.德納已經否認了一些這顯然是正確的。 And it’s looking more and more as if the legal opinion that she expressed about the Pentagon’s propaganda program, “I don’t think that that should be against the law,” is just它的研究越來越多，因為如果法律意見，她表示，五角大樓的宣傳計劃， “我不認為這應該是違反法律的， ”只是 whistling in the dark吹口哨在黑暗中 . 。
The preceding article was a White House report from Eric Brewer, who will periodically attend White House press briefings for Raw Story. 前條是白宮的報告，由李家祥啤酒，誰將定期出席白宮新聞簡報為原料的故事。 Brewer is also a contributor at 啤酒也是一個投稿者在 BTC News 參與變革新聞 . 。 He was the first person to ask about the Downing Street memo at a White House briefing. 他是第一人詢問有關唐寧街備忘錄在白宮的簡報。
See More: 看到更多的： Military 軍事 USA News 美國新聞Have Your Say: White House denied knowledge of military analyst program 你說：白宮出面否認知識的一位軍事分析家的計劃
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的我們的新論壇
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 at 2:59 pm and is filed under 此項目被張貼在週四， 2008年5月15日在下午2時59分，並提交下 War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。
Free Newsletter 免費通訊 
Related News 相關新聞
- Did White House Censor Science?當時白宮檢查員科學？
- White House clams up on CIA cover-up白宮蛤了對美國中央情報局掩蓋起來
- Pentagon cuts ties with mouthpieces五角大樓削減關係的喉舌
- What are they hiding?它們是什麼隱藏？
- President Bush to veto torture Bill美國總統布什否決酷刑條例草案
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- CIA death squads killing with “impunity” in Afghanistan美國中央情報局行刑隊殺害與“有罪不罰的現象”在阿富汗
- Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee?我們為什麼要支付奧威爾的牌照費？
- Firms await verdict on £2 billion ID cards project公司正等待判決英鎊， 20.0億的身份證項目
- I was tortured to confess, Pervez tells appeal court我是折磨招供，佩爾韋茲告訴上訴法庭
- Iran busts CIA terror network伊朗胸圍中央情報局的恐怖網絡
- Propaganda and the media宣傳和新聞媒體
- Cluster Bomb Ban Opposed by US, China, Russia集束炸彈，禁止反對由美國，中國，俄羅斯
- Is the Creative Internet Just About Dead?是創造性的互聯網僅僅是死？
- Hybrid embryos ’should be banned’混合胚胎'應被禁止'
- ‘Challenging Authority’ '富有挑戰性的權威'
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔
