White House denied knowledge of military analyst program白宫出面否认知识的一位军事分析家的计划
By通过 Eric Brewer李家祥啤酒 | In the two weeks since |在两个星期以来， I asked Dana Perino我问德纳Perino ） whether the White House knew about or approved of the Pentagon’s use of TV military analysts as propaganda tools, I’ve been back to the briefing room three times (May 6, 12, and 13) to try to ask a follow-up question.白宫是否知道或批准五角大楼的使用电视军事分析家作为宣传工具，我已经回到简报室的3倍（五月六日， 12 ，和第13条） ，试图提出一项后续行动质询。 As is her wont, Dana has refused to call on me.I had been intending to essentially repeat my question, since I’ve been under the impression that she hadn’t answered it the first time.由于是她wont ，德纳拒绝，呼吁me.i已有意基本上是重复我的问题，因为我已经下的印象，她没有回答这是第一次。 But on Tuesday,但在周二， Glenn Greenwald pointed out格伦格林瓦德指出， that Perino did answer the question back on April 30. Perino ）表示，没有回答这个问题回到4月30日。 Although I didn’t realize this when I filed my last story, as seen in this虽然我没有实现这个，当我提起我在去年的故事，看到在这 video clip of the exchange视频剪辑的交流 , the White House press secretary did indeed provide a specific response. ，白宫新闻秘书确实提供了具体的回应。
I had repeated my question as she walked away from the podium, “Did the White House know about the program?” And on her way out of the room, Perino answered, “I just said: no.”我曾多次我的问题，因为她走开了，从讲台上， “白宫知道该程序？ ”和她走出房间， Perino ）回答说： “ 我刚才说的：没有” 。
(I just rechecked my own tape recording of the briefing, and that is what she said. I apologize profusely for leaving this crucial detail out of my earlier article.) （我只是复查我自己的录音的简报，而这正是她说，我道歉， profusely离开这个关键，详细列于我较早时条） 。
Of course, in her earlier answer, she really hadn’t just said no—she’d said only, “I didn’t know.” But her denial of White House knowledge during that parting shot is very interesting, for reasons that Greenwald当然，在她刚才的答案，她真的没有刚才所说的不she'd说，只有， “我不知道” ，但她拒绝白宫的知识在这临别开枪很有趣，理由格林瓦德 points out指出， in the same post I linked to above: Glenn publishes emails from Pentagon officials dealing with the military analyst program that refer to weekly meetings with “karl,” to having the analysts briefed by Bush’s National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, and even to getting the analysts “in with potus” himself (that’s POTUS, or the President of the United States).在同一职位i挂钩以上：格伦出版的电子邮件从五角大楼的官员在处理与军事分析家的程序，是指每周一次的会议与“卡尔” ，有分析家听取布什的国家安全事务助理哈德利，甚至越来越分析家们“在与potus ”自己（即的potus ，或美国总统） 。 As Glenn sums up, rather understatedly I believe:作为格伦总结，而不是understatedly我相信：
So in the process of discussing how to keep “their” TV military analysts “on message” regarding claims about the Iraq war, they talked about efforts to have both Stephen Hadley and Bush himself speak with the analysts — proposals that had been discussed with “karl” (which, clearly, in this case, means Rove). 因此，在讨论的过程中如何保持“他们的”电视军事分析家“的讯息”的有关索赔的有关伊拉克战争，他们谈论的努力都斯蒂芬哈德利和布什本人发言，与分析师-的建议，已讨论了与“卡尔“ （即，显然，在这种情况下，指罗夫） 。 That means Perino’s denial was false and that the White House had at least some knowledge of and involvement in this propaganda program. 这意味着， Perino ）的否认，是虚假的，并说，白宫已至少有一些知识和参与，在这方面的宣传计划。
Uh oh.嗯哦。 Dana has denied something that is clearly true.德纳已经否认了一些这显然是正确的。 And it’s looking more and more as if the legal opinion that she expressed about the Pentagon’s propaganda program, “I don’t think that that should be against the law,” is just它的研究越来越多，因为如果法律意见，她表示，五角大楼的宣传计划， “我不认为这应该是违反法律的， ”只是 whistling in the dark吹口哨在黑暗中 . 。
The preceding article was a White House report from Eric Brewer, who will periodically attend White House press briefings for Raw Story. 前条是白宫的报告，由李家祥啤酒，谁将定期出席白宫新闻简报为原料的故事。 Brewer is also a contributor at 啤酒也是一个投稿者在 BTC News 参与变革新闻 . 。 He was the first person to ask about the Downing Street memo at a White House briefing. 他是第一人询问有关唐宁街备忘录在白宫的简报。
See More: 看到更多的： Military 军事 USA News 美国新闻Have Your Say: White House denied knowledge of military analyst program 你说：白宫出面否认知识的一位军事分析家的计划
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的我们的新论坛
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 15th, 2008 at 2:59 pm and is filed under 此项目被张贴在周四， 2008年5月15日在下午2时59分，并提交下 War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。
Free Newsletter 免费通讯 
Related News 相关新闻
- Did White House Censor Science?当时白宫检查员科学？
- White House clams up on CIA cover-up白宫蛤了对美国中央情报局掩盖起来
- Pentagon cuts ties with mouthpieces五角大楼削减关系的喉舌
- What are they hiding?它们是什么隐藏？
- President Bush to veto torture Bill美国总统布什否决酷刑条例草案
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
- ‘Challenging Authority’ '富有挑战性的权威'
- Torture Policies Undermine 9/11 Case酷刑政策，破坏9 / 11案例
- Guantanamo official says he’s not resigning关塔那摩官员说，他不辞职
- China Says Quake Death Toll Could Top 50,000中国说，地震死亡人数可能顶端50000
- McCain: Most Troops Will Be Home by 2013马侃：大多数部队将在家中2013
- Watchdog: European DNA Database a Potential Nightmare看门狗：欧洲DNA资料库的一个潜在的噩梦
- Top Activist’s Detention Blot on Democracy最活跃的拘留污点，民主
- White House denied knowledge of military analyst program白宫出面否认知识的一位军事分析家的计划
- President Bush should be impeached for war crimes美国总统布什应该被弹劾的战争罪行
- Blair recalls despair at Bush’s victory布莱尔回顾绝望在布什的胜利
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻
Archive 存档
