Comments on: TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE

By: Dem

Dem — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:04:42 +0000

The Neo-Cons desperately wanted a Pearl Harbor. They boldly published their desire for one on the PNAC website. They needed a pretext by which to invade the middle east and suspend our Constitutional rights. They sure got one on 9/11.

Had the media not become the raging propaganda monopoly that it now is, I might take some stock in this second revisionist expose by the BBC, but no longer. The use of constant lies is now standard operating procedure in mass media and western politics. Remember, Tower 7 was rarely discussed until the Truth Movement came along.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:46:19 +0000

@Searcher

I don’t think that calling people crackpots can be used to try and discredit the arguments anymore. A poll in the US showed that 1/3 of the American people believe their government to be complicit in 9/11 in some way, that is over 100 million people in the US alone.

Another poll showed that 60% of people in the US don’t trust their governemnt, that is just shy of 200 million people.

The anti-truther movement claim we are kooks, conspiraloons, fringe elements etc. With the number of people who think it was an inside job, they will soon have to stop trying to discredit the messenger and look at the evidence empirically (rather than subjectively).

9/11 was an inside job, forget the no plane theories, Pentagon, WTC1&2, space weapons, pods, holograms, missiles etc. WTC7 is the smoking gun, it was controlled demolition plain and simple.

By: Searcher

Searcher — Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:25:12 +0000

As a South African, we have enough of our own problems to be concerned about 9/11. My brother first confronted me with these theories, and at first, I also thought it’s just another bunch of crackpots that has nothing better to do.

However, the one thing that got me convinced, was building 7. I had a new fresh look at the evidence, and found there is just too many things that doesn’t fit. The reactions of officials when being asked perfectly valid questions, only reinforces suspision. Now, I also discovered that the truth movement was started by first responders, who aren’t getting awnsers to their questions.

I’m not normally inclined to believe conspiracy theories, however, the 911 truth movement has some very compelling evidence. If someone could awnser their questions, I will be happy to change my position, but for now, I do believe that 911 was an inside job.

Remember Hitler’s words : “People would much rather believe a big lie than a small one”. I think this is the case with 911. Rather than assuming that these people are crackpots, I would suggest people find out for themselves what they’re talking about. After all, if they are right, shouldn’t Americans know? If you say they are crackpots, then it should be an informed opinion, not an ignorant one.

By: Liam

Liam — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 20:36:56 +0000

The buildings fell at a free-fall speed (under 15 seconds), defying law of conservation of momentum, which would have predicted around 45 seconds HAD there have been resistance to the collapse at each floor (which there wasnt). Then Bulding 7 just happened to implode into its own footprint 5 hours later. However, the 9/11 commision made no official report about bulding 7 in their invesigation. Coincidence? Its quite obvious that it was a controlled demolition. There are also major questions about the jet fuel (4/5ths kerasine which is not a hot-burning fuel) and its ability to melt huge steel gurders to collapse the building. Yet where is the evidence of all this mass melted steel? There are some other major questions about 9/11 which are not being answered.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:37:59 +0000

No steel framed building, before or since, has collapsed due to fire damage. The fires and impact damage in this building were asymmetrical. Two major news channels predicted the collapse by some 20 minutes due to it being put on the wire that it had collapsed. When it did collapse it completely ignored the 2nd law of thermodynamics, completely ignored the asymmetrical damage, completly ignored the law of conservation of momentum and failed completely and totally at every point around the perimeter within 1/10th of a second and collapsed in to its own footprint at almost freefall speed.

These ‘normal office fires’ had some pretty remarkable results.

By: Bob

Bob — Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:44:04 +0000

So why were there pockets of molten steel in the basement? We would like to study the steel from those buildings. Why did the government remove all of the steel from the scene and send it overseas? Our government would have us believe that we can safely fire all of the demolitions experts because we found a new way of making buildings collapse into their own footprint. Do you believe it?