|
|
INFORME DE LA TORRE 7 ESPERADO CULPAR EL FUEGO POR DERRUMBAMIENTO
Lunes 7 de julio de 2008
Era no sólo las torres gemelas que se derrumbaron el 11 de septiembre. Una tercera torre del centro de comercio mundial que no fue golpeada por los planos también cayó. Mientras que un informe en la torre 7 se prepara para publicar sus resultados, Mike Rudin considera cómo esta teoría de la conspiración consiguió ser tan grande. 9/11 es la teoría de la conspiración de la edad del Internet. Puesto “9/11 conspiración” en Google y le consiga 7.9 millones de golpes. Puesto en “9/11 verdad” y usted consiga más de 22 millones. Los sondeos de opinión en los E.E.U.U. han tomado dudas extensas entre la gente americana. Una encuesta de las noticias de Nueva York Times/CBS en 2006 encontró que el 53% de eso pensamiento preguntado la administración de Bush ocultaban algo. Otra encuesta de los E.E.U.U. encontró un tercero de ésos los oficiales del gobierno preguntados del pensamiento asistido a los ataques de 9/11 o no prohibido los para suceder. En el Reino Unido un examen por los archivos de la conspiración del BBC, realizados por GfkNOP en 2006, encontrado que el 16% de eso pensamiento preguntado allí eran una “conspiración más amplia que incluyó el gobierno americano”. Este verano será un momento dominante para los que pregunten la explicación oficial de qué sucedió en 9/11, el “9/11 movimiento self-styled de la verdad”. Casi siete años después de los acontecimientos terribles de ese día de septiembre, las autoridades de los E.E.U.U. deben publicar el informe final sobre una tercera torre que también se derrumbó en 9/11. Desemejante de las torres gemelas, este 47 cuentos, rascacielos de 610 pies no fueron golpeados por un plano. Y la torre 7 se ha convertido en una cuestión clave para los “truthers” como Dylan Avery, el director de la película del Internet cerca de 9/11 llamado Loose Change. “El movimiento de la verdad se centra pesadamente en el edificio 7 y para los muchos muy buenos de la razón de la gente sea muy sospechoso sobre qué fue abajo de ese día,” él dice. Avery precisa que la torre 7 contuvo a algunos arrendatarios inusuales: la Cia, el servicio secreto, el pentágono y la misma agencia significados para ocuparse de los desastres o de los ataques en Nueva York - la oficina del terrorista de la gerencia de la emergencia. Y alguna gente piensa que la torre 7 era el lugar en donde una conspiración de 9/11 fue tramada. La explicación oficial es que los fuegos ordinarios eran la razón principal del derrumbamiento de la torre 7. That makes this the first and only tall skyscraper in the world to have collapsed because of fire. Yet despite that all the thousands of tonnes of steel from the building were carted away and melted down. The way official bodies have investigated Tower 7 at the World Trade Center has made some people think they’re hiding something. Its destruction was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report. An inquiry by the Federal Emergency Management Agency said the building collapsed because intense fires had burned for hours, fed by thousands of gallons of diesel stored in the building for emergency generators. But its report said this had “only a low probability of occurrence” and more work was needed. That was in May 2002. The task has now fallen to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based at a sprawling campus near Washington DC. For more than two-and-a-half years, scientists there have been studying Tower 7. Inevitably the officials have been criticised for being slow and even of being frightened to publish. But the lead investigator at NIST, who heads up their World Trade Center inquiry, Dr Shyam Sunder, says that two-and-a-half years is typically how long an aeroplane crash investigation takes. He added that only in the last few years did they begin to hear criticism from the “truth” movement. “It’s only at the very end in 2005 that this group became more vocal and we found them coming to some of our meetings. But for a long time they were not even present. It wasn’t the delay that really caused them, they just woke up one morning and decided to take this on as an issue.” Soul searching In April 2005, the first thousand DVDs of Dylan Avery’s Loose Change movie were pressed. It cost just $2,000 to make. It was a critical moment for the development of the movement. The makers of Loose Change claim it has now been viewed by more than a hundred million people. Steven Jones, a former physics professor at Brigham Young University, who has become the leading academic voice in the movement, first watched a video of the collapse of Tower 7 in the spring of 2005. But when he did, he said he was taken aback as a physicist.
The American architect Richard Gage’s conversion came in 2006 when driving along he heard an independent radio station interviewing the theologian David Ray Griffin. “I had to do some real soul searching and some research. And the more I discovered the more disturbed I became and realized I was looking for… the architects and the engineers.” Finding that they hadn’t really entered the fray by then, Gage decided he had to act. “It just came to me, I had to start an organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.” The fifth anniversary of 9/11 was a huge moment for “truthers”. Under the media spotlight protests intensified, websites were spawned and internet films proliferated. With the publicity also came the “debunkers”, challenging the “truthers” at every stage. After Loose Change came a website called Screw Loose Change. And internet film 9/11 Mysteries was followed by Screw 9/11 Mysteries. Conspiracy splits And the “truthers” have fought back. When the US technology magazine Popular Mechanics launched a book called Debunking 9/11 Myths, it was countered with a book by David Ray Griffin called Debunking 9/11 Debunking. Over time the scale of the alleged conspiracy has grown and grown, encompassing not just sections of the Bush administration, intelligence, but also the fire service, the police, first responders, official investigators, experts, the building’s owner, and the media, and, oh yes, even the BBC.
And over time schisms have opened up in the 9/11 “truth” movement. So-called “no-planers” believe that commercial aeroplanes did not actually crash into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania. Some have suggested lasers from outer space were used. “Planers” believe aeroplanes were used but argue that only controlled demolitions can explain the collapses of the World Trade Center towers. Then there are the LIHOPs and MIHOPs. Most “truthers” are MIHOPs - they think the government Made It Happen On Purpose, planning and orchestrating the 9/11 attacks. But LIHOPs believe the government just Let It Happen On Purpose, to allow them to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and a clampdown on civil liberties. Into this febrile atmosphere comes the final official report on 9/11. This summer we will find out whether NIST’s report has answered the many questions that have been raised, or whether it will suffer the same fate as the Warren Commission on the assassination of President John F Kennedy and merely add fuel to the conspiracy theories.  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7488159.stm Have Your Say: TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. 6 Responses to “TOWER 7 REPORT EXPECTED TO BLAME FIRE FOR COLLAPSE”
Related News
|
Activists arrested because of UK Indymedia secret IP logging Last post by Unregistered @ 07:31 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) & the All-Digital TV Broadcast Signal: Connection Last post by loki @ 06:46 PM Israel Treated Gaza Like Its Own Private Death Laboratory Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:28 PM New collapse footage of WTC7 and North Tower - Nov 2008 Last post by Regina @ 06:21 PM Study takes step toward erasing bad memories Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:21 PM Galaxy has 'billions of Earths' Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:17 PM Skinheads, Neo-Nazis Draw Fury at Dresden 1945 ?Mourning March? Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:10 PM UK police seize Gaza aid vans Last post by Victor @ 04:24 PM Foot vs Brain Last post by Regina @ 03:35 PM G20 leaders will face mass protests Last post by Boris The Bullet Dodger @ 03:34 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive
|
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
UK Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, on drugs Top MI6 spy: Terrorism less serious than bird flu Lendman: Obama's 'War on Terror' Amy Goodman: Obama?s Afghan Trap Scottish Ministers 'completely opposed' to ID cards |
Ian commented on: UK Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, on drugs “Runciman has a history of being behind liberalisation. ” - Shock, horror, she’s not... Continue Reading & Reply Jim the Jamster commented on: Scottish Ministers ‘completely opposed’ to ID cards We do not do dodgy ID cards for ?10 and we do not hack into the... Continue Reading & Reply John Church commented on: Most Britons want troops out of Afghanistan: poll To-day 14th February yet another brave young marine has given his life to a cause... Continue Reading & Reply Sgant commented on: Why You Should Delete Your MySpace Account though I in no way, shape, or form support any type of racism we should still allow free speech.... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
So why were there pockets of molten steel in the basement? We would like to study the steel from those buildings. Why did the government remove all of the steel from the scene and send it overseas? Our government would have us believe that we can safely fire all of the demolitions experts because we found a new way of making buildings collapse into their own footprint. Do you believe it?