|
|
번역하십시오:
             
고문은 이라크 전쟁을 판매하기 위하여 작동했다
토요일, 2009년 4월 25일
딕 체니를 위한 3개의 환호. 이전 부통령은, 고문 메모의 Obama 행정 방출 좀더 아무리 수사학으로 촉구했다. "나가 이 최근 노출에 관하여 조금 교란을 찾아내는 것의 한개 그들 껐다 법적인 메모, CIA가 법률 상담의 사무실에게서 얻은 메모를이다, 그러나 노력의 성공을 보여준 메모를,"는 FoxNews를 말한 이전 부통령 끄지 않았다. " 나는 지금 형식적으로 그 메모 그래서 우리를 기밀 취급을 해제하기 위하여 조치를 취하는 CIA가 거기 그들을 밖으로 놓을 수 있고 미국 사람들은 우리가 얻고 무슨 무슨, 그리고 얼마나 좋았던 정보가." 배운지 인 보는 기회가 다는 것을 물었다 보도 기록은 여부 씨 다르다. Cheney는 형식적으로 요구를 만들었다, 그러나 완전한 기록을 보기 위하여 미국 사람들이 필요로 하는 그는 절대로 맞다. 그는 기록이 보여줄 무슨을에 관하여 틀리다. 이미 신문인이 풀어 놓이거나 색출하고 물자에서, 명확하다 그 씨. 부시는 1 차로 필요한 정보를 이용에 확보하고기 위하여, 그러나 그들이 이라크의 그들의 내습을 판매했었다 주의를 창조하기 위하여 고문, 성공했다. 기록은 군의 상원 의원 피억류자의 처리에 보고를 포함하여 다양한 근원에서, 온다. 칼 Levin 군대 위원회는 지금 막 풀어 놓았다. 보고는 펜타곤 관리가 - 2001년 12월 이미 - 고문을 - 또는 "입버릇 나쁜 심문 기술" 사용하기 위하여 준비 시작했다는 것을 계시했다. 이것은의 시작 후에 2 달 미만이었다 전쟁 아프가니스탄에서는 8 달 법무부 2002년 8월 1일 날짜가 기입될 2개의 메모에 있는 법적인 허가를, Jay Bybee, 법률 상담의 사무실을 위한 그때 조수 법무 장관에 의하여 주기 전에 서명했다. 첫번째 메모는 육체 및 정신 고문을 재정의하고 총사령관으로 그의 체질상 힘에 의하여 행동해 대통령이, 반대로 고문한ㄴ다는 것을 법령을 연방을 무시할 수 있었다는 것을 건의했다. 피해자를 그는 익사하고 있다 느낀 두번째 분석하고 찬성되고 특정한 심문 전술, 고립을 포함하여, 머리말을 붙인 잠 박탈, 긴장 위치 waterboarding. 그렇지 않으면 누구, 사법부 변호사는 더 이른 허가를 주었는가? 상원 보고는 decider 에서 장, 조지 W. 대통령에 의무를 직접적으로 둔다. 부시. He issued a written determination on February 7, 2002, “that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, which would have afforded minimum standards for humane treatment, did not apply to al-Qaeda or Taliban detainees.” Former White House terrorist adviser Richard Clarke has confirmed that Mr. Bush gave an informal go-ahead even earlier. According to Clarke’s account in his book, “Against All Enemies,” Bush addressed his national security advisers late on September 11, 2001. “We are at war and we will stay at war until this is done,” Bush told them. “Any barriers in your way, they’re gone.” Later he added in a heated exchange with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, “I don’t care what the international lawyers say, we are going to kick some ass.” The Senate report also pointed the finger at Mr. Cheney and other top officials of the Bush administration. “Members of the President’s Cabinet and other senior officials participated in meetings inside the White House in 2002 and 2003 where specific interrogation techniques were discussed,” the committee concluded. “National Security Council principals reviewed the CIA’s interrogation program during that period.” Why so much attention from the top? McClatchy news has provided the obvious answer. According to a former senior US intelligence official and a former Army psychiatrist, the Bush administration wanted “to find evidence of cooperation between al-Qaeda and the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s regime.” ”There were two reasons why these interrogations were so persistent, and why extreme methods were used,” said the former official. “The main one is that everyone was worried about some kind of follow-up attack (after 9/11). But for most of 2002 and into 2003, Cheney and Rumsfeld, especially, were also demanding proof of the links between al-Qaeda and Iraq that (former Iraqi exile leader Ahmed) Chalabi and others had told them were there.” In part to get that smoking gun, the CIA waterboarded Khalid Sheikh Mohammed 183 times and Abu Zubaydah 83 times. But neither man told the interrogators what Bush and Cheney wanted to hear about Iraq and al-Qaeda. That came from Ibn al Sheikh al Libi, whom the Bush administration sent to Egypt for what CIA Director George Tenet called “further debriefing.” As PBS Frontline reported back in November 2007, al Libi “confessed” - after being beaten repeatedly and locked in a small box for some 17 hours - that Saddam Hussein had trained al-Qaeda in chemical weapons. Al Libi later retracted his statement and the CIA later rejected it as reliable intelligence. But the torture of al Libi worked to sell the war in Iraq, providing the “evidence” that Secretary of State Colin Powell used when he spoke before the United Nations Security Council in February 2003. ”I can trace the story of a senior terrorist operative telling how Iraq provided training in these [chemical and biological] weapons to al-Qaeda,” Powell asserted. “Fortunately, this operative is now detained, and he has told his story.” Torture might not work as well as conventional interrogation to provide sound intelligence, but it certainly worked for Bush and Cheney in exactly the way they most wanted. Steve Weissman Have Your Say: Torture Worked to Sell the Iraq War Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Don’t discount Israel pre-emptive strike, Hillary Clinton warns Iran Last post by loki @ 06:34 PM
Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
MP Blunkett injured in cow attack Last post by loki @ 06:28 PM Programming Language Inventor or Serial Killer? Last post by loki @ 06:25 PM No shortage of European bedfellows for BNP Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:19 PM A full third of US cocaine smuggled in subs Last post by Nostalgia @ 06:09 PM Is America a Great Country? Last post by UseGoodProtection @ 05:31 PM Tornado seen moving over Suffolk Last post by Nostalgia @ 05:27 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
I hope people do something. Even John McCain who helped write a torture law has decided that torture should not be looked into and no one (yes, NO ONE) should be held accountable. That is a coward.