Het systeem van de Defensie van de Raket van de V.S.
De beschermer | Het is een nieuwe manier om uw eigen leven te nemen. Enkel aangezien Rusland aantoont wat aan vroegere minions gebeurt die het ergeren, komt Polen overeen om een basis van de de raketdefensie van de V.S. te ontvangen. De Russen, aangezien verwacht Polen, aan dit voorstel door om het land in een parkerenpartij aan te bieden te veranderen antwoordt. Dit bewijst dat het systeem van de raketdefensie na allen noodzakelijk is: het zal de raketten Rusland nu zal streven naar Polen, de Tsjechische Republiek en het UK in antwoord op, ER, hun betrokkenheid in het systeem van de raketdefensie tegenhouden.
De Amerikaanse overheid dringt erop aan dat de interceptors, die op de Baltische kust zullen worden geplaatst, niets hebben met Rusland te doen: hun doel is Europa en de V.S. tegen de intercontinentale ballistische raketten Iran te verdedigen en Noord-Korea bezit niet. Vandaar dat worden zij geplaatst in Polen, dat, zoals elke aardrijkskundestudent in Texas het weet, een grens met beide schurkenstaten deelt.
Zij laten ons toe om zich te verheugen op een het gloeien toekomst, waarin de raketdefensie, volgens het Pentagoon, „ons geboorteland… en onze vrienden en bondgenoten tegen ballistische raketaanval“ zal beschermen; zolang de Russen wachten tot het werkt alvorens zij ons wapen. Het goede nieuws is dat, naar rato van huidige vooruitgang, de betrouwbare raketdefensie weg slechts 50 jaar is. Het slechte nieuws is dat het 50 jaar weg in de afgelopen zes decennia is geweest.
Het systeem is in ontwikkeling sinds 1946 geweest, en tot dusver heeft het een totaal generaal van niets bereikt. U zou het niet kennen als u de persmededelingen leest die door het agentschap van de de raketdefensie van het Pentagoon worden gepubliceerd: eigenschappen de van het woord „succes“ vaker dan een ander zelfstandig naamwoord. Het is waar dat het programma erin is geslaagd om twee uit de vijf raketten te raken die in de loop van de afgelopen vijf jaar tijdens tests van zijn hoofdcomponent in brand worden gestoken, het de defensie (GMD) systeem ground-based van de middenbaanraket. Maar droevig, dragen deze tests geen relatie aan om het even wat die op een echte kernstaking lijkt.
Al proevenlooppas tot dusver - succesvol of anders - is gemonteerd. Het doel, zijn type, baan en bestemming, zijn gekend alvorens de test begint. Slechts één vijandelijke raket wordt gebruikt, aangezien het systeem geen hoop in hel van het neerhalen van twee of meer heeft. If decoy missiles are deployed, they bear no resemblance to the target and they are identified as decoys in advance. In order to try to enhance the appearance of success, recent flight tests have become even less realistic: the agency has now stopped using decoys altogether when testing its GMD system.
This points to one of the intractable weaknesses of missile defence: it is hard to see how the interceptors could ever outwit enemy attempts to confuse them. As Philip Coyle - formerly a senior official at the Pentagon with responsibility for missile defence - points out, there are endless means by which another state could fool the system. For every real missile it launched, it could dispatch a host of dummies with the same radar and infra-red signatures. Even balloons or bits of metal foil would render anything resembling the current system inoperable. You can reduce a missile’s susceptibility to laser penetration by 90% by painting it white. This sophisticated avoidance technology, available from your local hardware shop, makes another multibillion component of the programme obsolete. Or you could simply forget about ballistic missiles and attack using cruise missiles, against which the system is useless.
Missile defence is so expensive and the measures required to evade it so cheap that if the US government were serious about making the system work it would bankrupt the country, just as the arms race helped to bring the Soviet Union down. By spending a couple of billion dollars on decoy technologies, Russia would commit the US to trillions of dollars of countermeasures. The cost ratios are such that even Iran could outspend the US.
The US has spent between $120bn and $150bn on the programme since Ronald Reagan relaunched it in 1983. Under George Bush, the costs have accelerated. The Pentagon has requested $62bn for the next five-year tranche, which means that the total cost between 2003 and 2013 will be $110bn. Yet there are no clear criteria for success. As a recent paper in the journal Defense and Security Analysis shows, the Pentagon invented a new funding system in order to allow the missile defence programme to evade the government’s usual accounting standards. It’s called spiral development, which is quite appropriate, because it ensures that the costs spiral out of control.
Spiral development means, in the words of a Pentagon directive, that “the end-state requirements are not known at programme initiation”. Instead, the system is allowed to develop in whatever way officials think fit. The result is that no one has the faintest idea what the programme is supposed to achieve, or whether it has achieved it. There are no fixed dates, no fixed costs for any component of the programme, no penalties for slippage or failure, no standards of any kind against which the system can be judged. And this monstrous scheme is still incapable of achieving what a few hundred dollars’ worth of diplomacy could do in an afternoon.
So why commit endless billions to a programme that is bound to fail? I’ll give you a clue: the answer is in the question. It persists because it doesn’t work.
US politics, because of the failure by both Republicans and Democrats to deal with the problems of campaign finance, is rotten from head to toe. But under Bush, the corruption has acquired Nigerian qualities. Federal government is a vast corporate welfare programme, rewarding the industries that give millions of dollars in political donations with contracts worth billions. Missile defence is the biggest pork barrel of all, the magic pudding that won’t run out, however much you eat. The funds channelled to defence, aerospace and other manufacturing and service companies will never run dry because the system will never work.
To keep the pudding flowing, the administration must exaggerate the threats from nations that have no means of nuking it - and ignore the likely responses of those that do. Russia is not without its own corrupting influences. You could see the grim delight of the Russian generals and defence officials last week, who have found in this new deployment an excuse to enhance their power and demand bigger budgets. Poor old Poland, like the Czech Republic and the UK, gets strongarmed into becoming America’s groundbait.
If we seek to understand American foreign policy in terms of a rational engagement with international problems, or even as an effective means of projecting power, we are looking in the wrong place. The government’s interests have always been provincial. It seeks to appease lobbyists, shift public opinion at crucial stages of the political cycle, accommodate crazy Christian fantasies and pander to television companies run by eccentric billionaires. The US does not really have a foreign policy. It has a series of domestic policies which it projects beyond its borders. That they threaten the world with 57 varieties of destruction is of no concern to the current administration. The only question of interest is who gets paid and what the political kickbacks will be.
Have Your Say: The US Missile Defence System
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 20th, 2008 at 1:50 pm and is filed under War & Terrorism News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Translations
Loading ...Related News
- Poland to host US defence shield
- Congress delivers blow to Bush’s European missile project by slashing funding
- Nato to back US missile defence
- Putin rejects Bush’s missile plans
- Russia said to receive U.S. missile shield plan
Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines
- L.A. City Council Decides to Outlaw New Fast Food Restaurants
- A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
- US oil pipeline politics and the Russia-Georgia conflict
- Pentagon can’t find $2.3 trillion, wasting trillions on ‘national defense’
- New Guidelines Would Give F.B.I. Broader Powers
- Scientists to study synthetic telepathy
- London tube workers hit back at profiteers
- Britain’s terror laws have left me and my family shattered
- Police to get £40m mobile fingerprinting kit
- Libby questioned on forged letter linking Saddam to 9/11
More Breaking News
Archive
