|
|
Translate:
              NATO: 6,000 troops urgently needed in Afghanistan
Monday, June 23rd, 2008 BERLIN (Reuters) | Up to 6,000 additional troops are urgently needed in Afghanistan and a failure to deploy them will only prolong the presence of Western forces in the country, a German NATO general said on Sunday. Egon Ramms told public radio station Deutschlandfunk that alliance members would end up paying a price later if they did not boost troop numbers now. “We are talking about a total of 5,000, 6,000 soldiers,” Ramms said. “We need these soldiers now, very soon, because we need to hold specific areas, we need to win over Afghanistan’s citizens and because at some point, in 2010, 2011 or 2012 we will want to hand over responsibility to Afghan forces. Roughly 60,000 foreign troops are in Afghanistan, most of them part of the NATO-led International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF), but security has deteriorated over the past two years. Some 6,000 people were killed in 2007, the deadliest year since U.S.-led and Afghan forces toppled the Taliban in 2007. “The troops that I don’t have now could lead to delays in the withdrawal of NATO and ISAF,” Ramms said. “In other words, the costs that are not being paid now will have a negative impact on the bottom line at some point.” Ramms declined to say how many additional German troops he thought were necessary, but said Germany should increase the number of troops it can send to Afghanistan from a fixed ceiling of 3,500. The parliamentary mandate for German troops operating in Afghanistan is due to expire in October and Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung is expected to request an increase of at least 1,000 in the troop limit. (Writing by Noah Barkin) Have Your Say: NATO: 6,000 troops urgently needed in Afghanistan Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. One Response to “NATO: 6,000 troops urgently needed in Afghanistan”
Related News
|
Mumia Abu-Jamal Faces US Supreme Court as New Book and Film Expose Injustice Last post by Unregistered @ 08:44 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Just The Facts Please Last post by jamiedb @ 03:56 AM What Is Marxism? Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 02:31 AM Open Publishing. Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 02:13 AM Why nationalisation isn't socialism Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 01:41 AM Huge Planet Defies Explanation Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:20 AM Blow to the blockade in the USA Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 01:18 AM Scientists develop guilt detector to catch smugglers at customs Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:13 AM Boffins unveil life-like robogirl Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:10 AM The bishop and the 'bank robbers' Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 01:08 AM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Another Education is Possible Censorship and Freedom of Speech |
stony commented on: Smoking Ban To Hit Amsterdam Coffee Shops Yo guys, Don’t be scared about the ban in the coffeshops, it is still the same, nobody cares... Continue Reading & Reply denita commented on: McCain-Palin Campaign Increasingly Staffed by Bush Administration Officials the usa election is a set up…(they gave him a chance to... Continue Reading & Reply Maximus V commented on: VIDEO: Martin Bell - Media Censorship & War Criminals There is a prof in the background 40.11 into this vid, when the question about... Continue Reading & Reply Andrew Yu-Jen Wang commented on: Would Obama prosecute the Bush administration for torture? George W. Bush’s sentence-by-sen tence speaking skills are... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
ITS one big CON!
More of Bush’s dirty work.