Breaking News 實時新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭與恐怖主義的新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
| |
 | Translate: 翻譯：               Lies begin to unravel in police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes謊言開始瓦解警察謀殺讓查爾斯德梅內塞斯 Friday, October 17th, 2008 星期五， 2008年一十月17日 By通過 Vicky Short and Paul Mitchell維基短期和保羅米切爾 | Explosive testimony has been presented to the inquest into the police killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, suggesting that he was shot even though he was known to be unarmed.爆炸性的證詞已提交調查納入警察殺害讓查爾斯德梅內塞斯，表明他被槍殺即使他被稱為是手無寸鐵的。 Evidence was given that the innocent Brazilian was killed despite his not being clearly identified as a suspected terrorist.證據是考慮到巴西的無辜被殺害，儘管他沒有被明確認定為恐怖嫌疑。 In addition, officers involved have said that they were prepared to kill de Menezes even without authorisation from commanding officer Cressida Dick.此外，有關人員說，他們準備殺死德梅內塞斯甚至未經批准擅自從指揮官克瑞西達迪克。 Jean Charles was fatally shot two weeks after the July 7 bombings in London, which killed 56 people and one day after an apparent failed second attempt to detonate devices.讓查爾斯開槍打死兩個星期後， 7月7日倫敦爆炸案，造成56人死亡和一天後，第二次失敗顯然企圖引爆裝置。 He was reportedly mistaken for Hussain Osman, one of the failed July 21, 2005, bombers.據說，他被誤認為是侯賽因奧斯曼，一個失敗的2005年7月21號，轟炸機。 Anti-terror officers pinned him to the floor of a London underground train and pumped seven bullets into his head at point-blank range.反恐官員寄予他發言的倫敦地鐵列車和7發子彈抽水到他的頭部在近距離。 Last week, a Special Branch officer revealed that he altered his notes because they indicated that police shot dead Jean Charles as he boarded a train at Stockwell tube station on July 22, 2005, even though he was known to be unarmed.上週，特別處官員透露，他改變他指出，因為他們指出，警察開槍打死查爾斯讓他登上一列火車在倫敦地鐵站7月22日， 2005年，儘管他被稱為是手無寸鐵的。 The officer, referred to as “Owen,” was giving evidence on October 8.軍官，被稱為“歐文” ，提供證據是在10月8日。 Owen was deputy surveillance coordinator in the Scotland Yard control room during the surveillance operation that resulted in the young electrician’s death and had made notes about the day’s events on his computer.歐文副監視協調員倫敦警察廳在控制室的監視行動中的年輕電工的死亡和注意到了有關當天發生的事對他的電腦。 After he had given his evidence at the inquest, Owen was asked for all his notes relating to the shooting.之後他給他的證據的調查，歐文有人問他的所有注意到有關射擊。 He claims he logged onto his computer to change the names of officers into the codenames given by the court to protect their identities, but then deleted a paragraph in which Dick, who is now deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, had told officers to allow Jean Charles to continue his journey because he was “not carrying anything.”他聲稱，他登錄到自己的電腦更改姓名的官員給予的代號由法院來保護他們的身份，但後來刪除了該段切尼，誰現在是副助理專員都市警察，告訴警察，讓讓查爾斯繼續他的旅程，因為他“沒有攜帶任何東西。 ” The full paragraph reads, “Management discussion.充分段內容， “管理的討論。 CD [Cressida Dick]: Can run on to tube as not carrying anything.裁談會[克瑞西達切尼] ：可以運行在以管為沒有攜帶任何東西。 Persuaded by unidentified male amongst management.”說服被身份不明的男性之間的管理。 “ It flatly contradicts Dick’s own evidence at the inquest on October 7, the previous day, in which she claimed that she ordered her officers to “stop” Jean Charles because he was a “terrorist threat.”這違背了美國斷然自己的證據的調查在10月7日，前一天，她聲稱，她命令她軍官“一站式”讓查爾斯，因為他是一個“恐怖主義的威脅。 ” Owen says he deleted the paragraph because it was “misleading.” He claimed he couldn’t remember if it was Dick talking although he said it was probably her when questioned further.歐文說，他該段刪除，因為它是“誤導之嫌。 ”他聲稱，他無法忘記，如果這是切尼說雖然他說，這是她時，很可能進一步質疑。 “I believe it was the commander but when I reflected I couldn’t be sure, or whether she was saying this is what we are going to do or this is one of the options. “我相信，這是指揮員但是當我反映我不能肯定，還是她說這就是我們要做的還是這是一個選項。 It was a woman’s voice.”這是一個女人的聲音。 “ When asked if he realised he had committed a serious offence, Owen said, “I have removed a line I believed was wrong and gave a totally false impression.” He told the inquest he had deleted more than he had intended because he was rushing to an appointment.當記者問他是否意識到他已犯下了嚴重罪行，歐文說： “我已刪除了一條線我認為是錯誤的，給一個完全錯誤的印象。 ”他告訴他的調查中刪除了超過他打算，因為他急於預約。 When asked if “management” had asked him to make the changes, Owen replied, “No.當被問及是否“管理”要求他作出改變，歐文回答說， “第 I am sure of that, sir.”我相信這一點，先生。 “ Owen also made the startling revelation that he did not submit the crucial paragraph to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) inquiry in 2006 or the health and safety trial last year into the shooting, at which he gave evidence, “because he wasn’t asked to.”歐文還提出了驚人的發現，他沒有提出的重要段落，投訴警方獨立監察委員會（警監會）的調查在2006年或健康和安全的審判去年的射擊，在他的證據“ ，因為他沒有要求。 “ Commander Dick also claimed she was informed “they think it’s him” when Jean Charles left a building linked to Hussain Osman and made his way to Stockwell station.指揮官迪克還聲稱她被告知“他們認為這是他”讓查爾斯時，留下了建設與奧斯曼侯賽因和他的方式托克維爾站。 Chief Inspector Vince Esposito, a counter-terrorism expert advising Dick on the day of the shooting, said he believed, “without a shadow of doubt,” that Jean Charles was failed bomber Hussain Osman and that a “critical shot” to the head was only administered if a suspect was identified and was carrying a device.總監文埃斯波西托，反恐怖主義專家諮詢切尼在當天的拍攝，他認為， “毫無疑問， ”這讓查爾斯失敗轟炸機和奧斯曼侯賽因說， “關鍵開槍”的頭部只有管理，如果發現嫌疑人，並攜帶設備。 However, speaking at the inquest on October 10, “Pat,” who acted as contact between Scotland Yard and the surveillance team, reported he had said only that Mr. de Menezes was “possibly identifiable with” the suspect.然而，出席研訊10月10日， “八， ”誰擔任之間的聯繫和蘇格蘭場的監視小組，報告他只是說，德梅內塞斯先生是“可能是識別為”犯罪嫌疑人。 “I was always under the impression that the subject had been unidentified,” he stated. “我一直的印象是，這個問題一直不明， ”他說。 Another senior officer, Detective Inspector Merrick Rose, revealed that he could not “recall” whether images of the real suspect, Osman, were discussed at a dawn briefing before Jean Charles’s death—begging the question, was a comparison between the two men ever made?另一位高級官員，探長梅里克羅斯透露，他不能“召回”的形象是否真正的嫌疑人，奧斯曼，討論了在黎明之前，讓簡報查爾斯的死亡乞討的問題，是一個比較兩名男子以往做的？ Dick denies that her instruction to “stop” Jean Charles was an order to shoot to kill and that she did not say “at all costs.”切尼否認，她的指示， “一站式”讓查爾斯是為了拍攝殺死，她沒有說“不惜一切代價。 ” Mark Lewindon, now retired, was a detective chief inspector in Special Branch at the time.馬克Lewindon ，現在退休了，是一個偵緝總督察特別處的時間。 He had told the inquest he had overheard the order from Dick when she was speaking in the operations room at New Scotland Yard.他曾告訴審訊他已聽到了命令，切尼時說，她的業務室，新蘇格蘭場。 “It was said he shouldn’t be allowed to get on the train and I think the words she used were ‘at all costs,’ ” he said. “這是說，他不應該允許讓在火車上，我想的話，她使用了'不惜一切代價， ”他說。 Dick responded in her defence that “I would need to be absolutely satisfied that this person posed a dreadful imminent threat to members of the public before I would order a critical shot.”切尼在回答自己辯護說： “我將需要絕對滿意，此人提出了一個可怕的迫在眉睫的威脅市民之前，我將下令開槍的關鍵。 ” “I was asking for what you might call a conventional—albeit aware of all the risks—challenge from the firearms officers.” “我要求你可能要求的常規，儘管知道所有的風險挑戰的槍支人員。 ” Subsequent evidence demonstrated that, whether or not Dick was calling to make operational a shoot-to-kill policy, the police involved had already been instructed to do just that.後來的證據表明，不論是切尼要求，使開辦一個格殺勿論的政策，涉及的警察已經接到指示，要做到這一點。 A tactical adviser and senior firearms advisor known as Trojan 84 made the extraordinary admission to the inquest that police were prepared to take a “critical” shot without orders from their superiors.一個戰術顧問和高級顧問的槍支被稱為84木馬了非凡的接納調查，警方準備採取一個“危急” 槍決上級的命令。 The inspector had been in charge of briefing the marksmen who shot dead Jean Charles.督察一直負責簡報的神槍手開槍打死誰讓查爾斯。 Giving evidence in open court for the first time, Trojan 84 said: “We felt that for any DSO [designated senior officer] to make a decision about a critical shot was a hugely difficult decision to make and maybe career-threatening.提供證據在法庭公開的第一時間，木馬84說： “我們認為，任何數字示波器[指定的高級官員]作出決定的一個關鍵開槍是一個非常困難的決定作出，也許職業生涯的威脅。 “In relation to the critical shot, the instruction would come direct from the DSO but what I also mentioned was that if we were able to challenge, but the subject was not compliant, then a shot may be taken.” “關於關鍵球，指令將直接從數字示波器但我還提到，如果我們能夠挑戰，但這個問題是不符合，然後一桿可能採取的。 ” When Trojan 84 was asked if officers were prepared to take the critical shot without authorisation, he replied, “Yes.”當木馬84 ，如果有人問人員準備採取的關鍵未經授權開槍，他回答， “是的。 ” “It was my job to tell the team they would be supported whatever decision they took because of the structures that were in place.” “這是我的工作告訴球隊，他們將支持任何決定，因為他們的結構，已經到位。 ” Trojan 84 could only have conceivably issued such instructions if they had been already laid down at the highest possible level—much higher than the DSO Cressida Dick.木馬84只能可以想像發出這種指示他們是否已經放下在盡可能高的級別，遠遠高於數字示波器克瑞西達迪克。 The shoot-to-kill policy implemented against Jean Charles is known as “Operation Kratos,” adopted in secret two years earlier in high-level discussions between top police officers and the government.該格殺勿論的政策實施對讓查爾斯稱為“克拉托斯行動” ，通過秘密兩年前在高級別討論兩國高層警官和政府。 Under its remit, a senior police officer is on standby 24 hours a day at Scotland Yard, the headquarters of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), with the authority to deploy special armed squads to follow and, if deemed necessary, shoot dead suspected suicide bombers.根據其職權，一名高級警務人員正在待命，每天24小時倫敦警察廳總部的警視廳服務（公安部） ，並授權部署特殊的武裝小隊遵循，如果認為有必要，擊斃疑似自殺轟炸機。 It is now clear that, without any clear identification or indication of an imminent threat, the police were determined that someone would die that day in furtherance of the so-called “war on terror.”現在很清楚，如果沒有任何明確的身份證明或說明迫在眉睫的威脅，警方認定，有人會死於這一天，以推動所謂的“反恐戰爭” 。 Moreover, even the limited safeguard of accountability to a designated superior officer would not be allowed to interfere with what was a political and not a security-driven decision . As the World Socialist Web Site insisted in the immediate aftermath of police murder, “there was a deliberate decision to kill, rather than arrest, de Menezes, taken at the highest level of the police force rather than by the officers immediately involved.”此外，即使在有限的保障責任到指定的上級軍官不得干涉什麼是政治，而不是安全驅動的決定 。作為世界社會主義網站在堅持後立即警察謀殺， “有故意殺人的決定，而不是逮捕，德梅內塞斯，採取了最高級別的警察部隊，而不是由官員直接參與。 “ Jean Charles was shot in cold blood primarily in order “to instill fear in the population and implement a shoot-to-kill policy that had been secretly decided on by Prime Minister Tony Blair and top officials two years previously.” The treatment meted out to de Menezes sent out the clear message—first articulated by Blair—that the “rules of the game” had changed.讓查爾斯被擊中冷血主要是為了“灌輸恐懼的人口和執行格殺勿論的政策，已經秘密決定，由英國首相布萊爾和高級官員兩年以前。 ”的待遇了德梅內塞斯發出了明確的信息，首先闡明了布萊爾，說， “遊戲規則”發生了變化。 Have Your Say: Lies begin to unravel in police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes 你說：謊言開始瓦解警察謀殺讓查爾斯德梅內塞斯 Please read our請仔細閱讀我們的 posting guidelines before posting張貼在發布前的指導方針 . 。 Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here你可以討論這份報告在這裡 . 。 Related News 相關新聞
| Criminal, Immoral And Now A Farce刑事的，不道德的，現在是一場鬧劇 Last post by ZingPao @ 01:47 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午01時47 Go to Forum進入論壇 | Latest Topics最新的話題 Trick or Treat?不給糖就搗蛋？ Last post by ZingPao @ 01:44 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午01點44分 Just The Facts Please只要事實請 Last post by loki @ 01:22 AM 最後職位洛基@上午01點22 Political Compass Test政治指南針測試 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:55 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午12時55 Seven-point plan for Britain's crisis-KEN LIVINGSTONE 7點計劃，英國的危機肯利文斯通 Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:39 AM 最後職位懷舊@上午12時39分 Syd Barrett's Pink Floyd悉尼Barrett的平克弗洛伊德 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:32 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午12時32分 Vote Third Party表決第三者 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:13 AM 最後職位ZingPao @上午12時13分 Time To Lighten Up Or Light Up Or Both時間，減輕了或輕或兩 Last post by ZingPao @ 11:58 PM 最後職位ZingPao @下午11時58分 George Galloway on Talksport加洛韋對Talksport Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:13 PM 最後職位懷舊@下午11點13 Jack Nicholson 1978 and his Hydrogen fuelled car 1978年傑克尼科爾森和他的氫燃料汽車 Last post by Unregistered @ 11:01 PM 上次未註冊後@下午11時零一分  Email This Page To A Friend 本頁發送給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的頭條
More更多 Breaking News實時新聞  Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD商店 | | Opinion 意見 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 中表達的意見RINF新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者（ s ）和不一定反映意見的管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. RINF.COM ：打破新聞和其他媒體的版權-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
