Breaking News 实时新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争与恐怖主义的新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页
论坛
最新新闻
RINF论坛
Translate: 翻译: Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Lies begin to unravel in police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes谎言开始瓦解警察谋杀让查尔斯德梅内塞斯

Friday, October 17th, 2008 星期五, 2008年一十月17日

By通过 Vicky Short and Paul Mitchell维基短期和保罗米切尔 |

Explosive testimony has been presented to the inquest into the police killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, suggesting that he was shot even though he was known to be unarmed.爆炸性的证词已提交调查纳入警察杀害让查尔斯德梅内塞斯,表明他被枪杀即使他被称为是手无寸铁的。

Evidence was given that the innocent Brazilian was killed despite his not being clearly identified as a suspected terrorist.证据是考虑到巴西的无辜被杀害,尽管他没有被明确认定为恐怖嫌疑。 In addition, officers involved have said that they were prepared to kill de Menezes even without authorisation from commanding officer Cressida Dick.此外,有关人员说,他们准备杀死德梅内塞斯甚至未经批准擅自从指挥官克瑞西达迪克。

Jean Charles was fatally shot two weeks after the July 7 bombings in London, which killed 56 people and one day after an apparent failed second attempt to detonate devices.让查尔斯开枪打死两个星期后, 7月7日伦敦爆炸案,造成56人死亡和一天后,第二次失败显然企图引爆装置。 He was reportedly mistaken for Hussain Osman, one of the failed July 21, 2005, bombers.据说,他被误认为是侯赛因奥斯曼,一个失败的2005年7月21号,轰炸机。 Anti-terror officers pinned him to the floor of a London underground train and pumped seven bullets into his head at point-blank range.反恐官员寄予他发言的伦敦地铁列车和7发子弹抽水到他的头部在近距离。

Last week, a Special Branch officer revealed that he altered his notes because they indicated that police shot dead Jean Charles as he boarded a train at Stockwell tube station on July 22, 2005, even though he was known to be unarmed.上周,特别处官员透露,他改变他指出,因为他们指出,警察开枪打死查尔斯让他登上一列火车在伦敦地铁站7月22日, 2005年,尽管他被称为是手无寸铁的。 The officer, referred to as “Owen,” was giving evidence on October 8.军官,被称为“欧文” ,提供证据是在10月8日。

Owen was deputy surveillance coordinator in the Scotland Yard control room during the surveillance operation that resulted in the young electrician’s death and had made notes about the day’s events on his computer.欧文副监视协调员伦敦警察厅在控制室的监视行动中的年轻电工的死亡和注意到了有关当天发生的事对他的电脑。 After he had given his evidence at the inquest, Owen was asked for all his notes relating to the shooting.之后他给他的证据的调查,欧文有人问他的所有注意到有关射击。

He claims he logged onto his computer to change the names of officers into the codenames given by the court to protect their identities, but then deleted a paragraph in which Dick, who is now deputy assistant commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, had told officers to allow Jean Charles to continue his journey because he was “not carrying anything.”他声称,他登录到自己的电脑更改姓名的官员给予的代号由法院来保护他们的身份,但后来删除了该段切尼,谁现在是副助理专员都市警察,告诉警察,让让查尔斯继续他的旅程,因为他“没有携带任何东西。 ”

The full paragraph reads, “Management discussion.充分段内容, “管理的讨论。 CD [Cressida Dick]: Can run on to tube as not carrying anything.裁谈会[克瑞西达切尼] :可以运行在以管为没有携带任何东西。 Persuaded by unidentified male amongst management.”说服被身份不明的男性之间的管理。 “

It flatly contradicts Dick’s own evidence at the inquest on October 7, the previous day, in which she claimed that she ordered her officers to “stop” Jean Charles because he was a “terrorist threat.”这违背了美国断然自己的证据的调查在10月7日,前一天,她声称,她命令她军官“一站式”让查尔斯,因为他是一个“恐怖主义的威胁。 ”

Owen says he deleted the paragraph because it was “misleading.” He claimed he couldn’t remember if it was Dick talking although he said it was probably her when questioned further.欧文说,他该段删除,因为它是“误导之嫌。 ”他声称,他无法忘记,如果这是切尼说虽然他说,这是她时,很可能进一步质疑。

“I believe it was the commander but when I reflected I couldn’t be sure, or whether she was saying this is what we are going to do or this is one of the options. “我相信,这是指挥员但是当我反映我不能肯定,还是她说这就是我们要做的还是这是一个选项。 It was a woman’s voice.”这是一个女人的声音。 “

When asked if he realised he had committed a serious offence, Owen said, “I have removed a line I believed was wrong and gave a totally false impression.” He told the inquest he had deleted more than he had intended because he was rushing to an appointment.当记者问他是否意识到他已犯下了严重罪行,欧文说: “我已删除了一条线我认为是错误的,给一个完全错误的印象。 ”他告诉他的调查中删除了超过他打算,因为他急于预约。 When asked if “management” had asked him to make the changes, Owen replied, “No.当被问及是否“管理”要求他作出改变,欧文回答说, “第 I am sure of that, sir.”我相信这一点,先生。 “

Owen also made the startling revelation that he did not submit the crucial paragraph to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) inquiry in 2006 or the health and safety trial last year into the shooting, at which he gave evidence, “because he wasn’t asked to.”欧文还提出了惊人的发现,他没有提出的重要段落,投诉警方独立监察委员会(警监会)的调查在2006年或健康和安全的审判去年的射击,在他的证据“ ,因为他没有要求。 “

Commander Dick also claimed she was informed “they think it’s him” when Jean Charles left a building linked to Hussain Osman and made his way to Stockwell station.指挥官迪克还声称她被告知“他们认为这是他”让查尔斯时,留下了建设与奥斯曼侯赛因和他的方式托克维尔站。 Chief Inspector Vince Esposito, a counter-terrorism expert advising Dick on the day of the shooting, said he believed, “without a shadow of doubt,” that Jean Charles was failed bomber Hussain Osman and that a “critical shot” to the head was only administered if a suspect was identified and was carrying a device.总监文埃斯波西托,反恐怖主义专家咨询切尼在当天的拍摄,他认为, “毫无疑问, ”这让查尔斯失败轰炸机和奥斯曼侯赛因说, “关键开枪”的头部只有管理,如果发现嫌疑人,并携带设备。

However, speaking at the inquest on October 10, “Pat,” who acted as contact between Scotland Yard and the surveillance team, reported he had said only that Mr. de Menezes was “possibly identifiable with” the suspect.然而,出席研讯10月10日, “八, ”谁担任之间的联系和苏格兰场的监视小组,报告他只是说,德梅内塞斯先生是“可能是识别为”犯罪嫌疑人。 “I was always under the impression that the subject had been unidentified,” he stated. “我一直的印象是,这个问题一直不明, ”他说。

Another senior officer, Detective Inspector Merrick Rose, revealed that he could not “recall” whether images of the real suspect, Osman, were discussed at a dawn briefing before Jean Charles’s death—begging the question, was a comparison between the two men ever made?另一位高级官员,探长梅里克罗斯透露,他不能“召回”的形象是否真正的嫌疑人,奥斯曼,讨论了在黎明之前,让简报查尔斯的死亡乞讨的问题,是一个比较两名男子以往做的?

Dick denies that her instruction to “stop” Jean Charles was an order to shoot to kill and that she did not say “at all costs.”切尼否认,她的指示, “一站式”让查尔斯是为了拍摄杀死,她没有说“不惜一切代价。 ”

Mark Lewindon, now retired, was a detective chief inspector in Special Branch at the time.马克Lewindon ,现在退休了,是一个侦缉总督察特别处的时间。 He had told the inquest he had overheard the order from Dick when she was speaking in the operations room at New Scotland Yard.他曾告诉审讯他已听到了命令,切尼时说,她的业务室,新苏格兰场。 “It was said he shouldn’t be allowed to get on the train and I think the words she used were ‘at all costs,’ ” he said. “这是说,他不应该允许让在火车上,我想的话,她使用了'不惜一切代价, ”他说。

Dick responded in her defence that “I would need to be absolutely satisfied that this person posed a dreadful imminent threat to members of the public before I would order a critical shot.”切尼在回答自己辩护说: “我将需要绝对满意,此人提出了一个可怕的迫在眉睫的威胁市民之前,我将下令开枪的关键。 ”

“I was asking for what you might call a conventional—albeit aware of all the risks—challenge from the firearms officers.” “我要求你可能要求的常规,尽管知道所有的风险挑战的枪支人员。 ”

Subsequent evidence demonstrated that, whether or not Dick was calling to make operational a shoot-to-kill policy, the police involved had already been instructed to do just that.后来的证据表明,不论是切尼要求,使开办一个格杀勿论的政策,涉及的警察已经接到指示,要做到这一点。

A tactical adviser and senior firearms advisor known as Trojan 84 made the extraordinary admission to the inquest that police were prepared to take a “critical” shot without orders from their superiors.一个战术顾问和高级顾问的枪支被称为84木马了非凡的接纳调查,警方准备采取一个“危急” 枪决上级的命令。

The inspector had been in charge of briefing the marksmen who shot dead Jean Charles.督察一直负责简报的神枪手开枪打死谁让查尔斯。 Giving evidence in open court for the first time, Trojan 84 said: “We felt that for any DSO [designated senior officer] to make a decision about a critical shot was a hugely difficult decision to make and maybe career-threatening.提供证据在法庭公开的第一时间,木马84说: “我们认为,任何数字示波器[指定的高级官员]作出决定的一个关键开枪是一个非常困难的决定作出,也许职业生涯的威胁。

“In relation to the critical shot, the instruction would come direct from the DSO but what I also mentioned was that if we were able to challenge, but the subject was not compliant, then a shot may be taken.” “关于关键球,指令将直接从数字示波器但我还提到,如果我们能够挑战,但这个问题是不符合,然后一杆可能采取的。 ”

When Trojan 84 was asked if officers were prepared to take the critical shot without authorisation, he replied, “Yes.”当木马84 ,如果有人问人员准备采取的关键未经授权开枪,他回答, “是的。 ”

“It was my job to tell the team they would be supported whatever decision they took because of the structures that were in place.” “这是我的工作告诉球队,他们将支持任何决定,因为他们的结构,已经到位。 ”

Trojan 84 could only have conceivably issued such instructions if they had been already laid down at the highest possible level—much higher than the DSO Cressida Dick.木马84只能可以想象发出这种指示他们是否已经放下在尽可能高的级别,远远高于数字示波器克瑞西达迪克。

The shoot-to-kill policy implemented against Jean Charles is known as “Operation Kratos,” adopted in secret two years earlier in high-level discussions between top police officers and the government.该格杀勿论的政策实施对让查尔斯称为“克拉托斯行动” ,通过秘密两年前在高级别讨论两国高层警官和政府。 Under its remit, a senior police officer is on standby 24 hours a day at Scotland Yard, the headquarters of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS), with the authority to deploy special armed squads to follow and, if deemed necessary, shoot dead suspected suicide bombers.根据其职权,一名高级警务人员正在待命,每天24小时伦敦警察厅总部的警视厅服务(公安部) ,并授权部署特殊的武装小队遵循,如果认为有必要,击毙疑似自杀轰炸机。

It is now clear that, without any clear identification or indication of an imminent threat, the police were determined that someone would die that day in furtherance of the so-called “war on terror.”现在很清楚,如果没有任何明确的身份证明或说明迫在眉睫的威胁,警方认定,有人会死于这一天,以推动所谓的“反恐战争” 。

Moreover, even the limited safeguard of accountability to a designated superior officer would not be allowed to interfere with what was a political and not a security-driven decision . As the World Socialist Web Site insisted in the immediate aftermath of police murder, “there was a deliberate decision to kill, rather than arrest, de Menezes, taken at the highest level of the police force rather than by the officers immediately involved.”此外,即使在有限的保障责任到指定的上级军官不得干涉什么政治,而不是安全驱动的决定 。作为世界社会主义网站在坚持后立即警察谋杀, “有故意杀人的决定,而不是逮捕,德梅内塞斯,采取了最高级别的警察部队,而不是由官员直接参与。 “

Jean Charles was shot in cold blood primarily in order “to instill fear in the population and implement a shoot-to-kill policy that had been secretly decided on by Prime Minister Tony Blair and top officials two years previously.” The treatment meted out to de Menezes sent out the clear message—first articulated by Blair—that the “rules of the game” had changed.让查尔斯被击中冷血主要是为了“灌输恐惧的人口和执行格杀勿论的政策,已经秘密决定,由英国首相布莱尔和高级官员两年以前。 ”的待遇了德梅内塞斯发出了明确的信息,首先阐明了布莱尔,说, “游戏规则”发生了变化。


Have Your Say: Lies begin to unravel in police murder of Jean Charles de Menezes 你说:谎言开始瓦解警察谋杀让查尔斯德梅内塞斯
Please read our请仔细阅读我们的 posting guidelines before posting张贴在发布前的指导方针 .
Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here你可以讨论这份报告在这里 .

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL引用网址


Related News 相关新闻
This entry was posted on Friday, October 17th, 2008 at 11:53 pm and is filed under本条目被张贴在周五, 2008年10月17日在下午11时53分,并提交下 War & Terrorism News战争与恐怖主义的新闻 . You can follow any responses to this entry through the您可以按照任何反应,这个项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. You can饲料。您可以 leave a response留下一个反应 , or trackback引用 from your own site.从您自己的网站。
Criminal, Immoral And Now A Farce刑事的,不道德的,现在是一场闹剧 Last post by ZingPao @ 01:47 AM 最后职位ZingPao @上午01时47

Trick or Treat?不给糖就捣蛋? Last post by ZingPao @ 01:44 AM 最后职位ZingPao @上午01点44分

Just The Facts Please只要事实请 Last post by loki @ 01:22 AM 最后职位洛基@上午01点22

Political Compass Test政治指南针测试 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:55 AM 最后职位ZingPao @上午12时55

Seven-point plan for Britain's crisis-KEN LIVINGSTONE 7点计划,英国的危机肯利文斯通 Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:39 AM 最后职位怀旧@上午12时39分

Syd Barrett's Pink Floyd悉尼Barrett的平克弗洛伊德 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:32 AM 最后职位ZingPao @上午12时32分

Vote Third Party表决第三者 Last post by ZingPao @ 12:13 AM 最后职位ZingPao @上午12时13分

Time To Lighten Up Or Light Up Or Both时间,减轻了或轻或两 Last post by ZingPao @ 11:58 PM 最后职位ZingPao @下午11时58分

George Galloway on Talksport加洛韦对Talksport Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:13 PM 最后职位怀旧@下午11点13

Jack Nicholson 1978 and his Hydrogen fuelled car 1978年杰克尼科尔森和他的氢燃料汽车 Last post by Unregistered @ 11:01 PM 上次未注册后@下午11时零一分

Go to Forum进入论坛 | Latest Topics最新的话题

论坛

Network This Report 网络本报告

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. 这些图标链接到社会书签场所读者能分享和发现新的网页。
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Fark
  • Netscape
  • Furl

Email This Page To A Friend 本页发送给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的头条

RINF广告 Archive 存档
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS 头条新闻讨论
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息讨论
LATEST FORUM TOPICS 最新论坛主题
Chomsky: Anti-Democratic Nature of US Capitalism is Being Exposed 乔姆斯基:反民主性质的美国资本主义正受到

The October Surprise: Global Panic 10月的惊喜:全球恐慌

Democracy Now Follows Up on NSA's Illegal Spying and War Crimes 民主现在采取行动,国家安全局非法窃听罪和战争罪

Charles Andrew 查尔斯安德鲁 commented on: 评论:
Prison interrogation techniques in Israel 监狱的审讯技术在以色列
I OWNED A VALUABLE STUDENT APARTMENT BUILDING IN STATE COLLEGE PA. 本人拥有一个宝贵的学生公寓楼州立大学巴。 THIS IS THE HOME OF... 这是家中...
Continue Reading & Reply 继续阅读及回复

Leona P 利昂娜P commented on: 评论:
Holes in the wall to see PINs in our eyes 孔在墙上看到码在我们的眼睛
Hiya, just meandered in. God love yahoo, nice site. Hiya ,公正meandered英寸上帝爱雅虎,漂亮的网站。 Thanks. 谢谢。
Continue Reading & Reply 继续阅读及回复

ZingPao ZingPao commented on: 评论:
The October Surprise: Global Panic 10月的惊喜:全球恐慌
Great story, thanks for posting. 伟大的故事,感谢张贴。 People need to act. 人们需要的行为。 Where have “WE THE PEOPLE” gone????? 凡有“我们人民”了?????
Continue Reading & Reply 继续阅读及回复

R Dujour R Dujour commented on: 评论:
Democracy Now Follows Up on NSA’s Illegal Spying and War Crimes 民主现在采取行动,国家安全局非法窃听罪和战争罪
Why do I find myself yelling at the radio, “ask the follow up... 为什么我发现自己骂电台“ ,要求采取后续行动...
Continue Reading & Reply 继续阅读及回复

Activism & Protest News 积极与抗议新闻 | | Business News 商业新闻 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公民与人权新闻 | | Environmental News 环境新闻 | | Media News 媒体新闻 | | Globalisation News 全球化新闻 | | Web Development News Web开发新闻
ADVERTISEMENTS广告
SITE MAPS网站地图
Web Desing & Hosting UK , USA, Europe网页设计与托管英国,美国,欧洲

WOWEB - Web Design WOWEB -网页设计

FAST GATEWAY - Web Hosting快速通道-虚拟主机

INFOTX - Web Hosting Guides and Resources INFOTX -W eb托管和资源指南


ASHLEY GUEST HOUSE - Morecambe Guest House阿什利招待所-莫克姆招待所


Skin up marijuana cannabis weed forum皮肤了大麻,大麻草论坛
Linux Web Hosting Linux的虚拟主机

Never Be Lied To Again!绝不会骗了!

Subliminal Secrets Exposed潜意识的秘密接触

Holographic Creation: Your Own Reality全息创造:你自己的现实


Masonic Secrets Revealed共济会秘密透露


What You Aren't Supposed To Know你不应该知道


Conspiracy DVDs Cheap DVDs阴谋DVD光盘便宜的DVD
Debt Consolidation债务
7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative-Energy替代能源 Art艺术 Barack Obama奥巴马 BBC英国广播公司 Big-Brother大兄弟 Bilderberg彼尔德伯格 Biometrics生物识别技术 Bush布什 CCTV中央电视台 Censorship检查 CIA美国中央情报局 Climate-Change气候变化 Cover-Up掩盖 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database-State数据库的国家 David-Hicks大卫希克斯 David-Ray-Griffin大卫射线格里芬 Debt债务 Democrats民主党 Demos演示 Drugs药品 Education教育 Entertainment娱乐 Environmental News环境新闻 EU欧盟 False-Flag假旗 FBI美国联邦调查局 Fraud诈骗 Free-Speech自由言论 Freemasons G8八国集团 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo关塔那摩 Health-News健康新闻 History历史 ID-Cards编号卡 Internet互联网 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 John McCain约翰麦凯恩 Law Marches游行 Media News媒体新闻 MI5军情五处 MI6军情六处 Microsoft微软 Military军事 MoD国防部 Money金钱 Music音乐 NASA美国宇航局 Neocons新保守主义 New World Order新的世界秩序 NSA国安局 Oil Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police-State警察国家 Political News政治新闻 Propaganda中宣部 Reviews评语 RFID RFID技术 RINF Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲尔德 Science科学 Science & Technology News科技新闻 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Slavery奴隶制 Space空间 Sports体育 Spy间谍 Spying从事间谍活动 Stephen-Lendman斯蒂芬- Lendman Technology技术 Terrorism恐怖主义 Tony-Blair英国首相布莱尔 Torture酷刑 TV电视 UK-News英国新闻 UN联合国 USA-美国, USA-News美国新闻 Video视频 Voting投票 war战争 War & Terrorism News战争与恐怖主义的新闻 Warfare White-House白家 Wolfowitz沃尔福威茨 World-News世界新闻 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003至2005年档案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年档案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008档案 | Current Archives目前档案馆 | Past Version |以往版本
About 大约 | | DVD Store DVD商店 | | Opinion 意见 | | Reviews 评语 | | Special Guests 特别来宾 | | Webmasters 网站管理员
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 中表达的意见RINF新闻电线和通讯是唯一的责任作者( s )和不一定反映意见的管理员。
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. RINF.COM :打破新闻和其他媒体的版权-复制及分发自由。 News Forum 新闻论坛