RINF.COM: 最新新聞選擇
星期二， 2008年7月29日
RINF.COM: 最新新聞選擇
|
|
最新新聞 |
法官禁止證據反對恐怖主義嫌疑犯在關塔那摩試驗
星期二， 2008年7月22日 談論這個報告在RINF論壇 > 由 卡羅爾J。 威廉斯 | 一位軍事法官由Salim Ahmed Hamdan，一個司機在`高度強制』設置說有些聲明為本・拉登，被做了。 它可能規定一個標準為其他案件。 華盛頓-監督第一戰爭犯罪的軍事法官試驗反對恐怖主義嫌疑犯在關塔那摩海灣同意星期一禁止一些證據反對本・拉登的前司機，因為它在「高度強制環境和情況裡獲得了」。 在試驗的開幕日，海軍上尉。 Keith J。 Allred駁回防禦請求排除其他聲明Salim Ahmed在審訊期間被做的Hamdan由美國。 代理在阿富汗並且在他的超過六年期間』監禁在關塔那摩海灣，古巴。 法官說他在a 2003年5月審訊會扣壓評斷，直到防禦有時間回顧拘留紀錄600頁，政府沒有移交直到星期天-夜在試驗之前。 被認為強制的證據Allred排除在其他戰爭犯罪案件在的months能規定一個標準為可容許性交付在法庭之前，包括那自稱9月。 11策劃者。 「正義的興趣沒有通過承認這些聲明為服務由於高度強制環境，并且他們被做的情況」， Allred認為聲明做的Hamdan，當由美國時舉行。 力量在Panjshir和Bagram阿富汗前哨基地。 在他的監禁期間在Bagram， Hamdan被摔打了，被剝奪了睡眠并且據報道是由至少一个嫌疑那麼非常被摔打了的其他囚犯和衛兵通知的他死了。 壓制強制的證詞的Allred的判決能使它難為了其他法庭法官能忽略相似的要求，例如在論點反對交代9月。 面對死刑的11策劃者Khalid Shaikh Mohammed和四人。 Mohammed是二個關塔那摩囚犯之一知道是waterboarded，當在CIA監管海外時。 技術，引起淹沒的轟動，由許多美國視為同等拷打。 盟友、法定學者和人權提倡者。 Hamdan，在阿富汗的贏得$200每月駕駛本・拉登的也門，在2001年11月被奪取了。 He is charged with conspiracy and material support for terrorism, and faces up to life imprisonment if convicted by the jury — actually, a military commission made up of six senior officers and an alternate. Allred had been asked by Hamdan’s defense team to suppress numerous statements the defendant made under questioning after his capture near Kandahar, including two videotaped interrogations. The judge said he would allow the videos to be played for the commissioners when testimony gets underway later this week. But he agreed to exclude other statements made before Hamdan’s May 2002 transfer from Afghanistan field prisons to the Guantanamo detention center for terrorism suspects. Aside from withholding judgment on the May 2003 interrogation pending the defense review, the judge said interrogation results would be allowed into evidence only if the interrogators who conducted the sessions were available for cross-examination. Much of the evidence the government wanted to introduce was drawn from interrogations in which the notes and records of those involved were destroyed. The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Army Col. Lawrence Morris, said he hadn’t decided whether to appeal the ruling. “We need to evaluate . . . to what extent it has an impact on our ability to fully portray his criminality in this case, but also what it might set out for future cases,” Morris told the Associated Press. Hamdan’s trial is expected to take about three weeks. He has indicated at times that he may boycott the proceedings, and has made conflicting statements as to what degree he will allow his Navy lawyer, Lt. Cmdr. Brian Mizer, to represent him in his absence. Hamdan testified during pretrial hearings last week that he was subjected to sleep deprivation, solitary confinement and sexual humiliation during interrogations at Guantanamo. Allred largely rejected motions to dismiss statements made during interrogations there, saying the techniques employed by detention officials could be “rationally related to good order and discipline.” Officers of the Joint Task Force that runs the prison and interrogation network at Guantanamo said Hamdan was deprived of “comfort items” such as personal hygiene products as punishment for violating camp rules. Hamdan is the first of nearly 800 men brought to Guantanamo over the last 6 1/2 years to face trial in the first U.S.-administered war crimes cases since World War II. About 265 remain at the sprawling compound of maximum-security prisons, open-air cells and a barracks-like facility for a few dozen of the most cooperative prisoners. Most of the others have been repatriated. War crimes charges have been sworn out against 21 Guantanamo prisoners over the last 18 months. Of those prisoners, 11 have been arraigned. All but two, Hamdan and Canadian Omar Khadr, have indicated they will refuse to attend their trials as a show of contempt for a process they say is inherently stacked against them. Thirteen potential jurors were brought to Guantanamo over the weekend. During questioning, several indicated that they carried emotional scars from the Sept. 11 attacks, which killed or endangered friends and colleagues. The Pentagon was one of the targets. The six jurors and one alternate were sworn in Monday. At least two potential jurors appeared to have been excluded because of their raw feelings associated with Sept. 11. Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: Judge Bars Evidence Against Terrorism Suspect at Guantanamo Trial One Response to “Judge Bars Evidence Against Terrorism Suspect at Guantanamo Trial”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
Hypocrisy of the “Repatriate Omar Khadr to Canada” Movement
As soon as the Gitmo interrogation tape of Omar Khadr hit the Internet, the blogosphere was flooded with demands to repatriate him to Canada. This wave is reminiscent of a Soviet campaign to free Luis Corvalán from the “fascist regime” of Augusto Pinochet thirty five years ago. The scenario is strikingly similar. A “victim” held by “fascist regimes” this time run by Bush and Harper, and a public outcry for justice. Except for the fact that Luis Corvalán didn’t kill anyone and didn’t fight for a terrorist group that wants to impose Sharia.
The “repatriate Khadr” crowd describes him as “a child”, “a kid”, “a boy”, and even “a torture victim”, with no facts to substantiate the torture claims notwithstanding. They complain about Khadr being mistreated, again, without anything to back up their claims. Some of them are outraged about “child abuse.” And they all scream for justice.
They want justice? OK, let’s talk about JUSTICE. What about justice for Sgt. First Class Christopher J. Speer, who was (according to an eyewitness) murdered by this “child”? What about justice for Tabitha Speer, who is a widow because of this “kid”? What about justice for Taryn and Tanner Speer, who are left without a father by this “a boy”? And what about all those Afghani civilians and NATO troops who are a little bit safer because this “torture victim” is behind bars? How many of these “repatriate Khadr” hypocrites concern themselves with justice for real victims? In literally hundreds of posts, we couldn’t find a single one.
One would ask, what is the reason for this idiocy? The answer is simple. Ignorance. Complete and utter ignorance. Let’s forget for a second that Omar Khadr killed Christopher Speer. Let’s forget that Khadr’s father was an al Qaeda financier. Let’s forget that Khadr’s family is known for it being al Qaeda sympathizers. Let’s just remember what this “child” was fighting for in Afghanistan.
This is what Taliban-imposed Sharia looks like in real life: http://muslimsagainstsharia.blogspot.com/2000/07/hypocrisy-of-repatriate-omar-khadr-to.html
Why don’t all of you, bleeding heart demagogues go to Afghanistan and spend a day in a Taliban-controlled territory? And let’s talk about Khadr when you get back. If you get back.