By通過 Duncan Campbell 鄧肯坎貝爾 | The government’s 42 days counterterrorism legislation came under fresh fire last night when a former director general of MI5 said the provision to hold suspects for six weeks without charge was excessive. |政府42天的反恐立法受到新鮮昨晚火災時，前總幹事說，軍情五處的規定舉行嫌疑人6個星期不充電是過分的。

Dame Stella Rimington became the second former MI5 chief in three months to come out against the controversial measures.聖母院斯特拉•裡明頓成為第二個前軍情五處負責在三個月內出來反對有爭議的措施。 “It’s too much, quite frankly,” she said when asked about the 42-day limit during a talk in London about her new spy thriller novel. “這太過分了，坦率地說，她說： ”當被問及42天限制在倫敦討論有關她的新小說的間諜驚悚片。 While she was uncertain what the right limit was, it was clear to her that 42 days was too long.雖然她不確定什麼是正確的限制，很顯然她是42天過長。

Rimington, who became the first woman director general of MI5 in 1992 and held the post until her retirement in 1996, also attacked the US-led “war on terror” for sending the wrong message and said that the treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay had been very damaging.裡明頓，誰成為了第一位總幹事軍情五處在1992年和後舉行的，直到她在1996年退休，還襲擊了以美國為首的“反恐戰爭”的發出錯誤的信息說，囚犯待遇的在關塔那摩灣了是非常有害的。 “If there was a moral high ground, Guantánamo has lost it,” she told an audience at the Crime Scene festival where she was launching her novel, Dead Line. “如果有一個道德高地上，關塔那摩已經失去了它， ”她告訴觀眾在犯罪現場節，她推出她的小說，死線。

The 42-day plan faces rejection when it goes to the House of Lords after the summer recess, guaranteeing a bruising round of parliamentary “ping pong” in which the counterterrorism bill will travel back and forth between the Lords and Commons if the government insists on the plan. 42天計劃面臨的排斥反應時，去英國上議院暑假休會後，保證青腫輪議會“乒乓”中的反恐法案將前往之間來回上議院和下議院，如果政府堅持該計劃。

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, who is strongly opposed to the measure, tells the Guardian today that he expects it to be rejected by peers.多米尼克悲傷的影子內政大臣，誰是堅決反對的措施，告訴衛報今天表示，他預計這是拒絕同齡人。 “I’m not a member of the House of Lords and I can’t tell their lordships what to do. “我不是一個成員國上議院和我不能告訴他們lordships做些什麼。 But my impression is that the chances of the bill getting through in its current form in the House of Lords are low.但我的印象是，機會的法案獲得通過目前的形式在上議院很低。 And it’s very likely that the House of Lords will remove the proposal for 42 days altogether, which is what we would support.”這很可能是上議院將刪除的提案共42天，這就是我們將支持。 “

Two months ago, another former head of MI5, Lady Manningham-Buller, used her maiden speech in the Lords to attack the plans.兩個月前，另一名前軍情五處負責人，撒切爾夫人曼寧厄姆-布勒，用於婚前講話上議院攻擊計劃。 She opposed them on a “practical basis as well as a principled one”.她反對他們的“實踐基礎，以及作為一個原則性的” 。

A critical report from the all-party Lords constitution committee, which includes the former lord chief justice Lord Woolf and former Labour attorney general Lord Morris of Aberavon, said the draft bill risked undermining the independence of judges and the chances of a fair trial for suspects.一個重要的報告，各黨上議院憲法委員會，其中包括前首席大法官伍爾夫勳爵和前勞工總檢察長勳爵莫里斯的Aberavon說，該法案草案可能損害法官的獨立性和機會的公平審判的嫌疑人。 Other notable opponents of the legislation include Sir Ken MacDonald, the director of public prosecutions, who sees no reason to extend beyond 28 days.其他顯著對手的立法包括麥克唐納先生肯，檢察長，誰看不出有什麼理由延伸到28天。 Lord Goldsmith, former attorney general, warned that it would undermine fundamental British freedoms.戈德史密斯勳爵，前司法部長警告說，它將英國損害基本自由。

The former head of MI5 said that a “war on terror” gave the false impression that aspirations could be achieved by military action.前軍情五處負責人說， “反恐戰爭”了錯誤的印象，即願望可以實現了軍事行動。 In fact, she said, a combination of policing, intelligence gathering and diplomacy was far more likely to succeed than force of arms.事實上，她說，相結合的治安，情報收集和外交更有可能取得成功比武力。 Terrorism should be treated as a crime, she said, as it was in the UK.恐怖主義應被視為犯罪行為，她說，因為它是在英國。 “With the ‘war on terror’, the United States has gone down the wrong line,” she added. “隨著'反恐戰爭' ，美國已下降了錯誤路線， ”她補充說。

Asked about the introduction of ID cards, another key element of the government’s security strategy, she said that “they [ID cards] won’t make us safer.”當被問及實行身份證，另一關鍵因素，政府的安全戰略時，她說， “他們[ ID卡]將不會使我們更安全。 ”