By通过 Duncan Campbell 邓肯坎贝尔 | The government’s 42 days counterterrorism legislation came under fresh fire last night when a former director general of MI5 said the provision to hold suspects for six weeks without charge was excessive. |政府42天的反恐立法受到新鲜昨晚火灾时，前总干事说，军情五处的规定举行嫌疑人6个星期不充电是过分的。

Dame Stella Rimington became the second former MI5 chief in three months to come out against the controversial measures.圣母院斯特拉•里明顿成为第二个前军情五处负责在三个月内出来反对有争议的措施。 “It’s too much, quite frankly,” she said when asked about the 42-day limit during a talk in London about her new spy thriller novel. “这太过分了，坦率地说，她说： ”当被问及42天限制在伦敦讨论有关她的新小说的间谍惊悚片。 While she was uncertain what the right limit was, it was clear to her that 42 days was too long.虽然她不确定什么是正确的限制，很显然她是42天过长。

Rimington, who became the first woman director general of MI5 in 1992 and held the post until her retirement in 1996, also attacked the US-led “war on terror” for sending the wrong message and said that the treatment of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay had been very damaging.里明顿，谁成为了第一位总干事军情五处在1992年和后举行的，直到她在1996年退休，还袭击了以美国为首的“反恐战争”的发出错误的信息说，囚犯待遇的在关塔那摩湾了是非常有害的。 “If there was a moral high ground, Guantánamo has lost it,” she told an audience at the Crime Scene festival where she was launching her novel, Dead Line. “如果有一个道德高地上，关塔那摩已经失去了它， ”她告诉观众在犯罪现场节，她推出她的小说，死线。

The 42-day plan faces rejection when it goes to the House of Lords after the summer recess, guaranteeing a bruising round of parliamentary “ping pong” in which the counterterrorism bill will travel back and forth between the Lords and Commons if the government insists on the plan. 42天计划面临的排斥反应时，去英国上议院暑假休会后，保证青肿轮议会“乒乓”中的反恐法案将前往之间来回上议院和下议院，如果政府坚持该计划。

Dominic Grieve, the shadow home secretary, who is strongly opposed to the measure, tells the Guardian today that he expects it to be rejected by peers.多米尼克悲伤的影子内政大臣，谁是坚决反对的措施，告诉卫报今天表示，他预计这是拒绝同龄人。 “I’m not a member of the House of Lords and I can’t tell their lordships what to do. “我不是一个成员国上议院和我不能告诉他们lordships做些什么。 But my impression is that the chances of the bill getting through in its current form in the House of Lords are low.但我的印象是，机会的法案获得通过目前的形式在上议院很低。 And it’s very likely that the House of Lords will remove the proposal for 42 days altogether, which is what we would support.”这很可能是上议院将删除的提案共42天，这就是我们将支持。 “

Two months ago, another former head of MI5, Lady Manningham-Buller, used her maiden speech in the Lords to attack the plans.两个月前，另一名前军情五处负责人，撒切尔夫人曼宁厄姆-布勒，用于婚前讲话上议院攻击计划。 She opposed them on a “practical basis as well as a principled one”.她反对他们的“实践基础，以及作为一个原则性的” 。

A critical report from the all-party Lords constitution committee, which includes the former lord chief justice Lord Woolf and former Labour attorney general Lord Morris of Aberavon, said the draft bill risked undermining the independence of judges and the chances of a fair trial for suspects.一个重要的报告，各党上议院宪法委员会，其中包括前首席大法官伍尔夫勋爵和前劳工总检察长勋爵莫里斯的Aberavon说，该法案草案可能损害法官的独立性和机会的公平审判的嫌疑人。 Other notable opponents of the legislation include Sir Ken MacDonald, the director of public prosecutions, who sees no reason to extend beyond 28 days.其他显着对手的立法包括麦克唐纳先生肯，检察长，谁看不出有什么理由延伸到28天。 Lord Goldsmith, former attorney general, warned that it would undermine fundamental British freedoms.戈德史密斯勋爵，前司法部长警告说，它将英国损害基本自由。

The former head of MI5 said that a “war on terror” gave the false impression that aspirations could be achieved by military action.前军情五处负责人说， “反恐战争”了错误的印象，即愿望可以实现了军事行动。 In fact, she said, a combination of policing, intelligence gathering and diplomacy was far more likely to succeed than force of arms.事实上，她说，相结合的治安，情报收集和外交更有可能取得成功比武力。 Terrorism should be treated as a crime, she said, as it was in the UK.恐怖主义应被视为犯罪行为，她说，因为它是在英国。 “With the ‘war on terror’, the United States has gone down the wrong line,” she added. “随着'反恐战争' ，美国已下降了错误路线， ”她补充说。

Asked about the introduction of ID cards, another key element of the government’s security strategy, she said that “they [ID cards] won’t make us safer.”当被问及实行身份证，另一关键因素，政府的安全战略时，她说， “他们[ ID卡]将不会使我们更安全。 ”