10 Responses to “DU Shells Used by U.S. Worse Than Nuclear Weapons”

1. Neal Posted: May 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 am

   http://www.iron-clay.com/american_legacy.html and http://www.iron-clay.com/mystery-babylon.html Says it all. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

2. whistler Posted: May 22nd, 2008 at 4:31 am

   The story speaks for itself; humanity at it’s worse. There is a saying “the worse enemy to ourselves is ourselves”. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

3. Dan Williams Posted: May 23rd, 2008 at 5:50 am

   If anyone can see any good reason to terrorize humanity for eternity, please let the rest of us know. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

4. Hornet Posted: May 24th, 2008 at 7:19 am

   Power. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

5. whistler Posted: May 24th, 2008 at 8:07 am

   A simple rule/law of Nature that corrupt governments disregard is ‘what goes around comes around’. Do they honestly think they can get away with it. They might think so, but Life does not forget. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

6. Nick Posted: May 27th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

   Iraq and the rest of the world always have been radioactive, and will remain so in the future. DU was concentrated from natural resources, and some has now been dispersed back into the environment. It does pose a significant health risk if inhaled in quantity, such as victims who narrowly escape death from the direct action of DU shells (during the initial invasion). In the mostly low concentrations that it now exists in the environment the risks are very low. There are far more pressing humanitarian issues for the people of Iraq (suicide bombers, sectarian violence, kidnapping, poverty, low quality of life, road accidents…). Where does the 2000 ton figure come from? Why not extrapolate to 20 million deaths - because very little of the 50 tons will ever be inhaled. DU munitions are not illegal - and the UN has not ruled so. No doubt I’ll be accused of being in the pay of the CIA, or some other baseless nonsense. DU is a major propaganda issue, propagated by well intentioned but misguided peace activists. Sadly this only achieves only further mistrust and violence. Do not doubt that the self-proclaimed experts on DU have vested interests in their cause. Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

7. pingback: Posted: May 28th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

   Bill’s Blog » Blog Archive » Our Troops Deserve Better Than This [...] use of depleted uranium (DU) munitions by the U.S. and British militaries in both Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as by NATO forces in [...] Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

8. pingback: Posted: Jun 6th, 2008 at 3:55 am

   Bill’s Blog » Blog Archive » A Decidely Corrupt and Deceptive Legacy [...] by The National Canadian Newspaper (note: links in the quoted text were added by me): “The use of Depleted Uranium is evidence of an apparent intent to execute a Eugenics inspired [...] Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

9. pingback: Posted: Jul 7th, 2008 at 3:57 am

   Bill’s Blog » Blog Archive » Disreputable Politics & Corrupted Democracy [...] The American military only cares about the mission those individuals, in formation, can accomplish. The use of Depleted Uranium in the munitions used by the American military leadership is further evidence of [...] Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

10. pingback: Posted: Aug 4th, 2008 at 1:25 am

    Bill’s Blog » Blog Archive » Soldiers Are Pawns In The President’s Wars [...] is illegal under international treaties and U.S. military law. DU shells used by the military are worse than nuclear weapons. Much of the Middle East has been contaminated by the use of bombs containing DU. Some heavy armor [...] Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this