最新ニュース | フォーラム | イギリスのニュース | 米国のニュース | 全体的なニュース | 政治ニュース | Sci技術のニュース | 戦争及びテロリズムのニュース | スポーツのニュース | マルチメディア | ホームページを置きなさい |
|
|
|
翻訳しなさい:
             
CIAは苦悶テープ文書を引っくり返すことを断る
5月14日木曜日のTh 2009年
CIAは92本の質問のビデオテープの破壊に最近発表された裁判所文書に従って代理店がテープの内容を記述するアメリカの市民の自由連合(ACLU)に詳しい文書を引っくり返させる特別な遂行者の犯罪調査の完全性を妥協される要求する。 米国の地方裁判所の裁判官Alvin 「文書の生産[犯罪者の]調査と質問テープの破壊に…」が対立し、大幅に干渉すること司法省に最近質問テープの破壊に犯罪調査で動作している遂行者との議論があり、知識のあったことをHellerstein、レフDassin、ニューヨークの南地区のための代理米国の代理人へのa 5月5日の手紙では、言った。 「裁判所がご承知の通り、テープ調査の規模はどの人でも正義を、含まれている妨げたとまたはビデオテープの破壊に関連してまたは議会法廷侮辱で機能されて」、Dassinの手紙は言うかどうか意識的に物質的に虚偽の陳述になされた検討がの。 「テープ調査が」。は完了したまで[CIAを要求する前の判決は破壊されたテープの内容の詳細な説明を引っくり返す]引っ込んだまたは他ではとどまられる政府こうして丁重に要求する 移動が「古典的なCIAの遅れ作戦」。であることをAmrit Singh、ACLUのスタッフ代理人は、言った 法廷でペーパー、彼女は政府が不明確に」ビデオテープの破壊と関連している文書を作り出す義務を延期するための口実として犯罪調査を「使用していることを言った。 「政府[ジョン特別な遂行者]ダラム[「はs]調査の完了のための期待されたタイムラインが陳述されていない」、ACLUはペーパーを法廷で言った。 「氏を持っている。 ダラムは政府の位置を助けて提供した宣言を」。 Hellersteinは一致したようである。 彼は2ページの順序でテープの破壊と関連していた文書がACLUに引っくり返されたら彼の調査が妨げられることを示すためにダラムが先に歩まなかったことを指摘した。 実際は、3月の裁判所への申し立てで、Dassinは軽蔑の動きの滞在がテープのACLU追求解放によって継続-ダラムの調査が完全だったことシグナリングのための要求なしで2月28日に切れるために割り当てられたファイルしたことに注意した。 1月では、ダラムは裁判所への申し立てで彼が2月の終りまでに彼の調査を包むと期待したことを示した。 Last month, however, Durham questioned the CIA’s former number three official, Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, about the destruction of the tapes. Foggo, who was sentenced to three years in prison for fraud for steering lucrative contracts to a friend, was due to report to federal prison, but Durham asked for a delay so he could question him about the tape destruction. In December 2007, the ACLU filed a motion to hold the CIA in contempt for its destruction of the tapes in violation of a court order requiring the agency to produce or identify all records requested by the ACLU related to the CIA’s interrogation of “war on terror” detainees. Hellerstein ordered the Justice Department, on behalf of the CIA, to file legal briefs by May 27 justifying the reasons for withholding the documents. He added that those papers should include affidavits, including a declaration from the special prosecutor investigating the tape destruction Those documents “may include also any reasons why the identity of persons involved in the destruction should not be disclosed,” Hellerstein wrote in a two-page order. Several weeks ago, Dassin revealed in another court filing that the CIA has about 3,000 documents related to the 92 destroyed videotapes, suggesting an extensive back-and-forth between CIA field operatives and officials of the Bush administration. The Justice Department said the documents include “cables, memoranda, notes and e-mails” related to the destroyed CIA videotapes. In last week’s court filing, Dassin said, “those 3,000 records included ‘contemporaneous records,’ which were created at the time of the interrogation or at the time the videotapes were viewed, ‘intelligence record,’ which do not describe the interrogations but contain raw intelligence collected from the interrogations, ‘derivative records,’ which summarize information contained within the contemporaneous records, and documents related to the location of the interrogations, that upon further review by the CIA, were determined not to relate to the interrogations or to the destroyed videotapes.” The ACLU and the government have jointly proposed that the government describe the contents of the “contemporaneous” and “derivative” records, but not the intelligence records or the “other records that ultimately proved to be unrelated to the interrogations or the videotapes.” Dassin said the Justice Department intends to turn over additional indexes next month, and on May 18 will produce a list of “all contemporaneous records and all derivative records” related to the destruction of the interrogation tapes, but he added that quite a bit of information will be withheld. In previous court filings, Dassin acknowledged that 12 videotapes, showed Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, the alleged mastermind of the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, being subjected to waterboarding and other harsh methods. The 80 other videotapes purportedly show Zubaydah and al-Nashiri in their prison cells. Some of the videotapes predated the Justice Department’s August 1, 2002, legal memo authorizing CIA interrogators to use ten torturous methods against “high-value” detainees. But it’s unknown whether the interrogation tapes that predate the August 1, 2002, “torture” depict “enhanced interrogation” techniques not yet approved by the Justice Department. Last week, the CIA turned over to the ACLU documents that showed CIA interrogators at a secret “black site” prison provided top agency officials in Langley with daily “torture” updates of Abu Zubaydah, the alleged “high-level” terrorist detainee, who was waterboarded 83 times in August 2002. The documents included two sets of indexes (Part I) (Part II), totaling 52 pages that contained general descriptions of cables sent back to CIA headquarters describing the August 2002, videotaped interrogation sessions of Zubaydah. Those cable transmissions included a description of the techniques interrogators had used and the intelligence, if any, culled from those sessions. The CIA and the Justice Department declined to turn over a more detailed description of the cables its field agents sent back to headquarters, citing several exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act. In a two-page letter accompanying the indexes, CIA Associate General Counsel John McPherson wrote that a “senior government official” would submit a declaration on May 22 “that more fully explains the justifications for withholding a more detailed description of the cables.”
*************Jason Leopold is editor in chief of The Public Record, www.pubrecord.org Have Your Say: CIA Refuses to Turn Over Torture Tape Documents Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. One Response to “CIA Refuses to Turn Over Torture Tape Documents”
Related News
|
Noam Chomsky Intellectually Humiliates Alex Jones Live On Air Last post by Regina @ 04:49 PM
Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Daft to invite traitor Prince Charles to D-Day event. Last post by Regina @ 04:47 PM Silver Nanoparticles Show 'Immense Potential' In Prevention Of Blood Clots Last post by Victor @ 03:31 PM What the Research Really Says About Apple Cider Vinegar Last post by Victor @ 02:34 PM Mission One Electric Motorcycle Hits the Track Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:29 PM Tom Morello combines music, activism in Street Sweeper Social Club Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:21 PM French: No sign of problem with Air France jet Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:12 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
The destruction of 92 tapes by the CIA, (almost 100 tapes), tapes of interrogations of terrorist suspects, is a clear and egregious felony violation of the USA Patriot Act.
The destruction of evidence in a terrorist investigation, (destruction of 92 tapes), is a felony violation of the USA Patriot Act.
Additionally, the admission of the destruction of CIA tapes of terrorist suspect interrogations and investigations is an admission of providing false information on terrorism to the US courts.
The CIA, (previous to my posting here), had admitted the destruction of a small number, (less than five interrogation tapes), when last ordered by the courts to produce tapes of terrorist investigations. The CIA informed the court that they had destroyed all terrorist interrogation tapes made by the CIA; this was a perjury and provided false information on terrorism.
The CIA withheld information from a court of law and provided false information to that court of law concerning terrorism, (that there were no more tapes and that all tapes had been destroyed). The false information the CIA gave to the court, (that all tapes had been destroyed), was a singular act of treason under the USA Patriot Act, an egregious felony violation of the USA Patriot Act, (as providing false information on terrorism is a felony violation of the USA Patriot Act).
The CIA knowingly provided false information to the courts about terrorism when they admitted to the court that they had destroyed all tapes.
Furthermore, the CIA admitted to a Congressional investigation committee that all tapes had been destroyed which we now know was a felony violation of the USA Patriot Act, providing false information on terrorism, (to the Congress of the United States of America).
The destruction of 92 tapes by the CIA of terrorist interrogations is a clear and egregious felony violation of the USA Patriot Act. Destruction of evidence in a terrorist investigation is a felony violation of the USA Patriot Act. That the CIA withheld information of terrorism from the courts in violation of court orders and provided false information to the courts with respect to the existence of the, (recently), destroyed 92 CIA tapes of terrorist interrogations and investigations is a felony violation of the USA Patriot Act.