[ليد] حكومة بريطانيّة حول [برسن غلف] حادث
يوم الثلاثاء, أبريل - نيسان [22ند], 2008
ب بول متشيل |
أطلق وزارة سرّيّة من دفاع وثائق إلى ال أوقات جريدة يكشف أنّ [ليد] الحكومة بريطانيّة حول الظروف يحيط الإعتقال من 15 بحارات والمارينز من [همس] [كرنولّ] في ال [برسن غلف] بإيران ثورية [إيسلميك] يحرسون ([إيرغ]) في مارس - آذار 2007.
القوّة بحريّة كان مستخدمة جزء من بريطانيا طارئ في [أوس-لد] قوة بحريّة يفرز ب ال [بوش دمينيسترأيشن] يهدف ضدّ [تهرن], يطلب أنّ إيران نهايته نوويّة برنامج ويزعم رعاية من ال [إينسورجنسي] في العراق. كان ال [أوس], مع اثنان ناقلة طائرة فصيلة متحاربة, قد احتدّ وجوده كبيرة بحريّة في المنطقة بما أنّ هو أطلق الغزوة العراق في 2003. بريطانيا كان قد ضاعف الحجم من وجوده بحريّة على ال يتقدّم ستّة شهور.
لا يفكّر [أت ث تيم], [دس] [بروون], الدفاع سكرتيرة, يدّعى, "هناك ما من شك أنّ [همس] [كرنولّ] كان شغل في مياه عراقيّة وأنّ الحادث بنفسي تمّ في مياه عراقيّة… أنا أنّ حتّى هم [[إيرنين]] يبقون الموقعة أنّ الحادث تمّ في أيّ مكان غير في مياه عراقيّة."
[بروون] [بكد-وب] بيان كان بأميرال نائبة شارلز [ستل], النائب رئيس من الدفاع ملاكة, الذي قال مؤتمر صحفيّ أنّ ال [أوك] "بشكل واضح مسابقة" ادّعاءات أنّ البحارات كانوا مياه داخليّة إيرانيّة وينتج صور ومخططات أنّ زعم أن [بك-وب] إدعاءه.
أولى بحر أنكر لورد أميرال سيد [جونثون] [بند] ادّعاءات أنّ [همس] [كرنولّ] تلقّى يكون تضمّنت في [إينتلّيجنس-غثرينغ] عمليات ضدّ إيران. "لا يتجسّس نحن بالتّأكيد على هم," هو قال. "ليس [إيرنين] في أنّ جزء من مياه عراقيّة إقليميّة جزء من المشهد."
ما [بروون], أسلوب ويعصب أبدا يكشف, وفقا ل ال [مود] يوثّق, كان أنّ ال [أوس-لد] إئتلاف في العراق تلقّى من جانب واحد قرّر أن يسحب يقسم خطّ بين يتنازع عراقيّة ومياه إيرانيّة في ال [برسن غلف] قبل الحادث, دون قال الحكومة إيرانيّة حيث هو كان.
One of the reports, “Why the incident occurred,” dated April 13, 2007, sent to Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, a week after the navy personnel were released says, “Since the outset of the Iraq-Iran War there has been no formal ratified TTW [territorial waters] agreement in force between Iraq and Iran … While it may be assumed that the Iranians must be aware of some form of operational boundary, the exact coordinates to the Op Line have not been published to Iran.”
The communications log between HMS Cornwall and its two boarding vessels also discloses that Revolutionary Guard patrols were crossing the line (unaware of the change), three times a week before the incident and that it appears the British forces raised their weapons first.
The MoD still refuses to make known the precise location of the incident, claiming it would jeopardise “operational tactics, routines and capability” of British forces operating in the Persian Gulf.
At the time there were fears that the US would utilise the incident as an excuse for launching military action against Tehran. The US navy launched a major military exercise within days of the capture of the sailors. Prime Minister Tony Blair condemned Iran’s actions as “completely unacceptable, wrong and illegal” and warned, “It is now time to ratchet up international and diplomatic pressure in order to make sure that the Iranian government understands their total isolation on this issue.”
Blair had acted as Washington’s key ally in seeking to isolate the Iranian regime and impose the strictest sanctions possible, alongside making preparations for a possible military assault.
Britain demanded a United Nations Security Council resolution against Iran that placed the blame squarely on Tehran, but even so right-wing British newspapers denounced Blair for failing to take tougher action against the Iranian regime. The Times itself condemned “the pusillanimous timidity of British officials and politicians, who have failed disgracefully to confront Iran with the ultimatum this flagrant aggression demands.”
The Daily Telegraph called for intensified sanctions against Iran unless “it stops lying to us about the details of its nuclear program, [stops] arming and directing insurgents in southern Iraq, and [stops] violating Iraqi territorial waters … We wait anxiously to see whether this weakened and discredited Prime Minister has the necessary spine to do what is required, or whether Britain will persist in presenting its weakest aspect to a potential enemy.”
Neo-conservative circles within the US declared the detention of the British personnel to be an act of war on a NATO country and demanded other members of the alliance support the UK. Several top US military personnel made clear that had American sailors been involved in such an incident they would have fired on the Iranian forces. Lieutenant Commander Erik Horner, second in command of the USS Underwood in the Gulf declared, “We not only have the right to self-defence, but also an obligation to self-defence.”
Senator Joseph Biden of Maryland, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, called on the Bush administration to make plans to cut off Iran’s “importation of refined oil and affect their export of crude oil. You can hit them very, very badly. But I don’t think you talk about that publicly. Were I president, I wouldn’t be talking about that. I’d be planning that while I was moving on every front diplomatically.”
However, whilst Bush called Iran’s action “inexcusable behaviour” and called on the country’s leaders to “give back the hostages,” the administration kept a relatively low profile over the incident. Within American ruling circles, there remained significant opposition to a military attack on Iran, particularly under conditions where the US was still bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan and was politically isolated internationally.
In the event, the Persian Gulf incident resulted in a humiliation for the Blair government, epitomising the gap between Britain’s pretensions as a world power and its actual capabilities. London was only able to secure the most limited formal censure of Iran’s actions at the UN and from the European Union. Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett was forced to tone down her rhetoric at a European Union summit saying, “I think everyone regrets that this position has arisen … What we want is a way out of it.”
A subsequent all-party parliamentary inquiry described the incident as a “national disaster” for the UK.
The capture of the sailors was a propaganda coup for the Iranian regime, which ended with President Mahmud Ahmadinejad announcing that they would be released as a “gift” to Britain in order to mark both the Prophet Muhammad’s birthday and the Easter holiday.
The British government’s cover-up immediately began to unravel once Captain Chris Air, who headed the operation, admitted, upon his release, that his crew was on an intelligence-gathering mission—a fact deliberately suppressed during the incident in order to portraying Iran as having carried out an unprovoked act of aggression.
The fact that military action faced serious opposition among working people meant that neither Bush nor Blair was in a position to simply push for an immediate attack on Iran. Both faced popular hostility to their warmongering and a belief that they were habitual liars. Even a poll by the Daily Telegraph found that only a tiny seven percent of those surveyed had been convinced by the jingoistic media campaign demanding military action against Iran.
Even so, the incident contains warnings that another pretext may be sought for military action against Iran. The Bush administration is determined to effect “regime change” in Iran in order to gain control over the country’s vast oil resources, as they have done in Iraq. Earlier this year an incident involving US warships and small, high-speed Iranian craft as they passed through the Strait of Hormuz some three miles outside Iranian waters led to a series of high-level US warnings describing their action as a “reckless and dangerous and potentially hostile act.”
The Democrats have adopted the same belligerent tone towards Iran, with leadership challenger Hilary Clinton stating during a televised debate on April 16 that an Iranian attack on Israel “would incur massive retaliation from the United States.” Responding to questions, she added that the US should “do the same with other countries in the region” and “create an umbrella of deterrence that goes much further than just Israel.”
Her rival, Barak Obama, did little to distance himself from this warlike rhetoric, stating that an attack on Israel would be “an attack on our strongest ally in the region” and that “the United States would take appropriate action.”
See More:Military UK NewsHave Your Say: British government lied about Persian Gulf incident
Please note, only selected comments will be published.
One Response to “British government lied about Persian Gulf incident”
-
Aldo
Posted: Apr 22nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm | Link to this
Free Newsletter
Loading ...Related News
- Fake Maritime Boundaries
- UK sailors detained 0.5 km inside Iranian waters, embassy confirms
- Freed British sailors say they were in Iraqi waters
- Iran slams US propaganda campaign
- UK writes to Iran over troops
Latest Headlines
- Question For RINF Users: Do You Want a Forum?
- Students Skip Class For Obama Event, Get Suspended
- Olympic protest movement turns its sights on to sponsors
- Gitmo Torture Orders Came From The Top
- Feds to require visitors’ fingerprints when they leave US
- Police: DNA database ready as early as next year
- Murdoch to buy New York rival
- Chertoff Says Fingerprints Aren’t ‘Personal Data’
- MEPs to keep audit of wage abuse secret
- DOD data: More forced to stay in Army
More Breaking News
Archive
Most people in the UK and around the world knew that Labour and our media where lying about this incident it was so obvious, but you have to look at the press here, these lying scum journalists are decieving the people by kissing the Governments arse for a small crumb of a story, the time is coming when these journalists will be held accountable by the people… The UK mainstream media is in the process of commiting suicide and the people will be holding the rope… YOU JOURNALISTS WILL REEP WHAT YOU SOW, BE READY!!!