Rompere le notizie | Tribuna | Notizie BRITANNICHE | Notizie degli S.U.A. | Notizie del mondo | Notizie politiche | Notizie di Sci-Tecnologia | Notizie di terrorismo & di guerra | Notizie di sport | Multimedia | Regoli il homepage

Mercoledì 30 luglio 2008
Discuta questo rapporto nelle tribune di RINF >

Da Legno di David | WASHINGTON - airstrikes quotidiani dagli Stati Uniti e i combattente-bombardieri alleati nell'Afghanistan quasi si sono raddoppiati dall'ultima estate, secondo gli Stati Uniti I dati dell'aeronautica, una tendenza che riflette hanno aumentato gli attacchi insurgent ma anche le preoccupazioni di aumenti circa gli incidenti civili.

Il ricorso crescente ai airstrikes dagli Stati Uniti i comandanti nell'Afghanistan sembra contrassegnare una girata nel corso della guerra.

Rispondendo alle richieste dai comandanti a terra, l'eccedenza che alleata del velivolo la settimana passata ha pummeled gli obiettivi nemici di messa a terra un una media di 68 volte un giorno attraverso l'Afghanistan, cadente 500 - e bombe guidate 2.000 libbre e forze nemiche strafing con il fuoco del cannone, secondo i rapporti quotidiani di colpo dell'aeronautica.

Un anno fa, l'aeronautica era registrazione circa 35 airstrikes al giorno nell'Afghanistan.

Anche se l'aeronautica prende che cosa dice è misure esaurienti evitare le morti accidentali, gli incidenti civili dai airstrikes hanno due volte finora appuntito questo anno, da nessun in gennaio a 23 di marzo a 60 questo mese, secondo i nuovi, dati non pubblicati dalla vinaccia Garlasco, un ex capo d'ottimizzazione del ricercatore della vigilanza di diritti dell'uomo per il personale unito del pentagono.

i insurgents Taliban-condotti stanno attacando nei numeri significativi e rimanere per combattere piuttosto che agganciarsi in tradizionale colp-e-fanno funzionare le tattiche del guerrigliero, secondo gli Stati Uniti comandanti.

In parecchi avvenimenti recenti, gli Stati Uniti e le truppe alleate sono prevalso nelle battaglie lanciate solo dopo che combattente-bombardieri indicati fino allo scoppio i insurgents.

Il ruolo crescente di alimentazione di aria suggerisce che la guerra richiederà più delle truppe supplementari suggerite vicino Presidente Bush ed entrambi i candidati presidenziali. Potrebbe richiedere velivolo equipaggiato e più senza equipaggio da un'aeronautica e da un blu marino già overstretched.

E l'uso più grande di alimentazione di aria probabilmente provocherebbe gli incidenti più civili, in conflitto in cui la lealtà locale di vincita è considerata la chiave a successo.

L'autunno scorso, presidente afgano Hamid Karzai, rispondendo al tributo civile aumentante di morte dai airstrikes, richiesti pubblicamente che gli Stati Uniti trovano un'alternativa. Ma i airstrikes sono aumentato soltanto.

I comandanti alleati ancora stanno studiando un airstrike del 6 luglio che il governo afgano dice ha ucciso 47 civili sul loro senso alle nozze.

“Profondamente ci rammarichiamo tutto l'avvenimento dove i civili sono danneggiati,„ abbiamo detto il capitano reale del blu marino. Mike Finney, un portavoce per gli Stati Uniti - coalizione militare condotta nell'Afghanistan.

`Nemico emboldened'

But the Air Force says it is only responding to the intensity of fighting on the ground.

“Let’s face it, the enemy is more emboldened,” said Air Force Maj. Gen. Douglas L. Raaberg, deputy commander of air operations in the region. Raaberg is a B-1 bomber pilot who has flown strike missions over Afghanistan as recently as last week.

“The Taliban, when they have an opportunity to take a stand, they are doing that,” he said in a telephone interview from the region.

Coalition aircraft have doubled the number of hours they spend each day on airborne “armed overwatch” of U.S. and allied convoys and other operations, he said. He acknowledged that strike missions also have doubled as ground commanders increasingly request air support.

To meet the demand, allied air crews are flying more sorties each day, and more U.S. aircraft are on station with the recent diversion of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln from Iraq operations to supporting operations in Afghanistan.

“We are shifting assets as needed to make sure we don’t leave [ground forces] uncovered,” Raaberg said.

But the Air Force has to scramble to meet unexpected demand.

A Taliban attack July 13, for example, nearly overran a remote U.S. and Afghan outpost near the Pakistani border. Insurgents held the upper hand in combat until an Air Force B-1 bomber flew in to drop 2,000-pound bombs, an unmanned Predator fired a Hellfire missile and other strike aircraft dropped bombs and strafed the enemy with cannon. The insurgents retreated, leaving nine American soldiers dead.

“The only reason they weren’t completely overrun was air power, and that’s the first time that has happened” in the Afghan war, said John McCreary, who retired in 2006 as a senior intelligence analyst for the Pentagon’s Joint Staff.

“Coalition ground forces are not winning every battle, but they are winning every battle where they have air support,” said McCreary, who follows Afghanistan closely and still assembles a daily open-source intelligence report.

On July 20, Raaberg was piloting a B-1 bomber over Afghanistan when he was redirected to attack Taliban forces gathering for an assault on a U.S. forward operating base in Kunar province, in eastern Afghanistan near the border with Pakistan.

“They started attacking within half an hour of when I got there,” Raaberg recalled. He said U.S. artillery fired at the enemy, followed by airstrikes, followed by more artillery and more airstrikes, “until we ran out of bombs.”

Defeating such Taliban attacks, he said, is “not so much air [power] saving the day, it’s air combined with ground forces combined with our coalition partners. We’re trying to use everything.”

Analysts who have studied casualty patterns in Afghanistan say that the vast majority are caused, deliberately or not, by the Taliban and other insurgents.

According to Human Rights Watch, a nonpartisan international research organization, 929 Afghan civilians were killed in the fighting in 2006. Of those, 699 were killed by the Taliban and 230 by U.S. or coalition forces, including 116 by airstrikes.

In 2007, 1,633 Afghan civilians died in the fighting, with 950 killed by the Taliban and 434 by U.S. and coalition forces, according to data provided by Garlasco. The rest died under unclear or unknown circumstances, he said.

But while the number killed by U.S. or coalition ground forces stayed about the same, those killed by airstrikes more than doubled, to 321.

A key reason for the increase is that the Taliban are “shielding” their fighters among Afghanistan’s civilian population, Garlasco said.

“They actually go into peoples’ homes, force them to stay there during a battle, force them to build defensive trenches for them - these are true Geneva Conventions violations,” Garlasco said.

Raaberg said the Air Force will not attack insurgents shielding themselves among civilians “and the enemy knows that.”

Unplanned strikes

But Garlasco said the Air Force has not taken as much care with its quick-reaction airstrike missions as it has with those planned in detail and reviewed by intelligence analysts and lawyers at the U.S. regional air operations headquarters in Qatar.

“In their planned airstrikes, they have virtually eliminated the danger of civilian casualties,” Garlasco said. “It is in the unplanned airstrikes that you’re seeing almost all of the civilian casualties.”

Such unplanned missions often involve urgent calls to support U.S. and allied troops who unexpectedly engage in battle. Or an unmanned surveillance plane might find a group of people mistakenly identified by targeters as insurgents.

Raaberg said that for unplanned missions - such as the one in which he participated July 20 - the air command dispatches not just strike aircraft but intelligence and command aircraft, all in close coordination with ground commanders and tactical air controllers.

“It’s a painstaking effort,” he said. If insurgents are mixed in with civilians, “we will wait them out if we can” or ask the ground commander to flush them out.

But U.S. and allied troops in trouble take precedence.

“My hat’s off to the ones on the ground,” Raaberg said.

“There’s nothing more uncomfortable than to hear on the radio mortars and grenades going off. You’ve got to go help them.”

Discuss this report in the RINF forums >

Have Your Say: Afghan air war grows in intensity

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 30th, 2008 at 10:45 pm and is filed under War & Terrorism News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA-News Video Voting Warfare White-House Wolfowitz World-News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version