![]() |
|
ÇÕ¹ýÈ °í¹®ÀÇ À¯»ê
¼ö¿äÀÏ, 2007³â 8¿ù 29
¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ·Î¹öÆ® Scheer Àå¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °í¹®ÀÚÀÇ »çÁ÷Àº ¹Ì±¹ ¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀǸ¦ À§ÇÑ ºÒ¿îÇÑ ÀÏ·Î ±×ÀÇ ÈÄ¿øÀÚ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ´ëÅë·É, ÁÖÀǵǾú´Ù. ? ±×°Í? ¿ì¸®°¡ °âÀüÇÏ°í ±×¸®°í ÈǸ¢ÇÑ »ç¶÷ÀÌ Alberto Gonzales¸¦ ÁÁ¾ÆÇÏ´Â ½Ã°£¿¡¼ »ê´Ù ½½Ç s´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ÀÏ¿¡¼ ±×ÀÇ ÁÁÀº À̸§ÀÌ Á¤Ä¡ÀûÀÎ ÀÌÀ¯¸¦ À§ÇÑ ÁøÈëÀ» ÅëÇØ¼ ²ø·È±â ¶§¹®¿¡ ¹æÇصǴ°¡? ºÎ½Ã ´ëÅë·É ¿ù¿äÀÏ¿¡ ¾ÖµµÇß´Ù. ¹«½¼ ÁÁÀº À̸§? ¾î·µç ºÎ½Ã´Â ±¹°¡À̱â À§ÇÏ¿© Gonzales¸¦ »Ì¾Ò´Â°¡? s Gonzales Á÷ÈÄ¿¡ °¡Àå ³ôÀº »ç¹ý ´ç±¹Àº ¹é¾Ç°ü ¹ý·ü °í¹®À¸·Î ÀÏÀ» À§ÇÑ ±×ÀÇ ±âÁúÀ» Áõ¸íÇß¾ú´Ù. ´ëÅë·É¿¡°Ô ±×ÀÇ ¹ýÀû Á¶¾ðÀº ºÎ½Ã ¶§¹®¿¡ °í¹®ÀÌ Á¤´çÇÑ ¼±ÅñÇÀÌ´Ù À̾ú´Â°¡? s´Â °¢ÀÚ Á¤ÀÇÇߴ°¡? Å×·¯¿ÍÀÇ ÀüÀï? ¹ÛÀ¸·Î ´Û´Â ¸ðµç ÀÌÀü ¹ýÀûÀÎ °¨±ÝÀ̶ó°í ¹× ƯÈ÷? ±¸½Ä Á¦³×¹Ù¸¦ ¸¸µå´Â°¡? Àû Æ÷·ÎÀÇ ½É¹®¿¡ s ÁؾöÇÑ Á¦ÇÑ.? Gonzales? 1¿ù¿¡¼ ´ëÅë·É¿¡°Ô ¼öÄ¡½º·¯¿î ¸Þ¸ð. 25, ¶ÇÇÑ, ´Ù¸¥ üÁú»ó º¸È£ Áß ±¸½Ä, ÇàÁ¤ºÎ¿¡ ±¹È¸ üũ¸¦ Á¦°øÇÏ´Â ÈûÀÇ ºÎºÐÀ» ¸¸µé¾îÁö´Â 2002³â. Gonzales¿¡ µû¸£¸é? Á÷¾÷ÀûÀÎ ÆÇ´ÜÀº 1996ÀÇ ÀüÀï ¹üÁ˰¡ ÇൿÇѤ¤´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» °üÂûÇϱâ À§ÇÏ¿©, Á¦³×¹Ù ÇùÁ¤ ¹× ¸¦ À§ÇÑ À§¹ÝÀ» À§ÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ÀÎÀÇ Çü»ç ¼ÒÃ߸¦ Çã¿ëÇÏ´Â ´ëÅë·É ´õ ÀÌ»ó ¹Ù¿î½ºµÇÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Â°¡? °³ÀÎ Á¸¾ö¿¡ ħ¹ü.? Àú ¹ý·ü¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ´ëÅë·É ¹× ±×ÀÇ ¹ý¹« Àå°ü µÑ ´Ù °¡È¤ÇÑ Çü¹úÀ» Á¶°ÇÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿©, Çã°¡ÇÑ Ã¼°èÀûÀÎ °í¹®À» À§ÇÑ Á×À½À» Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿©, ÀáÀçÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÏ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ´ç¿¬È÷ ºÎ½Ã´Â, ÇÏÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ¾î¶² ÁøÃëÀûÀÎ »ç¹ýºÎ º¯È£»ç µµÀü Æø·Î ¹é¾Ç°ü¿¡¼ À¯ÃâÇÏ´Â ¹üÁË ¹ý¹« Àå°üÀ¸·Î Gonzales¸¦ ÀÓ¸íÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¿ì¸®°¡ ÁÔ Ashcroft, ÀÌÀü ¹ý¹« Àå°ü ±âº»ÀûÀÎ ÀαÇÀ» º¸È£ÇÏ´Â ¹ý·ü À§¹Ý¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© ½É°¢ÇÑ ¿¹¾àÀ» ÀÖ´ø Çб¸ºÎÅÍ ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÁÖ¾îÁö´Â ±â¹ßÇÑ °ü½É»ç ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù. ÂüÀ¸·Î, GonzalesÀÇ ¸í¹éÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ¼ø°£? Á¤¹«´Â Ashcroft¿¡ ±×ÀÇ ¾ß°£ ¹æ¹®À̾ú´Â°¡? ±×¶§ ¹é»ö Àü¼Ó º¯È£»ç°¡ Á¤ºÎ °¨½ÃÀÇ ¿¬ÀåÀ» Çã°¡Çϱâ·Î º´¾àÇÑ Ashcroft¸¦ ¼ÓÀÌÁö ¸øÇÑ °÷¿¡, s º´»ó. »çÀýµÈ Ashcroft´Â FBI ÁöµµÀÚÀÇ ·Î¹öÆ® S. ³»Á¤°£¼·¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼¸¸ ´õ Æø·Â¿¡¼ º¸È£µÇ°í. Mueller III. ¹®Á¦´Â Ashcroft¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© ¼±¹°Çߴ°¡? ¹ýÀûÀÎ ¿ÏÀü¼ºÀÇ s Àü½Ã´Â ºÎ½Ã°¡ Gonzales¿¡°Ô ±×ÀÇ ÀÏÀ» ÁÙ ¶§ »èÁ¦µÇ¾ú´Ù. While the media are once again buying the White House backroom spin that the president?s error in the Gonzales scandal is one of misplaced loyalty to a friend who didn?t perform up to expectations, the truth is that Bush promoted Gonzales because of his assaults on the Constitution and not in ignorance of that sorry record. As the president put it in ?reluctantly? accepting the resignation of ?a man of integrity, decency and principle?: ?As Attorney General and before that, as White House Counsel, Al Gonzales has played a role in shaping our policies in the war on terror. ¡¦ The PATRIOT Act, the Military Commissions Act and other important laws bear his imprint.? Frighteningly accurate testimony: that the Gonzales legacy will live on long after his government tenure. One aspect of that dreadful legacy, not often remarked upon, is that Gonzales shaped Bush?s selections of lifetime appointees to the judiciary that will preside for decades to come. As Bush observed: ?As Attorney General, he played an important role in helping to confirm two fine jurists in Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. He did an outstanding job as White House Counsel, identifying and recommending the best nominees to fill critically important federal court vacancies.? One of those critical vacancies was filled on Gonzales? recommendation by the appointment of then-Assistant Attorney General Jay S. Bybee as a judge on the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Bybee distinguished himself in the eyes of Gonzales and the president by being the author of the 50-page ?Bybee memo? of Aug. 1, 2002, which held that torturing al-Qaida captives ?may be justified? and that international laws against torture ?may be unconstitutional if applied to interrogations? conducted under President Bush. But Bybee went further than merely sweeping aside the restraints of international law, concluding, ?Finally, even if an interrogation method might violate Sect. 2340A [of the U.S. Torture Convention passed in 1994] necessity or self-defense could provide justification that would eliminate any criminal liability.? The Bybee memo protected Gonzales and Bush from being branded with the ?torturer? label by arguing that torture ?covers only extreme acts ¡¦ where the pain is physical, it must be of an intensity akin to that which accompanies serious physical injury such as death or organ failure.? Oh? Maybe my opening sentence for this column was too harsh. Surely Gonzales, and the president who still adores him, intended all along to draw the line at organ failure.? Have Your Say: A Legacy of Legitimizing Torture Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Nano Ink 'Tattoo' Could Monitor Diabetes Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:14 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Can geo-engineering rebuild the planet? Last post by Nostalgia @ 01:08 PM Discussing the cashless society Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:18 PM Activists arrested because of UK Indymedia secret IP logging Last post by ben @ 12:03 PM Hello from the Philippines Last post by loki @ 10:27 AM The Global Financial Pyramid Scheme Explained Last post by loki @ 10:25 AM Underground coal gasification Last post by lincdean @ 09:05 AM Saudi judge sentences pregnant gang-rape victim to 100 lashes for committing adultery Last post by Unregistered @ 04:06 AM Video shocker: Pig Filth smack the snot out of homeless man whilst restrained. Last post by Boris The Bullet Dodger @ 12:21 AM What Happened To Indymedia? Last post by Tony Gosling @ 12:14 AM Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |