Progressif
Activisme de médias
Chargement…
| Registre | Mot de passe perdu ? | Bulletin
Un mot de passe sera expédié à toi. Ouverture | Mot de passe perdu ?
Un email te sera envoyé. Ouverture | Registre
Traduisez :
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Outils : Nouvelles | Commentaire de poteau | Version d'imprimeur | Email à l'ami

Jeudi 6 septembre 2007

Vote le `rejeté automatiquement'

Partagez cet article :

Ces icônes lient aux emplacements bookmarking sociaux où les lecteurs peuvent partager et découvrir de nouvelles pages Web.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Tache
  • Fark

Papiers de vote, mai 2007 Des dizaines de milliers de voix dans l'élection de Holyrood ont été rejetées par les machines de compte sans n'importe quelle adjudication humaine, BBC Ecosse a appris. Une recherche a établi que les machines ont été programmées pour rejeter certains des nouveaux papiers de vote de modèle automatiquement.

Ils ne sont jamais apparus sur les écrans à défier par les parties ou jugés en retournant des dirigeants.

L'Office de l'Ecosse dit là n'était aucune évidence qu'il s'est ajoutée à la confusion d'électeur.

Il a ajouté que, dans l'exemple de l'automobile-adjudication pour l'élection du 3 mai, la décision a été prise entre les dirigeants de renvoi et le fournisseur de e-compte.

Cependant, le premier ministre Alex Salmond a décrit le développement comme « étonnant » et profondément troublant.

“I was under the impression - until this revelation - that the ballots that were rejected were actually seen by the election agents as part of the process,” he said.

More than 140,000 ballots were spoilt on 3 May when votes were held for the Scottish Parliament.

Tens of thousands more ballots were rejected for the local authority elections, which were held on the same day, under a separate electoral system.

One of the enduring images of election night was of candidates and agents scrutinising screens showing the rejected ballots.

However, the BBC has learned that in some contests, more than half of all the “spoilt” ballots were rejected without any human adjudication.

The machines were set to auto-adjudicate if they thought they had a Holyrood ballot paper with a cross in one column but apparently no mark in the other.

Human adjudication

In those circumstances the machine would count the good vote, reject the other one and automatically put the ballot paper in the pile alongside all the correctly-completed ballots.

Shadow Scottish secretary David Mundell said he was “appalled” by the claims.

“Unfortunately it has become part of a series of revelations. Right from the start the Scotland Office did not come clean about the mishandling of the elections,” he told BBC Scotland.

The Tory MP claimed that information had to be “dragged out of” the Scotland Office.

He said: “Rather than putting their hands up and saying ‘we made a complete hash of this and we apologise to the people of Scotland’, they’ve just continued to show arrogance and contempt, as if somehow it was nothing to do with them.”

Mr Mundell’s Lib Dem opposite number, Alistair Carmichael, added that the auto-adjudicate decision was “inappropriate”.

“Individual decisions should have been taken by returning officers in consultation with the machine operating company,” he said.

A spokesman for the Scottish Green Party said that the review of the election must leave no stone unturned in order to get to the bottom of the problems.

He added: “We are particularly concerned that the review of the election may only look at samples of rejected ballot papers rather than all of them. It is important that the review is absolutely thorough.”

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Ballots ‘rejected automatically’' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Postal voting cheats are threat to May elections
  • Uproar: Bush official’s quip on black voters
  • 20 percent of election printouts were unreadable
  • Holyrood puts ID cards plan under scrutiny
  • Plan to ‘hijack’ bus passes as ID cards

  • This entry was posted on Thursday, September 6th, 2007 at 7:38 pm and is filed under Top Stories | Breaking News | Current Events . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Fair use notice

    This website contains some copyrighted material that has not been specifically authorised by the copy right owner. RINF is making such material available in our efforts to advance public understanding of poverty alleviation, political economy, popular democracy and social justice issues both in Scotland and overseas. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material provided under US Copyright Law.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 321 Users Online Right Now

    Breaking News