eutruth.org.uk eutruth.org.uk

The following are all involved with building the EU dictatorship.以下是所有參與建設的歐盟專政。 An estimate of the percentage of members involved with this agenda or its associated corruption is shown alongside.估計百分比成員參與了這項議程或其相關的腐敗，是顯示旁邊。 This is not an exhaustive list.這不是一份完整的清單。

The Bilderbergers:該bilderbergers ：

A society of 140 politicians and the powerful, whose main concern is building the EU police state: 96%.一個社會的140名政界人士和強大的，其主要關注的是建立歐盟警察國家： 96 ％ 。

All our Prime Ministers since Ted Heath have been Bilderbergers.我們所有的首相以來特德希思已bilderbergers 。 This society has sufficient members within the leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties, that it can choose the candidates who stand for leader.這個社會有足夠的成員領導人保守，勞工及鋰離子電池的DEM黨派，它可以選擇候選人主張的領導人。 It chose John Major, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Gordon Brown (who joined in 1991), all of whom work for the Bilderbergers and for the EU, not for the voters they pretend to represent.它選擇了梅傑，英國首相布萊爾，戴維卡梅倫和英國財政大臣布朗（參加過1991年） ，他們都沒有工作，為bilderbergers和歐盟，而不是為選民，他們假裝代表。 That is why your vote makes no difference.這就是為什麼你的一票不差。

Has the Queen been persuaded by the Bilderbergers to sign the five illegal treaties?已女王被說服由bilderbergers簽署查處了5家非法條約？ She risks prosecution for treason, and has failed in her personal constitutional duties as a monarch.她起訴的風險，為叛國，並沒有在她個人的憲法職責，作為君主。

Britain is the target英國是目標

Amongst its 27 nations, Britain is the main target.當中，它的27個國家，英國是主要目標。 They know from our long history the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep.他們知道，從我國的悠久歷史，歐盟專政不能建立，同時是有一個堅強有力和熱愛自由的英國，它的門戶。

For that reason the EU’s British sympathysers have been undermining us with scores of Frankfurt School subversion techniques since the 1950’s, including control of the media, the corruption of our courts, political correctness to prevent debate, undermining teachers and the family.出於這個原因，歐盟的英國sympathysers已破壞了我們與幾十法蘭克福學派顛覆技術自50年代以來，包括對媒體的控制，貪污腐敗是我們的法院，政治正確性，以防止辯論中，破壞了教師和家庭。

That is why, for example, the French don’t implement many EU regulations, but in Britain our fifth column implements the lot, and gold plates them.這就是為什麼，舉例來說，法國不執行許多歐盟法規，但在英國，我們的第五縱隊實施該地段，黃金等板塊。

The Deutsche Verteiderungs Dienst Intelligence department德意志verteiderungs dienst情報部

Controls development of the EU.管制的發展，歐盟的選擇。 Set up by Adolf Hitler for this purpose.成立了由希特勒作此用途。 Recruits British politicians including Heath, Rippon and Jenkins, and major British newspapers for the EU.新兵英國政客包括希思， rippon和詹金斯，英國各大報紙對歐盟。 Some of our top politicians are DVD controlled, we may not know who until their deaths.我們的一些高層政界人士，是DVD的控制下，我們可能不知道是誰，直至其死亡。

Inside Britain: the fifth column:在英國國內：第五欄：

The Conservative Party保守黨

The leadership: 75%.領導： 75 ％ 。 Penetrated by a pro-EU leadership since the 1960’s, the Conservative Party is the primary instrument of the European Union in Britain.侵入，由一個親中歐領導人自1960年以來，保守黨是首要的文書中的歐洲聯盟在英國。 Francis Maude stated the Party founded Common Purpose in 1970.弗朗西斯莫德地闡明了我們黨創建的共同目的，在1970年。

The Conservatives say at elections they will do something minor about the EU (eg. Cameron promised to leave the European People’s Party; he didn’t).保守派人士說，在選舉中，他們會做一些輕微面對歐盟即將實施（如金馬倫答應離開歐洲人民黨;他沒有） 。 They never do - its leaders are deeply dedicated to the EU; the likes of Cameron and Francis Maude would rather be in the EU than be in power, traitors to their nation and to Conservative voters.他們從來沒有這樣做-它的領導人是深深地致力於歐盟;喜歡的金馬倫和弗朗西斯莫德寧願在歐盟比在權力，出了叛徒，以自己的民族和國家，並以保守的選民。

Labour and the Lib Dems勞動和自由民主黨

Their leaderships (60%) have been EU controlled for 15 years.他們的領導人（ 60 ％ ）已被歐盟控制為15年。 A vote for these three parties is a vote for the EU dictatorship.表決這三個黨派就是投票給歐盟專政。 We have a one party state.我們有一個一黨制國家。

The Freemasons:該共濟會：

The top 10% of Britain’s 400,000 freemasons.前10 ％的英國的400,000共濟。 Most freemasons would be horrified if they knew what their own leadership are up to, or what their real goals are.最共濟會震驚，如果他們知道是什麼，他們自己的領袖均達到或什麼，他們真正的目標。 See http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm to find out.見http://www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm找出答案。

(It is difficult to be promoted above the rank of sergeant in the police if you are not a freemason, slightly higher ranks in the Army, Royal Navy and RAF). （這是很難被晉升以上職級的警長在警察，如果你還不是freemason ，略高於隊伍在陸軍，皇家海軍和皇家空軍） 。

The Legal Profession:法律界人士：

Law Lords 80%, Lawyers as a whole: 65%.上議院高級法官80 ％ ，律師作為一個整體： 65 ％ 。 British justice is now utterly corrupt.英國大法官，現在完全腐化。 See our August issue.看到我們8月發行。 Law Lords refuse to enforce our long and written British Constitution, under which the EU is an illegal regime.上議院高級法官拒絕執行長的書面英國憲法下，歐盟是一個非法政權。 They are themselves guilty of misprision of treason - the crime of refusing to act when they know treason has been committed.他們是自己犯隱匿叛國罪-罪拒絕採取行動的時候，他們知道叛國一直致力於。

Common Purpose:共同的目的：

The EU’s criminal local control organisation with 25,000 members: 60% involved.歐盟的刑事局部控制組織25000名成員： 60 ％ 。 Many members think its all above board, and do not realise they have not been selected.許多委員認為，其一切光明磊落，並沒有意識到他們並沒有被選中。

Common Purpose have penetrated the BBC, where four hundred of them control news and current affairs, our newspapers, council executives, the Church of England, the NHS which over 20 years they have deliberately destroyed from within, social services, our police and many more.共同的目的，都侵入英國廣播公司，如400 ，他們控制新聞和時事，我們的報紙，常務理事，英國教會， NHS的，其中超過20年，他們有故意毀壞從內部，社會服務，我們的警察和多。 Common Purpose members control the Quango budget, £124 billion, and the NHS budget, £90 billion, ie about £210 billion, or 1/3 of our taxes.擁有共同的目標，成員控制的半官方機構的財政預算案，英鎊， 1240億， NHS的財政預算案中， 90英鎊億元，即約£ 210億元，即1 / 3 ，我們的稅收。 See our Book Review, page 6.看到我們的書評，第6頁。

Among all the above, there are about 25,000 dedicated British traitors sabotaging our nation, with 100,000 useful idiots iimplementing the EU’s corruption.除上述所有，有大約25000名專責英國叛徒破壞我們的國家，有10萬名有用的白痴iimplementing歐盟的腐敗。 and feeding off its gravy train.和餵養過它的肉汁列車。

17 councils to hold referendums?議會17日舉行公投？
Many people doubt we’ll ever be given a referendum, so the local councils of East Stoke, Purbeck, in Dorset, Charfield in South Gloucestershire, Newton and Noss Mayo, and possibly South Hams in Devon are holding their own referendums on the EU.很多人懷疑，我們將永遠不會讓公投，因此，地方議會的東斯托克， purbeck ，在多塞特， charfield在南格洛斯特郡，牛頓和noss馬約，並在可能的南火腿，在德文郡舉辦自己的公投對歐盟的選擇。

The Campaign Alliance for Referenda in Parishes has now got 17 other councils in the South West interested.該競選聯盟為公投教區現在已經得到其他17個議會在西南興趣。

In our view their question “Do you want a referendum on the EU” is the wrong one.我們認為他們的問題： "你是否希望有一個公投對歐盟" ，是錯誤的。 It should be “Do you want your council, county or nation to be abolished by the EU (currently by the Reform Treaty?)”它應該是"你想你會或縣，民族要取消，由歐盟（目前由改革條約？ ） "

Referendums legally binding公投在法律上的約束力

Under our British Constitution these referendums are legally binding on the government, whose power is legally limited to implementing the wishes of the people.根據我們的英國憲法公投，這些都是具有法律約束力，對政府的權力是有法律限制，以落實人民的願望。

This constitutional limit on government power was confirmed as recently as May 2007 in the High Court ruling in the Chagos Archipelago case.這一憲法限制政府權力，被確認為最近2007年5月，在高等法院的裁決，在查戈斯群島的情況。 Government has been breaking the British Constitution for some time - they must be stopped.政府已打破了英國憲法，有一段時間-他們必須予以制止。

“Do it yourself” "做你自己"

YOU can force a referendum on your council, using Part 3, Schedule 12, paragraph 18, sub paras 4&5 of the 1972 Local Government Act as follows:你可以迫使舉行全民投票來貴會，利用第3部分，附表12 ，第18 ，小組第4 ，第5 ， 1972年地方政府法如下：

1. 1 。 Six residents must sign a letter announcing a parish or town meeting with at least 7 days notice, and it must start after 6pm.六名居民必須簽署一項意向書宣布教區或城鎮會見至少七天通知，而且它必須開始後，至下午六時。 2. 2 。 Inform the press and local dignitaries.新聞界通報和當地政要。 3. 3 。 At least 10 people on the electoral role must show up.至少10人在選舉事務的作用，必須表現出了。 Propose and second a motion that a parish poll should be held on whether or not the EU’s Reform Treaty should be ratified.建議和第二次議案一堂民調，應舉行與否，歐盟的改革條約應當得到批准。 At least 10 voters, and 1/3 of those present, need to vote in favour for the poll to take place.至少10名選民，並有1 / 3在座的各位，需要投贊成票，這次民調的，以發生。 Under the Act, the council must hold the poll within 25 days.根據該法案，安理會必須舉行民調在25天內。

This question gives the council the power to take direct action if our utterly corrupt Westminster Parliament continues to refuse to obey the wishes of the people.這個問題，使安理會有權採取直接行動，如果我們完全腐敗西敏寺國會繼續拒絕服從人民的意願。

We call upon all Britain’s 19,579 paid councillors and 20,000 unpaid councillors to propose a motion for a referendum in their council.我們呼籲所有英國的19579支付議員和20000名無償議員提出一項議案，為公民投票委員會。

Rory Watson and David Charter 羅裡沃森和大衛憲章

BRUSSELS Every visitor to the European Union would have to provide fingerprints before being allowed to enter, under plans unveiled yesterday to clamp down on illegal immigration. 布魯塞爾每一位參觀者向歐洲聯盟將提供指紋，然後才獲准進入，根據計劃，在昨天揭幕，以嚴厲打擊非法入境活動。

The move to record the arrival and departure of non-EU citizens and to store the data in a single European database is part of a wider overhaul of border security.此舉記錄抵港及離港的非歐盟國家公民，並存儲這些數據，在歐洲單一數據庫的一個組成部分，更廣泛的檢修邊境安全。 It is aimed at the largest single category of illegal migrants: people who remain once their visa or permit has expired.它的目的是在最大的單一類別的非法移民：很多人，一旦他們的簽證或許可證已經過期。

Franco Frattini, the EU Justice Commissioner, argued that the existence of the electronic register containing a visitor’s personal details and final destination would make it possible to identify overstayers.佛朗哥弗拉蒂尼，歐盟司法專員，辯稱所存在的電子註冊載有旅客的個人詳細資料，並最終目的地將有可能找出逾期居留者。

The scheme, which must be approved by all 27 EU governments before it can come into force in 2013 as proposed, has been criticised by civil rights groups.這項計劃，都必須經所有27個歐盟國家政府，然後才可以生效，在2013年提出的，也為人所詬病，由民權團體。 They fear that it could lead to a “fortress Europe” mentality against foreigners and to identity theft if the data were lost or stolen.他們擔心，這可能會導致一場"歐洲堡壘"的心態，對外國人和身份被盜用，如果數據丟失或被盜。

We Are Change Ireland attended the Training Day on the Lisbon Treaty on Jan 2008 in Dublin. 我們正在改變愛爾蘭參加了培訓一天就里斯本條約於2008年1月在都柏林舉行。 This was organized by Irish MEP Kathy Sinnott. 這項活動是由愛爾蘭優良凱茜sinnott 。 Danish MEP Jens-Peter Bonde exposes the lies and manipulations by the EU elites to hide the significance of the treaty by making it unreadable. 丹麥優良斯-彼得b onde暴露了謊言和操縱由歐盟精英，以隱藏的意義，該條約，使讀取。

What are we doing to stop our beloved Britain being taken over? 我們怎麼做，以阻止我們敬愛的英國正在接管？

This is too frightening and too important to ignore any longer.這是太可怕，太重要了忽視下去了。

Peter Hitchens彼得hitchens

If we don’t want to become a neglected outstation of the European Superstate, stripped of our nationhood, powerless to decide who lives here, controlled by laws we don’t make and can’t change, ruled by a government we cannot throw out, we have rather a short time in which to do something about it.如果我們不想成為一個被忽視的外地的歐洲超級大國美國，剝奪了我們的民族性，無力決定誰生活在這裡，控制的法律，我們不作和不能改變的，裁定由政府，我們不能再丟了，我們有相當短的時間內做一些工作。

You may think none of this matters to you, but the trouble is that it does, whether you think so or not.你也許認為所有這一切事宜，以你的，但麻煩的是，它不，你是否覺得是這樣或不是。

The European Union is interested in you, your liberty and your money, even if you don’t care about it.歐洲聯盟是有興趣的你，你的自由和你的錢，就算你不關心它。

Its decisions affect your life, even if you don’t realise they do.它的決定影響你的生活，即使你不明白，他們這樣做。

When I point out that local councils are changing rubbish collections because of EU laws, people don’t believe me.當我指出，地方議會正在改變垃圾收集的，因為歐盟的法律，人民不相信我。

Scroll down for more… 向下滾動，為更多… …

Ex-Europhile: Margaret Thatcher wears jumper adorned with EU member states當然europhile ：撒切爾夫人，戴跳投貼著歐盟會員國

They rightly think it ridiculous that such things should be affected by what is supposed to be a Free Trade partnership.他們正確地認為這可笑的是，這些事情應該受到什麼是一個自由貿易的夥伴關係。 But they are.但他們的影響。

A huge number of our laws have been drawn up in Brussels and hurried through Parliament without anybody really understanding what they were doing.數量龐大的，我們的法律已經制定了在布魯塞爾急忙國會通過，沒有人真正了解他們做些什麼。

A lot of us still don’t even grasp why it is that we can no longer have nice blue British passports.我們很多人還沒有掌握，甚至為何，那就是我們不能再有尼斯藍色英國護照。

They also don’t grasp why they have to queue for ages to get back into the country after a holiday.他們也沒有把握，為什麼他們要排隊，為不同年齡人士重返戰場後，為國家假日。

They aren’t paying attention.他們還沒有給予足夠重視。 That passport you have isn’t British.護照，你是不是英國人。 It’s European.它的歐洲。 It gives you no more right to enter this country than if you were a Lithuanian.這會讓你更沒有權利進入這個國家比，如果你是立陶宛語。

The border you are crossing is the border of the EU, not Britain.邊界你是過路的是邊界的歐盟，而不是英國。 If the Government set up a special channel for UK passport holders it would be breaking EU law.如果政府設立一個特別通道，為英國護照持有人，將打破歐盟法律。 There is no longer any such thing as a British passport.不再存在任何這類的事情，因為一本英國護照。

This has another grim meaning.這是另一項嚴峻的含義。 We cannot control two-thirds of the immigration now revolutionising this country because it comes from EU states.我們無法控制的近三分之二，入境事務，現在逐步改變這個國家，因為它是來自歐盟國家。

British people have a way of ignoring the Continent then finding out just in time that what happens there matters – Dunkirk being the most recent example of this complacent folly.英國人民有辦法忽略了大陸，然後找出只是在當時那裡發生的事情-敦克爾克被認為是最最近的一個例子，這自滿蠢事。 We probably won’t get another Dunkirk to warn us.我們大概不會再敦克爾克，以警示世人。

By the time it is clear to everyone what has happened, it will be far too late.經過一段時期，這是誰都清楚發生了什麼，這將遠遠為時已晚。

Look at the row we are having, a rather lukewarm row in my view, about the European Constitution, dressed up as the Treaty of Lisbon but still what it always was – the official foundation document of the European Superstate.看看行我們有一個相當冷淡，排在我看來，對歐洲憲法，盛裝，因為該條約的里斯本，但仍是什麼，它始終是-官方的基礎文件中的歐洲超級大國美國抗衡了。

At first it looks as if there are two sides, those for a referendum, and those against.起初看來，如果有兩面，那些為統獨公投，贊成與反對的。

But what use would a referendum be?但有什麼用處會全民投票？ Who seriously believes that, if Britain said “No”, the EU would say: “Oh, sorry to have troubled you with our silly, over-ambitious idea.誰認真的相信，如果英國說"不" ，歐盟會說： "哦，對不起，有困擾，你與我們傻，過於雄心勃勃的想法。 We’ll give it up for good.”?我們將放棄它為善" ？

No, they would threaten and suborn the British Government into holding the vote again.不，他們將威脅和收買了英國政府舉辦再進行一次表決。

Or they would have yet another summit in which the thing would be adjusted a tiny bit and presented as if it were new.或者他們會又一次峰會，其中事會修正一點點，並作為如果它新的。 Or they would say: “Very well then, if you don’t like it, why not leave?”或者他們會說： "非常好，然後，如果你不喜歡它，為什麼不離開？ "

Gordon Brown might hold a referendum on that very subject.英國財政大臣布朗可能舉行全民公決表示非常課題。 At this point we would badly need a major political figure to stand up and say: “Yes, please, let’s leave.”在這一點上，我們將所最需要的一個重要的政治人物，站出來說： "是的，請你，讓我們離開" 。

He could add: “After all, if Norway and Switzerland can cope outside, we certainly can.他補充說： "畢竟，如果挪威和瑞士能應付外，我們當然也可以。 And I defy anyone to tell me one single way in which this country has benefited from its long entanglement with this horrible organisation.”我藐視任何人告訴我，一個單一的途徑，即這個國家已經受益於其長期的糾纏與這種可怕的組織" 。

But this will not happen.不過，這將不會發生。 Our entire political elite, in all parties, love the EU, not because it is good for the country, but because it is good for them.我們的整個政治精英，在各黨派，熱愛歐盟，而不是因為它是好的，為國家，但因為這是對他們有好處。

They love its regular service of gravy trains, carrying failed Ministers off to a life of high salaries, big expenses and huge pensions, plus an almost total absence of responsibility.他們愛其正常服務的肉汁列車，攜帶未能部長們開了一個終身的高薪，大費和龐大的退休金，再加上一個幾乎完全沒有責任。

They don’t mind at all that it deprives them of the power to do very much.他們不介意在所有它剝奪了他們有權這樣做非常欣賞。 They are, for the most part, short of ideas and lazy, and happy to be able to pass the buck to Brussels while enjoying their pay and perks.他們是，在大多數情況下，短期的思想和懶惰的，並高興能夠將責任推給布魯塞爾享受權利的同時，他們的薪酬和福利。 Note, specially, the behaviour of the Tory Party.注意到，特別地，該行為的保守黨黨。 People sometimes ask why I call them ‘useless’.有時候人們問我為什麼稱他們為'沒用' 。 Well, here’s an example.那麼，這裡的一個例子。 You get a lot of something called ‘Euroscepticism’ from Tories.你得到了很多的東西，所謂' euroscepticism '從保守黨。 It’sa stupid word and it describes a worthless thing.這是愚蠢的一個字，它描述了一個不值錢的東西。

They act as if they are against the EU grabbing our power and money, and talk sternly about how they disapprove.他們充當如果他們反對歐盟攫取權力和金錢，談嚴詞如何，他們都不同意。

But David Cameron, William Hague and Malcolm Rifkind are clear that, if the Lisbon Treaty is ratified, that will be that.但是大衛卡梅倫威廉海牙和馬爾科姆里夫金德明確表示，如果里斯本條約批准後，這將是這一點。 In the (highly unlikely) event of them coming to power, they won’t hold a referendum because, oh dear, it will be too late.在（極不可能發生的）他們上台以後，他們不會舉行統獨公投，因為，哦親愛的，將是為時已晚。

In doing this, they are part of a great tradition.這樣做，他們是一個偉大的傳統。 Harold Macmillan first sought British entry to the Common Market in 1962.哈羅德麥克米倫首先要求英國加入共同市場於1962年。 Then Ted Heath succeeded in getting it, ramming our membership through Parliament with characteristic ruthlessness and sacrificing Britain’s fisheries industry for his ambition.然後特德希思成功地得到了它，撞毀了我們的會員國會通過具有特色的殘忍和犧牲英國的漁業產業，為他的野心。

When, in 1975, Harold Wilson held a referendum on staying in, Margaret Thatcher campaigned vigorously for Britain to remain in the Market, sporting a jumper bearing the flags of member states.時，在1975年，哈羅德威爾遜舉行了公民投票，在下榻的，撒切爾夫人競選大力英國繼續留在市場，體育跳投承受會員國國旗。

When she came to office, she pushed through the Single European Act, a huge surrender of British vetoes.當她來到辦公室，她被推通過單一歐洲法，以及龐大的投降英國的否決。 Then she was bludgeoned by Cabinet colleagues into entering the Exchange Rate Mechanism.當年她bludgeoned內閣同事到進入匯率機制。

By the end of her premiership, she had begun to realise what was at stake.到去年底，她的超級聯賽，她已經開始明白什麼是利害攸關。 But it was precisely because of this that the Tory Party then threw her out of office.但也正是因為如此，保守黨黨，然後把她走出辦公室。

John Major went on to browbeat and bully his MPs into voting for the Maastricht Treaty, yet another huge surrender of independence.梅傑接著就browbeat和欺負他的國會議員到投票馬斯特里赫特條約，但另一個巨大投降的獨立性。

Mr Cameron represents a firm return to the Europhile days before Lady Thatcher’s rebellion.卡麥隆是一個堅定的回歸到europhile天前撒切爾夫人的反叛。

When it comes to action, the Tory Party will continue to support the EU because they have been committed to it since the Sixties, and cannot admit that this was a mistake.當談到行動，保守黨黨將繼續支持歐盟，因為他們一直致力於它自六十年代，並不能承認這是一個錯誤。

But they also recognise how unpopular it is, which is why they pretend to be hostile and invented ‘Euroscepticism’ to console disgruntled voters.但他們也承認，如何不得人心的，它是如此，這就是他們假裝被敵對和發明' euroscepticism '安慰心懷不滿的選民。

The longer this goes on, the harder it will be to unscramble.時間越長，任其發展下去，就越難將破解密碼。 My advice is not to be diverted by campaigns for a referendum that will get us nowhere.我的忠告是：不要改由運動公投，將讓我們越來越行不通了。

It is to consider, very carefully, whether you will be able to look your children and grandchildren in the face when, 20 years hence, they ask: “What did you do to stop the country being taken over by a foreign power?”它是要考慮，很小心，不論你將可以看看你的孩子和孫子們，在面對時， 20年來，因此，他們問： "什麼叫你做，以阻止該國正在採取由一名外國勢力" ？

I shall continue, week by week, to suggest ways in which you might be able to ensure that they never need to ask that question.我會繼續進行，一周一周，獻計獻策，其中，你或許還可以，以確保他們沒有需要問這個問題。

EUObserver euobserver : “The European Union has overnight agreed the precise text of its new ‘Lisbon Treaty’ to be formally signed off on 13 December in the Portuguese capital.說： "歐洲聯盟已經同意在一夜之間確切文字，其新的'里斯本條約> ，以正式簽署了關於12月13日在葡萄牙首都。
At around 02:00 local time on Friday morning - following shorter-than-usual discussions - Portuguese prime minister Jose Socrates announced that a deal has been struck, describing it as ‘victory for Europe’.在02:00左右，當地的時間週五上午-以下比一般要短，討論主題-葡萄牙首相何塞蘇格拉底宣布一項協議已被擊中，並形容它為'勝利，為歐洲'。
The new treaty will be formally signed by all European leaders in Lisbon on 13 December and subsequently go for ratification next year, with a view to coming into place by mid-2009, ahead of the next European elections.”新條約將正式簽署的所有歐洲領導人在里斯本12月13日及隨後轉到批准明年起，以期在未來到位，由2009年年中之前，可以先下一歐洲議會選舉" 。

The only reason this ‘treaty’ was drawn up was to break down the sovereignty of all participating nations in order to give free reign to the neoliberals, the neocons, the privatization-and-deregulation gurus and big corporations, who will be able to dictate their terms for everything.唯一的原因，這'條約'是制定了被打破的主權所有參與國為了讓自由行事向neoliberals ，新保守主義者，私有化和放鬆管制大師和大公司，他們將可以操縱他們的任期為一切。 Wages, social welfare, health care, taxes, ‘defence’ (read ‘war’) will eventually be taken from the national governments and the citizen will have much less influence on laws and regulations.工資，社會福利，衛生保健，稅收， '國防' （讀'戰爭' ） ，最終將採取由各國政府和公民，將有很大的影響較小法律和法規。
In short, the treaty is an attempt to impoverish and subdue the European population.總之，該條約是美國企圖以貧窮和制服的歐洲人口。

Because it is important and far-reaching the whole population should be able to vote on this treaty.因為它是重要而深遠的整個人口應該能夠表決這一條約。 Those in power don’t want you to have any influence whatsoever.當權者不希望你有任何影響力可言。 This treaty is the beginning of an undemocratic Europe.這個條約是開始一個不民主的歐洲。 It’sa coup d’état.這是一次政變。

Telegraph電報 : “Gordon Brown has steadfastly ignored a growing British campaign for a referendum on the European Union Treaty that was agreed in the early hours of this morning.”說： "英國財政大臣布朗已堅定不移地忽視了越來越多的英國運動公投對歐洲聯盟條約，商定在凌晨時分今天上午" 。

Petitions請願
European referendum歐洲公投
Referendum公投 in the Netherlands在荷蘭

Just剛 one example其中一個例子 of the things they have in store for us:的東西，他們已經在商店為我們：
“Commissioner Frattini has stated that the Commission intends to propose, in the framework of a package of anti-terrorism measures foreseen for November, the blocking of Internet searches for bombmaking instructions, adding that the Commission will also ask the private sector to make it possible to use technology to prevent people from using or searching dangerous words like ‘bomb, kill, genocide or terrorism’ (Reuters, 10 Sept. 2007). "專員弗拉蒂尼曾表示，該委員會打算提出的，在這框架下的一系列反恐怖主義措施預計11月，屏蔽因特網搜索bombmaking指示，並補充說，委員會也將要求私營部門要想辦法使利用技術，以防止有人使用或尋找危險的字眼，例如'炸彈，殺害罪，種族滅絕罪或恐怖主義' （路透社， 2007年9月10日） 。 Privacy organisations and the private sector, including Google, have already stated that the blocking of Internet searches with these words would be contrary to the freedom of expression and would not be an efficient tool against terrorism.”隱私保護組織和私人機構，包括Google ，都已經表示，該堵的網際網路搜尋與這些話，將有違言論自由及不會是一個高效率的工具，打擊恐怖主義" 。

This measure is intended to prevent you from researching genocide, terrorism, prevent you from getting information on the number of killings and bombs gone off, and that includes the killings done by European forces.這項措施的目的是防止你從研究種族滅絕，恐怖主義，阻止你獲取信息的人數殺戮和炸彈經歷過的，這也包括殺人所做的歐洲部隊。 It’s as simple as that.事情就這麼簡單。 It is typical for the new wave of totalitarian thinking that is gaining momentum in neocon Europe.這是典型的，為新一輪的極權主義思想抬頭的勢頭，在新保守主義歐洲。

Do you think Europe would act to denounce all instances of genocide and war crimes?你認為歐洲會採取行動，譴責所有對他們的種族滅絕和戰爭罪行嗎？ Think again:再想一想：
“Today Council and Commission were summoned to explain the follow-up on Parliament’s report adopted in February 2007 and the report from the Council of Europe from 08 June dealing with clandestine CIA operations in Europe. "今天的理事會和委員會分別召見解釋後續對國會的報告通過了2007年2月和該報告由歐洲理事會從6月8日處理秘密中央情報局在歐洲的業務。 Liberal and Democrat members remain very critical of the lack of action by Member States to follow up on the conclusions drawn from the investigations.”自由民主黨議員仍然非常關鍵的缺乏採取行動的會員國跟進，對所得出的結論，從調查的" 。

The motor behind it all is corporate power.汽車背後的卻是企業的權力。
“From Bengal to Baghdad: Three Centuries of Corporate Warriors.” "從孟加拉到巴格達：三個世紀的企業戰士" 。
Neocons thrive on poverty and war.新保守主義者賴以貧窮和戰爭。

By Ivan Simic由伊万西米茨

The European Union (EU) is a multinational union, established in 1993.歐洲聯盟（歐盟）是一個多國聯盟，成立於1993年。 The該
EU is made up of twenty-seven Member States.歐盟作出了對27個成員國。 First, the EU was established首先，歐盟成立
as the European Economic Community in 1957 by the Treaty of Rome and has作為歐洲經濟共同體在1957年由羅馬條約，並已
since undergone many changes.自從經歷了很多變化。 The EU has a single market between member歐盟單一市場的成員國之間
states with common trade policy.國，有著共同的貿易政策。 Important EU institutions and bodies歐盟重要機構和組織
include the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of包括歐洲委員會，歐洲議會和理事會
the European Union, the European Court of Justice and the European Central歐洲聯盟，歐洲法院的司法以及歐洲中央銀行
Bank, among others.銀行，等等。

The end of War World II brought the idea for the unification of Europe, now結束戰爭的世界第二所帶來的構思，為統一的歐洲，現在
known as the EU, but some individuals or groups also known as world rulers眾所周知，由於歐盟，但有些個人或團體也被稱為世界統治者
needed to conduct an experiment before the formation of an important super需要進行實驗前形成的一個重要的超
power such as the EU.權力如歐盟。 And soon, they succeeded; the right person for them不久，他們成功了;合適的人，為他們
was Josip Broz Tito leader of Communist Party and lifetime President of the被josip布羅茲鐵托領導的共產黨和終身總統的
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRJ).南斯拉夫社會主義聯邦共和國（固體燃料沖壓發動機） 。 With the Royal family in與皇室
exile and a post war atmosphere in Europe, Tito became famous, an ideal流亡政府和戰後的氣氛在歐洲，狄托成為國際知名，是一個理想
partner for this experiment.合夥做這個實驗。

Many will wonder why Yugoslavia?許多人會感到奇怪，為何南斯拉夫嗎？ The answer is very simple; besides the答案很簡單，除了
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), which was too powerful, to play蘇維埃社會主義共和國聯盟（蘇聯） ，這是過於強大，以發揮
with, she was the only post war country in Europe with multiethnic and同，她是唯一戰後歐洲各國，與多種族和
multicultural population, and Member Republics.多元文化的人口，以及成員共和國。

In 1945, from the remains of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia; the Democratic 1945年，從遺骸南斯拉夫王國;民主黨
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia was proclaimed, headed by Tito.南斯拉夫聯邦共和國宣告成立，為首的鐵托。 Tito becomes狄托成為
Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs.總理和外交部長。

The experiment begins; one State with six republics, one army, one currency,實驗開始，一個國家與六個共和國之一，軍隊，貨幣，
one federal police, one federal Government and Law, one passport, no borders一名聯邦警察，其中聯邦政府和法律，一本護照，沒有國界
and a visa regime among republics, and most of all: every Republic had their和簽證制度，各共和國之間，而且大部分都：每一個共和國有其
own Government with all vital institutions.自己的政府與各重要機構。 Still, one very important thing還有，其中一個很重要的事情
for this experiment was the fact that Yugoslavia had different cultures and這個實驗，是一個事實，即南斯拉夫問題有不同的文化和
religions among State members, such as: Orthodox, Catholic and Muslim.宗教的國家之間的成員，例如：東正教，天主教和穆斯林。 The該
way the population is going to live in these circumstances was essential for單程人口是跟誰過，在這種情況下是必要的
the future of the EU.未來的歐盟。

In 1948, Tito makes one interesting move, highly motivated; he becomes the在1948年，斯托使得一個有趣的舉動，士氣高昂;他成為
first socialist to defy Stalin’s leadership in COMINFORM also known as世界上第一個社會主義冒天下之大不韙，在斯大林的領導cominform也稱為
Information Bureau (Inform biro).新聞局（告知比羅） 。 This move by Tito gains him good positions這項動議是由斯托收益他的好陣地
with all Western powers, of course his old friends, but bad relations with同所有西方大國，當然還有他的老朋友，但惡劣關係
the USSR.蘇聯。 For good results and loyalty to the West, In London in 1954,供了良好的效果和忠誠，到西部，在倫敦，在1954年，
Yugoslavia gets zone B from Free Territories of Trieste by treaty based on南斯拉夫獲得B區從自由領土上的裡雅斯特的條約為基礎
the “Memorandum of Understanding”. "諒解備忘錄" 。

On the other side, with the first results of the experiment, formation of在另一邊，與第一次試驗的結果，形成
the future European Union begins with European Coal and Steel Community未來的歐洲聯盟是從歐洲煤鋼共同體
(ECSC) in 1952. （ ecsc ）於1952年。 Let us not forget that coal and steel were, and still are,讓我們不要忘記，煤炭和鋼鐵人，現在仍然是，
very important in war and industry.很重要的，在戰爭和工業。 A very important founding member of this一個非常重要的創始成員，這
Community was West Germany.社區是西德。 A few years later, the Treaties of Rome in 1957數年後，羅馬條約於1957年
created two more communities: the European Economic Community (EEC) and創造了兩個多社區：歐洲經濟共同體（歐洲經濟共同體）
European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or EURATOM).歐洲原子能共同體（歐亞經濟共同體或共同體） 。 The EEC and EAEC later歐洲經濟共同體和歐亞經濟共同體稍後
merge into EEC in 1967.融入歐洲共同市場於1967年。

Strangely, but as previously arranged, Tito is chosen for SFRJ to be free很奇怪，但由於先前的安排，鐵托是選擇的固體燃料沖壓發動機獲得自由
Eastern European country, independent from the USSR, and neither member of東歐國家，獨立於蘇聯，二者缺一成員
Warsaw pact nor NATO, but in 1961, Tito puts Yugoslavia to be a founding華沙條約，也沒有北約，但在1961年，鐵托把南斯拉夫是一個創始
member of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).成員國的不結盟運動（南） 。 Membership in NAM did not affect加入不結盟運動絲毫沒有影響
the experiment since Yugoslavia was the only European country in the實驗以來，南斯拉夫是唯一的歐洲國家在
Movement at that time, but it did affect future of Yugoslavia.運動在那個時候，但它確實影響到日後的南斯拉夫。

Time is running, and in the beginning of eighties, Tito dies, but the時間已經不多，而在一開始的，八十年代，鐵托去世，但
experiment continues.實驗仍在繼續。 The West needs a few more years before final西部地區需要一個多幾年，最後才
announcement of new European Union.宣布新的歐洲聯盟。 Europe is rapidly altering, many歐洲正在迅速改變，許多
countries have joined EEC.國家已加入歐洲經濟共同體。

At the beginning of nineties, Europe is about to change forever.在一開始的， 90年代，歐洲即將永遠改變。 In在
Yugoslavia a new government is forming headed by Slobodan Milosevic, the南斯拉夫新政府正在逐漸形成為首的米洛舍維奇，
experiment is about to end, mission is about to be accomplished.實驗即將結束，任務即將完成。 World世界
rulers are entering the final phase before the formation of the EU.統治者正進入最後階段，形成了歐盟。 With the與
USA battling Gulf War in Middle East, in Europe, history has been written;美國爭奪海灣戰爭在中東，在歐洲，歷史已經寫;
Germany’s reunification takes place in 1990, followed by; dissolution of the德國的統一，發生在1990年，之後，解散了
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in 1991, dissolution of Socialist蘇維埃社會主義共和國聯盟於1991年解散的社會主義
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1992, dissolution of Czechoslovakia in南斯拉夫聯邦共和國在1992年，捷克斯洛伐克解體的，在
1992, and wide spread fall of communist monopoly. 1992年，並廣泛蔓延，屬於共產主義的壟斷。

As planned, the new Europe comes into being in the year 1993, and with no按計劃，新的歐洲開始實施是在1993年，並沒有
threats on the way, a new star was born, European Union.威脅，就這樣，一個新的明星誕生了，歐洲聯盟。 Just a few months僅僅幾個月的時間內
after termination of the USSR in which America had a big influence, the USA終止後，蘇聯是美國有一個大的影響，美國
got a new rival; the EU.得到一個新的競爭對手;歐盟。 This rival will become more influential and這個對手將變得更加有影響力和
powerful than any other country or Union in the world, more powerful than強大的，比任何其他國家或聯盟，在世界上更強大的比
the old USSR.舊蘇聯。

Two questions arise from this: First, did world rulers decide to put兩個問題出現：第一，沒有世界的統治者決定把
European Union instead of the USA as a leader of a free world and first歐洲聯盟而不是美國作為一個領導人，一個自由的世界第一
super power?超強？ Second, who are those rulers and where were they coming from?第二，誰是當權者，而被他們從？

Answer for the first question is yes, they did, and as always, the USA was回答的第一個問題是，他們這樣做了，同以往一樣，美國是
used.用。 Second: We will never know who they are, but they are definitely第二：我們永遠不會知道他們是誰，但他們肯定是
coming from Germany, they are not Jews as many think, if they were Jews then來自德國，他們是不是猶太人，因為許多人認為，如果他們是猶太人，然後
they would have had their own State long time ago.他們有他們自己的國家在很久以前。

If we turn back and look through European history, Germany was not defeated如果我們回頭看看，透過歐洲歷史上，德國並沒有敗給
as many thought, they played very smart; waited and planned to return正如許多人認為，他們踢得非常聰明;等候，並計劃返回
stronger than ever and they did through the EU, as leader and strongest強比以往任何時候都與他們沒有通過歐盟，作為領導者和最強
Member State.會員國。 Germany was, and still is the Union’s biggest net contributor;德國是，現在仍然是歐盟最大的淨貢獻者;
with the biggest economy, she is responsible for about 23% of the EU budget.與最大的經濟體，她是負責約23 ％的歐盟預算。
Same is with Japan and the USA; it looks like Japan was also not defeated in同樣是與日本和美國的，它看起來像日本，也沒有被打敗
the USA-Japan war.美國-日本戰爭。 Now, Japan is the strongest independent economic and現在，日本是最強的獨立經濟體系和
industrial power on the earth, most Japanese products is represented in the工業用電對地球，大部分日本產品為代表的是在
USA.美國。 In contemporary days, power is not measured through weapons, rather在當代天，權力不是衡量武器，而不是
through strongest industry.通過最強的產業。

Will the EU have an equal rival in the future?將歐盟有一個平等的競爭對手，在未來呢？

It will; a true rival for the EU will be a future Union with lots of money它將;一個真正的對手，為歐盟將是一個未來的聯盟與很多錢
and same religion among member States as an advantage (maybe, Union of和同一宗教會員國之間的一個優勢（也許，聯盟的
Islamic countries?).伊斯蘭國家？ ） 。

However, maybe we are being deceived with the EU; perhaps the EU is just不過，也許我們都被愚弄了與歐盟，或許歐盟是剛
another world experiment before the launch of another giant global Union.另一個世界試驗飛船發射前的另一巨頭的全球聯盟。

A Council of Europe report made public June 9 said that investigators have found proof that the CIA ran clandestine prisons for terrorist suspects in Europe with the full cooperation of government leaders, especially in Poland and Romania.歐洲理事會報告公佈了6月9日說，調查人員已發現有證據顯示，中情局然秘密監獄的恐怖嫌犯在歐洲與全面合作的政府領導人，尤其是在波蘭和羅馬尼亞。
A European commission spokesman told journalists that the commission was in the process of studying the report and will make assessment in due course of time as it did not want to make any hasty comments.歐盟委員會發言人對記者說，該委員會正在著手研究該報告，並會作出評估，在適當的過程中的時間，因為它不想作出任何草率的評論。 He, however lamented that in the absence of any investigative powers, the commission could not go into the matter on its own.但他抱怨說，在沒有任何調查的權力，委員會無法去調查此事，對自己的。
The report, prepared by Dick Marty, a Swiss senator who is heading the investigation, said, “There is now enough evidence to state that secret detention facilities run by the CIA did exist in Europe from 2003 to 2005, in particular in Poland and Romania.這份由馬蒂，瑞士一名參議員，他們是對頭的調查，說： "現在有足夠的證據表明，被秘密拘留設施，由美國中央情報局的確存在，在歐洲，從2003年至2005年，尤其是在波蘭和羅馬尼亞。
“We have also had clear and detailed confirmation from our own sources, in both the American intelligence services and the countries concerned, that the two countries did host secret detention centres under a special CIA programme established by the American administration in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, to ‘kill, capture and detain’ terrorist suspects deemed to be of ‘high value’,” the report claimed. "但是我們也有過明確和詳細的確認，從我們自己的來源，無論在美國情報部門和有關國家，這兩個國家沒有東道主的秘密拘留中心根據一項特別計劃，中情局設立的，美國行政當局在善後工作9月11日， 2001 ， '殺死，抓捕和拘留恐怖嫌疑人被認為是'高價值' ， "該報告稱。
For example, Marty’s report stated that investigators had received confirmation, “from more than one source,” of eight names of “high-value detainees” that were held in Poland between 2003 and 2005.舉例來說，馬蒂的報告說，調查人員已得到證實， "從不止一個消息人士透露， "八國集團的名字"高價值囚犯" ，即分別在波蘭2003年和2005年。 CIA sources told Marty’s investigators that Poland was the “black site” where both Abu Zubaydah and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed were held and questioned using “enhanced interrogation techniques,” which is usually a euphemism for torture.中情局消息來源告訴馬蒂的調查員說，波蘭是"黑站點" ，而這兩個阿布祖貝達和哈立德謝赫穆罕默德舉行了，並質疑以"強化審訊技術" ，這是通常是一種委婉的說法，為酷刑。
Abu Zubaydah was a leading member of Osama bin Laden’s brain trust and the operations chief of al-Qaeda.阿布祖貝達是一個主要成員，拉登的智囊和行政業務的基地組織有牽連。 Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has admitted planning the September 11 attacks on the United States.哈立德謝赫穆罕默德已承認策劃九一一對美國的攻擊。
The report states that these secret prisons “were run directly and exclusively by the CIA” and that local staff performed only “purely logistical duties.”該報告說，這些秘密監獄"的人來說，直接和完全由中央情報局" ，並表示，當地工作人員的表現，只是"純粹的後勤職務" 。
However, investigators had “sufficient grounds to declare that the highest state authorities were aware of the CIA’s illegal activities on their territories.” The report said that former Polish president Aleksander Kwasniewski as well as the former and current presidents of Romania, Ion Iliescu and Traian Basescu, “could be held accountable for these activities” because they “knew about and authorized” them.不過，調查人員"充分的理由申報國家最高當局知道中情局的非法活動，在其領土上"的報告中說，前波蘭總統克瓦希涅夫斯基以及前任和現任總統的羅馬尼亞，伊利埃斯庫和伯塞斯庫14 ， "可能被追究責任，為這些活動" ，因為他們"知道並認可" 。
The report noted that the “rendition, abduction and detention of terrorist suspects” have always taken place outside US borders because they would have been “ruled unlawful and unconstitutional” by American courts.該報告指出， "移交逃犯，綁架和扣押的恐怖嫌犯"一直以外發生的美國邊界，因為他們已"排除非法和違憲" ，由美國法院審理。
“Obviously, these actions are also unacceptable under the laws of European countries, who nonetheless tolerated them or colluded actively in carrying them out,” the report said. "很顯然，這些行動也無法接受，根據法律的歐洲國家，但是不能容忍他們或相互勾結，積極進行整改， "該報告稱。
“This export of illegal activities overseas is all the more shocking in that it shows fundamental contempt for the countries on whose territories it was decided to commit the relevant acts,” it said. "這個出口的非法活動，在海外更是讓人吃驚，因為它顯示出根本蔑視為國家，其領土，它是決定將有關的行為" ，它說。
In addition, the fact that these measures applied only to non-US citizens reflected “a kind of legal apartheid,” the report said.此外，事實是，這些措施只適用於非美國公民的反映， "是一種法律種族隔離制度， "報告說。 The blame does not lie only with Americans, but also, “above all, with European political leaders who have knowingly acquiesced in this state of affairs.”責任不在於只是美國人，而且， "最重要的是，隨著歐洲政治領袖的人明知而默許這種狀況的內政" 。
Marty’s report also criticised Germany and Italy for having “obstructed the search for the truth and continuing to do so by invoking the concept of ‘state secrets’.”馬蒂的報告還批評了德國和意大利，因"妨礙尋求真相，並繼續這樣做，引用的概念， 『國家機密』 " 。
In an interview published in the French daily Le Figaro, Marty said, “The United States wanted to impose a war without rules against terrorism.在接受採訪時發表了在法國費加羅報，馬蒂說： "美國想要強加的戰爭沒有規則打擊恐怖主義。 This policy ended in disaster.”這項政策的結束，在災難" 。
The European Parliament which has been in the forefront of unmasking these facts about renditions flights by CIA and allied subjects was quick to respond.歐洲議會已在前列，揭露這些事實演繹航班，由美國中央情報局和專職科目也很快作出回應。
MEP Sarah Ludford of the United Kingdom, vice-President of the former committee of enquiry on CIA activities in the EP said: “The new Marty report confirms what had been found by the Council of Europe and the European Parliament.歐盟莎拉ludford的聯合王國，副總統，前調查委員會，對美國中央情報局的活動，在歐洲議會說： "新馬蒂的報告證實已被發現，由歐洲理事會和歐洲議會議員。 Any new evidence confirming that CIA prisons existed, as we alleged, in Europe, would be damning and shameful.任何新的證據，證實中情局秘密監獄存在，因為我們據稱，在歐洲，將確鑿的和可恥的。 As MEPs demanded, we must expose the secret agreements between US intelligence services and some European governments.作為歐洲議會議員要求，我們一定要揭露的秘密協議，與美國情報部門和一些歐洲國家政府。 These illegal, undemocratic and unacceptable actions must be accounted for and punished.”這些非法的，不民主和不能接受的行動，必須經過清點，並遭到懲罰" 。
MEP Ignasi Guardans of Spain, former Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) coordinator in the CIA committee declared: “The release of this new report by the Council of Europe rapporteur will help to maintain the spotlight on what happened in the name of the ‘war on terror.’ The EP too must maintain its scrutiny of this rendition practice in the coming months and continue to push the Member States to reveal the true facts of the matter.” As an immediate reaction, EU and NATO member Poland denied the findings of the report alleging it had hosted secret US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) prisons for terror suspects.歐盟ignasi guardans的西班牙，前聯盟的自由派和民主派人士為歐洲（ alde ）協調員在中央情報局委員會宣布： "釋放的這份新報告是由歐洲委員會的報告員，將有助於維持聚光燈對究竟發生了什麼事的名義the ‘war on terror.’ The EP too must maintain its scrutiny of this rendition practice in the coming months and continue to push the Member States to reveal the true facts of the matter.” As an immediate reaction, EU and NATO member Poland denied the findings of the report alleging it had hosted secret US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) prisons for terror suspects.
According to the report, Poland’s former president Aleksander Kwasniewski had known about the covert CIA activities on Polish soil.
“Poland maintains its position on the issue of the alleged CIA prisons on the territory of our country - There were no secret bases in Poland,” Polish Foreign Ministry spokesperson Robert Szaniawski was quoted by the Polish PAP news agency last Friday.
Szaniawski added Polish officials were waiting for the Council of Europe to produce more details and evidence to support its claims. “Up to now the evidence presented on this issue has been worth very little,” he said.

http://www.neurope.eu/articles/74870.php

Although it has 80,000 trainees in 36 cities, 18,000 graduate members and enormous power, Common Purpose is largely unknown to the general public. It recruits and trains “leaders” to be loyal to the directives of Common Purpose and the EU, instead of to their own departments, which they then undermine or subvert, the NHS being an example. Although it has 80000 trainees in 36 cities, 18000 graduate members and enormous power, Common Purpose is largely unknown to the general public. It recruits and trains “leaders” to be loyal to the directives of Common Purpose and the EU, instead of to their own departments, which they then undermine or subvert, the NHS being an example.

Common Purpose is identifying leaders in all levels of our government to assume power when our nation is replaced by the European Union, in what they call “the post democratic society.” They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us. Common Purpose is also the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments to reward pro European local politicians. Corrupt deals are enabled that put property or cash into their pockets by embezzling public assets. Common Purpose is identifying leaders in all levels of our government to assume power when our nation is replaced by the European Union, in what they call “the post democratic society.” They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us. Common Purpose is also the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments to reward pro European local politicians. Corrupt deals are enabled that put property or cash into their pockets by embezzling public assets.

It has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal profession, the church, many of Britain’s 7,000 quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA’s (Regional Development Agencies). Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised the “Shoot to kill” policy without reference to Parliament, the law or the British Constitution. It has members in the NHS, BBC, the police, the legal profession, the church, many of Britain’s 7000 quangos, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries, Parliament, and it controls many RDA’s (Regional Development Agencies ). Cressida Dick is the Common Purpose senior police officer who authorised the “Shoot to kill” policy without reference to Parliament, the law or the British Constitution. Jean de Menezes was one of the innocents who died as a result. Her shoot to kill policy still stands today.

Common Purpose trained Janet Paraskeva, the Law Society’s Chief Executive Officer. Surprising numbers of lawyers are CP members. It is no coincidence that justice is more expensive, more flawed and more corrupt. And no surprise the courts refused to uphold the law, when a challenge was made to the signing of the six EU treaties, which illegally abolish Britain’s sovereignty. Common Purpose is backed by John Prescott’s “Office of the Deputy Prime Minister” (ODPM), and its notional Chief Executive is Julia Middleton. It is no coincidence that justice is more expensive, more flawed and more corrupt. And no surprise the courts refused to uphold the law, when a challenge was made to the signing of the six EU treaties, which illegally abolish Britain’s sovereignty. Common Purpose is backed by John Prescott’s “Office of the Deputy Prime Minister” (ODPM), and its notional Chief Executive is Julia Middleton. The Head of the Civil Service Commission is a member

It is close to controlling Plymouth City Council, where is has subverted the democratic process. Local people cannot get CP’s corrupt activities published, because the editors of local papers are in CP, and refuse to let journalists publish the articles. CP started in 1985; in the 1990’s, with its members’ cross departmental influence, it was involved with what then became the disasterous New Millennium Dome Company and the squandering of £800 million; it appears £300m of this was diverted into the web of quangos set up by CP. Local people cannot get CP’s corrupt activities published, because the editors of local papers are in CP, and refuse to let journalists publish the articles. CP started in 1985; in the 1990’s, with its members’ cross departmental influence, it was involved with what then became the disasterous New Millennium Dome Company and the squandering of £800 million; it appears £300m of this was diverted into the web of quangos set up by CP. There is a fraud case over this, stalled in the courts thanks to CP’s influence in the legal profession.

Over £100 million of our money has been spend on CP courses alone, and its been hidden from the public, and members names are a guarded secret. It charges substantial figures for its courses. Matrix for example costs £3,950 plus VAT, and courses for the high flying ‘leader’ can be as much as £9,950 plus VAT. This money is ours, paid by government departments financing senior staff to become agents for CP, instead of loyal to their own jobs. Common Purpose (Ltd by guarantee, No. 2832875) is registered as charity No. 1023384. Matrix for example costs £3950 plus VAT, and courses for the high flying ‘leader’ can be as much as £9950 plus VAT. This money is ours, paid by government departments financing senior staff to become agents for CP, instead of loyal to their own jobs. Common Purpose (Ltd by guarantee, No. 2832875) is registered as charity No. 1023384. It describes itself as being involved in Adult education. Given it preys on the rich and powerful, charges expensive fees, and its aims are clearly power and control, its charity status stinks and should be revoked.

Potential Common Purpose subjects are selected for training. Are they susceptible to being converted; are they in the right job, with the right colleagues and friends? Do they have power, influence and the control of money? If the candidate has some, or all of these key attributes, then the local Common Purpose Advisory Board decides if they can do the course.

Common Purpose - training our future EU rulers - continued Trained leaders are encouraged to act as a network, enable other members’ plans, and have meetings under the so called Chatham House rules. This effectively means their statements are not attributable to them, nor can attendees reveal information heard at a Common Purpose meeting.

Council Officers are having secret meetings with, for example, property developer Common Purpose friends. No agendas and no minutes. Common Purpose Graduates from the public quango sectors such as the Regional Development Agencies attend, and have the power to award large sums of public money to projects. It is the worst national example of cronyism, closed contract bids, fraud and corruption. And unseen to the general public. Common Purpose Graduates from the public quango sectors such as the Regional Development Agencies attend, and have the power to award large sums of public money to projects. It is the worst national example of cronyism, closed contract bids, fraud and corruption. And unseen to the general public.

Common Purpose undermines traditionally effective and efficient government departments with an overwhelming influx of new language, political correctness and management initiatives. The talk is of empowering communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming (sucking EU money into a project to sustain it), community empowerment, working partnership, regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc. Documents appear about change, and reorganisation. As CP “leaders” become more senior they employ countless managers and bureaucrats. In time confusion rules, and things don’t seem to work properly. The talk is of empowering communities, vision, worklessness, mainstreaming (sucking EU money into a project to sustain it), community empowerment, working partnership, regeneration and celebrating diversity etc etc. Documents appear about change, and reorganisation. As CP “leaders” become more senior they employ countless managers and bureaucrats. In time confusion rules, and things don’t seem to work properly. Management decisions are made that seem stupidly destructive. The organisation’s performance becomes sluggish. Undermining the NHS is Common Purpose’s biggest success so far, with bureaucrats outnumbering hospital staff three to one.

David Cameron, who is pro Europe, uses the language of Common Purpose; he has appointed Ken Clarke, the most committed of the pro Europeans, in charge of his “ Democracy Taskforce” - rather like putting the cat in charge of the safety of mice. Common Purpose specifically targets children from the age of 13, and more recently younger, for special leadership and citizenship training. David Cameron, who is pro Europe, uses the language of Common Purpose; he has appointed Ken Clarke, the most committed of the pro Europeans, in charge of his “ Democracy Taskforce” - rather like putting the cat in charge of the safety of mice . Common Purpose specifically targets children from the age of 13, and more recently younger, for special leadership and citizenship training. Yes, it is active in schools, and again the average parent has no idea.

People have contacted us to speak of their experiences with Common Purpose. A common theme is its all sweetness and light, until you fail to follow the direction set by the CP leadership. Then interesting things happen. Ladies in particular have been bullied at work, some have lost their jobs, some have become paranoid and depressed at the pressure from people ganging up on them.

A typical story is a husband describing the decline in his wife from the time she becomes a Common Purpose graduate. Loss of sparkle, enthusiasm, anxious and ‘changed’, and she initiated a divorce. Other Common Purpose people lie when they are challenged as to their involvement.

Common Purpose candidates are given a two day residential course in which they are ‘trained’ in a closed residential environment, such as a small hotel. They are encouraged to reveal personal information about themselves, such as their likes, dislikes, ambitions and dreams. Discussions are then controlled by the course leaders. Some participants have likened this to Delphi technique or the application of group psychology such as Cognitive Dissonance or brainwashing. If you suspect Common Purpose is active in your organisation, or see a pattern of incredibly bad decisions, money being wasted, notice bullying, fraud, or threats, note the names of those involved (we’ve tracked down over a thousand) and please contact us. And publish the truth about Common Purpose as widely as you can. Brian Gerrish 07841 464187, David Noakes 07974 437097; http://eutruth.co.uk for action. Some participants have likened this to Delphi technique or the application of group psychology such as Cognitive Dissonance or brainwashing. If you suspect Common Purpose is active in your organisation, or see a pattern of incredibly bad decisions, money being wasted, notice bullying, fraud, or threats, note the names of those involved (we’ve tracked down over a thousand) and please contact us. And publish the truth about Common Purpose as widely as you can. Brian Gerrish 07841 464187, David Noakes 07974 437097; http:/ /eutruth.co.uk for action.

http://drjn.co.uk/

1. The Queen has signed 6 of the 7 EU Treaties.

2. The 6 treaties define and build the EU as an unelected dictatorship.

3. The EU’s laws give it the powers of a police state.

4. The 7th EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain as a nation - the Queen could sign it in as little as two years.

5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how our democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights - the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A majority of us don’t want to be in the EU. We are being forced in against our will. Do you feel you’ve become powerless, unable to influence events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties are gradually removing our democracy; and 70% of the laws now passed by our Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn’t the real reason people have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has taken away our ability to change things?

Common law, where the government was our servant, is now largely replaced by the EU’s Corpus Juris, which puts the government above the law, and we don’t participate. We have already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU, pretending its not significant.

6. Massive EU corruption
The EU’s auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they’ve refused to sign off the EU’s accounts for each of the last ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn’t account for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth. The EU’s auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they’ve refused to sign off the EU’s accounts for each of the last ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn’ t account for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth.

7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their own voters.

As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the policy of their leaderships, not that of their members. (unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted for the EU dictatorship.

8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7000 quangos.
A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within. A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within.

Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments, most of it lining the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM.

9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU’s 107,000 regulations will close hundreds of thousands more businesses when fully enforced, and control our private lives more closely than those of Soviet citizens. The EU’s 107000 regulations will close hundreds of thousands more businesses when fully enforced, and control our private lives more closely than those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there were 101,811 EU regulations) (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there were 101811 EU regulations)

10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of our economy
According to the government’s Better Regulation Task Force, complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over £100 billion a year. Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by associating with the EU’s inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which costs us £5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion. Our EU contribution is £10 billion.

Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose £22 billion year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We’d be enormously more wealthy if we left.

11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England’s 48 counties and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter. As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not be implemented until the seventh treaty is signed, when we lose our right to object.

12. The deliberate destruction of our way of life, standards and morals
From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don’t get a job, to the government’s deliberate undermining of the family, to sex education for the under 13’s, to children being given obscene homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to the EU over the last 34 years. From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don’t get a job, to the government’s deliberate undermining of the family, to sex education for the under 13’s, to children being given obscene homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to the EU over the last 34 years. While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it.

13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997
The Amsterdam Treaty handed complete control of our immigration to the EU. The EU increased the numbers of immigrants from 30,000 a year to 200,000 a year. The EU increased the numbers of immigrants from 30000 a year to 200000 a year. That’s why house prices have been screaming up. Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with thousands of immigrants available on low pay, corporations can impose the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they can’t get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they won’t offer a decent wage to compensate for unpleasant work, and instead use immigrants at £5 an hour.

Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he said he’d fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he’d have had no control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas, decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing.

If the seventh Treaty is signed, we lose our right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six, it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the Queen’s.

.

Fifty years ago our greatest threat might have been violence or mugging. Now the greatest threat to our economic well being, our way of life, our freedom and the very existence of our nation, is our own government.

.

Our Councillors abolished
Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions. Our 20000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions. Point out they were elected to serve the public, not the government, and the public has not agreed to their abolition.
Try to persuade them to stand up for the people who voted for them, (which is only doing their duty) by holding a yes/no local ballot on whether the public agree with the abolition of our counties, councillors and nation.

If the public vote no, they should declare, for their Town or county, UDI from Europe and the illegal actions of our government since 1971, particularly the abolition of our British Constiution, common law, our nation and counties. The press coverage this would generate would force the truth into the open nationally, leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU. Just one council could achieve this fabulous result alone. s

Download: A summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP file)

Download: A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf)

The Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose nationally, and corruption in Plymouth.

The six treaties are:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
6. The European Union Treaty, 2003.

The seventh will be called something equally innocuous, like the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss of our nation, way of life and freedom will be complete.

By Marie Woolf

Ministers, including David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, are set to come out fighting this week against growing demands for a EU treaty referendum.

Government sources say that a string of ministers will “make it clear” that the Government has a mandate for the new reform treaty, given at the European Council in June. The Government came under growing pressure last week to refuse to rule out a referendum. But the Prime Minister is expected to firmly rule out a referendum later this week.

The move follows intense pressure on Gordon Brown from members of his own party. A campaign led by the Labour MP Ian Davidson, who said that up to a third of Labour MPs could back calls for an EU treaty, was joined by the former Europe minister, Keith Vaz, on Friday. He said: “We should not be afraid of actually putting this argument before the British people. We don’t need a referendum on the reformed treaty because we didn’t have one on the Nice Treaty or on Maastricht. But I think there’sa difference between need and desirability.

“I think once and for all we need to put this behind us by putting it to the British people. I am absolutely convinced that we will win any test of public opinion as to whether or not the British people want us in Europe.”

By Brendan Carlin

Pressure for a referendum on the controversial European constitution grew last night amid growing signs of public concern and fresh claims that voters are being misled.

The Open Europe think-tank published research showing the new draft was exactly the same length as the rejected constitution and contained similar threats to British sovereignty.

According to the think-tank, which campaigns for a more flexible, open Europe, the original constitutional treaty ran to 63,000 words. According to the think-tank, which campaigns for a more flexible, open Europe, the original constitutional treaty ran to 63000 words. When the new proposals, involving a series of amendments to existing treaties, were put together in a consolidated text, the proposals new treaty came to the same length.

Open Europe also sought to debunk the Government’s argument that the new draft was substantially different from what went before.

Neil O’Brien, the Open Europe director, said that although ministers insisted they had now inserted new “red lines” and opt-outs into the revised proposals, those safeguards were in the original constitution.

Open Europe also raised concerns that the proposed new arrangements would end Britain’s veto in foreign policy in 11 key areas including terrorism and mutual defence.

By Andrew Bounds

The privacy rights of air passengers travelling from Europe to the US will be put at risk by an information- sharing deal between the two aimed at stopping terrorist attacks, the European Union’s top data protection official has said.

Peter Hustinx wrote in a letter that the agreement, to be unveiled on Friday, could violate the rights of EU citizens. It allows the US to retain information about passengers for 15 years, up from three at present, while placing “no limitation to what US authorities are allowed to do with the data”, Mr Hustinx wrote on Wednesday to Wolfgang Schäuble, the German interior minister who clinched the deal. It allows the US to retain information about passengers for 15 years, up from three at present, while placing “no limitation to what US authorities are allowed to do with the data”, Mr Hustinx wrote on Wednesday to Wolfgang Schäuble, the German interior minister who clinched the deal.

EU officials reject the claim, saying the agreement has more safeguards than the interim regime it will replace at the end of July. While the US maintains the exchange of letters that will seal the deal is not legally binding, Brussels regards it as an international agreement that could be revoked if not complied with.

Washington has agreed to allow a senior European official to travel to the US and scrutinise how it is using the data. It has reduced its demands for information, cutting the number of categories from 34 to 19, the Financial Times has learned. However, some diplomats said the change was “presentational” as some categories had simply been enlarged.

EU citizens will also be covered by the US Privacy Act for the first time, meaning they could enforce their rights in US courts.

Critics say the deal would allow the Department of Homeland Security as well as US customs access to the data. The US rejected an EU request that sensitive data such as dietary requirements, a clue to religion, be filtered in Europe, insisting it be done on its soil.

Sophie in t’Veld, an MEP who represents the European parliament on the issue, called it a “bad deal”.

While the US had made it clear it would ban airlines that refused to comply, the EU could have extracted more concessions, she said. “It is making legal an illegal practice,” the Dutch Liberal said. “We are trusting the Americans to stick to the rules on scout’s honour.”

The original deal was struck in the wake of the September 11 attacks and allowed for information including names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card details and past flight details to be handed over. The European Court of Justice overturned it on procedural grounds last year. The EU fears summer travel chaos if it does not replace the interim agreement before the July 31 deadline, as the US could block flights.

EU ambassadors are expected to rubber-stamp the new deal today. It has to be ratified by national parliaments before taking effect and Ireland’s Dail breaks up next week.