|
|
Translate:
              Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee?
Monday, May 19th, 2008
The TV licence advert currently gracing our screens is the government’s most menacing and threatening to date. It depicts a city in the form of a computer’s innards, boasting that the government’s computers have access to all of our details, suggesting in the process that the state regards us not as citizens, but as numbers, pieces of data, cogs in the machine. Never mind identity cards, why don’t they just brand us with irons instead? It is tempting to say that this is akin to Nazi Germany or Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. It is true that these allusions are all too loosely and inappropriately bandied about. One thinks of Basil Fawlty’s response to guests who were merely complaining about his incompetence: ‘this is exactly how Nazi Germany started’. Yet in the case of the menacing license threats, one may argue that such comparisons with the past are merited. Out of all the forms of undesirable governance, one of the unique features of totalitarianism is its reliance on bureaucracy, technology, statistics and surveillance as means to dehumanise people. Our society may not be totalitarian to the extent that genocide is permitted, but it is becoming so in the way that the contract between state and citizen is interpreted. Certainly, the UK is beginning to resemble countries such as Singapore or China, where political and civil liberties are curtailed in exchange for economic liberalism. On the other hand, one may interpret this latest advert as a sign of panic and of weakness (after all, who’s going to be afraid of notoriously cack government databases). The case for the abolition of the licence fee has never been stronger, and I suspect that the government knows it. The licence fee is in its death throes. First of all, since many households have Sky, Freeview or Virgin, the BBC, just like its commercial counterparts, Channel 4 and ITV1, does not command the share of the audience they once did. People are watching other channels, and thus compulsorily paying for a channel they use less frequently. This is partly what made the old radio licence fee so unjustified, which, since the airwaves were liberalised in the 1960s, was abolished in 1971. The expansion of the television network since the 1990s has also in turn dismissed the unfounded fear that commercial television is incapable of producing sensible and high-brow programmes. The wealth of documentary, news, foreign language and film channels suggests the market can provide - the quality found here is ironically highlighted by the fact the BBC now puts its sensible fare on its non-terrestrial BBC4 channel, and that in order to place EastEnders and its profusion of Casualty spin-offs in prime-time, Question Time comes out just when most people are going to bed, leaving poor old Andrew Neil’s jolly politics show, This Week, to languish in the middle of the night. The BBC really is its own enemy at times, and antagonises those who are otherwise sympathetic to the Reithian spirit. Radio 4’s jaundiced, liberal-left take on the world is a particular scandal. I don’t mind people being left-wing, I just object to people thinking it is normal - and that anyone who is not is wicked or stupid and in need of re-education. Auntie is shooting itself in the foot in another area currently, by reminding viewers that they can watch their favourite shows on the BBC website. By doing so, the Beeb is spreading the realisation that you don’t necessarily need a television set to watch television programmes anymore. Many teenagers and young adults are increasingly eschewing television altogether, preferring to watch YouTube. Just as landline telephone lines are vanishing from our homes as mobile phones have made them redundant, I suspect greater technological interactivity will one day see television sets go the same way. So with no TVs, why a TV licence? By watching programmes on the internet, we can by-pass irritating commercial breaks, whose presence on the other channels has always been cited as a reason to keep the BBC as it is. But commercial breaks will also soon be a thing of the past. The internet and the Sky+ record and fast-forward facilities are making them obsolete, which Sky knows all-too-well, hence the bulk of its revenue comes from subscription charges. There are moves afoot at present to lift the ban on product placement on television programmes, a direct reaction to the waning influence of commercial breaks. So, soon, viewers of Coronation Street may no longer have to endure the unrealistic spectacle of someone asking for ‘a pint of bitter’ at the Rover’s Return (no-one asks for generic beers in pubs) but, perhaps, ‘a pint of Boddington’s’ or ‘a pint of John Smith’s’. I won’t predict that the licence fee is definitely on its way out. Nor will I necessarily applaud it if it does go, because you know what’s going to happen as a consequence. Australia abolished its TV licence fee in 1974, but its government still funds the Australian Broadcasting Commission to the tune of A$800m per year. India abolished its in 1977, Portugal in 1992, Holland in 2000, Hungary in 2002: all of these countries replaced it with direct state funding. The only difference this made was to cut down on administrative costs, and to alter a tax on televisions from a regressive tax to a proportional one. So, in a way the issue is not whether to abolish the TV licence fee. The real question is: what should come after? In essence, the quandary remains: should we be taxed to watch television? Have Your Say: Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee? Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. One Response to “Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee?”
Related News
|
Support Bolivian democracy Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 11:30 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Agent Orange International Solidarity Campaign Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 11:15 AM Indonesia Halts Stock Trading After 10 Percent Plunge Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:12 AM Lowest Of The Low Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:08 AM WSWS- father, despondent over financial losses, kills family and himself Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 10:06 AM JEREMY CORBYN: No return to 1931 Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 10:00 AM Mumia Abu-Jamal Faces US Supreme Court as New Book and Film Expose Injustice Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 09:33 AM Just The Facts Please Last post by jamiedb @ 03:56 AM What Is Marxism? Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 02:31 AM Open Publishing. Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 02:13 AM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Another Education is Possible Censorship and Freedom of Speech |
stony commented on: Smoking Ban To Hit Amsterdam Coffee Shops Yo guys, Don’t be scared about the ban in the coffeshops, it is still the same, nobody cares... Continue Reading & Reply denita commented on: McCain-Palin Campaign Increasingly Staffed by Bush Administration Officials the usa election is a set up…(they gave him a chance to... Continue Reading & Reply Maximus V commented on: VIDEO: Martin Bell - Media Censorship & War Criminals There is a prof in the background 40.11 into this vid, when the question about... Continue Reading & Reply Andrew Yu-Jen Wang commented on: Would Obama prosecute the Bush administration for torture? George W. Bush’s sentence-by-sen tence speaking skills are... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
By 
Loading ...
I am lucky to have a Holiday home in Thailand I am semi retired, I spend a few months of the year in my UK home. I refuse to buy a tv licence, I only ever watch downloaded internet tv or streamed movie channels that I pay for. It makes me very angry that when I was overseas I could not access any Uk tv channels off the internet even though I used to pay for my TV licence. It recognises that I am located overseas because of my computers IP address. If I am not allowed to access the UK channels whilst abroad even when I had a licence, why should I renew my TV licence for the BBC, (British Broadcasting Criminals).However I am allowed to watch BBC World News in Thialand for free in most public bars and places! why is that allowed when they have no TV licence???????. Abolish this blatant discrimination of free choice. Until the BBC can give me assurance that the TV I have paid for when a licence is purchased is also available over the internet I will never buy another licence.Best regards to everyone that supports our stand against the licence fee.