Progressiv
Mittel-Aktivismus
Laden…
| Register | Verlorenes Kennwort? | Rundschreiben
Ein Kennwort wird zu Ihnen verschickt. LOGON | Verlorenes Kennwort?
Ein email wird Ihnen geschickt. LOGON | Register
Übersetzen Sie:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Werkzeuge: Nachrichten | Pfosten-Anmerkung | Drucker-Version | Email zum Freund

Montag, den 31. März 2008

Drohung der überwachung zum 42 Tagesterrorgesetz

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel:

Diese Ikonen verbinden mit bookmarkenden Sozialaufstellungsorten, in denen Leser neue Webseiten teilen und entdecken können.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Alan Travis | Der Wächter

Bedrohte eigene überwachung der menschlichen Rechte der Regierung gestern Abend, um eine zugelassene Herausforderung zum Plan der Arbeit auszustoßen, um ein Gesetz vorzustellen, das Polizei Terrorverdächtige ohne Aufladung für 42 Tage würde zurückhalten lassen.

Die Gleichheit und die menschliche Recht-Kommission sagt, daß das Schlüsselteil der Kostenzählerterrorismus Rechnung gegen Gesetz der menschlichen Rechte geht und die Rennen-Relationen Tat durchbrechen kann.

Während die Hauptsekretärin, Jacqui Smith, erneuert ihrem Anklang, zum der bedeutender Unterhausmitglieder zu bearbeiten, um das Maß zu stützen - unter dem Wachsen der internationalen Kritik - das EHRC sich vorbereitete, MPs vor dem Messwert der Rechnung zweiter in den Common morgen zu unterweisen. Die freien Kommission Marken bringt es eine zugelassene Herausforderung wenn der parlamentarische Schutzträger mit 42 Tagesbegrenzung Gewinnen an.

“If adopted, we may seek to use our legal powers to challenge the lawfulness of the provisions and to establish clear legal principles on the use of pre-trial detention,” it says in a briefing note to MPs.

The threat of a legal challenge from the EHRC, which has powers to take judicial review on legislation it considers may be in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights, is another setback to a government determined to increase the time terrorism suspects can be held without charge from 28 to 42 days.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Noam Chomsky and the American Civil Liberties Union have led an international outcry against the plan, which is opposed at home by the Tories and Liberal Democrats.

The government receives a further blow today when Lord Dear, the former chief inspector of constabulary, says a change in law would be a “propaganda coup” for al-Qaida. In a Guardian article, Dear writes that every chief constable he has spoken to regards the change as unnecessary.

Dear writes: “Make no mistake, extending pre-charge detention would most certainly be a propaganda coup for al-Qaida and its ilk. When I was an undergraduate reading law at university in the 60s, every self-respecting student had a poster of Che Guevara on their wall and knew something of the writings of [Herbert] Marcuse. Both of those terrorist luminaries said repeatedly that the best course for a terrorist was to provoke a government to overreact to a threat by eroding civil liberties, increasing executive powers and diminishing due process by the denial of justice.”

The deep unease about the new measures was underlined by the EHRC. Set up last October under the chairman Trevor Phillips, it has specific power to take legal action over potential breaches of the Race Relations Act. The commission says it accepts that circumstances might arise which make an increase in the 28 day limit on pre-charge detention helpful to the police in obtaining evidence but this should not be at the expense of fundamental human rights.

It has told the Home Office that a “positive and compelling case” must be made before the maximum limit on pre-charge detention is raised, given its potential impact on liberty, the likelihood of its disproportionate impact on the Muslim community, and the risk of operational error.

“We consider that despite being restricted to particular and specific contingencies, the provisions set out by the Home Office are unlikely to meet threshold tests of public interest, justification or fairness,” the commission adds.

It says the proposed safeguard of parliamentary scrutiny of each order will be meaningless without giving MPs detailed information on each suspect. Yet that would raise constitutional issues.

The commission says the proposed change also raises “very difficult issues” under race equality laws as it is being established to deal with a particular religious and racial minority. The EHRC believes it carries a high risk of damaging community relations, as Muslims are more likely to be regarded with suspicion.

The government is expected to win a Commons majority tomorrow for the bill’s second reading. But Smith faces the prospect of defeat when detailed votes are held on the 42 days issue at the report stage in May after the local elections.

She said yesterday she believed the 42-day extension would be passed. But she told the BBC: “I hope parliamentarians will take their responsibility seriously to give those that we task with keeping us safe from terrorism the tools that we need to do it. I need to make the argument to parliament. As home secretary my responsibility is to do what I believe … it is necessary to protect this country from the serious, sustained, and in some ways growing threat from international terrorism.”

Smith stressed that the government was only taking a precautionary “reserve power” to increase the maximum period for detention without charge to be used in the exceptional circumstances of the country facing multiple terror plots.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Watchdog’s threat to 42-day terror law' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Guantanamo conditions ‘worsening’
  • UN expert: Guantanamo hearings unfair
  • MPs: Abandon 42-day limit
  • US: Presidential Order Affirms CIA Secret Detentions
  • Watchdog: War on Terrorism Leads to Rights Abuses

  • This entry was posted on Monday, March 31st, 2008 at 1:33 am and is filed under Surveillance, Human Rights . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Fair use notice

    This website contains some copyrighted material that has not been specifically authorised by the copy right owner. RINF is making such material available in our efforts to advance public understanding of poverty alleviation, political economy, popular democracy and social justice issues both in Scotland and overseas. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material provided under US Copyright Law.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 409 Users Online Right Now

    Breaking News