World News 世界新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | Global News 全球新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭與恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
| |
  | Translate: 翻譯：               UK government fined for violation of right to privacy英國政府罰款侵犯隱私權 Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 星期三， 2008年7月2日
THE EUROPEAN Court of Human Rights has ordered the British government to pay €7,500 in costs and expenses to the UK human rights organisation Liberty for violating its right to privacy by intercepting its telecommunications.在歐洲人權法院已經下令，英國政府支付€ 7500的費用和開支英國人權組織自由，侵犯其隱私權的攔截其電信。 Liberty took the case along with the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) and British-Irish Rights Watch over the interception of telephone, fax, e-mail and data between these organisations over a seven-year period, from 1991 to 1997.自由的情況下發生一起愛爾蘭公民自由理事會（ ICCL ）和英國愛爾蘭人權觀察在截聽電話，傳真，電子郵件和這些組織之間的數據超過了7年期間， 1991年至1997年。 The UK government, while refusing to disclose specifics, acknowledged these communications were likely to have been intercepted and stored en masse by an electronic test facility operated by the British ministry of defence.英國政府，而拒絕透露細節，承認這些信函有可能被攔截並儲存了大量的電子測試設備由英國國防部。 It defended the interception on the grounds that, while the surveillance did violate the applicants’ right to privacy, this was necessary in the interests of national security, for the prevention of serious crime and to safeguard the economic wellbeing of the United Kingdom.它捍衛了攔截，理由是，雖然沒有違反監視申請人的隱私權，這是必要的國家安全利益，為防止嚴重犯罪，維護經濟健康聯合王國。 It argued that there was a system of safeguards in place to ensure that people’s communications were not unnecessarily intercepted, and that appropriate procedures were followed.有人認為，有一個保障制度，以確保人民的通信沒有不必要的攔截，並有適當的程序後。 Liberty argued that the “safeguards” that surrounded the interception were not accessible and not known to the public, so that people could not foresee the extent to which their privacy was being violated.自由爭辯說， “保障”圍繞攔截無法瀏覽，而不是公眾了解，使人們無法預見的程度，他們的隱私被侵犯。 This did not accord with the European Convention on Human Rights and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, they said.這不符合歐洲人權公約的判例法和歐洲人權法院，他們說。 The court found that the rules governing data interception in the United Kingdom did not “as required by the court’s case law, set out in a form accessible to the public any indication of the procedure to be followed for selecting for examination, sharing, storing and destroying intercepted material”.法院認為，規則的數據攔截在英國沒有“所規定的法院的判例法中規定的形式向公眾開放的任何跡象表明所應遵循的程序選拔考試，共享儲存和銷毀截取的材料“ 。 While noting the arguments made by the UK government that revealing information on how the safeguards worked would inhibit the effectiveness of the surveillance regime, the court pointed out that the German government was able to spell out in legislation the regulations surrounding its interception of citizens’ telecommunications.雖然注意到所提出的論據，英國政府透露有關如何保障工作將抑制效力的監督制度，法院指出，德國政府能夠闡明了在法律法規圍繞其攔截公民電信。 Finding that there had been a violation of the applicants’ right to privacy, as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the court stated that the interference with the applicants’ rights was not “in accordance with the law”.發現有違反申請人權，隱私權，保障的第8條歐洲人權公約，法院指出，干擾申請人的權利，而不是“依照法律規定” 。 Welcoming the judgment, ICCL director Mark Kelly said: “The Strasbourg Court has vindicated the ICCL’s belief that data ‘fishing expeditions’ by the intelligence services will fall foul of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.歡迎判斷， ICCL主任馬克凱利說： “斯特拉斯堡法院已經證明了ICCL的信念，即數據'釣魚'的情報部門將交惡第8條歐洲人權公約。 The judges have found that the United Kingdom’s relatively sophisticated rules on data interception have failed to prevent unlawful interference with privacy rights.法官們認為，英國的相對複雜的規則對數據攔截失敗，以防止非法干涉隱私權利。 “This has clear implications for Ireland’s lax data interception regime, which will require a thorough overhaul in order to ensure that it meets the standards required by the European Court of Human Rights.” “這已經明顯影響愛爾蘭的鬆懈數據攔截制度，這將需要徹底檢修，以確保它符合標準要求的歐洲人權法院。 ” TJ McIntyre, chairman of Digital Rights Ireland and lecturer in law in University College Dublin, said that this judgment would be significant for the legal challenge to data retention currently being brought by Digital Rights Ireland in the High Court.天津麥金太爾主席，愛爾蘭和數字版權法律講師在都柏林大學，他說，這一判決將是重大的法律挑戰，數據保留目前所帶來的數字版權愛爾蘭高等法院。 “This is a landmark case which casts further doubt on the legality of Ireland’s ‘data retention’ system, which tracks the telephone calls and internet use of all citizens without discrimination,” he said. “這是一項具有里程碑意義的案例，人們更加懷疑的合法性愛爾蘭的'保存數據的系統，整體電話和因特網使用的所有公民不受歧視， ”他說。 “It is a clear statement from the court that indiscriminate surveillance will generally be incompatible with the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights.” “這是一個明確的聲明，法院不分青紅皂白地監視一般將不符合隱私權根據歐洲人權公約。 ” © 2008 The Irish Times © 2008愛爾蘭時報 Have Your Say: UK government fined for violation of right to privacy 你說：英國政府罰款侵犯隱私權 Please read our請仔細閱讀我們的 posting guidelines before posting張貼在留言之前準則 . 。 Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here你可以在這裡討論這一報告 . 。 2 Responses to “UK government fined for violation of right to privacy” 2回應“英國政府罰款侵犯隱私權”
Related News 相關新聞
| How the Government Staged the London Bombings in Ten Easy Steps政府如何舉辦了倫敦爆炸案中的10個簡單步驟 Last post by Boris Clone 3 @ 06:34 PM 最後發表的鮑里斯克隆3 @下午6時34分 Go to Forum進入論壇 | Latest Topics最新話題 Indymedia UK used as a platform for fascists?印迪媒體英國作為一個平台，法西斯？ Last post by initiatrix @ 06:28 PM 最後發表的initiatrix @下午6時28分 Russia's Gazprom warns Europe of possible gas cuts俄羅斯Gazprom公司警告說歐洲可能氣體削減 Last post by ZingPao @ 05:50 PM 最後發表的ZingPao @下午五時五十 Hydro power shows signs of comeback水力發電的跡象捲土重來 Last post by ZingPao @ 05:45 PM 最後發表的ZingPao @下午5時45分 Sex and Money: Are Women Regulators Different?性別和金錢：是婦女穩壓器有什麼不同嗎？ Last post by ZingPao @ 05:34 PM 最後發表的ZingPao @下午5點34分 Leaving Las Vegas:離開拉斯維加斯： Last post by ZingPao @ 05:25 PM 最後發表的ZingPao @下午5時25分 Criminal Euro Scrotes spends £2bn each year on 'vain PR exercises'刑事歐元Scrotes花費20億英鎊，每年的'徒勞的公關演習' Last post by Mick @ 05:08 PM 最後發表的米克@下午5時08分 Here's hoping...JOHN PILGER這裡的希望...約翰皮爾格 Last post by ArthurBorges @ 04:43 PM 最後發表的ArthurBorges @下午4時43分 Dope Menace: The Sensational World of Drug Paperbacks塗料威脅：的轟動世界的藥物平裝 Last post by ZingPao @ 03:33 PM 最後發表的ZingPao @下午3點33分 Our elite isn't up to the job我們的精英仍未能就業 Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 01:07 PM 最後發表的思維人的白痴@下午1時07分  Email This Page To A Friend 電郵此頁給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新頭條
More更多 World News世界新聞  Archive 存檔
 |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS 頭版新聞討論 | LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論 | |
| Obama on Weed 奧巴馬的雜草 Iraqi shoe thrower vows never to apologize to Bush, family says 伊拉克擦鞋投擲發誓永不道歉布什，家人說 Students criticise ID cards 學生批評身份證 Hunger mounts in the US 飢餓安裝在美國 | John McCarthy 麥卡錫 commented on: 評論： DU Shells Used by US Worse Than Nuclear Weapons 杜殼用美國不如核武器 And every time the wind blows, those nano sized particles of DU are on the move.... 每當風吹，這些納米粒子的杜是在移動中.... Continue Reading & Reply 繼續閱讀及回复 ezrydn ezrydn commented on: 評論： Obama on Weed 奧巴馬的雜草 Our LEAP Lobbyist, Howard Wooldridge, recently gave us all a bit of “insight. 我們利普遊說霍華德伍爾德瑞奇，最近給我們一點“的見解。 ” He said, in his numerous... “他說，在他的眾多... Continue Reading & Reply 繼續閱讀及回复 smashy smashy commented on: 評論： Adbusters’ Ads Busted Adbusters的廣告懂得 the teacher is yourself listen inside 老師是你自己聽裡面 Continue Reading & Reply 繼續閱讀及回复 mlang52 mlang52 commented on: 評論： Prescription Drugs Kill 300 Percent More Americans than Illegal Drugs 處方藥殺死3倍多的美國人不是非法藥品 All this hype! 所有這一切炒作！ NSAIDS (aspirin and such)kill up to 16,000 people a... NSAIDS （阿司匹林等）殺死多達16000人答： .. Continue Reading & Reply 繼續閱讀及回复 | |
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD商店 | | Opinion 輿論 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 中表達的意見RINF新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者（ s ）和不一定反映的意見，管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. RINF.COM ：打破新聞和其他媒體的版權-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
[...] 1.2 via Rinf.com: UK government fined for violation of right to privacy [...] [...] 1.2通過Rinf.com ：英國政府罰款侵犯隱私權[...]