Progressiv
Mittel-Aktivismus
Laden…
| Register | Verlorenes Kennwort? | Rundschreiben
Ein Kennwort wird zu Ihnen verschickt. LOGON | Verlorenes Kennwort?
Ein email wird Ihnen geschickt. LOGON | Register
Übersetzen Sie:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Werkzeuge: Nachrichten | Pfosten-Anmerkung | Drucker-Version | Email zum Freund

Dienstag, den 11. Dezember 2007

Die Rückkehr der Identifikation Karte Debatte

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel:

Diese Ikonen verbinden mit bookmarkenden Sozialaufstellungsorten, in denen Leser neue Webseiten teilen und entdecken können.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Der BRITISCHEN peinliche Verlust der Regierung von 25 Million Bürgern', das persönliche Details hat, reignited die Identifikation Karte Debatte

Durch Peter Swabey

Identifikation Karten Datenschutz

Es war der in hohem Grade publizierte Datenbruch aller Zeit. Und als Details des Verlustes durch HM Einkommen und Gewohnheiten (HMRC) von 25 Million BRITISCHEN Bürgern' die persönlichen Daten im November 2007 auftauchten, war es, nicht lange zuvor die Aufmerksamkeit der Nation an die umstrittenen Anträge der Regierung für einen nationalen Personalausweis wendete.

Up to 25 million Britons now face worries that their bank details could fall into criminal hands, after two HMRC disks containing their details were lost in the post. So does data loss on that scale demonstrate that the state should not attempt to store large volumes of personal data? Or does it actually demonstrate that citizens need the security that a biometric ID card would bring?

Under the current ID card proposals, the UK Government would store an unprecedented volume of sensitive personal information – and given its reputation on protecting data, those plans need rethinking, insists George Osborne, the shadow Chancellor. The child benefit scandal should be the “final blow” for the national ID card scheme, he says: “They simply cannot be trusted with people’s personal details.”

Conversely, Government officials believe that the mistakes that led to the HMRC’s data breach underscore the need for a national ID system. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith argues that the identity system will make ID fraud harder by enforcing dual authentication of biographic details – similar to those lost by HMRC – with biometric data. The biographic and biometric data will be stored in separate databases. “It is an increased protection even against times when people’s biographic details are actually stolen or lost,” argues Smith.

Many business leaders will recognise the ‘chicken and egg’ dilemma facing the Government. It insists the ID card is central to plans for offering better public services, yet there may be reluctance to hand over additional information when its track record on data protection is seemingly so lamentable.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'The return of the ID card debate' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Gov will have to ask permission for ID card information
  • NO2ID calls for government data audit
  • UK gov rethinks ID card database
  • No trust in keeping our data
  • MoD lost 11,000 military ID cards

  • This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 11th, 2007 at 2:30 pm and is filed under Surveillance, General . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com

    Breaking News