Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁

BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞

Monday, April 28th, 2008 週一， 2008年4月28日

By通過 Mitch Ratcliffe米奇•拉特克利夫 | Here’sa simple rule for preventing totalitarian rule in any nation: Don’t build the systems for monitoring people’s daily lives closely in the first place, and you will not be at risk of totalitarian rulers using those systems to overwhelm individual choice. |以下是簡單的規則，為防止極權統治，在任何一個國家的：不建立監測系統的人們的日常生活密切合作擺在首位，您將不會受到威脅的極權統治者使用這些系統，以壓倒個人的選擇。 The Wall Street Journal today has a long piece on the various ways that the National Security Agency has expanded 華爾街日報今天已久的作品就以各種方式表示，國家安全局已經擴大 its ability to monitor individuals within the United States without a warrant.其監測能力的個人，美國在沒有逮捕證。 It’sa must-read, whether you think we need this kind of police agency or not.這是必須閱讀，你是否認為我們需要這樣的警察機構或沒有。

Originally set up by President Truman to facilitate signals intelligence (wiretapping, radio monitoring and so forth) conducted against foreign governments, the NSA today can gain access to your personal communications without any need to ask permission, including:原先設立的杜魯門總統，以方便信號情報（竊聽，無線電監測和等等）進行的對外國政府，國家安全局今天能獲得您的個人通信，沒有任何需要請許可，其中包括：

Email , such as the to- and from-addresses, subject line content and time sent; 電子郵件 ，如要和來自-地址，主題行的內容和時間發送;

Web sites visited and the content of your searches; 網站的訪問和內容，您的搜尋;

Wireless calling , from your location and that of the person receiving the call to the length and account numbers; 無線呼叫 ，從您的位置，以及該人接到電話的長度和帳戶號碼;

Wired phone calling , including account numbers and length of call (there have been rumors for years that the first minute of calls are monitored for keywords, but this is not confirmed, because, as a national security matter, citizens aren’t supposed to know); 有線電話 ，包括帳戶號碼和長度的調用（有傳言多年來的第一分鐘的電話監控，關鍵字，但是這是沒有得到確認，因為，作為一個國家安全問題，公民不知道） ;

Financial transactions , such as your credit card use, wire transfers and deposits and withdrawals on your checking and savings accounts, 金融交易 ，如您的信用卡使用，電匯及存款和取款對您的檢查和儲蓄帳戶，

as well as the content of any transaction recorded by a computer that the NSA deems necessary for its pattern recognition analyses. 以及為內容的任何交易記錄的電腦上 ，國家安全局認為有必要的，其模式識別分析。

The NSA has always insisted it works scrupulously within the limits of the laws governing its behavior, but it has, like all human institutions, had lapses in its judgment.美國國家安全局一直堅持它的工程，嚴格內部的界限，法律行為，但它一樣，所有人權機構，有失誤，在其判詞中。 For example, during the year immediately after 9/11舉例來說，在這一年裡後，立即9 / 11 , NSA attempted to set up a Total Information Awareness network ，美國國家安全局試圖成立一個總的認識，信息網絡 , which was meant to grab all data about people and their transactions and communication for analysis, but Congress prohibited any further spending on the program over civil liberties concerns. ，這是為了攫取的所有數據約人民和他們的交易和溝通，分析，但國會禁止任何進一步的開支計劃以公民自由的關注。 Nevertheless,然而， the program has continued in pieces該計劃繼續在件 that, in total, add up to the same level of access to domestic civilian communications, as the Journal article makes clear. ，在總，最多添加相同水平的進入國內民用通訊，作為雜誌的文章作出明確的。

Technologists must be aware of this ever-expanding net科技人員必須認識到這一點日益擴大的淨 that can trap and hold their customers’ and colleagues’ data, because it is reshaping the potential for public discourse about what our country and government can and should do, as well as how we may act as individuals.可以陷阱，舉行他們的客戶和同事的數據，因為它正在重塑的潛力，供公眾話語什麼我們的國家和政府可以和應該做的事，以及我們如何可以作為個人。

Sure, there will be commenters on this posting who write that “it’s nothing to worry about if you don’t do anything wrong.” And that may be true, but the problem with these institutions is that they will not go away when the threat of terrorism passes.當然，也有將提意見對這次調職，誰寫“ ，這沒有什麼好擔心如果你不這樣做有何不妥， ”這可能是事實，但問題與這些機構的是，他們是不會自動消失的時恐怖主義威脅的通行證。 Maybe you think that threat will never end, but then we must ask whether this approach to fighting terrorism has any merit.也許你認為這種威脅將永遠不會結束，但我們便要請問這是否辦法來打擊恐怖主義有任何的好處。 Let’s assume, for argument’s sake, that terrorism can be handled within the scope of normal police activity, as it has been since before 9/11.我們假設，論據起見，認為恐怖主義可以處理的範圍，正常的警察活動，因為它一直以來，前9 / 11 。

Human sources of information are known to be far more valuable than data-driven analysis of massive amounts of transactional data.人類的信息來源是眾所周知的遠更有價值，比數據驅動的分析大量的交易數據。 Yes, after an agency has a human source those data analyses can be very useful in assembling a case, though it is perfectly reasonable and very easy to get a warrant from a judge for that information based on the human source—there is no need for unbridled warrantless monitoring of the people of the United States.是的，後一個機構有一個人類的來源，這些數據的分析可以非常有用，在裝配情況下，雖然這是完全合理和很容易得到手令，從法官的資料的基礎上，人類的來源-有沒有必要肆無忌憚的無證監測的，美國人民。

You see, if we assume that most of us are law-abiding citizens, the need for unrestricted monitoring is obliterated by the logic of focused pursuit of known and suspected bad guys based on established legal procedures.你看，如果我們假定我們大多數人都是守法的公民，需要無限制的監測是由抹殺的邏輯集中追求懷疑或已知的壞人，根據既定的法定程序。 Warrants before monitoring is more efficient, faster and not just an ACLU talking point, but the very foundation of limited government.認股權證之前，監測更有效，更快，不只是美國公民自由聯盟談一點，但非常的基礎，有限的政府。

If we allow our nation to be shot through with monitoring systems, we’ll be monitored forever, because people and institutions that have been granted power seldom give it up, as we all know.如果我們允許我們的民族被槍斃，通過與監測系統，我們將永遠監測，因為人民和機構，已經獲得的權力，很少給它，因為大家都知道。 They even fall prey to the temptation to abuse those powers.他們甚至犧牲品的誘惑，濫用這些權力。 In Cincinnati back in the late 1980s, the power to use wiretaps overcame the good judgment of police officers who used them to listen to their spouses’ conversations and to conduct surveillance on businesses.在辛辛那提，早在20世紀80年代末，有權使用竊聽克服了良好的判斷力，警務人員誰使用他們，聽取他們的配偶的交談和進行監視的企業。 During the 1970s, the abuse of national surveillance powers was so rife that Congress established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and a system of courts for providing law enforcement legal access to communications with a warrant.在20世紀70年代，濫用國家權力的監視是如此盛行，美國國會成立的外國情報監視法和法院制度提供執法的法律獲得通信與手令。 Today, the FISA system is under attack by those who believe we need unrestricted surveillance of Americans, as well as of potential terrorists abroad.今天，參賽指南系統是根據攻擊那些誰相信我們需要無限制地監視的美國人，以及作為潛在的恐怖分子在國外。

The trajectory of the NSA’s existence is the proof we face a serious threat to our ability to live and decide for ourselves.軌跡的美國國家安全局的存在證明我們所面對的嚴重威脅到我們的能力，生活，並決定為自己。 An agency originally chartered to monitor the communications of “foreign governments” is now monitoring individual American citizens.一機構原本特許監察通訊“外國政府”是現在監管個別的美國公民。 It is a classic case of over-reaching by government.它是一個典型的案件超過深遠的政府。

The NSA has worked around the decision of Congress to build its total awareness network.國家安全局的工作，周圍的決定，國會建立其總的認識網絡。 It is time the people made fighting that unrestricted access to their lives a campaign issue.現在是時候了人民作出的戰鬥不受限制地進入他們的生命運動的問題。 If we don’t stop the vast spending on domestic surveillance today, it will bankrupt our government, morally and financially.如果我們不停止廣大消費對國內監視今天，它會破產，我們的政府，在道義上和財政上。 We’ll be giving increasing power to bureaucrats to peak into our lives to ensure that we are living according to their whims, as every comprehensive system of public monitoring in history has produced in the past.我們將給予越來越多的權力，官僚的高峰到我們的生活，以確保我們的生活，根據他們的衝動，因為每一個綜合系統，公眾監督在歷史上產生了在過去的。

See More: 看到更多的： Big Brother 大哥哥 Internet 互聯網 NSA 美國國家安全局 USA News 美國新聞

Have Your Say: The NSA, personal data and you 有您這樣說：美國國家安全局，個人資料和你
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 郵件（不會被公佈） （必填）

Website 網站

This entry was posted on Monday, April 28th, 2008 at 3:46 am and is filed under 此項目被張貼在週一， 2008年4月28日在上午03時46分，並提交下 Surveillance, Civil Liberties & Human Rights News 監視，公民自由及人權新聞 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。

Loading ...載入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新聞討論

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論

Activism & Protest News 積極與抗議新聞 | | Business News 商業新聞 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公務員＆人權新聞 | | Environmental News 環境新聞 | | Media News 新聞 | | Globalisation News 全球經濟一體化新聞 | | Web Development News Web開發新聞

ADVERTISEMENTS廣告

SITE MAPS網站地圖

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art藝術 BBC英國廣播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物識別技術 Bush布什 CIA美國中央情報局 Climate Change氣候變化 Cover Up掩蓋 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State數據庫狀態 David Hicks大衛希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射線格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs藥物 Education教育 EU歐盟 False Flag虛假國旗 FBI美國聯邦調查局 Fraud欺詐 Free Speech免費的講話 Freemasons共濟會 G8八國集團 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo關塔那摩 Health News健康新聞 History歷史 ID Cards身份證 Internet互聯網 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches遊行 MI5軍情五處 MI6軍情六處 Microsoft微軟 Military軍事 MoD按付款當日價格計算 Money金錢 Music音樂 NASA美國航天局 Neocons新保守主義者 NSA美國國家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察國家 Propaganda宣傳 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲爾德 Science科學 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Space空間 Sports體育 Spying諜報活動 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技術 Terrorism恐怖主義 Tony Blair托尼布萊爾 Torture酷刑 TV電視 UK News英國新聞 UN聯合國 USA News美國新聞 Video視頻 Voting投票 Warfare戰 White House白宮 Wolfowitz沃爾福威茨 World News世界新聞 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005檔案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年檔案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008檔案 | Current Archives目前檔案 | Past Version |過去的版本

About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員