Breaking News 突发新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页

BREAKING NEWS 突发新闻

Monday, April 28th, 2008 周一， 2008年4月28日

By通过 Mitch Ratcliffe米奇•拉特克利夫 | Here’sa simple rule for preventing totalitarian rule in any nation: Don’t build the systems for monitoring people’s daily lives closely in the first place, and you will not be at risk of totalitarian rulers using those systems to overwhelm individual choice. |以下是简单的规则，为防止极权统治，在任何一个国家的：不建立监测系统的人们的日常生活密切合作摆在首位，您将不会受到威胁的极权统治者使用这些系统，以压倒个人的选择。 The Wall Street Journal today has a long piece on the various ways that the National Security Agency has expanded 华尔街日报今天已久的作品就以各种方式表示，国家安全局已经扩大 its ability to monitor individuals within the United States without a warrant.其监测能力的个人，美国在没有逮捕证。 It’sa must-read, whether you think we need this kind of police agency or not.这是必须阅读，你是否认为我们需要这样的警察机构或没有。

Originally set up by President Truman to facilitate signals intelligence (wiretapping, radio monitoring and so forth) conducted against foreign governments, the NSA today can gain access to your personal communications without any need to ask permission, including:原先设立的杜鲁门总统，以方便信号情报（窃听，无线电监测和等等）进行的对外国政府，国家安全局今天能获得您的个人通信，没有任何需要请许可，其中包括：

Email , such as the to- and from-addresses, subject line content and time sent; 电子邮件 ，如要和来自-地址，主题行的内容和时间发送;

Web sites visited and the content of your searches; 网站的访问和内容，您的搜寻;

Wireless calling , from your location and that of the person receiving the call to the length and account numbers; 无线呼叫 ，从您的位置，以及该人接到电话的长度和帐户号码;

Wired phone calling , including account numbers and length of call (there have been rumors for years that the first minute of calls are monitored for keywords, but this is not confirmed, because, as a national security matter, citizens aren’t supposed to know); 有线电话 ，包括帐户号码和长度的调用（有传言多年来的第一分钟的电话监控，关键字，但是这是没有得到确认，因为，作为一个国家安全问题，公民不知道） ;

Financial transactions , such as your credit card use, wire transfers and deposits and withdrawals on your checking and savings accounts, 金融交易 ，如您的信用卡使用，电汇及存款和取款对您的检查和储蓄帐户，

as well as the content of any transaction recorded by a computer that the NSA deems necessary for its pattern recognition analyses. 以及为内容的任何交易记录的电脑上 ，国家安全局认为有必要的，其模式识别分析。

The NSA has always insisted it works scrupulously within the limits of the laws governing its behavior, but it has, like all human institutions, had lapses in its judgment.美国国家安全局一直坚持它的工程，严格内部的界限，法律行为，但它一样，所有人权机构，有失误，在其判词中。 For example, during the year immediately after 9/11举例来说，在这一年里后，立即9 / 11 , NSA attempted to set up a Total Information Awareness network ，美国国家安全局试图成立一个总的认识，信息网络 , which was meant to grab all data about people and their transactions and communication for analysis, but Congress prohibited any further spending on the program over civil liberties concerns. ，这是为了攫取的所有数据约人民和他们的交易和沟通，分析，但国会禁止任何进一步的开支计划以公民自由的关注。 Nevertheless,然而， the program has continued in pieces该计划继续在件 that, in total, add up to the same level of access to domestic civilian communications, as the Journal article makes clear. ，在总，最多添加相同水平的进入国内民用通讯，作为杂志的文章作出明确的。

Technologists must be aware of this ever-expanding net科技人员必须认识到这一点日益扩大的净 that can trap and hold their customers’ and colleagues’ data, because it is reshaping the potential for public discourse about what our country and government can and should do, as well as how we may act as individuals.可以陷阱，举行他们的客户和同事的数据，因为它正在重塑的潜力，供公众话语什么我们的国家和政府可以和应该做的事，以及我们如何可以作为个人。

Sure, there will be commenters on this posting who write that “it’s nothing to worry about if you don’t do anything wrong.” And that may be true, but the problem with these institutions is that they will not go away when the threat of terrorism passes.当然，也有将提意见对这次调职，谁写“ ，这没有什么好担心如果你不这样做有何不妥， ”这可能是事实，但问题与这些机构的是，他们是不会自动消失的时恐怖主义威胁的通行证。 Maybe you think that threat will never end, but then we must ask whether this approach to fighting terrorism has any merit.也许你认为这种威胁将永远不会结束，但我们便要请问这是否办法来打击恐怖主义有任何的好处。 Let’s assume, for argument’s sake, that terrorism can be handled within the scope of normal police activity, as it has been since before 9/11.我们假设，论据起见，认为恐怖主义可以处理的范围，正常的警察活动，因为它一直以来，前9 / 11 。

Human sources of information are known to be far more valuable than data-driven analysis of massive amounts of transactional data.人类的信息来源是众所周知的远更有价值，比数据驱动的分析大量的交易数据。 Yes, after an agency has a human source those data analyses can be very useful in assembling a case, though it is perfectly reasonable and very easy to get a warrant from a judge for that information based on the human source—there is no need for unbridled warrantless monitoring of the people of the United States.是的，后一个机构有一个人类的来源，这些数据的分析可以非常有用，在装配情况下，虽然这是完全合理和很容易得到手令，从法官的资料的基础上，人类的来源-有没有必要肆无忌惮的无证监测的，美国人民。

You see, if we assume that most of us are law-abiding citizens, the need for unrestricted monitoring is obliterated by the logic of focused pursuit of known and suspected bad guys based on established legal procedures.你看，如果我们假定我们大多数人都是守法的公民，需要无限制的监测是由抹杀的逻辑集中追求怀疑或已知的坏人，根据既定的法定程序。 Warrants before monitoring is more efficient, faster and not just an ACLU talking point, but the very foundation of limited government.认股权证之前，监测更有效，更快，不只是美国公民自由联盟谈一点，但非常的基础，有限的政府。

If we allow our nation to be shot through with monitoring systems, we’ll be monitored forever, because people and institutions that have been granted power seldom give it up, as we all know.如果我们允许我们的民族被枪毙，通过与监测系统，我们将永远监测，因为人民和机构，已经获得的权力，很少给它，因为大家都知道。 They even fall prey to the temptation to abuse those powers.他们甚至牺牲品的诱惑，滥用这些权力。 In Cincinnati back in the late 1980s, the power to use wiretaps overcame the good judgment of police officers who used them to listen to their spouses’ conversations and to conduct surveillance on businesses.在辛辛那提，早在20世纪80年代末，有权使用窃听克服了良好的判断力，警务人员谁使用他们，听取他们的配偶的交谈和进行监视的企业。 During the 1970s, the abuse of national surveillance powers was so rife that Congress established the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and a system of courts for providing law enforcement legal access to communications with a warrant.在20世纪70年代，滥用国家权力的监视是如此盛行，美国国会成立的外国情报监视法和法院制度提供执法的法律获得通信与手令。 Today, the FISA system is under attack by those who believe we need unrestricted surveillance of Americans, as well as of potential terrorists abroad.今天，参赛指南系统是根据攻击那些谁相信我们需要无限制地监视的美国人，以及作为潜在的恐怖分子在国外。

The trajectory of the NSA’s existence is the proof we face a serious threat to our ability to live and decide for ourselves.轨迹的美国国家安全局的存在证明我们所面对的严重威胁到我们的能力，生活，并决定为自己。 An agency originally chartered to monitor the communications of “foreign governments” is now monitoring individual American citizens.一机构原本特许监察通讯“外国政府”是现在监管个别的美国公民。 It is a classic case of over-reaching by government.它是一个典型的案件超过深远的政府。

The NSA has worked around the decision of Congress to build its total awareness network.国家安全局的工作，周围的决定，国会建立其总的认识网络。 It is time the people made fighting that unrestricted access to their lives a campaign issue.现在是时候了人民作出的战斗不受限制地进入他们的生命运动的问题。 If we don’t stop the vast spending on domestic surveillance today, it will bankrupt our government, morally and financially.如果我们不停止广大消费对国内监视今天，它会破产，我们的政府，在道义上和财政上。 We’ll be giving increasing power to bureaucrats to peak into our lives to ensure that we are living according to their whims, as every comprehensive system of public monitoring in history has produced in the past.我们将给予越来越多的权力，官僚的高峰到我们的生活，以确保我们的生活，根据他们的冲动，因为每一个综合系统，公众监督在历史上产生了在过去的。

See More: 看到更多的： Big Brother 大哥哥 Internet 互联网 NSA 美国国家安全局 USA News 美国新闻

Have Your Say: The NSA, personal data and you 有您这样说：美国国家安全局，个人资料和你
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的新论坛

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 邮件（不会被公布） （必填）

Website 网站

This entry was posted on Monday, April 28th, 2008 at 3:46 am and is filed under 此项目被张贴在周一， 2008年4月28日在上午03时46分，并提交下 Surveillance, Civil Liberties & Human Rights News 监视，公民自由及人权新闻 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。

Loading ...载入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新闻讨论

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息讨论

Activism & Protest News 积极与抗议新闻 | | Business News 商业新闻 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公务员＆人权新闻 | | Environmental News 环境新闻 | | Media News 新闻 | | Globalisation News 全球经济一体化新闻 | | Web Development News Web开发新闻

ADVERTISEMENTS广告

SITE MAPS网站地图

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art艺术 BBC英国广播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物识别技术 Bush布什 CIA美国中央情报局 Climate Change气候变化 Cover Up掩盖 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State数据库状态 David Hicks大卫希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射线格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs药物 Education教育 EU欧盟 False Flag虚假国旗 FBI美国联邦调查局 Fraud欺诈 Free Speech免费的讲话 Freemasons共济会 G8八国集团 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo关塔那摩 Health News健康新闻 History历史 ID Cards身份证 Internet互联网 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches游行 MI5军情五处 MI6军情六处 Microsoft微软 Military军事 MoD按付款当日价格计算 Money金钱 Music音乐 NASA美国航天局 Neocons新保守主义者 NSA美国国家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察国家 Propaganda宣传 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲尔德 Science科学 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Space空间 Sports体育 Spying谍报活动 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技术 Terrorism恐怖主义 Tony Blair托尼布莱尔 Torture酷刑 TV电视 UK News英国新闻 UN联合国 USA News美国新闻 Video视频 Voting投票 Warfare战 White House白宫 Wolfowitz沃尔福威茨 World News世界新闻 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005档案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年档案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008档案 | Current Archives目前档案 | Past Version |过去的版本

About 大约 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 评语 | | Special Guests 特别来宾 | | Webmasters 网站管理员