|
|
Translate:
              Surveillance goes too far
Monday, April 23rd, 2007
Over the years, Wal-Mart has acquired a growing crowd of critics. The retail behemoth is regularly the target of unfavorable billboards, newspaper ads and at least one critical documentary. So it’s hardly surprising that the Bentonville, Ark., company would try to protect itself from damaging leaks and disruptions during shareholder meetings. As the company points out, taking such steps is only prudent. It should be noted that Wal-Mart’s low prices deliver real benefits to consumers, especially families with low incomes. Those low prices also help tamp down the national inflation rate. But Wal-Mart went too far in its efforts to deal with critics. The work of the company’s Threat Research and Analysis Group, set up to counter problems such as leaked confidential memos, makes the company look downright paranoid. Last month an employee was fired after phone calls from a New York Times reporter were intercepted along with pager messages. A subsequent Wall Street Journal story, quoting the fired worker and several Wal-Mart employees, shed light on the company’s extensive surveillance operations. The Journal reported that those efforts involved infiltrating an anti-Wal-Mart group. Other surveillance targets included company employees, activists, a consulting firm and certain investors, including the New York City controller’s office. Wal-Mart says it has revised some of its practices since the unauthorized recordings were revealed. The company also says it did not act on a 2007 internal memo seeking a “threat assessment” of shareholders thought to be opposed to management policies. The company is correct in noting that it has a responsibility to keep tabs on potential threats to its operations. But the issue here largely seems one of degree. As one security consulting executive told The Journal, Wal-Mart’s surveillance program seemed “Orwellian.” The question of whether Wal-Mart snooped on activist shareholders was recently referred to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s New York office. Wal-Mart’s board of directors should act on its own to help clear the air. It should oversee its own investigation, find out how extensive the snooping was and then make those results public. Have Your Say: Surveillance goes too far Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Beaten, Tortured and Sentenced 25-to-Life for Minor Drug Offense Last post by ZingPao @ 05:27 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Can I be a mod? Last post by cshaobu186304 @ 05:26 PM Satan worshippers kill and eat four Russian teenagers after stabbing each of them 666 Last post by cshaobu186304 @ 05:25 PM Rothschilds To Bring America To Its Knees !! Last post by cshaobu186304 @ 05:25 PM Campaigns / Pro Active Groups Last post by cshaobu186304 @ 05:24 PM If You're Republishing News Last post by cshaobu186304 @ 05:24 PM Negativity will get us nowhere Last post by Regina @ 05:23 PM BBC Timewatch: Operation Gladio : You really do need to know this! Last post by Unregistered @ 05:09 PM Barack Obama inauguration crowd estimate soars to 5 million Last post by ZingPao @ 04:54 PM The End of US Dominance Last post by ZingPao @ 04:51 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More World News  Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
